Pc Building Simulator

Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the Intel Arc B570 in Pc Building Simulator presents a fascinating study in system balance, where a high-end 16-core processor meets a mid-range graphics card. The benchmark data reveals a configuration that is decisively GPU-limited at higher resolutions, yet capable of exceptional frame rates at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes the hardware within its respective market positions, and offers clear guidance on optimal settings based on the empirical data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it is an unlocked multiplier part, suggesting headroom for overclocking. The processor features a substantial cache hierarchy, including 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 30 MB shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, though the discrete Arc B570 handles all rendering here. The CPU’s raw computational strength is evident in its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30745 and a single-core score of 2116, alongside a Geekbench multi-core score of 19429.

In the context of Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title that often involves complex logic and physics calculations, the CPU’s multi-threaded prowess is theoretically valuable. However, the measured frame rates tell a more nuanced story. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 192 FPS, which is remarkably high. This suggests that even at lower graphical loads, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to maintain high performance. The data shows that the i7-13700K sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46881. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, has an average score of 46971, which is a delta of -0.2%, indicating the two are virtually tied in overall processing power. This places the CPU in a dominant position, unlikely to be the primary bottleneck in this pairing. The high core count and clock speeds ensure that the processor can handle the game’s simulation overhead, but the frame rate ceilings observed in the data are dictated more by the graphics card’s capabilities, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The CPU’s performance is a constant, enabling high FPS at lower resolutions where the GPU is less taxed.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a consistent 2500 MHz base and boost clock. Its memory runs at an effective speed of 19 Gbps. The card has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, along with 18 ray tracing cores. Its compute capabilities are rated at 11.52 TFLOPS for FP32 operations. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which has an average score of 20534, a delta of 0.1%, showing near-identical synthetic performance. This is a mid-range card, and its performance in Pc Building Simulator reflects that positioning.

The data shows a clear pattern: the Arc B570 is the limiting factor as resolution and settings increase. At 4K Ultra, the system produces only 30 FPS, while at 4K Low, it reaches 63 FPS. This 33 FPS swing indicates that the GPU is heavily taxed by the higher fidelity settings. The card’s pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s are respectable, but they are insufficient for maintaining high frame rates at 4K with Ultra presets. The 10 GB VRAM is adequate for this game, as there are no signs of texture thrashing or loading stutters in the measured minimum FPS values for Medium settings (e.g., 38 FPS at 4K Medium). However, the performance ceiling is clearly defined by the GPU’s raw shader throughput, not by memory capacity. The switch from Low to Ultra at 1440p results in a drop from 121 FPS to 58 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU’s rendering load is the primary determinant of performance in this title.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achievable with this combo at 1080p?

A: The highest measured average frame rate is 192 FPS, achieved at 1080p with Low settings. This suggests the CPU-GPU pair has ample headroom for high-refresh-rate gaming at this resolution.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13700K a significant bottleneck for the Intel Arc B570?

A: Based on the data, no. The CPU has an average benchmark score of 46881, ranking in the 89th percentile, while the GPU scores 20556, ranking in the 65th percentile. The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a consistent decline, indicating the GPU is the primary limiter, not the CPU.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile?

A: The two GPUs are virtually identical in overall benchmark performance. The Arc B570 has an average score of 20556, while the RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a delta of just 0.1% in favor of the Arc B570. In this game, the measured FPS data shows the Arc B570 producing a solid 61 FPS at 1440p High.

Q: What is the difference in frame rate between 1080p and 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the system averages 91 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 30 FPS. This represents a 67% reduction in average frame rate, highlighting the immense rendering load increase at 4K.

Q: Which settings preset provides the most balanced experience at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset at 1440p offers an average of 86 FPS with a minimum of 73 FPS, which is a smooth experience. High settings at 1440p drop to 61 FPS, while Ultra falls to 58 FPS, making Medium the best option for consistent performance at this resolution.

Q: Does the data show any frame pacing issues at lower settings?

A: For Medium settings, the data includes minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p Medium, the average is 136 FPS, with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS. This 41 FPS spread between min and max indicates some variance but no severe stuttering, as the minimum remains high.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core i7-13700K and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2402 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the lower 20th percentile of all configurations tested, which is a significant finding given the CPU’s high individual standing. The data suggests that while the CPU is top-tier, the GPU pairing drags the overall rank down, reinforcing the analysis that this is a GPU-limited setup. The i7-13700K alone is in the 89th percentile of CPUs, but the Arc B570 is only in the 65th percentile of GPUs. This mismatch creates a ceiling on the combo’s performance, as the GPU cannot translate the CPU’s high processing power into equally high frame rates at demanding settings.

This rank of 2402 implies that a majority of other hardware combinations, likely those with more powerful GPUs, achieve better average frame rates across the test suite. The combo’s performance is not weak in absolute terms—it can hit 192 FPS at 1080p Low—but the average across all resolutions and settings pulls it down. The fact that the CPU is so powerful means that the bottleneck is unambiguously the GPU. Upgrading the GPU would likely yield substantial performance gains, whereas upgrading the CPU would yield little to no improvement in this specific game, as the current processor is already far more capable than the GPU requires. This rank serves as a caution that high-end CPUs do not guarantee high gaming performance without a commensurate GPU.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1080p, the High preset offers an average of 96 FPS, which is excellent for most displays, but Low settings push this to 192 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors (e.g., 144 Hz or 165 Hz). The Ultra preset at 1080p yields 91 FPS, which is only 5 FPS less than High, making Ultra a viable choice if visual fidelity is prioritized over a slight FPS dip. For a balanced experience at 1080p, High is the recommended preset, as it provides a significant visual upgrade over Low while maintaining a high frame rate.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the clear winner, offering an average of 86 FPS with a minimum of 73 FPS. This ensures smooth playback without dropping below 60 FPS. High settings at 1440p average 61 FPS, which is playable but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes. Ultra at 1440p drops to 58 FPS, which is borderline. Therefore, Medium is the optimal choice for 1440p, balancing visual quality and performance. At 4K, the data shows that only Low settings (63 FPS) are truly playable. Medium (45 FPS) and High (32 FPS) are below the 60 FPS threshold, and Ultra (30 FPS) is not recommended. For 4K, the recommendation is to use Low settings to achieve a playable frame rate, though users with less sensitivity to frame rate might accept Medium. Overall, the best experience across all resolutions is achieved by selecting settings that keep the average FPS above 60, which points to High at 1080p, Medium at 1440p, and Low at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 192 FPS on Low, 136 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 115 and maximum of 156), 96 FPS on High, and 91 FPS on Ultra. This shows a linear progression where each settings increase costs roughly 30 to 40 FPS, except for the jump from High to Ultra, which only costs 5 FPS. The 1080p results demonstrate that the combo is capable of very high performance, with even Ultra settings exceeding 90 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop significantly. Low settings produce 121 FPS, Medium produces 86 FPS (with a minimum of 73 and maximum of 99), High produces 61 FPS, and Ultra produces 58 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 35 FPS, and between Medium and High is 25 FPS, but the gap between High and Ultra narrows to just 3 FPS. At 1440p, the system remains playable at all settings, but the frames per second dip below 60 on Ultra. At 3840x2160, the performance takes a major hit. Low settings yield 63 FPS, Medium yields 45 FPS (with a minimum of 38 and maximum of 52), High yields 32 FPS, and Ultra yields 30 FPS. The data shows that 4K is only feasible with Low settings, as every other preset falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The minimum FPS values for Medium settings across all resolutions show a consistent pattern, with the 4K minimum of 38 FPS being the lowest recorded, indicating potential stutters in heavy scenes.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the nature of the system’s bottleneck. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 192 at 1080p to 121 at 1440p, and then to 63 at 4K. This represents a 37% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 48% drop from 1440p to 4K. At High settings, the drop is from 96 FPS at 1080p to 61 FPS at 1440p (a 36% drop), and then to 32 FPS at 4K (a 48% drop). The percentage drops are remarkably consistent across settings, which is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario. If the CPU were the limiter, we would expect the FPS to remain relatively constant as resolution increases, since the CPU workload would stay the same while the GPU workload grows. Instead, the FPS halves at each major resolution step, indicating that the Arc B570’s rendering throughput is the definitive constraint.

This scaling pattern has direct implications for the user. The i7-13700K is not the limiting factor; its massive multi-threaded capabilities are underutilized at higher resolutions. The data suggests that the GPU is working at near-maximum capacity in all scenarios, while the CPU has significant spare headroom. For users with high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors, this combo is excellent, providing well over 144 FPS on High settings. However, for 4K gaming, the GPU’s limitations are stark, and the user would need to dramatically lower settings to achieve playable frame rates. The 4K Ultra result of 30 FPS is a clear indicator that this configuration is not suited for 4K gaming. The resolution scaling analysis firmly establishes that the Intel Arc B570 is the performance ceiling for this pairing, and any future upgrades should focus on the GPU to improve higher-resolution performance.