Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title focused on assembling and benchmarking virtual hardware, presents a unique workload that stresses both CPU and GPU. The measured data for the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 shows a combination that delivers high frame rates across all settings and resolutions, with the CPU’s strengths in multi-threaded tasks and the GPU’s rasterization power creating a balanced experience. The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, with its 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, posts an average benchmark score of 54762, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, built on the Ampere architecture with 8704 shading units, achieves an average benchmark score of 23172, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. This pairing results in a combo rank of 785 out of 3002 tested combinations in this game, indicating a solid mid-to-upper tier performance level. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, settings recommendations, and the specific roles each component plays in this simulation environment.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Ultra settings for this CPU-GPU combo?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the measured average FPS is 168. This is the lowest average frame rate at 1080p across the four settings presets, but it still provides a very smooth experience for a simulation game. The High preset at the same resolution yields an average of 176 FPS, showing a minimal performance difference between High and Ultra in this title.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54762, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55093. This makes the Intel chip the closest competitor, with a deltaPct of -0.6. The AMD processor is 1.3% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K, which has an average score of 54053.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between Low and Medium settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers an average FPS of 222, while the Medium preset delivers an average FPS of 157. This represents a significant drop of 65 FPS, or approximately a 29% reduction in frame rate, when moving from Low to Medium settings. The Medium preset also shows a minimum FPS of 134 and a maximum of 181, indicating some frame time variance.

Q: Is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080's 10 GB VRAM a limiting factor in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data does not indicate that the 10 GB of GDDR6X memory is a bottleneck. The GPU maintains playable frame rates even at 4K Ultra, with an average FPS of 55. The memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s and the 320-bit bus width are sufficient for the textures and rendering workloads in this simulation, as evidenced by the measured performance metrics across all resolutions.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations in the game?

A: This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ranks 785 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the top 26% of all tested configurations, showing that it is a capable pairing for this title, though not at the absolute top tier.

Q: What is the FPS difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average FPS at 1920x1080 is 176, while at 3840x2160, it drops to 58. This represents a 118 FPS decrease, or a 67% reduction in performance, when moving from 1080p to 4K. This large gap indicates that the resolution increase places a substantial load on the GPU.

Settings Recommendations

For the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination in Pc Building Simulator, the data suggests that the High preset offers the best balance between visual fidelity and performance. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average FPS of 176, which is only 8 FPS lower than the Low preset's 352 FPS average, but it provides significantly better visual quality. Moving from High to Ultra at 1080p only yields an 8 FPS drop (from 176 to 168), making Ultra also a viable choice for users with high-refresh-rate monitors, as both remain well above 144 FPS. The Medium preset sits in between with an average of 249 FPS, but it lacks the visual polish of High or Ultra while still not providing the maximum frame rate headroom of Low.

At 2560x1440, the High preset continues to be the recommended setting. It achieves an average FPS of 111, which is smooth for a simulation title, and it is a substantial improvement over the Ultra preset's 106 FPS average. The Medium preset at 1440p delivers 157 FPS, but the visual upgrade to High is generally worth the 46 FPS sacrifice for most users, as 111 FPS is still well within the range of smooth gameplay. The Low preset at 1440p reaches 222 FPS, but the visual downgrade is often too severe for a game where inspecting components and details is part of the core experience.

For 4K gaming at 3840x2160, the High preset is the most balanced choice, providing an average FPS of 58. This is just above the 55 FPS average of the Ultra preset, making both playable, but High offers a small performance advantage with a minimal visual difference. The Medium preset at 4K delivers a more comfortable 82 FPS average, which is a better option for users who prioritize frame rate stability over maximum visual settings. The Low preset at 4K reaches 116 FPS, but this setting strips away much of the graphical detail that makes the simulation engaging. The measured data shows that for the best experience across all resolutions, the High preset is the sweet spot, as it maintains playable frame rates even at 4K while offering substantial visual quality over lower presets.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear GPU-bound trend in Pc Building Simulator. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 176 at 1920x1080 to 111 at 2560x1440, a decrease of 65 FPS or 37%. Moving from 1440p to 3840x2160, the average FPS falls further from 111 to 58, a reduction of 53 FPS or 48%. This continuous decline with increasing resolution indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU's performance remains constant while the GPU must render more pixels.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 352 at 1080p to 222 at 1440p (a 37% decrease), and then to 116 at 4K (a 48% decrease from 1440p). At Ultra settings, the average FPS goes from 168 at 1080p to 106 at 1440p (a 37% decrease), and then to 55 at 4K (a 48% decrease from 1440p). This uniform percentage drop across different quality presets reinforces that resolution scaling is governed by the GPU's fill rate and pixel throughput, not by CPU limitations or VRAM capacity.

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D's high multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 and Passmark multithread score of 56154, ensures that it is not a bottleneck even at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 352 FPS, which is an extremely high frame rate that would require a very powerful CPU to feed the GPU. The fact that the RTX 3080 can reach these levels without the CPU holding it back shows that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is more than sufficient for this game. The 128 MB of L3 cache and the Zen 5 architecture's high single-thread performance, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1269, contribute to the CPU's ability to handle the simulation's logic and component physics calculations efficiently.

The resolution scaling data also suggests that the RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory is not a limiting factor. Even at 4K Ultra, which is the most memory-intensive configuration, the combo maintains an average FPS of 55. If VRAM capacity were insufficient, the frame rate would likely drop more precipitously at 4K due to texture swapping or memory compression overhead. Instead, the consistent scaling pattern indicates that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth resources are being utilized effectively across all resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination achieves a combo rank of 785 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the pairing in the top 26.1% of all configurations tested in this game, which is a respectable position for a hardware set that pairs a high-end 2025 CPU with a 2020-era GPU. The rank reflects the balanced nature of this combination, as the CPU is not overpowered relative to the GPU in a way that would create a significant bottleneck, nor is the GPU so weak that it drags down the overall experience.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 91 among all CPUs indicates that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is in the top 9% of processors, while the GPU's percentile ranking of 68 places it in the top 32% of graphics cards. This asymmetry in performance tiers is typical for a combo where the CPU is newer and more powerful relative to the GPU. The combo rank of 785 suggests that many other tested combinations include either more powerful GPUs or a better balance between CPU and GPU performance for this specific game's workload.

Comparatively, the CPU's nearest rivals show how close the performance margins are at the top of the CPU hierarchy. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF scores 55093, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD chip, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54053, 1.3% lower. These small deltas mean that swapping the CPU for a direct rival would have a negligible impact on the combo rank, as the game's performance is more dependent on the GPU at higher resolutions. The GPU's nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, have average scores very close to the RTX 3080 (within 0.4%), but these are not equivalent in real-world gaming performance, as the benchmark score aggregates multiple workloads.

The combo rank of 785 out of 3002 can be interpreted as a strong mid-tier result. It outperforms the majority of tested combinations, which likely include older CPUs paired with mid-range GPUs or newer CPUs with less capable graphics cards. However, it does not reach the top echelon, which would require a newer GPU like the RTX 40-series or an RTX 3090 with more VRAM. For Pc Building Simulator, this rank shows that the combo is more than capable of delivering high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, with acceptable performance at 4K, making it a versatile pairing for this simulation title.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 plays a critical role in determining the frame rates in Pc Building Simulator, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory, operating at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective), provides a memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s across a 320-bit bus. This high bandwidth is essential for handling the texture data and rendering buffers in a simulation game that often displays multiple detailed components and system information on screen simultaneously. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU's memory subsystem is sufficient, as there are no sudden frame rate collapses at 4K that would indicate VRAM exhaustion.

The GPU's clock speeds are a base of 1440 MHz and a boost of 1710 MHz, which are relatively modest compared to some newer cards, but the Ampere architecture's efficiency makes up for this. With 8704 shading units, 272 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, the RTX 3080 can achieve a pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s. These specifications translate to the measured frame rates, where at 1080p High, the card pushes 176 FPS, and at 4K High, it maintains 58 FPS. The FP32 compute of 29.77 TFLOPS also contributes to the game's physics and simulation calculations, which are handled by the GPU in addition to rendering.

The GPU's role becomes more dominant as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 184 FPS (from 352 to 168), which is a 52% reduction. At 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra is 61 FPS (from 116 to 55), a 53% reduction. This consistency suggests that the GPU is being utilized efficiently across all settings, and the performance scaling is proportional to the rendering workload. The RTX 3080's 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores are not specifically relevant to Pc Building Simulator, as the game does not appear to use ray tracing or DLSS based on the measured data, but they do not detract from performance.

The GPU's 320 W TDP and suggested 700 W PSU indicate that this is a power-hungry card, but the benchmark results show that it delivers the expected performance for its class. The fact that the combo achieves a 68th percentile GPU rank while still performing well in this game demonstrates that the RTX 3080 is well-suited for simulation titles that do not heavily utilize the latest rendering features. The GPU's memory configuration, with 10 GB and a high bandwidth, is adequate for this game's needs, as evidenced by the smooth scaling from 1080p to 4K without any anomalies in the data.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080 resolution, the measured average FPS across all settings presets shows a wide range of performance. The Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 352, which is an exceptionally high frame rate that would smooth out any potential stutters in the simulation. The Medium preset achieves an average of 249 FPS, with a minimum of 212 and a maximum of 287, indicating some frame time variation but still an excellent experience. The High preset produces an average of 176 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any monitor, while the Ultra preset delivers 168 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 1080p is only 8 FPS, making Ultra a sensible choice for users who want maximum visual quality without sacrificing much performance.

At 2560x1440 resolution, the frame rates remain high but show a more pronounced difference between presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 222 FPS, which is still extremely smooth. The Medium preset delivers 157 FPS on average, with a minimum of 134 and a maximum of 181, providing a stable experience. The High preset drops to 111 FPS, which is still well within the range of a 100 Hz or 120 Hz monitor. The Ultra preset produces 106 FPS, which is nearly identical to High, showing that the GPU is hitting a performance plateau at this resolution. The 46 FPS gap between Medium and High at 1440p is notable, but the visual improvements at High generally justify the lower frame rate for this type of game.

At 3840x2160 resolution, the frame rates become more demanding on the GPU. The Low preset achieves an average of 116 FPS, which is playable but shows a significant drop from 1440p. The Medium preset delivers 82 FPS, with a minimum of 70 and a maximum of 95, providing a good balance for 4K gaming. The High preset produces 58 FPS, which is at the edge of smoothness but still playable. The Ultra preset drops to 55 FPS, which is the lowest measured average in this dataset. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is only 3 FPS, making High the better choice for users who want to maintain a higher frame rate. The Medium preset at 4K, with its 82 FPS average, is the recommended setting for users who want to ensure a consistently smooth experience without the frame rate dipping below 60 FPS.

The minimum FPS values are only provided for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1080p, the minimum is 212 FPS, which is still very high. At 1440p, the minimum is 134 FPS, and at 4K, the minimum is 70 FPS. These minimums indicate that the Medium preset maintains a stable frame rate without significant drops, which is important for a simulation game where frame time consistency can affect the perceived smoothness of animations and component movements. The lack of minimum FPS data for other presets means that the averages should be interpreted with some caution, but the overall trend is clear: this combo delivers high performance in Pc Building Simulator, with the GPU being the primary determinant of frame rates as resolution increases.