Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator presents a unique benchmarking scenario, where the workload is heavily CPU-bound due to its complex simulation logic, yet the data shows a clear dependency on the graphics card as resolution and settings increase. This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Intel Arc B570 combination, which achieves a combo rank of 2402 out of 3002 tested configurations, placing it in the lower 20th percentile of all tested combos for this game. The measured FPS data reveals a system that can deliver high refresh rates at 1080p but struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K with higher presets.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate behavior across resolutions indicates a classic shift from CPU to GPU limitation as pixel count increases. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 192 FPS, suggesting the CPU is capable of feeding frames well above the GPU's capacity to render them. However, this is not a simple linear scaling; the data shows that the CPU overhead is substantial. When moving from 1080p Low (192 FPS) to 1440p Low (121 FPS), there is a 71 FPS drop, a 37% reduction. This significant decline at the same settings level points to the GPU becoming a bottleneck as resolution increases, even with the relatively light Low preset.

Scaling to 4K with Low settings yields 63 FPS, which is a further 58 FPS drop from 1440p. This demonstrates that the Intel Arc B570's rendering throughput is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The pattern is consistent across all quality presets. At Medium settings, the frame rates are 136 FPS at 1080p, 86 FPS at 1440p, and 45 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops from 1080p to 1440p (37%) and from 1440p to 4K (48%) are comparable, indicating that the GPU's pixel throughput is the dominant constraint at these settings. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is not the primary bottleneck once resolution increases.

The data suggests that the CPU's role is most critical at 1080p, where its high single-thread performance can push frame rates high. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a base clock of 4.70 GHz, and benchmark results like a 3DMark single-thread score of 1212 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2964 support its ability to handle the simulation logic. However, the 4K High setting (32 FPS) and 4K Ultra (30 FPS) results show that the GPU is severely overburdened. The transition from High to Ultra at 4K yields only a 2 FPS difference, from 32 to 30 FPS, which is within the margin of error and indicates both settings are saturating the GPU's capabilities. The limiting component at 4K is unequivocally the Intel Arc B570, which has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 160-bit bus width.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear hierarchy for optimal settings based on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, the Ultra preset at 91 FPS is perfectly playable and offers the best visual experience without compromising smoothness. The High preset at 96 FPS provides a marginal 5 FPS advantage over Ultra, which is negligible, making Ultra the better choice for maximum visual fidelity at this resolution. The Medium preset at 136 FPS and Low at 192 FPS are available for users with high refresh rate monitors, but the Ultra preset's 91 FPS is already above the 60 FPS threshold for most displays.

At 1440p, the High preset at 61 FPS is the sweet spot for a smooth experience, barely exceeding the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset at 58 FPS is slightly below this target and may be acceptable for users who prioritize visuals over a strict 60 FPS lock. The Medium preset at 86 FPS is a solid alternative for those who want more headroom, but the visual difference between Medium and High is often more noticeable than between High and Ultra. The Low preset at 121 FPS is excessive for most 1440p displays and sacrifices too much visual quality.

The 4K resolution is where the settings recommendations become critical. The Ultra preset at 30 FPS is not a playable experience for a simulation game that requires precise mouse input and smooth camera movement. The High preset at 32 FPS is equally unplayable. The Medium preset at 45 FPS is borderline, but the 38 FPS minimum frame rate could cause noticeable stutters. The Low preset at 63 FPS is the only playable option at 4K, providing a frame rate that is stable and responsive. Given the data, the best experience per the measured rows is to run 1080p Ultra for the highest visual quality with a smooth frame rate, or 1440p High for a balanced experience. At 4K, users must accept Low settings to achieve a playable frame rate with this combo.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2402 out of 3002 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the combo in the bottom 20% of all configurations tested, indicating that it is not a strong performer for this specific game. The rank is a composite measure that likely weighs performance across all settings and resolutions, and the poor 4K performance heavily drags down the overall ranking.

When examining the individual components, the CPU and GPU have different relative standings. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has a percentile of 87 against all CPUs, indicating it is a high-performing processor. Its average benchmark score of 39768 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS with a score of 39603 (0.4% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with a score of 40081 (-0.8% difference). This suggests the CPU is not the reason for the low combo rank. Conversely, the Intel Arc B570 has a percentile of 65 against all GPUs, with an average score of 20556. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, scores 20582, a delta of -0.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a delta of 0.1%. This indicates the GPU is a mid-range performer.

The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile (87) and the combo's low rank (2402/3002, roughly 20th percentile) strongly suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing for Pc Building Simulator. The CPU is overqualified for the task, while the GPU cannot keep up with the demands of the game at higher resolutions. The data shows that at 1080p, the combo is capable, but the rank is likely dragged down by the 4K results where the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The combo's rank is not a reflection of the CPU's capability, but rather a statement about the GPU's performance ceiling in this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is a detailed breakdown of the measured average FPS for each resolution and settings combination.

1920x1080:

• Low: 192 FPS
• Medium: 136 FPS (min 115, max 156)
• High: 96 FPS
• Ultra: 91 FPS

At 1080p, the combo demonstrates strong performance. The jump from Low to Medium is a 56 FPS drop, and from Medium to High is a 40 FPS drop. The difference between High and Ultra is only 5 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional effects are not heavily taxing the GPU at this resolution, and the CPU is still able to feed the GPU adequately.

2560x1440:

• Low: 121 FPS
• Medium: 86 FPS (min 73, max 99)
• High: 61 FPS
• Ultra: 58 FPS

At 1440p, the frame rates show the GPU's load increasing. The Low to Medium drop is 35 FPS, and Medium to High is 25 FPS. The High to Ultra drop is only 3 FPS, indicating that the GPU is becoming saturated. The 61 FPS average for High is barely playable for a smooth experience, while the 58 FPS for Ultra is slightly below the 60 FPS target.

3840x2160:

• Low: 63 FPS
• Medium: 45 FPS (min 38, max 52)
• High: 32 FPS
• Ultra: 30 FPS

At 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The Low to Medium drop is 18 FPS, and Medium to High is 13 FPS. The High to Ultra drop is only 2 FPS, showing that the GPU is completely maxed out. The 30 FPS average for Ultra is not a playable experience. The minimum frame rate of 38 FPS at Medium settings further confirms the instability at this resolution.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Pc Building Simulator with this combo?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset provides 91 FPS, which is an excellent experience. At 1440p, the High preset at 61 FPS is the minimum for a smooth experience. 4K is not recommended, as only the Low preset (63 FPS) achieves a playable frame rate.

Q: Why is the 4K performance so poor compared to 1080p?

A: The frame rate drops from 192 FPS at 1080p Low to 63 FPS at 4K Low, which is a 67% reduction. This indicates that the Intel Arc B570's rendering capabilities are the limiting factor. The CPU, with its high single-thread score, is not the bottleneck at 4K.

Q: Is the Ultra preset worth the performance cost over High?

A: At 1080p, the difference is only 5 FPS (96 vs 91), making Ultra the better choice. At 1440p, the difference is 3 FPS (61 vs 58), and Ultra dips below 60 FPS. At 4K, the difference is 2 FPS (32 vs 30), which is negligible and both are unplayable.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D has an average benchmark score of 39768. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, scores 39603, which is a 0.4% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 scores 40081, a -0.8% difference. The CPU's performance is on par with these rivals.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a -0.1% difference, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a 0.1% difference. The GPU's performance is roughly equivalent to these rivals.

Q: What is the limiting component for this combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting component. The combo ranks 2402 out of 3002, while the CPU's percentile is 87. The GPU's percentile is 65. The severe frame rate drops at higher resolutions are consistent with a GPU bottleneck, not a CPU one.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D plays a critical role in the lower resolution performance of this combo. With 8 cores and 16 threads, this processor is built for high multithreaded throughput, but its single-thread capabilities are what matter most for Pc Building Simulator's simulation logic. The CPU has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which are high frequencies for a 120 W TDP part. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1212 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2964 both indicate that the CPU can handle the game's physics and AI calculations without being a bottleneck.

The CPU's 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant asset. This large cache can store more of the game's working set, reducing the need to access slower system memory. The CPU's memory support for DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data can be fed to the cores quickly. The benchmark results, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23230 and the Passmark multithread score of 40009, show that the CPU has ample headroom for any background tasks or game engine threads.

The CPU's role is most evident when looking at the 1080p Low setting, which achieves 192 FPS. This high frame rate is only possible if the CPU can issue draw calls and update the simulation state faster than the GPU can render. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D, sitting in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, is capable of doing so. However, the data shows that the CPU's potential is not fully utilized at higher resolutions. The performance difference between 1080p and 4K at the same settings is purely a result of the GPU's inability to process the increased pixel count, not a CPU limitation. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, have near-identical average benchmark scores, but the 9800X3D's higher boost clock and larger cache give it an edge in simulation-heavy titles.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is the component that defines this combo's performance ceiling in Pc Building Simulator. The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes a limiting factor at 4K. The GPU's architecture, Xe2-HPG, has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS.

The GPU's role as the bottleneck is clearly shown in the scaling data. At 1080p, the GPU can keep up with the CPU, producing 192 FPS on Low settings. However, the frame rate drops by 37% when moving to 1440p and by a further 48% when moving to 4K. This is a classic symptom of a GPU that is limited by its pixel fillrate and memory bandwidth. The 10 GB VRAM is not exhausted at 1080p, but the sheer number of pixels at 4K requires more processing power than the 80 ROPs can deliver.

The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its mid-range positioning. It has a percentile of 65 against all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, scores 20582, which is a -0.1% difference. This shows that the B570 is essentially a sidegrade from the previous generation. The GPU's performance in Pc Building Simulator is consistent with its general benchmark results. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 is a measure of its DirectX 12 performance, which is the API used by the game. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility, but its raw performance is not enough for 4K gaming in this title. The 4K Medium setting with a minimum frame rate of 38 FPS underscores that the GPU's 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for high-resolution textures and effects. The GPU is the primary reason the combo ranks at 2402 out of 3002, as its performance ceiling is well below what the CPU can feed it.