Pc Building Simulator

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER delivers a compelling, if lopsided, experience in Pc Building Simulator. The data shows a combination where the modern 8-core processor vastly outclasses the older graphics card, yet the measured frame rates reveal that this pairing still manages to produce playable results across most settings, with the CPU’s dominance becoming most apparent at lower resolutions and the GPU’s limitations surfacing at 4K.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a formidable processing unit built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. This configuration, coupled with a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache, places it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs tested, giving it an average benchmark score of 37,780. Its performance is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon 6353P, which scores 37,811, a mere 0.1% difference, and it sits just ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 by the same margin. The data suggests the 9800X3D is a top-tier performer for simulation tasks, which often rely on strong single-thread performance and large caches for complex calculations.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s role is critical for managing the game’s physics, component logic, and the state of the simulated PC. The benchmark results indicate that at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves a massive 246.1 FPS. This extremely high frame rate, which is well beyond the refresh rate of most monitors, strongly suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution. The 9800X3D’s single-thread score of 1,212 in 3DMark and 4,800 in Cinebench R23 provides ample headroom for the game’s simulation logic. When compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU’s performance delta is negligible, indicating that regardless of which of these top-tier processors is used, the frame rates in this game are likely to be similar, pointing to the GPU as the eventual bottleneck at higher graphical loads.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the older component in this pairing, based on the Turing architecture and manufactured on a 12 nm process. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its core clocks are 1,605 MHz base and 1,770 MHz boost, and it houses 2,560 shading units. In the broader landscape, this GPU sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22,206. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A400, scores 22,307, which is only 0.5% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 trails by 2.5% with a score of 21,670. The data shows the 2070 SUPER is a mid-range performer, a stark contrast to the high-end CPU it is paired with.

The GPU’s role becomes the defining factor at higher resolutions. The measured FPS figures tell a clear story: at 4K Ultra, the average frame rate drops to 39.5 FPS, a level that is often considered the threshold for smooth, playable performance. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is likely sufficient for a simulation game of this type, but the raw compute power of the TU104 chip appears to be the limiting factor. This is a classic bottleneck scenario where the CPU is capable of delivering well over 200 FPS at 1080p, but the GPU’s rendering capabilities cap the system’s performance. The data suggests that this GPU, while competent, is not designed for high-refresh-rate 4K gaming in this title, and its age is a significant factor in the overall performance envelope.

FAQ

*Q: Can this CPU and GPU combo handle 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?*

A: The measured data shows that at 4K resolution, the average frame rates are 39.9 FPS on High and 39.5 FPS on Ultra settings. While these are technically playable, they hover near the 40 FPS mark, which may not feel smooth to all users. For a more consistent experience, lowering the resolution or settings is advisable.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve high frame rates?

A: Benchmark results indicate that at 1080p, the system achieves 173.1 FPS on Medium and 125.6 FPS on High settings. At 1440p, the frame rates are also very respectable, with 111.8 FPS on Medium and 76.1 FPS on High. These resolutions offer a much better balance between visual fidelity and performance than 4K.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D has an average benchmark score of 37,780. Its closest rival, the Intel Xeon 6353P, scores 37,811, which is a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 also has a 0.1% delta, while the Intel Core i9-13900HK is 0.6% behind. This indicates that the 9800X3D is essentially on par with these top-tier processors.

Q: Is the RTX 2070 SUPER a bottleneck for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D?

A: The data strongly suggests this is the case at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 246.1 FPS, showing the CPU's potential. However, at 4K Ultra, the frame rate falls to 39.5 FPS, which is a massive drop that is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. The GPU's average benchmark score is in the 65th percentile, while the CPU is in the 90th, highlighting the performance disparity.

Q: What is the performance difference between Medium and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS on Medium settings is 111.8, while on Ultra settings it is 76.6. This represents a significant 35.2 FPS difference, or roughly a 31.5% reduction in frame rate for the jump to the highest preset. This suggests that Ultra settings place a considerable additional load on the GPU.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested combinations?

A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks at number 1,078 out of 1,769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the pack, which is logical given the significant gap in performance class between the CPU and GPU.

How This Combo Ranks

In the specific context of Pc Building Simulator, this hardware pairing holds a rank of 1,078 out of 1,769 tested combinations. This positioning is telling. It is not a top-tier combo, nor is it a low-end one; it sits firmly in the middle of the distribution. This rank is a direct consequence of the component mismatch. The CPU, being in the 90th percentile, is a top performer, but the GPU, in the 65th percentile, is not. The overall rank of 1,078 suggests that the GPU is holding the system back from reaching the upper echelons of the leaderboard, where more balanced pairings of high-end CPUs and GPUs would reside. The data implies that to improve this combo's rank, upgrading the GPU would yield a far more significant benefit than upgrading the CPU, as the latter is already performing at an elite level.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates provide a detailed view of the system's capabilities across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptional. With Low settings, the system achieves a staggering 246.1 FPS, dropping to 173.1 FPS on Medium, 125.6 FPS on High, and 118 FPS on Ultra. These numbers indicate a very playable experience even at the highest settings, with the CPU clearly providing ample performance headroom. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show the GPU starting to take a toll. The average FPS is 157.4 on Low, 111.8 on Medium, 76.1 on High, and 76.6 on Ultra. The difference between High and Ultra is minimal, suggesting a setting that is less demanding on the GPU or a potential CPU limit at these lower loads. Finally, at 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant limiting factor. The system averages 82.2 FPS on Low, 57.7 FPS on Medium, 39.9 FPS on High, and 39.5 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results show a clear drop-off, with the Ultra preset barely maintaining 40 FPS, indicating that this resolution is at the edge of the GPU's capabilities.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user's target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, all settings presets are viable, but the High preset at 125.6 FPS offers an excellent balance of visual quality and high refresh rate performance, while Ultra at 118 FPS provides a marginal visual uplift for a small performance cost. At 1440p, the Medium preset at 111.8 FPS is arguably the sweet spot, providing a smooth and responsive experience. The High preset at 76.1 FPS is also good for users prioritizing visual fidelity, but the Ultra preset at 76.6 FPS offers no tangible benefit over High, making High the more sensible choice. For 4K gaming, the data suggests that users should stick to the Low or Medium presets to maintain playable frame rates, as the High and Ultra presets both fall below the 40 FPS mark. The Medium preset at 57.7 FPS appears to be the best compromise for a console-like experience on a 4K display.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the nature of the system's bottleneck. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 246.1 FPS at 1080p to 157.4 FPS at 1440p, and then to 82.2 FPS at 4K. This represents a 33% decrease from 1080p to 1440p and a further 48% decrease from 1440p to 4K. This scaling is somewhat linear and indicates that the GPU is being increasingly taxed. However, the most dramatic scaling is seen at the higher settings. At Ultra, the frame rate falls from 118 FPS at 1080p to 76.6 FPS at 1440p, a 35% drop, and then to 39.5 FPS at 4K, another 48% drop. This severe reduction at 4K, where the frame rate drops below 40 FPS, strongly suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting component. The CPU, which can deliver over 240 FPS at 1080p, is clearly not the constraint. The data implies that the RTX 2070 SUPER's compute and memory bandwidth are insufficient to handle the pixel throughput required at 4K with high settings, making the resolution scaling a direct reflection of the GPU's performance ceiling.