Pc Building Simulator

# Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

This combo pairs an 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 5700 with a 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT, and the measured results show a pairing that scales cleanly across resolutions and settings in Pc Building Simulator. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU lands at the 71st percentile, making this a balanced mid-range pairing that ranks 1699th out of 3723 tested combos in this specific game. The data reveals that Pc Building Simulator is far more GPU-bound at higher resolutions than the CPU-centric simulation genre might suggest, with frame rates ranging from a playable 44 FPS at 4K Ultra to a blistering 283 FPS at 1080p Low.

FAQ

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator?

A: This pairing ranks 1699th out of 3723 tested combos, placing it in the upper half of the database. That rank reflects a solid mid-pack position, with the CPU's 78th percentile and GPU's 71st percentile scores indicating neither component dramatically overperforms nor bottlenecks the other.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: At 2560x1440, the combo delivers 89 FPS on High settings and 85 FPS on Ultra, which represents the sweet spot for balancing visual quality with smooth gameplay. At 1920x1080, frame rates exceed 135 FPS on every preset, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, while 3840x2160 drops to 47 FPS on High and 44 FPS on Ultra, which is borderline for fast-paced play.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700's average benchmark score of 25517 is essentially tied with its closest competitors. It trails the Intel Xeon D-2752TER by 0.1% and the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H by 0.1%, while leading the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U by 0.1% and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U by 0.3%. These sub-1% deltas mean real-world performance differences are negligible.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 6750 XT's average benchmark score of 26011 puts it slightly ahead of its nearest competitors. It leads the AMD Radeon R9 M395X by 0.5%, the AMD FirePro W7100 by 0.6%, the AMD FirePro D700 by 0.7%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.1%. All of these are within normal run-to-run variance.

Q: What settings preset provides the largest frame rate jump?

A: Dropping from Medium to Low provides the biggest performance gain at every resolution. At 1080p, the jump is from 200 FPS to 283 FPS (a 83 FPS increase), at 1440p it goes from 126 FPS to 178 FPS (a 52 FPS increase), and at 4K it moves from 66 FPS to 93 FPS (a 27 FPS increase).

Q: Does this CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. The RX 6750 XT in this combo fills that role with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 192-bit memory bus providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the primary driver of frame rates in Pc Building Simulator, especially as resolution increases. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for the texture-heavy workloads of a simulation game that renders detailed PC components and workshop environments. The GPU's 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines process the scene geometry and pixel work, while 40 ray tracing cores handle any RT effects if enabled.

Clock speeds are substantial: the base clock runs at 2150 MHz, the game clock at 2495 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2600 MHz. These clocks, combined with the RDNA 2.0 architecture on a 7 nm TSMC process, yield a peak FP32 throughput of 13.31 TFLOPS. The GPU's pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s explain why the card scales so predictably across resolution steps — the raw fillrate and texture bandwidth are balanced enough that no single bottleneck dominates.

The measured FPS data shows the GPU's influence clearly. At 4K Ultra, the combo manages only 44 FPS, but dropping to Low settings at the same resolution nearly doubles performance to 93 FPS. That pattern holds at 1440p (85 FPS Ultra vs 178 FPS Low) and 1080p (135 FPS Ultra vs 283 FPS Low). The scaling from Ultra to Low at each resolution is roughly a 2.1x improvement, which indicates the GPU's shading units and memory subsystem are being stressed heavily at higher presets. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor here — even at 4K Ultra, the game doesn't appear to exceed the frame buffer, as the performance drops are consistent with compute-bound rather than memory-bound behavior.

The GPU's benchmark results reinforce its mid-range positioning. Its Passmark G3D score of 20700 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2548 place it at the 71st percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals listed are all within 1.1% in average score, which suggests the RX 6750 XT is a well-balanced card that trades blows with comparable products. In this game specifically, the GPU's 2600 MHz boost clock is the key enabler for the high frame rates seen at 1080p and 1440p.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 provides the computational foundation for Pc Building Simulator's simulation logic, which includes physics calculations, component compatibility checks, and system boot animations. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture (Cezanne codename), the CPU handles multi-threaded workloads efficiently. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz boosts up to 4.60 GHz, and the 16 MB of L3 cache (along with 512 KB L2 per core and 64 KB L1 per core) keeps frequently accessed data close to the cores.

The CPU's benchmark scores demonstrate its multi-threaded strengths. In Cinebench R23, it scores 20655 multi-core and 2916 single-core, while Geekbench shows 9959 multi-core and 1907 single-core. The 3DMark tests are particularly revealing: 16-thread score of 6628, 8-thread score of 5585, 4-thread score of 3382, 2-thread score of 1762, and single-thread score of 901. The scaling from 2 to 4 to 8 threads shows near-linear improvement, but the jump from 8 to 16 threads is modest (5585 to 6628), indicating diminishing returns beyond 8 threads in many workloads.

In Pc Building Simulator specifically, the CPU's role becomes less critical as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, where GPU load is minimal, the CPU must keep up with the simulation logic — and it does, delivering 283 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, dropping to 44 FPS regardless of CPU headroom. The 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs suggests the Ryzen 7 5700 is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the RX 6750 XT in this title.

The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score of 25517, which means any of these processors would perform nearly identically in this game. The Ryzen 7 5700's TDP of 65 W and dual-channel DDR4 support with 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate for the game's requirements. The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 24303 and physics score of 984 indicate solid computational throughput, though the game's frame rates at higher resolutions show that the GPU is doing the heavy lifting.

How This Combo Ranks

This combo ranks 1699th out of 3723 tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the 54th percentile of all tested pairings. That position is consistent with the individual component percentiles — the CPU at 78th and GPU at 71st — and suggests the pairing is well-matched without any obvious bottleneck. The rank indicates that roughly 54% of tested combos perform better, but the vast majority of those use higher-tier GPUs or newer architectures.

The ranking makes sense when examining the FPS data. At 1440p High, this combo delivers 89 FPS, which is smooth for most displays. At 1080p Ultra, it hits 135 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate gaming. The 4K Ultra result of 44 FPS is the weakest link, but that's expected for a mid-range GPU at the highest resolution and preset. Combos ranked above this one likely maintain higher frame rates at 4K or push 1080p frame rates past 200 FPS on Ultra settings.

The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles (78th vs 71st) is small, indicating this is a balanced pairing. The CPU has a slight edge in relative performance, which means it won't hold back the GPU in most scenarios. The fact that the combo's rank (54th percentile) sits between the two component percentiles suggests the game is neither purely CPU-bound nor GPU-bound — it benefits from both components working in concert. The data shows this combo is a dependable choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Pc Building Simulator, with acceptable 4K performance at lower settings.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for the best settings at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 141 FPS, which is excellent for any monitor, while Ultra drops to 135 FPS — a negligible 6 FPS penalty for maximum visual fidelity. The Medium preset's 200 FPS is only useful for 240 Hz displays, and Low's 283 FPS exceeds most monitors' refresh rates entirely. For 1080p, the Ultra preset is the best choice because the performance hit from High is minimal.

At 2560x1440, the High preset offers 89 FPS, which is smooth for most gamers, while Ultra delivers 85 FPS — only a 4 FPS difference. The Medium preset's 126 FPS is overkill unless using a 120 Hz or higher refresh rate monitor, and Low's 178 FPS is unnecessary for typical 1440p displays. The High preset is the sweet spot here, offering near-Ultra visuals with a slight frame rate buffer.

At 3840x2160, the situation is different. The High preset delivers 47 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action, while Ultra drops to 44 FPS. The Medium preset's 66 FPS with a min FPS of 56 and max of 76 is the best balance for 4K — it maintains reasonable visual quality while staying above 60 FPS on average. The Low preset's 93 FPS is smooth but sacrifices significant visual detail. For 4K, the Medium preset is recommended because it's the only setting that provides average frame rates above 60 FPS without dropping to Low visuals.

The measured min and max FPS values at Medium settings show the frame time consistency: 1080p has a range of 170-230 FPS, 1440p ranges from 107-145 FPS, and 4K ranges from 56-76 FPS. These ranges indicate the game maintains stable frame pacing at Medium settings across all resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset produces an average of 44 FPS, which is the lowest result in the entire dataset. The High preset improves this to 47 FPS, a marginal 3 FPS gain. Medium jumps to 66 FPS with a minimum of 56 and maximum of 76, providing a substantial 19 FPS improvement over High. Low reaches 93 FPS, nearly double the Ultra result and a 27 FPS increase over Medium. The 4K data shows that the game's highest resolution demands significant GPU resources, with the jump from Ultra to Low representing a 2.1x performance improvement.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 85 FPS, while High improves to 89 FPS — a modest 4 FPS gain. Medium delivers 126 FPS with a minimum of 107 and maximum of 145, representing a 37 FPS jump over High. Low reaches 178 FPS, a 52 FPS improvement over Medium and more than double the Ultra result. The 1440p data demonstrates excellent scaling, with each settings tier providing meaningful frame rate gains.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 135 FPS, while High improves to 141 FPS — just a 6 FPS difference. Medium delivers 200 FPS with a minimum of 170 and maximum of 230, a 59 FPS jump over High. Low reaches 283 FPS, an 83 FPS improvement over Medium and more than double the Ultra result. The 1080p data shows the combo is more than capable of driving high-refresh-rate displays, with even Ultra settings exceeding 135 FPS.

Comparing across resolutions, the scaling factors are consistent. At Ultra settings, 1080p (135 FPS) to 1440p (85 FPS) represents a 37% drop, and 1440p to 4K (44 FPS) represents a 48% drop. At Low settings, the drops are 37% from 1080p (283 FPS) to 1440p (178 FPS) and 48% from 1440p to 4K (93 FPS). This consistency indicates the GPU's performance scales predictably with pixel count, with no unexpected bottlenecks at any resolution. The Medium settings data, which includes min and max FPS, shows the frame pacing remains stable even at higher resolutions, with the 4K range of 56-76 FPS being the widest spread.