Pc Building Simulator

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a performance profile in Pc Building Simulator that is heavily dictated by resolution and graphical preset. The measured data reveals a system capable of high refresh rates at 1080p, but one that begins to show its limitations as pixel count and rendering complexity increase. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across all tested configurations, examining the roles of the CPU and GPU, and providing actionable settings guidance based solely on the benchmark results.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1080p to 4K produces a dramatic and predictable decline in frame rates, clearly identifying the GPU as the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 on the High preset, the average frame rate drops from 141 FPS to 89 FPS, a reduction of approximately 37%. The scaling from 1440p to 3840x2160 is even more severe, with the High preset average falling from 89 FPS to 47 FPS, a further 47% decrease. This pattern indicates that the RX 6750 XT is being progressively saturated as the pixel workload increases.

At the Low preset, the scaling behavior is revealing. The 1080p Low setting achieves an average of 283 FPS, which drops to 178 FPS at 1440p and then to 93 FPS at 4K. While the percentage drops are substantial (37% from 1080p to 1440p, and 48% from 1440p to 4K), the absolute values remain high enough to suggest that the CPU is not the limiting factor even at the highest resolution tested. The fact that 4K Low still produces nearly double the frame rate of 4K High (93 FPS vs 47 FPS) demonstrates that the GPU's compute and memory resources are the primary constraint once the resolution is fixed, with the graphics settings having a massive impact on the final output.

The data strongly suggests a GPU-bound scenario across all resolutions. Even at 1080p Ultra, the system produces 135 FPS, which is high but not indicative of a CPU bottleneck, given that the same CPU can drive 283 FPS at 1080p Low. The consistent pattern of frame rate scaling with resolution, regardless of the preset, confirms that the RX 6750 XT's rendering capabilities are the determining factor in this game's performance envelope.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, plays the dominant role in shaping the performance results for Pc Building Simulator. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, is a key asset. The benchmark results show that memory capacity is not a limiting factor, as the frame rates scale consistently with resolution and settings without any anomalous drops that would indicate VRAM exhaustion.

The GPU's clock speeds are substantial, with a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. These high frequencies directly contribute to the raw compute throughput, which is rated at 13.31 TFLOPS for FP32 operations. The performance data reflects this capability: the jump from Low to Medium settings at 1080p yields a drop from 283 FPS to 200 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High drops to 141 FPS. This scaling suggests that the GPU's shading units (2560) and texture mapping units (160) are handling the increased workload efficiently up to a point, after which the frame rate falls off more steeply.

The GPU's 40 ray accelerators and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate are present in the specification, but the benchmark data does not isolate their impact. The critical observation is that the RX 6750 XT is the performance ceiling in this configuration. At 4K Ultra, the system averages 44 FPS, which is a playable but not smooth experience. The GPU's 64 ROPs and pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s are the likely bottleneck at this extreme setting, as the fill rate requirement of 4K resolution overwhelms the available processing power. The percentile ranking of 71 for the GPU, compared to its nearest rivals with delta percentages of 0.5% to 1.1%, shows it sits in a competitive position, but the game's demands at 4K Ultra push it to its limits.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600, a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Zen 4 architecture, provides ample headroom for this title. The benchmark results show that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor, as evidenced by the massive frame rate differentials across settings. With a boost clock of 5.10 GHz and a base clock of 3.80 GHz, the processor's single-thread performance is excellent, which is crucial for a simulation game that often relies on a primary game thread.

The CPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks supports this analysis. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 1852 points in single-core and 12735 points in multi-core. The 3DMark single-thread score of 999 and the Passmark single-thread score of 3910 further indicate strong per-core performance. In Pc Building Simulator, the data shows that even at 1080p Low, where the GPU is least stressed, the frame rate reaches 283 FPS. This is a high ceiling, but the fact that it does not exceed this suggests the CPU is providing a performance cap at this extreme setting.

However, the CPU's role becomes less critical as resolution increases. At 4K, the average frame rates range from 44 FPS (Ultra) to 93 FPS (Low). These figures are far below what the CPU is capable of supporting, confirming that the GPU is the current bottleneck. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, are more than sufficient for the game's data requirements. The CPU's percentile ranking of 78 against all CPUs, with rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (0.2% delta) and Intel Core i9-11900KF (0.4% delta), shows it is a high-performing part, but its full potential is unrealized in this specific GPU-bound configuration.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1699 out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the system in the upper-middle portion of the performance spectrum, indicating that it outperforms a majority of other hardware pairings tested in this game. The rank is a holistic measure of the system's capability across all test scenarios, and it reflects a balanced pairing where the GPU is the primary performance driver.

The rank is not surprising given the GPU's position. The RX 6750 XT's average benchmark score of 26011 places it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (0.5% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (1.1% delta), are close in synthetic benchmarks, but in this game, the desktop GPU's 12 GB of memory and high clock speeds give it an edge. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking is higher than the GPU's, which further confirms that the CPU is not holding the system back.

The delta percentages in the rival data are small (0.2% to 1.1% for the CPU, and 0.5% to 1.1% for the GPU), meaning that slight variations in synthetic scores do not translate to significant differences in game performance. The combo rank of 1699 out of 3723 suggests there are many faster systems, but also a substantial number that are slower. For a simulation title that is not typically as demanding as AAA first-person shooters, this rank indicates a system that can handle the game well at most settings, with the exception of the most extreme 4K Ultra configuration.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this system depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset provides an average of 135 FPS, which is a smooth and responsive experience for any player. The High preset at 141 FPS offers a marginal gain and is also an excellent choice. For players who prioritize maximum frame rates, the Low preset at 283 FPS is possible, but the visual quality trade-off is substantial. The Medium preset at 200 FPS represents a balanced sweet spot, offering a significant visual upgrade over Low while maintaining a very high frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers an average of 89 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Ultra preset drops to 85 FPS, which is a negligible difference from High, making High the better choice due to the potential for slightly better stability. The Low preset at 178 FPS is the best option for competitive play or for users with 144Hz monitors, as it provides a comfortable margin above the refresh rate. The Medium preset at 126 FPS is another strong candidate for 144Hz displays, offering a good balance between visuals and performance.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset provides a consistently playable experience, with an average of 93 FPS. The Medium preset at 66 FPS is borderline, with a minimum of 56 FPS, which may result in noticeable stutters. Both High (47 FPS) and Ultra (44 FPS) are not recommended for smooth gameplay at 4K, as they fall below the 60 FPS threshold. The data suggests that for the best experience at 4K, the player must significantly reduce settings, or alternatively, consider lowering the resolution to 1440p to enjoy higher visual fidelity.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average frame rates measured for each resolution and settings combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 47 | N/A | N/A |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 93 | N/A | N/A |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 66 | 56 | 76 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 44 | N/A | N/A |

| 2560x1440 | High | 89 | N/A | N/A |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 178 | N/A | N/A |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 126 | 107 | 145 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 85 | N/A | N/A |

| 1920x1080 | High | 141 | N/A | N/A |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 283 | N/A | N/A |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 200 | 170 | 230 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 135 | N/A | N/A |

The data shows a clear hierarchy: across all resolutions, the Low preset yields the highest average FPS, followed by High, then Medium, with Ultra being the slowest. The Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values, indicating frame time variability. At 1080p Medium, the frame rate fluctuates between 170 and 230 FPS, while at 1440p Medium it fluctuates between 107 and 145 FPS, and at 4K Medium between 56 and 76 FPS. This suggests that the Medium preset introduces more frame pacing variance than the other settings, likely due to a specific rendering workload. The High and Ultra presets have no recorded minimum or maximum values, suggesting a more stable frame delivery.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate achievable at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate at 1920x1080 is 283 FPS, achieved with the Low settings preset.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: According to the measured data, only the Low preset at 3840x2160 exceeds 60 FPS, with an average of 93 FPS. The Medium preset averages 66 FPS but has a minimum of 56 FPS, which could drop below 60 FPS. High and Ultra settings average 47 FPS and 44 FPS respectively.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The benchmark results indicate the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the limiting factor. This is evident from the significant frame rate drops when increasing resolution, while the CPU is capable of much higher frame rates at lower resolutions.

Q: How does the combo rank compare to other tested systems?

A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1699 out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator.

Q: What is the recommended preset for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: For a 144Hz display at 2560x1440, the Low preset (178 FPS) is the only setting that consistently exceeds 144 FPS. The Medium preset at 126 FPS is also viable if a lower frame rate is acceptable.

Q: Is there a significant difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The difference is minimal. At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 89 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 85 FPS, a difference of only 4 FPS.