Pc Building Simulator

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination delivers measured performance in Pc Building Simulator. The CPU has a launch MSRP of $229, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD. Benchmark data shows this pairing ranks 32nd out of 1769 tested combos, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 91st percentile among their respective categories. The measured FPS spans from 395.3 at 1080p Low to 82.9 at 4K Ultra, indicating a system that can handle both high-refresh and high-resolution play.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's rank in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The combo ranks 32nd out of 1769 tested combinations.

Q: How many cores and threads does the Ryzen 5 7600 have?

A: It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost up to 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the RTX 4090's memory configuration?

A: It has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded?

A: The highest average FPS is 395.3 at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 8024P, while being 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-12900HK.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 4090 is at the 91st percentile among all GPUs.

How This Combo Ranks

With a rank of 32 out of 1769, this pairing sits near the top of the tested field. The CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 91st percentile indicate both components are well above average. The CPU's average benchmark score of 26617 places it within 0.3% of its nearest rivals, including the Ryzen 7 5800X3D (26574, +0.2%) and the Core i9-11900K (26546, +0.3%). The GPU's average score of 66473 is similarly close to the Tesla T4 (66733, -0.4%) and the Quadro P6000 (67320, -1.3%). This combination of high individual percentiles and a top-32 overall rank suggests a balanced system that excels in this simulation title. The rank is particularly strong given that the CPU is a mid-range part while the GPU is a flagship, yet the pairing still outperforms the vast majority of tested combos.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz and boost reaches 5.10 GHz. The CPU has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 22992 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3246 in single-core. The single-thread score is particularly relevant for Pc Building Simulator, a simulation that likely relies on a few fast cores. The CPU's 3DMark scores show scaling from 999 single-thread to 6503 max-threads, indicating good multi-threading efficiency. With a percentile of 83, it outperforms the majority of CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3% in average score, meaning the 7600 is competitive with older high-end parts like the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Core i9-11900K. The 65W TDP and DDR5 support are additional characteristics, though the game's performance is more directly tied to the measured FPS. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz ensures that lightly threaded workloads, such as simulation logic, receive high single-core throughput.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 395.3 fps on Low, 348.2 on Medium, 260.7 on High, and 249.8 on Ultra. These numbers show that even at the highest quality preset, the system maintains well above 240 fps. Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 325.6 (Low), 235.7 (Medium), 164.2 (High), and 156.3 (Ultra). The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant but still leaves Ultra above 150 fps. At 3840x2160, the results are 170.8 (Low), 119.7 (Medium), 84.9 (High), and 82.9 (Ultra). The 4K Ultra figure of 82.9 fps is still comfortably above 60, making this a viable 4K setup. Notably, the High preset outperforms Ultra at every resolution: 84.9 vs 82.9 at 4K, 164.2 vs 156.3 at 1440p, and 260.7 vs 249.8 at 1080p. This suggests that the Ultra preset may introduce settings that cost performance without proportional visual gains. The scaling from Low to Ultra is consistent across resolutions, with Low always providing the highest frame rates and Ultra the lowest, but the relative differences shrink as resolution increases.

GPU Role

The RTX 4090 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 16384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. It has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 2235 MHz with a boost of 2520 MHz, and memory runs at 21 Gbps effective. In benchmarks, it scores 38194 in Passmark G3D and 26613 in GPU compute. Its percentile of 91 places it above the vast majority of GPUs. The nearest rivals are all within 1.3% in average score, including the Tesla T4 (66733, -0.4%) and the Quadro P6000 (67320, -1.3%). The GPU's massive memory bandwidth and high core count are likely why the system can push 4K Ultra at 82.9 fps. The 24 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for this simulation, which does not appear to be VRAM-limited based on the measured FPS scaling. The boost clock of 2520 MHz ensures that even at 4K, the GPU sustains high throughput, as evidenced by the 170.8 fps at 4K Low. The GPU's compute score of 26613 further indicates strong parallel processing capability, which may benefit any physics or rendering tasks in the game.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the High preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. At every resolution, High yields a higher average FPS than Ultra: 260.7 vs 249.8 at 1080p, 164.2 vs 156.3 at 1440p, and 84.9 vs 82.9 at 4K. The differences are consistent, though modest. For users with high-refresh monitors, Low and Medium provide even higher frame rates, with 1080p Low reaching 395.3 fps. However, the visual trade-off is likely significant. The data suggests that High is the sweet spot for this combo, delivering 84.9 fps at 4K, which is above the 60 fps threshold, and 164.2 fps at 1440p, which suits 144Hz displays. Ultra can be used if maximum quality is desired, but the performance cost is measurable. For competitive play or maximum smoothness, Low at 1080p gives 395.3 fps, but that is likely overkill for a simulation game. Medium at 1440p (235.7 fps) and 4K (119.7 fps) also provide strong performance, making it a viable alternative for those who want higher frame rates without dropping to Low. Ultimately, the High preset is the recommended choice for most users, as it maintains high frame rates across all resolutions while preserving visual fidelity.