Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title, and the tested pairing is the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The data set contains measured FPS for 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 at Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, plus synthetic benchmark scores for both components. The combination ranks 82nd out of 1769 tested combos for this game.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The RTX 4090 is an Ada Lovelace GPU built on TSMC's 5 nm process, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. It has 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 128 RT cores, and 512 tensor cores. The base clock is 2235 MHz, and the boost clock is 2520 MHz. Memory consists of 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s; the memory clock is 1313 MHz or 21 Gbps effective. These are top-end specifications, and the synthetic scores in the data reflect that: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 9223, Geekbench OpenCL 317684, Geekbench Vulkan 270615, Passmark G3D 38194, and Passmark GPU Compute 26613.

The GPU sits at the 91st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 66473. Its nearest rivals are the Tesla T4 at 66733 (delta -0.4%), Tesla P40 at 66127 (delta 0.5%), Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 67097 (delta -0.9%), and Quadro P6000 at 67320 (delta -1.3%). Those deltas are all within 1.3 percentage points, so the RTX 4090 is in a tight cluster of high-scoring cards. For Pc Building Simulator, the 24 GB VRAM buffer is more than any measured preset would stress; the FPS deltas between presets come from shading and fill-rate work rather than capacity constraints. The boost clock of 2520 MHz and the texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s, pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s, and FP32 throughput of 82.58 TFLOPS are the GPU-side figures that correspond to the high frame rates in the measured rows.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS at 1080p are 333.1 Low, 288.8 Medium, 256.8 High, and 250.1 Ultra. At 1440p, the values are 284.6 Low, 232 Medium, 163.1 High, and 154.7 Ultra. At 4K, they fall to 172.3 Low, 122.2 Medium, and 83.9 High and Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 4K is much larger on the higher presets: 256.8 at 1080p High falls to 83.9 at 4K High, while 333.1 at 1080p Low falls to 172.3 at 4K Low. This pattern points to the GPU becoming the main scaling component as resolution increases.

At 4K, High and Ultra produce identical 83.9 fps averages, so the measured data does not separate those two presets at this resolution. The CPU, meanwhile, is an 8-core/16-thread part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU carries a 450 W TDP; the system is heavily weighted toward the graphics card. The resolution scaling behavior is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario at 4K, while the 1080p results show the CPU/GPU pair is capable of extremely high frame rates even on Ultra.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 7 5700G is a Zen 3 processor with the codename Cezanne, made on TSMC's 7 nm process. It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a base clock of 3.80 GHz, a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and a 65 W TDP. It uses AMD Socket AM4 and DDR4 dual-channel memory with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The cache layout is 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. It also includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics, though the tested configuration uses the RTX 4090 for rendering.

Synthetic CPU results include Cinebench R23 multicore 20755 and singlecore 2930, Cinebench R20 multicore 8717 and singlecore 1230, Geekbench multicore 8970 and singlecore 2016, and 3DMark scores of 6629 for 16 threads, 1758 for 2 threads, 3389 for 4 threads, 5648 for 8 threads, 6627 for max threads, and 899 for single thread. PassMark multithread is 24419 and single thread is 3283. The CPU ranks at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25626. In the nearest-rival set, the Ryzen 7 6800U scores 25706 (delta -0.3%), the Xeon D-2752TER scores 25532 (delta 0.4%), the Core 5 210H scores 25490 (delta 0.5%), and the Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485 (delta 0.6%). The largest delta in that group is 0.6%, so this processor is closely matched with its nearest neighbors.

For Pc Building Simulator, the 8-core/16-thread configuration provides enough throughput to feed the RTX 4090 in the measured runs. The 1080p Low result of 333.1 fps is particularly telling: it shows the CPU can drive very high frame rates when the GPU work is light. At 4K Ultra, the average is 83.9 fps, far below the CPU's demonstrated capacity in this game, so the CPU is not the bottleneck at high resolution.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific CPU+GPU pairing ranks 82nd out of 1769 tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator, according to the comboRankInGame field. That places it in the upper tier of the database's combo list. The CPU's individual percentile is 83, and the GPU's is 91; the combo's overall rank is stronger than either component's percentile would suggest on its own, meaning the two parts work well together for this particular game.

The nearest CPU rivals are all within 0.6% of the 5700G's average score, and the nearest GPU rivals are within 1.3% of the RTX 4090's average score. These small synthetic deltas make the relative position of the combo more meaningful: it is not a case where a synthetic benchmark outlier is carrying the result. The 82nd-place rank is driven by the measured FPS rows for this game, which show high averages even at 4K High and Ultra. This indicates that a powerful GPU and a strong eight-core CPU are a proven setup for Pc Building Simulator.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 1920x1080 | 333.1 | 288.8 | 256.8 | 250.1 |

| 2560x1440 | 284.6 | 232 | 163.1 | 154.7 |

| 3840x2160 | 172.3 | 122.2 | 83.9 | 83.9 |

All values are average FPS; the data does not include min or max FPS for these runs. At 1080p, Low is 333.1, Medium 288.8, High 256.8, and Ultra 250.1. At 1440p, Low is 284.6, Medium 232, High 163.1, and Ultra 154.7. At 4K, Low is 172.3, Medium 122.2, and High and Ultra are both 83.9. The ordering of presets is consistent at every resolution: Low fastest, then Medium, then High, with Ultra trailing High at 1080p and 1440p and tying High at 4K. At 1080p, every preset stays at 250.1 or higher, while at 4K the High and Ultra rows drop to 83.9. This reinforces the interpretation that resolution is the dominant factor in the results.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured rows make Ultra the strongest default choice. At 4K, Ultra and High are both 83.9 fps, so selecting Ultra does not reduce the measured average FPS. At 1440p, Ultra is 154.7 fps while High is 163.1 fps; the difference is small in absolute terms and Ultra remains above common high-refresh expectations. At 1080p, Ultra is 250.1 fps, again just below High's 256.8 but still usable for high-refresh displays.

If maximum raw FPS is the priority, High is the better measured preset at 1080p and 1440p, giving 256.8 and 163.1 fps versus Ultra's 250.1 and 154.7. At 4K, High and Ultra are tied, so High offers no advantage. Medium is a good middle ground for 4K: it hits 122.2 fps, well above the 83.9 of High/Ultra, while Low reaches 172.3 at 4K for users who want maximum frame rate. At 1440p, Medium gives 232 fps, and at 1080p Medium gives 288.8. Low is only advisable for extreme refresh-rate chasing because the averages are already high on Medium and above.

In practice, the data supports Ultra at 1080p and 4K, and High or Ultra at 1440p depending on whether the user values the 163.1 fps of High or the 154.7 fps of Ultra. Since 4K High and Ultra are identical in the measured data, there is no reason from a benchmark perspective to choose High over Ultra at that resolution. This combination delivers a strong experience on every preset, with the main trade-off being between 1440p High's extra FPS and 1440p Ultra's higher quality settings.