Pc Building Simulator

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER pairing delivers a highly playable experience in Pc Building Simulator, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and settings. The data shows a strong CPU foundation that never becomes a bottleneck, paired with a GPU that handles the simulation’s demands well up to 1440p, while 4K requires settings adjustments to maintain smooth frame rates. This combo ranks in the 42nd percentile of tested configurations, indicating solid mid-pack performance among all CPU-GPU pairings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture using a 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU’s cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and features Radeon integrated graphics, though the discrete RTX 2070 SUPER handles all rendering in this configuration.

Benchmark results for the Ryzen 5 7600 show strong single-threaded performance, which is critical for simulation games like Pc Building Simulator that often rely on a few heavily loaded threads. The CPU scores 999 in 3dmark_single_thread and 1852 in cinebench_r23_singlecore, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Multi-threaded performance is equally robust, with a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 12735 and a passmark_multithread score of 27058. The average benchmark score of 26324 places it just 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.4% above the Intel Core i9-11900KF, and 0.5% above the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, while being 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS, showing it competes directly with these processors.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s performance is more than adequate for the game’s simulation logic. The 12 threads provide ample headroom for background processes, and the high single-thread score ensures that UI interactions, component compatibility checks, and build validation calculations respond instantly. The measured FPS data shows that even at 1080p Low settings, the combo reaches 248 FPS, suggesting the CPU is not a limiting factor at any resolution tested. At 4K Ultra, where the GPU is stressed, the CPU still delivers 39 FPS, confirming it has enough processing power to feed the GPU without creating a bottleneck.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is a Turing architecture GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card runs at a base clock of 1605 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 40 ray tracing cores and 320 tensor cores. The GPU’s compute capabilities include 9.062 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 18.12 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio). The card has a 215 W TDP and requires a 550 W power supply.

The RTX 2070 SUPER’s benchmark scores place it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20282. It sits 1% above the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, 1.2% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, 1.3% above the Intel Arc B570, and 1.5% above the Intel Arc A750. In 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, it scores 1651, and in passmark_g3d it achieves 18169, demonstrating solid DirectX 12 performance.

For Pc Building Simulator, the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for the game’s textures and rendering requirements. The card’s memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s ensures that texture streaming remains smooth even when viewing detailed PC components up close. The GPU’s role becomes increasingly important at higher resolutions, as the measured FPS data shows a clear scaling pattern. At 1080p, the GPU has plenty of headroom, delivering 118 FPS at Ultra settings. Moving to 1440p, that drops to 74 FPS at Ultra, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 39 FPS, indicating the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 2155th out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the pairing in the 57.9th percentile of all configurations, meaning roughly 58% of tested combos perform better, while 42% perform worse. This mid-pack ranking reflects a balanced system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, and the overall performance is determined by the GPU’s limits at higher resolutions.

The ranking suggests that this combo is competitive with systems featuring newer or more powerful GPUs, but not at the top tier. For a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, this level of performance is more than sufficient, as the game’s graphical demands are moderate compared to AAA shooters. The combo’s rank indicates that users can expect a smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, with only 4K Ultra presenting a challenge. The CPU’s strong benchmark scores relative to its rivals give this combo an advantage in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU’s mid-range performance keeps it from reaching higher rankings.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo can achieve in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 248 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings widoczny. At Medium settings, the combo averages 175 FPS, and at High it reaches 124 FPS at the same resolution.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7600 compare to its nearest CPU rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26324, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900KF, and 0.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS by 0.3%.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM size and how does it affect performance at 4K?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. At 3840x2160 resolution, the combo averages 41 FPS at High settingsversus 39 FPS at Ultra, indicating that the GPU’s memory and compute capacity are the limiting factors at this resolution.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to bottleneck this system in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions. At 4K, the average FPS drops to 39-58 across settings, while the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures it can keep up, as evidenced by the 248 FPS at 1080p Low.

Q: What settings provide the best balance of performance and visual quality at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 78 FPS on average, while Medium provides 111 FPS with a minimum of 94 FPS. The Medium preset offers the best combination of smoothness and quality, as Ultra drops to 74 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 2155th out of 3723 total combinations in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the 57.9th percentile of all tested systems.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of performance scaling from 1080p to 4K, with the GPU becoming increasingly dominant as the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 118 FPS at Ultra settings, which is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay. Moving to 2560x1440, the Ultra preset drops to 74 FPS, a 37.3% reduction. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset yields only 39 FPS, representing a 67.0% decrease from 1080p Ultra.

The scaling at High settings follows a similar trend: 124 FPS at 1080p, 78 FPS at 1440p, and 41 FPS at 4K. This represents a 37.1% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 47.4% drop from 1440p to 4K. The Medium preset shows a less steep decline: 175 FPS at 1080p, 111 FPS at 1440p, and 58 FPS at 4K, with the 4K figure still being playable. Low settings maintain the highest frame rates, with 248 FPS at 1080p, 156 FPS at 1440p, and 82 FPS at 4K.

The pattern indicates that the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 8 GB of VRAM and compute power become strained at 4K, particularly at Ultra settings. The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is more pronounced at higher settings, suggesting that the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth are the bottlenecks. The CPU’s role remains constant across resolutions, as evidenced by the proportionally similar FPS reductions, meaning that users should focus on GPU settings when optimizing for higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of performance and visual quality, the data suggests different optimal presets depending on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 124 FPS on average, which is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset only drops to 118 FPS, so users with high-refresh monitors can comfortably use Ultra settings at this resolution. The Medium preset offers 175 FPS with a minimum of 149 FPS, which is ideal for competitive or high-refresh gameplay, but the visual difference between Medium and High is noticeable in the frame rate drop.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, delivering 111 FPS on average with a minimum of 94 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while maintaining good visual quality. The High preset at 78 FPS is also playable, but the 33 FPS difference between Medium and High represents a significant frame rate reduction for marginal visual gains. The Ultra preset at 74 FPS is the least efficient choice at this resolution, offering only 4 FPS more than High, which does not justify the settings increase.

At 3840x2160, users must make compromises to achieve playable frame rates. The Low preset delivers 82 FPS on average, which is smooth but sacrifices visual fidelity. The Medium preset offers 58 FPS with a minimum of 49 FPS, which is the highest quality setting that maintains acceptable performance. The High preset at 41 FPS is borderline playable, while Ultra at 39 FPS is not recommended for consistent gameplay. For 4K, the Medium preset provides the best experience, balancing visual quality with a minimum frame rate above 45 FPS, ensuring that the game remains responsive even during complex build scenes.