Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from 2019, presents a unique workload that scales significantly with both processor and graphics hardware. The benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX combination reveals a system that delivers high frame rates across all tested settings, with performance characteristics that shift depending on resolution and graphical fidelity.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance rank of this CPU and GPU combination in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The combo ranks 220 out of 1769 tested combinations, placing it in the top 12.4% of all systems benchmarked for this specific game.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7600 compare to its closest rival, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score that is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, indicating statistically equivalent synthetic performance between the two processors.

Q: What is the maximum frame rate achieved by this system at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 392.5 FPS at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This drops to 201 FPS when settings are raised to Ultra.

Q: How much does performance degrade when moving from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At Ultra settings, the average frame rate falls from 126.7 FPS at 2560x1440 to 65.3 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of approximately 48.5%.

Q: Does the RX 7900 XTX outperform the RTX 4070 Ti based on the available benchmark scores?

A: Yes. The RX 7900 XTX has an average benchmark score of 44019, which is 2% higher than the average score of 44900 for the RTX 4070 Ti. Note that a positive deltaPct for the RX 7900 XTX indicates it is ahead.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average frame rate drops from 268.9 FPS on Low settings to 126.7 FPS on Ultra settings, showing the significant impact of graphical fidelity on this system's output.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The processor's cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is evident in the high frame rates achieved at lower resolutions where graphical load is less demanding.

The synthetic benchmarks for the Ryzen 5 7600 show strong single-threaded performance with a 3dmark single-thread score of 999 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3246. Multi-threaded performance scales effectively, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22992. The processor's 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs indicates it outperforms the majority of processors on the market. Its average benchmark score of 26617 places it in close competition with the Intel Core i9-12900HK, which scores 26672, a difference of only -0.2%. The Ryzen 5 7600 also edges out the Intel Core i9-11900K by 0.3%.

This CPU performance becomes a key factor at 1080p, where the system achieves an average of 392.5 FPS on Low settings. This high frame rate suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to prevent it from becoming a bottleneck in less graphically intensive scenarios. The data indicates that the Ryzen 5 7600 provides a solid foundation for this simulation, allowing the graphics card to operate at its full potential when the load is not GPU-bound.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a high-end graphics card built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip. It features 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1929 MHz and a boost clock of 2498 MHz, with a game clock of 2365 MHz. Its 355 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a high-power component aimed at performance enthusiasts.

The GPU's substantial memory capacity and bandwidth are well-suited for high-resolution gaming. The card's 85th percentile ranking versus all GPUs places it above the vast majority of graphics cards. With a Passmark G3D score of 31238 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 189573, the RX 7900 XTX demonstrates significant compute and rendering power. Its average benchmark score of 44019 is 0.8% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and 2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's influence becomes more pronounced as resolution and settings increase. At 4K Ultra, the system maintains an average of 65.3 FPS, which is a substantial drop from the 1080p Ultra result of 201 FPS. This scaling pattern indicates that at 4K with maximum settings, the rendering load shifts heavily onto the GPU, making it the primary performance limiter. The 24 GB VRAM buffer ensures that memory capacity is not a constraint even at the highest tested settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX achieves a rank of 220 out of 1769 tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator. This places the system in the top 12.4% of all configurations tested, indicating a high level of performance for this game. The ranking reflects the balance between the CPU's strong single-threaded capabilities and the GPU's substantial rendering power.

This rank suggests that while the system is not at the absolute top of the performance charts, it offers a level of performance that would be considered high-end for most users. The data shows that the CPU's benchmark scores are competitive with, and in some cases slightly ahead of, processors like the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Intel Core i9-11900K. The GPU also holds its own, with a score that is slightly ahead of the RTX 4090 Mobile and RTX 4070 Ti.

The 220th rank out of 1769 combos indicates that there are 219 combinations that perform better in this specific game. These are likely to include more powerful CPUs or GPUs, but the data shows that this pairing provides a very strong experience, particularly when considering the frame rates achieved at 1440p and 1080p, which are well above the threshold for smooth gameplay.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show a clear trend of decreasing performance as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 392.5 FPS at 1080p to 268.9 FPS at 1440p, and further to 139.8 FPS at 4K. This represents a 64.4% reduction in performance from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the GPU is being tasked with a significantly higher workload at the higher resolution.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is similar but with a more pronounced drop. The average frame rate falls from 201 FPS at 1080p to 126.7 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 65.3 FPS at 4K. This is a 67.5% decrease from 1080p to 4K. The fact that the percentage drop is slightly larger at Ultra settings suggests that the GPU is the limiting component, as the increased graphical detail adds more strain to the rendering pipeline.

The pattern of frame rate scaling indicates a system that is CPU-bound at 1080p, where the GPU is not fully utilized, and becomes GPU-bound at 4K, where the rendering load is high enough to saturate the GPU's capabilities. The 1440p results represent a balance point where the system delivers high frame rates at all settings, with the Ultra preset still achieving 126.7 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table presents the exact average frame rates recorded for this hardware combination, broken down by resolution and settings:

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 72.9 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 139.8 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 98.2 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 65.3 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 136.8 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 268.9 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 188.7 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 126.7 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 213.1 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 392.5 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 300.4 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 201 |

At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional performance, with even the Ultra preset achieving an average of 201 FPS. The jump from Medium to Ultra settings at this resolution costs 99.4 FPS, from 300.4 to 201, showing the significant impact of the highest quality preset. Moving to 1440p, the Ultra preset still provides a smooth experience at 126.7 FPS, while the Low preset reaches 268.9 FPS. At 4K, the system remains playable at all settings, with the Low preset achieving 139.8 FPS and the Ultra preset maintaining 65.3 FPS. The High preset at 4K yields 72.9 FPS, which is a reasonable result for a simulation game at this resolution. The data shows a consistent performance hierarchy across all resolutions, with Low settings providing the highest frame rates and Ultra settings providing the lowest.