Pc Building Simulator

# Pc Building Simulator — AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

This combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER delivers surprisingly consistent frame rates across Pc Building Simulator's resolution and settings matrix, though the pattern of scaling reveals a system that shifts between GPU and CPU limitation depending on the workload. The measured data shows a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor paired with an 8 GB Turing-generation GPU, producing results that rank 2155th out of 3723 tested combos in this simulation title — a mid-pack placement that reflects the hardware's balanced but not exceptional profile.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep but predictable, with the most dramatic reduction occurring at Low settings. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo produces 248 FPS average; moving to 2560x1440 Low drops that to 156 FPS (a 37% reduction), and at 3840x2160 Low the average falls to 82 FPS — a 67% decline from the 1080p baseline. This steep scaling at Low settings strongly indicates that the CPU is the primary limiter at 1080p, since the GPU is not heavily taxed at minimal graphical loads. The Ryzen 5 7500F's 5.00 GHz boost clock and high single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 974, Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218) are what enable that 248 FPS figure, but the game's simulation logic appears to cap the frame rate well before the GPU becomes saturated.

At High settings, the scaling is more moderate: 124 FPS at 1080p, 78 FPS at 1440p (37% drop), and 41 FPS at 4K (67% drop from 1080p). The percentage reductions are nearly identical to Low settings, which suggests that the overall workload character doesn't change drastically across quality tiers — the same component becomes the bottleneck at each resolution. However, the absolute frame rates at High settings are roughly half of the Low settings values, indicating that GPU load increases substantially with quality settings.

The Medium preset shows the most interesting scaling behavior. At 1080p Medium, the combo averages 175 FPS with a minimum of 149 FPS and maximum of 202 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 111 FPS (min 94, max 127), and at 4K Medium, it falls to 58 FPS (min 49, max 67). The min-to-max ranges are tight at each resolution — roughly 30 FPS spread — which indicates consistent frame pacing without severe hitches. The 4K Medium result of 58 FPS is the only 4K preset that stays above 60 FPS average, making it the sole viable 4K option for smooth gameplay.

Ultra settings produce the lowest frame rates across all resolutions: 118 FPS at 1080p, 74 FPS at 1440p, and 39 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS is the single lowest measured value in the entire dataset, and the gap between 4K Ultra (39 FPS) and 4K High (41 FPS) is surprisingly small at just 2 FPS — suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional demands over High are modest in this simulation title, or that the GPU is already so saturated that the extra settings don't meaningfully change the bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data shows 2560x1440 as the sweet spot. At High settings, the combo delivers 78 FPS average, while at Medium it hits 111 FPS with a 94 FPS minimum. Both are well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the 1440p results offer a substantial visual upgrade over 1080p without the severe frame rate penalty seen at 4K.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in this title?

A: Yes, but only at Medium settings, where the average is 58 FPS with a 49 FPS minimum. At High settings, the average drops to 41 FPS, and at Ultra it falls to 39 FPS — both below the smoothness threshold. Low settings at 4K produce 82 FPS but require sacrificing visual quality.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER's 8 GB VRAM affect performance?

A: The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth appears sufficient for all tested settings in this game. The measured FPS data shows no anomalous drops at higher settings that would indicate VRAM capacity being exceeded — the frame rate scaling is consistent and gradual across quality tiers.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: At 1080p Low, the 248 FPS average suggests the CPU is the primary limiter, as the GPU would be under minimal load at those settings. The Ryzen 5 7500F's single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 974, PassMark single-thread score of 3841) is strong, but the game's simulation logic appears to cap frame rates before the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

Q: What is the frame time consistency like?

A: The Medium preset data includes min and max FPS values, showing a consistent ~30 FPS spread at each resolution (149-202 at 1080p, 94-127 at 1440p, 49-67 at 4K). This indicates stable frame pacing without severe stutters, which is important for a simulation game where consistent updates matter.

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested configurations?

A: In Pc Building Simulator, this combo ranks 2155th out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the 58th percentile. This is a middle-of-the-pack result, reflecting the hardware's balanced but not top-tier performance in this specific title.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data supports Medium as the optimal preset for most users. At 1080p Medium, the combo achieves 175 FPS average with a 149 FPS minimum — far exceeding the 60 FPS threshold and providing headroom for any monitor refresh rate up to 144 Hz. The 1440p Medium result of 111 FPS average (94 FPS minimum) is similarly excellent, making this the recommended configuration for high-refresh-rate gaming at that resolution. Even at 4K Medium, the 58 FPS average (49 FPS minimum) is playable, though it dips below the 60 FPS threshold.

High settings offer a reasonable alternative for users prioritizing visual fidelity. At 1080p High, the combo still produces 124 FPS average, and at 1440p High it maintains 78 FPS. However, at 4K High, the 41 FPS average falls below acceptable smoothness for most players. The Ultra preset provides marginal gains over High — only 2 FPS difference at 4K (39 vs 41) and 6 FPS at 1080p (118 vs 124) — while presumably adding extra graphical effects. Given the minimal FPS improvement from Ultra to High, the Ultra preset is difficult to justify unless the specific visual features it enables are essential.

For competitive or simulation-focused play where frame rate consistency matters most, Low settings at 1440p (156 FPS) or 1080p (248 FPS) eliminate any concern about frame pacing. However, the visual compromise is substantial. The Medium preset at 1440p offers the best balance: 111 FPS average, tight 94-127 FPS range, and likely the most visually acceptable compromise between quality and performance.

How This Combo Ranks

In Pc Building Simulator, this AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination ranks 2155th out of 3723 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the ranking distribution, which is somewhat surprising given the individual component performance. The RTX 2070 SUPER sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs (avg benchmark score 20282), while the Ryzen 5 7500F ranks at the 77th percentile among CPUs (avg benchmark score 24964). The combo's mid-pack ranking in this specific game suggests that Pc Building Simulator's workload characteristics do not favor this particular pairing as much as their general-purpose benchmark scores would indicate.

The CPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score are the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935, 0.1% ahead), AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005, 0.2% behind), Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, 0.2% ahead), and Intel Core 5 210H (24872, 0.4% ahead). These tight margins — all within 0.4% — indicate that the Ryzen 5 7500F's general compute performance is well-matched to a cluster of comparable processors. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, 1% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 1.2% ahead), Intel Arc B570 (20556, 1.3% ahead), and Intel Arc A750 (20582, 1.5% ahead), showing that the RTX 2070 SUPER is competitive with newer mobile and mid-range desktop parts despite its aging architecture.

The discrepancy between individual component percentiles (65th for GPU, 77th for CPU) and the combo's game-specific rank (58th percentile) indicates that Pc Building Simulator is not particularly demanding on either component, and the pairing's performance is more constrained by the game's engine than by hardware limits.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is built on the Turing architecture (TU104 chip) at a 12 nm process node, with 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which appears to be more than sufficient for this simulation title. The GPU's clock speeds are 1605 MHz base and 1770 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 113.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 283.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 9.062 TFLOPS places it in a capable range for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as the measured data confirms.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 65th among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20282, positions it as a mid-range performer. Its nearest rivals — the Quadro M4000M (1% ahead), RTX 3070 Mobile (1.2% ahead), Arc B570 (1.3% ahead), and Arc A750 (1.5% ahead) — all score within a narrow 1.5% band, indicating that the RTX 2070 SUPER is tightly clustered with several modern alternatives. The PassMark G3D score of 18169 and DirectX 12 score of 67 provide additional context: the card handles modern APIs competently but is not at the forefront of performance.

In Pc Building Simulator specifically, the GPU's role becomes increasingly important at higher resolutions. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a consistent ~67% reduction across all settings, which is typical of GPU-bound workloads. The 4K results — 41 FPS at High, 58 FPS at Medium, 82 FPS at Low — demonstrate that the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are not bottlenecks, as even the highest settings at 4K do not produce anomalous frame rate collapses. The GPU's 1770 MHz boost clock and 9.062 TFLOPS FP32 performance are adequate for this game's visual demands, though the 4K Ultra result of 39 FPS shows the hardware's limits at maximum quality.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its strongest results across all settings. Low settings achieve 248 FPS average, which is the highest measured value in the entire dataset. Medium settings deliver 175 FPS average with a tight 149-202 FPS range, indicating stable performance. High settings drop to 124 FPS average, while Ultra settings produce 118 FPS average. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 130 FPS, showing that settings have a substantial impact at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain highly playable. Low settings achieve 156 FPS average, Medium delivers 111 FPS (94-127 FPS range), High produces 78 FPS, and Ultra falls to 74 FPS. The reduction from 1080p to 1440p is consistent at approximately 37% across all settings, indicating that the same component characteristics govern performance at both resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops become more pronounced. Low settings still manage 82 FPS average, which is playable. Medium settings produce 58 FPS (49-67 FPS range), representing the only 4K preset that maintains near-60 FPS performance. High settings fall to 41 FPS, and Ultra drops to 39 FPS — the lowest measured result in the dataset. The 4K results show that this combo is marginal for 4K gaming, with only Low and Medium settings providing acceptable frame rates.

The Medium preset is the only setting that includes min and max FPS data at all three resolutions, providing insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the range is 149-202 FPS (53 FPS spread); at 1440p Medium, it's 94-127 FPS (33 FPS spread); and at 4K Medium, it's 49-67 FPS (18 FPS spread). The narrowing range at higher resolutions suggests that GPU load becomes more consistent as the bottleneck shifts away from CPU-side frame generation.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename) built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It operates at a 3.70 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.00 GHz, with 64 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, along with PCIe Gen 5 (24 lanes CPU-only). Its 65 W TDP reflects efficient power usage, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking potential.

The CPU's benchmark results are strong for its class. Its 3dmark single-thread score of 974 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218 indicate excellent single-thread performance, which is crucial for simulation games that often rely on a primary game thread. The multi-thread results — Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22799, Geekbench multicore of 12362, and PassMark multithread of 26825 — show that the 6-core/12-thread configuration handles parallel workloads competently. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 6376 and max_threads score of 6379 are nearly identical, indicating that the processor's scaling plateaus at 12 threads, as expected.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 77th among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964, places it above the GPU's 65th percentile. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.4% in average score, demonstrating that the Ryzen 5 7500F is competitively positioned against a range of Intel and AMD processors. In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is most evident at 1080p Low settings, where the 248 FPS average suggests the processor is the limiting factor. The 5.00 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread performance enable high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, while the 12 threads provide enough parallelism for the game's background simulation tasks.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and DDR5 support are relevant for a simulation game that may involve significant data movement, though the measured FPS data shows no obvious memory-related bottlenecks. The 32 MB L3 cache provides ample capacity for game data, and the 6-core/12-thread configuration balances single-thread responsiveness with multi-thread capability for this title's workload.