Pc Building Simulator

The data for Pc Building Simulator with the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti shows a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions, with the GPU becoming the clear limiting factor only at the highest settings. This analysis covers the measured frame rates, the hardware characteristics that drive them, and where this specific pairing stands among all tested combinations.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance gradient as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 363.7 FPS, which drops to 181.7 FPS at High and 174.6 FPS at Ultra. This pattern indicates that even at 1080p, the graphics card is doing substantial work, but the CPU still has headroom to push very high frame rates. Moving to 1440p, the Low preset yields 232 FPS, while High and Ultra deliver 114.1 and 108.8 FPS respectively. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a reduction of roughly 36% at Low settings, but only about 37% at High, suggesting the workload shifts more heavily onto the GPU as resolution climbs.

At 4K, the performance picture changes decisively. The Low preset still manages 123.9 FPS, which is playable, but the Medium preset drops to 84.2 FPS, and High falls to 59.1 FPS. Ultra at 4K produces just 58.1 FPS. The gap between 1080p Ultra (174.6 FPS) and 4K Ultra (58.1 FPS) is a 67% reduction, demonstrating that the RTX 3080 Ti is the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The data indicates that this game is not particularly demanding on the CPU, as the frame rates at 1080p Low (363.7 FPS) are far above what most displays can show, and the bottleneck moves to the GPU as pixel count increases.

The delta between Low and Ultra at each resolution is telling. At 1080p, the difference is 189.1 FPS, at 1440p it is 123.2 FPS, and at 4K it is 65.8 FPS. This narrowing gap suggests that the GPU is increasingly saturated at higher resolutions, reducing the relative impact of settings changes. The data clearly shows that for smooth 4K gameplay, users must accept Medium settings at best, while 1440p and 1080p offer more flexibility across the preset range.

GPU Role

The RTX 3080 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA102 chip, fabricated on an 8 nm process from Samsung. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 384-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 1188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed. These specifications directly support the measured 4K performance, where the 12 GB frame buffer and high bandwidth allow the card to maintain playable frame rates at Medium and High presets.

The GPU’s base clock is 1365 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz. The card has 10240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. Its pixel rate is 186.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 532.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 34.10 TFLOPS, which is substantial for a 30-series card. These figures explain why the card can deliver 232 FPS at 1440p Low and 123.9 FPS at 4K Low, as the raw compute power handles the lighter shading loads without strain.

The card’s TDP is 350 W, and it requires a 750 W suggested power supply. It uses a dual-slot design with a single 12-pin power connector. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 41224, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, which scores 41441, a delta of -0.5%. This means the RTX 3080 Ti is virtually tied with the RTX 3090 in synthetic benchmarks, yet the measured game data shows it handles Pc Building Simulator well. The card also trails the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 by -0.9% and the RTX 5070 by -1.1%, but these differences are within noise for most real-world workloads.

In this specific game, the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth are likely more important than raw shader count. The simulation genre often involves many textures and UI elements, and the 12 GB buffer prevents any memory-related stutters at 4K High, where the average FPS is 59.1. The card’s end-of-life production status does not affect its current performance, which remains competitive in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ranks 439th out of 1769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places it in the top 25% of all configurations, which is a strong result given the game’s relatively modest system requirements. The rank reflects the synergy between the CPU and GPU, where neither component is severely underutilized at the tested resolutions.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24993, which places it in the 82nd percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-11850H, with an average score of 24974, a delta of 0.1%. The Ryzen 5 7500F also sits close to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (25057, delta -0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25064, delta -0.3%). These rivals are all within a few points of the 7500F, indicating that the CPU’s performance is well established and not a differentiator in this game.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 41224, with the RTX 3090 as the closest rival at 41441. The combo rank of 439 is influenced by the fact that Pc Building Simulator is not a demanding title, so many lower-end combos can achieve high frame rates. However, the data shows that this specific pairing is above average, and the measured FPS at 1080p Ultra (174.6) is high enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor.

The rank suggests that users will not encounter any performance walls with this combo. The CPU has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and 6 cores with 12 threads, which is more than sufficient for the simulation logic. The GPU’s high memory bandwidth and 12 GB capacity ensure that texture streaming is smooth even at 4K. Overall, the combo sits in a comfortable position where it outperforms the majority of tested systems in this game.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal settings depend on the user’s resolution and refresh rate. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers 174.6 FPS, which is ideal for 144 Hz or 165 Hz displays. The High preset at 181.7 FPS offers a marginal improvement, but the visual difference between High and Ultra may be small in a simulation game where the camera is often static. For 1080p, Ultra is the best choice because it provides high frame rates without sacrificing image quality.

At 1440p, the Ultra preset yields 108.8 FPS, which is smooth for 60 Hz and 120 Hz displays. The Medium preset at 167 FPS would be better for 165 Hz monitors, but the drop from Ultra to Medium may reduce visual fidelity in a game that is about building and inspecting PCs. The High preset at 114.1 FPS is a balanced choice, offering a good compromise between frame rate and quality. For most users at 1440p, High is recommended because it stays above 100 FPS while maintaining the more detailed textures.

At 4K, the situation is different. The Ultra preset produces only 58.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for smooth gameplay. The High preset at 59.1 FPS is essentially identical, so there is no benefit to choosing Ultra over High at this resolution. The Medium preset at 84.2 FPS is the best option for 4K, as it provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while still offering decent visual quality. The Low preset at 123.9 FPS is only necessary for very high refresh rate 4K displays, which are rare.

The data indicates that the Medium preset at 4K is the sweet spot, as it balances frame rate and visual fidelity. For users with 1440p monitors, High is the recommended preset, and for 1080p, Ultra is the clear winner. The measured FPS values show that the combo is capable of high frame rates at all resolutions, but the settings must be adjusted to match the display’s refresh rate.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings is 114.1 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti compare to its nearest rival in GPU benchmarks?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 41224, which is -0.5% compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090’s score of 41441.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500F a strong CPU for this game?

A: The CPU ranks in the 82nd percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 24993, and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, is only 0.1% ahead.

Q: What is the best preset for 4K gaming with this combo?

A: The Medium preset at 3840x2160 provides 84.2 FPS, which is the highest settings level that stays comfortably above 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: It ranks 439th out of 1769 combos in Pc Building Simulator, placing it in the top quarter of all tested systems.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 363.7 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 174.6 FPS, a difference of 189.1 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz, and it boosts to 5.00 GHz. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and uses the AMD Socket AM5. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s role is to handle the simulation logic, which includes managing the state of various PC components and their interactions. The single-core performance is strong, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2759. The multi-core score in Cinebench R23 is 22799, which is more than adequate for this game. The CPU’s 3DMark scores show a scaling from 1902 for 2 threads to 6379 for max threads, indicating that the processor can efficiently use its 12 threads when needed.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H, which has an average score of 24974, and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, which scores 25057. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 7500F is not a bottleneck in this game. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (363.7) is so high that the CPU is likely not the limiting factor at any resolution. Even at 4K Ultra, where the GPU is stressed, the CPU still has enough headroom to feed the GPU with data.

The CPU’s release date of 2023-07-21 makes it a recent addition to the market, and its launch MSRP is $179. It has a multiplier unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and supports ECC memory. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 lanes ensures that the GPU has ample bandwidth for data transfer. In this game, the CPU’s performance is more than sufficient, and the data shows that the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates, especially at higher resolutions and settings.