Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 68 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 32 | 41 | 51 |
| 1440p QHD | 43 | 57 | 74 | 91 |
| 1080p Full HD | 65 | 86 | 112 | 138 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld presents a demanding survival sandbox where the balance between CPU and GPU determines playable frame rates. This analysis pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, examining measured results across resolutions and settings. The data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU provides a robust foundation at 1080p.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a steep performance cliff as resolution increases, which is a classic indicator of GPU-bound scaling. At 1080p High, the combo achieves an average of 86 FPS. Moving to 1440p High, the average drops to 57 FPS, a reduction of 29 FPS or roughly 34%. The climb to 4K High further crushes performance to just 32 FPS, a 54 FPS total drop from 1080p. This pattern clearly demonstrates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, with its 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus, is the limiting component as pixel count rises.
The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly severe. At 1440p High, the system produces 57 FPS, but at 4K High, it falls to 32 FPS. This 25 FPS drop for a 2.25x increase in pixel count suggests the GPU is running out of both raw throughput and memory bandwidth. The RTX 2060's 336.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6.451 TFLOPS FP32 performance are simply insufficient for the demands of 4K in a game like Palworld. The data implies that 4K is not a viable target for this combo, as even the Low preset only yields 51 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold often desired for smooth gameplay.
At 1080p, the scaling is less punishing but still present. The jump from 1080p High (86 FPS) to 1440p High (57 FPS) is a substantial 34% reduction. However, the 1080p results suggest that the CPU is not the bottleneck at this resolution. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265, with its 20 cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock, provides ample headroom. The fact that 1080p Low yields 138 FPS, while 1080p Ultra yields 65 FPS, indicates that the GPU is still the primary limiter, but the CPU is capable of feeding it enough data to reach high frame rates. The data suggests that for optimal performance, users should stay at 1080p or 1440p, with the latter requiring a settings compromise.
Settings Recommendations
Examining the measured rows, the Medium preset emerges as the most balanced choice across all resolutions. At 1440p Medium, the combo produces 74 FPS, which is a solid, playable experience. This is a significant improvement over the 57 FPS at High, while still maintaining visual quality. The 4K Medium result of 41 FPS is less ideal, but it is playable for a survival game where precise timing is less critical. The data shows that the Medium preset provides the best compromise between visual fidelity and frame rate.
For users prioritizing frame rate over visual quality, the Low preset offers the highest performance. At 1080p Low, the system hits 138 FPS, which is excellent for competitive or fast-paced gameplay. At 1440p Low, it produces 91 FPS, and at 4K Low, it achieves 51 FPS. The Low preset is the only way to get near 60 FPS at 4K. However, the visual downgrade may not be worth it for all players. The High preset, while visually appealing, drops below 60 FPS at 1440p (57 FPS) and becomes unplayable at 4K (32 FPS).
The Ultra preset is the least recommended option. At 1440p Ultra, the average FPS drops to 43, which is below the playable threshold for many. At 4K Ultra, it falls to a slideshow-like 24 FPS. The data clearly indicates that the Ultra preset is too demanding for this GPU. The performance gap between Medium and Ultra is substantial: at 1440p, it is a 31 FPS difference (74 vs. 43). This suggests that the RTX 2060 lacks the raw compute power and VRAM capacity to handle the highest settings in Palworld. The recommended path is clearly Medium for a smooth experience, with Low as a fallback for higher resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Palworld at 4K?
A: Yes, but only at lower settings. The measured data shows 51 FPS at 4K Low and 41 FPS at 4K Medium. At 4K High, performance drops to 32 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 24 FPS.
Q: What is the best resolution for this setup?
A: The data suggests 1440p is the sweet spot. At Medium settings, the combo achieves 74 FPS, which is a good balance. At 1080p, it can hit 86 FPS on High and 112 FPS on Medium.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this game?
A: The benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. The RTX 2060's performance drops significantly from 1080p to 4K. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265, with its high boost clock, is less of a constraint.
Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High in terms of performance?
A: The Ultra preset is significantly more demanding. At 1440p, High produces 57 FPS, while Ultra drops to 43 FPS. At 1080p, High yields 86 FPS, but Ultra only reaches 65 FPS.
Q: What kind of frame rate can I expect at 1080p with High settings?
A: The measured average is 86 FPS. This is a very playable frame rate for a survival game, indicating that the CPU can handle the game's logic while the GPU renders efficiently at this resolution.
Q: Does the 6 GB VRAM of the RTX 2060 become a problem?
A: The data suggests it may be a factor at high resolutions and settings. The steep drop from Medium to High at 4K (41 to 32 FPS) could be related to VRAM capacity or bandwidth limitations, though the benchmark data does not isolate this variable.
How This Combo Ranks
In the global database of tested combos for Palworld, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks at position 2327 out of 2944 combos. This places it in the lower 21% of all tested systems, indicating that while it is functional, it is not a high-performance configuration for this specific title. The rank of 2327 suggests that most other combos tested deliver higher frame rates in Palworld.
This ranking is more reflective of the GPU's limitations than the CPU's capabilities. The RTX 2060 has an average benchmark score of 15290, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (with a 0% deltaPct) and the AMD Radeon 680M (with a 0.1% deltaPct). This indicates that the RTX 2060 is positioned in the mid-range of the GPU performance spectrum. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265, on the other hand, has an average benchmark score of 64640, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 4464P (with a -0.3% deltaPct) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F (with a 0.3% deltaPct).
The disparity in percentile rankings between the CPU (93rd) and GPU (58th) is stark. The data implies that the combo's poor ranking in Palworld is almost entirely due to the GPU holding back the powerful CPU. The CPU is capable of supporting much higher frame rates, as evidenced by the 138 FPS result at 1080p Low. The GPU is simply the weak link in this chain, capping performance at levels far below what the CPU can provide.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a high-end desktop processor with 20 cores and 20 threads. Its base clock is 2.40 GHz, and it can boost up to 5.30 GHz. This architecture, Arrow Lake-S, is built on a 3 nm process node. The high boost clock is critical for gaming, as many titles favor single-core performance. In Palworld, which involves complex world simulation and creature AI, the CPU's ability to handle multiple threads is also beneficial.
The benchmark data shows that this CPU is not the bottleneck in this combo. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42216 in multi-core and 5960 in single-core tests. These are strong scores, indicating robust processing power. However, in Palworld, the measured FPS at 1080p Low (138 FPS) is likely near the upper limit of what the game engine can produce, and the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's high single-core score of 5960 suggests it can handle the game's main thread efficiently, while its 20 cores provide ample headroom for background tasks and game logic.
The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth) further enhance its capabilities. These features help reduce latency and improve data throughput, which is beneficial for a game like Palworld that loads many assets and entities. The data indicates that the CPU is a future-proof component in this system, capable of supporting a more powerful GPU. The performance ceiling for this combo in Palworld is dictated by the RTX 2060, not the Core Ultra 7 265.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1080p, the combo delivers an average of 138 FPS on Low, 112 FPS on Medium, 86 FPS on High, and 65 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 129 FPS, indicating a stable frame time. The Low preset, while lacking a min/max, clearly offers the highest headroom.
Moving to 1440p, the averages drop significantly. The Low preset yields 91 FPS, Medium delivers 74 FPS (with a min of 63 and max of 85), High produces 57 FPS, and Ultra falls to 43 FPS. The 1440p Medium result of 74 FPS is the most playable option at this resolution, offering a good balance. The step from Medium to High at 1440p is a 17 FPS drop, which is a noticeable reduction in smoothness.
At 4K, the results are challenging. The Low preset gives 51 FPS, Medium gives 41 FPS (with a min of 35 and max of 47), High gives 32 FPS, and Ultra gives 24 FPS. The 4K Medium result is the only one with a recorded min and max, indicating high frame time variance. The 4K High and Ultra results are not playable for a responsive experience. The data shows a clear pattern: to maintain a 60+ FPS average, the user must stay at 1080p with any settings, or 1440p with Low or Medium settings. For a 30 FPS minimum at 4K, the user must use Low settings.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is a mid-range GPU from the GeForce 20-series, based on the Turing architecture. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its core clocks are 1365 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost. With 1920 shading units and 30 RT cores, it offers a balance of rasterization and ray tracing capabilities, though the latter is not heavily utilized in Palworld. The GPU's FP32 performance is 6.451 TFLOPS.
The GPU's role in this combo is clearly the limiting factor. Its percentile rank of 58% places it below the majority of GPUs. The measured FPS data shows that performance drops off a cliff as resolution increases, which is a direct result of the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute capacity. The 6 GB VRAM is likely a constraint at 4K, as the texture and geometry data for Palworld can exceed this capacity, leading to performance degradation. The steep drop from 1440p High (57 FPS) to 4K High (32 FPS) is a 44% reduction, which is more than the pixel count increase, suggesting memory pressure.
The RTX 2060's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the AMD Radeon 680M (0.1% deltaPct) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (0.6% deltaPct). This indicates that the RTX 2060 is at the entry-level of dedicated gaming GPUs in the current landscape. The data implies that for Palworld, this GPU is best suited for 1080p gaming. At that resolution, it can produce high frame rates on Medium and High settings. For 1440p, it requires a settings reduction to Medium to stay above 60 FPS. The GPU's 160 W TDP and dual-slot design are moderate, but its performance ceiling is the primary concern for this game.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 32.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 24.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 91.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 74.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 57.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 43.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 138.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 112.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 86.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 65.0 |
Palworld with iUltra 7 265 + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265 + RTX 2060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.