Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 113 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 53 | 68 | 84 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 95 | 123 | 152 |
| 1080p Full HD | 109 | 144 | 187 | 231 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld presents an interesting stress test for the Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, as the measured FPS data reveals a system that scales predictably with resolution but shows distinct behavior at different quality presets. The combination of a 12-core Alder Lake processor with a high-bandwidth RDNA 2 graphics card produces a wide performance envelope, from highly playable frame rates at 1080p to a borderline experience at 4K Ultra.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and reveals the expected shift in bottleneck from the CPU to the GPU as pixel count increases. At High settings, the system delivers 144 FPS at 1920x1080, which falls to 95 FPS at 2560x1440 (a roughly 34% reduction) and then further to 53 FPS at 3840x2160 (a 44% drop from 1440p). This steep decline indicates that the Radeon RX 6800 XT becomes the limiting component at higher resolutions, as the rendering load on the 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and the 4608 shading units grows significantly.
Low settings paint a clearer picture of the CPU headroom. At 1080p Low, the pair hits 231 FPS, which is remarkably high and suggests the Core i7-12700KF's 20 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock are capable of feeding the GPU efficiently at lower graphical loads. Dropping to 1440p Low yields 152 FPS (a 34% reduction), and 4K Low produces 84 FPS (a 45% reduction from 1440p). The similarity in percentage drops across all settings implies that resolution scaling is consistent, but the absolute numbers show that even a powerful GPU like the RX 6800 XT cannot maintain high frame rates at 4K when graphical complexity increases.
Ultra settings show the most dramatic scaling penalty. At 1080p Ultra, the system manages 109 FPS, which falls to 72 FPS at 1440p (a 34% drop) and then plummets to 40 FPS at 4K (a 44% drop from 1440p). The 4K Ultra result of 40 FPS is below the 53 FPS seen at 4K High, demonstrating that the incremental cost of Ultra over High is significant at high pixel densities. This data suggests that the limiting component at 4K is unequivocally the GPU, as the CPU's performance headroom is unlikely to be exhausted at such low frame rates.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700KF brings a hybrid architecture with 12 cores (8 performance and 4 efficiency) and 20 threads, operating at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its benchmark data shows strong multi-threaded capabilities, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 14367. The single-thread performance, measured at 4071 in Cinebench R23 and 2255 in Geekbench, is competitive and indicates that the processor can handle the game logic and physics calculations that Palworld's survival mechanics require.
In the measured FPS data, the CPU's influence is most visible at 1080p Low, where the 231 FPS result is likely near the upper limit of what the GPU can produce without heavy shading work. The fact that 1080p Medium (187 FPS) and 1080p High (144 FPS) are both well above 100 FPS suggests that the Core i7-12700KF is not a bottleneck at these settings, as its 12 cores provide ample parallel processing for the game's world simulation and creature AI. The CPU's 25 MB of shared L3 cache also helps with data locality, reducing latency when accessing frequently used game assets.
The processor's percentile ranking of 85 against all CPUs positions it as a high-end part, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700T (with a delta of -0.1%) and the Intel Core i5-13600T (with a delta of 0.2%). These close margins in average benchmark score (around 35365) indicate that the i7-12700KF is performing at the expected level for its class, and its 125 W TDP is consistent with a desktop part designed for sustained workloads. In Palworld, the CPU's role appears to be providing consistent frame pacing, as the minimum FPS values recorded at Medium settings (159 FPS at 1080p, 105 FPS at 1440p, and 58 FPS at 4K) show no severe stuttering that would indicate CPU thread saturation.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications reveal why 4K Ultra proves challenging. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for high-resolution textures but not unlimited. Its boost clock of 2250 MHz and game clock of 2015 MHz drive 4608 shading units, producing a peak FP32 throughput of 20.74 TFLOPS. The 72 ray accelerators are present, but Palworld's rasterization-heavy rendering likely depends more on the 288 texture mapping units and 128 render output units.
The GPU's performance in Palworld shows a clear ceiling at 4K Ultra, where the 40 FPS average indicates that the 20.74 TFLOPS of compute power is insufficient to maintain fluid motion at maximum quality. However, at 1080p High, the 144 FPS result demonstrates that the RX 6800 XT has substantial headroom when pixel count is reduced. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is notable, as it prevents memory-related bottlenecks even at 4K, which is evidenced by the fact that 4K Medium (68 FPS) is still playable while 4K Ultra (40 FPS) is not.
The GPU's benchmark scores, including a Passmark G3D score of 24980 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 136875, place it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show mixed comparisons: the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile is 1.5% ahead, while the Intel Arc A550M is 2.5% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is 3% behind. This suggests that the RX 6800 XT is a solid mid-to-high-range performer, but in Palworld specifically, the data indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter at 4K, as the CPU is unlikely to constrain performance when the frame rate drops below 90 FPS at any resolution.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this system in Palworld?
A: At 2560x1440, the system delivers 95 FPS on High and 123 FPS on Medium, which provides a smooth experience without the extreme frame rate penalty seen at 3840x2160. The 4K resolution is only viable on Low (84 FPS) or Medium (68 FPS) settings.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Core i7-12700KF's average benchmark score is 35365, which is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305) and 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403). This indicates nearly identical synthetic performance among these processors.
Q: Why is 4K Ultra so much slower than 4K High?
A: The 4K Ultra average of 40 FPS is 13 FPS lower than 4K High (53 FPS), a 25% reduction. The additional rendering work at Ultra settings, combined with the GPU's fixed compute resources, causes a disproportionate performance cost at high pixel counts.
Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM cause any issues?
A: No, the 16 GB GDDR6 memory is sufficient for Palworld at all tested settings, as evidenced by playable frame rates at 4K Medium (68 FPS) and 4K Low (84 FPS). The VRAM capacity is not a bottleneck in this pairing.
Q: What is the minimum FPS at Medium settings?
A: At 1080p Medium, the minimum FPS is 159; at 1440p Medium, it is 105; and at 4K Medium, it is 58. These minimums indicate stable frame pacing without severe drops.
Q: How does this combo rank among tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 1183 out of 3711 tested combinations, placing it in the upper third of all systems. This ranking reflects its solid but not top-tier performance in Palworld.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data suggests that Medium settings offer the best balance of visual fidelity and performance across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium yields 187 FPS, which is only 44 FPS lower than Low but provides a significant visual upgrade over the minimum settings. The minimum FPS of 159 at 1080p Medium ensures that even heavy action scenes remain fluid. Moving to 2560x1440, Medium produces 123 FPS with a minimum of 105, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors and represents a 28 FPS improvement over High settings at the same resolution.
For users prioritizing frame rate over visuals, Low settings are the clear choice, delivering 231 FPS at 1080p and 152 FPS at 1440p. These numbers are sufficient for competitive play or for users with 144 Hz displays who want guaranteed frame rates. However, the jump from Low to Medium at 1440p (from 152 to 123 FPS) is a modest 19% reduction that is likely worth the graphical gains.
At 4K, the recommendations become more conservative. Medium settings (68 FPS) are the highest playable option, as High (53 FPS) and Ultra (40 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for smooth gameplay. Low settings at 4K (84 FPS) are viable if visual quality is secondary, but Medium provides a better compromise. Ultra settings should be avoided at 4K, as the 40 FPS average is below acceptable playability for most users.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers a range of performance depending on settings. Low settings achieve an average of 231 FPS, Medium reaches 187 FPS with minimum and maximum values of 159 and 215 respectively, High produces 144 FPS, and Ultra drops to 109 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 53% reduction in frame rate, reflecting the increasing shader and texture workloads.
At 2560x1440, the averages are 152 FPS on Low, 123 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 105 and maximum of 142), 95 FPS on High, and 72 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings, with approximately a 34% reduction in frame rate for each preset, indicating that the GPU is handling the additional pixel count linearly.
At 3840x2160, the averages drop significantly: 84 FPS on Low, 68 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 58 and maximum of 79), 53 FPS on High, and 40 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results show that only Low and Medium settings maintain acceptable frame rates, while High and Ultra fall below 60 FPS. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium (58) is notable, as it suggests that even with occasional dips, the experience remains relatively stable.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-12700KF and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT combination holds a rank of 1183 out of 3711 tested combos in Palworld, placing it in the 68th percentile of all systems. This rank is respectable but not exceptional, reflecting the GPU's mid-to-high-end positioning rather than top-tier status. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking against all processors suggests that the processor is not the limiting factor, while the GPU's identical 85th percentile ranking indicates that the graphics card is also well above average.
The combo's performance is characterized by strong 1080p and 1440p results, with the system comfortably exceeding 100 FPS at High settings in both resolutions. However, the 4K Ultra result of 40 FPS pulls the overall ranking down, as many higher-ranked combos likely maintain playable frame rates at maximum settings. The rank of 1183 out of 3711 means that approximately 32% of tested configurations outperform this system, which is consistent with the RX 6800 XT's position relative to newer or more powerful GPUs. This system is best suited for 1440p gaming, where it excels, and can handle 4K only with reduced settings.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700KF
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 84.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 68.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 53.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 40.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 152.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 123.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 95.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 72.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 231.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 187.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 144.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 109.0 |
Palworld with ii7-12700KF + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 6800 XT + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700KF + RX 6800 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.