Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 114 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 52 | 68 | 83 |
| 1440p QHD | 73 | 96 | 123 | 155 |
| 1080p Full HD | 111 | 146 | 187 | 229 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld’s measured performance with the Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT shows a clear, predictable scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 228.8 FPS on Low, 187.2 FPS on Medium, 146.2 FPS on High, and 110.6 FPS on Ultra. Dropping to 2560x1440, those numbers fall to 155.1, 122.8, 96.4, and 73.3 FPS respectively. At 3840x2160, the frame rates decline further to 82.9 FPS on Low, 67.9 FPS on Medium, 51.9 FPS on High, and 41.9 FPS on Ultra. The pattern is consistent: each step up in resolution costs roughly 30-40% of the previous frame rate, while raising settings from Low to Ultra at any given resolution reduces FPS by about half or more.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial but not uniform across settings. At Low settings, the transition from 1920x1080 (228.8 FPS) to 3840x2160 (82.9 FPS) represents a 63.8% reduction in performance. At Ultra settings, the same resolution change sees FPS fall from 110.6 to 41.9, a 62.1% drop. This relatively consistent percentage decline suggests the limiting component remains the same across the resolution range—the GPU is the primary bottleneck at all tested resolutions. If the CPU were the constraint, the 1080p results would show less variation between settings, since lower resolutions place more stress on the processor. Instead, the data shows that even at 1080p Ultra (110.6 FPS), the GPU is still stretched, as evidenced by the fact that lowering to 1080p Low (228.8 FPS) more than doubles the output.
The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly telling. At High settings, 2560x1440 produces 96.4 FPS while 3840x2160 yields 51.9 FPS—a 46.2% reduction. At Medium settings, the drop is from 122.8 to 67.9 FPS, a 44.7% decrease. This proportionality indicates that the Radeon RX 6800 XT is working harder at 4K, and the game’s visual complexity is the primary driver of performance loss. The i7-12700K, with its 12 cores and 20 threads, provides sufficient headroom to feed the GPU at these resolutions, as evidenced by the fact that the frame rate scales almost perfectly with pixel count rather than showing CPU-induced plateaus.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is the decisive component in this pairing. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for Palworld’s open-world environments at 4K. The GPU’s boost clock of 2250 MHz and game clock of 2015 MHz (base 1825 MHz) allow it to push high frame rates at lower resolutions, but the architecture—RDNA 2.0 on a 7 nm process—shows its limits when pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K. The 4608 shading units and 128 ROPs are capable, yet the measured data demonstrates that Ultra settings at 4K (41.9 FPS) are barely playable, while Low at 4K (82.9 FPS) is comfortable.
The GPU’s role becomes clearer when examining the delta between settings at each resolution. At 1080p, the gap between Low (228.8 FPS) and Ultra (110.6 FPS) is 118.2 FPS. At 1440p, that gap narrows to 81.8 FPS (155.1 vs 73.3). At 4K, it shrinks further to 41.0 FPS (82.9 vs 41.9). This shrinking delta indicates that at higher resolutions, the GPU is so saturated that increasing settings has a proportionally smaller absolute impact, because the base performance is already constrained by pixel throughput. The Radeon RX 6800 XT’s 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 648.0 GTexel/s texture rate are being fully utilized at 4K Ultra, where the 41.9 FPS result reflects the sheer workload.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ranks 584th out of 1718 tested combos for Palworld. This places it in the upper third of all configurations, though not at the top tier. Given that the GPU alone sits at the 87th percentile among all GPUs and the CPU at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, the combo rank of 584/1718 suggests that Palworld’s specific engine characteristics do not favor this pairing as strongly as their individual benchmark scores might imply. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, which scores 2.6% higher in aggregate benchmarks, and the Intel Arc A550M at 0.5% higher. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (-0.3% delta) and Intel Core i7-13700T (0.6% delta), are closely matched in synthetic tests.
The rank position indicates that while this combo is strong, there are 583 configurations that produce higher average frame rates in Palworld. The gap between the combo’s 1080p Ultra result (110.6 FPS) and its 4K Ultra result (41.9 FPS) shows that the system is more suited to 1440p gaming, where it achieves 73.3 FPS on Ultra and 96.4 FPS on High. For players targeting 60 FPS, the data suggests that 1440p High is the sweet spot, as 4K requires dropping to Low settings (82.9 FPS) or accepting sub-60 FPS at Medium (67.9 FPS) and below.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces its highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings yield 228.8 FPS, which is 22.2% higher than Medium’s 187.2 FPS and 56.5% higher than High’s 146.2 FPS. Ultra at 1080p drops to 110.6 FPS, which is still above the 100 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The progression from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 51.7% reduction in performance, indicating that Palworld’s visual settings have a significant impact on GPU load even at lower resolutions.
At 2560x1440, the results are more balanced for modern displays. Low produces 155.1 FPS, Medium 122.8 FPS, High 96.4 FPS, and Ultra 73.3 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 52.7%, nearly identical to the 1080p reduction. This consistency suggests that the GPU is handling the increased resolution without introducing a CPU bottleneck—the i7-12700K’s 25 MB of shared L3 cache and 5.00 GHz boost clock are sufficient to keep up with the GPU’s output.
At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more constrained. Low yields 82.9 FPS, Medium 67.9 FPS, High 51.9 FPS, and Ultra 41.9 FPS. The Ultra result is below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider minimum for action games, while High is just below it. Medium is playable at 67.9 FPS, but the gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 49.5%, slightly smaller than at lower resolutions, reinforcing that the GPU is the limiting factor here.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60+ FPS?
A: At 2560x1440, all settings except Ultra (73.3 FPS) exceed 60 FPS, with High at 96.4 FPS, Medium at 122.8 FPS, and Low at 155.1 FPS. At 3840x2160, only Low (82.9 FPS) and Medium (67.9 FPS) clear 60 FPS.
Q: How does the i7-12700K compare to its nearest rivals in CPU benchmarks?
A: The i7-12700K has an average benchmark score of 35684, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35802) and 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i7-13700T (35468). Its 89th percentile ranking indicates it outperforms most CPUs.
Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and how does it affect 4K performance?
A: The Radeon RX 6800 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. At 4K, this bandwidth is sufficient for High settings (51.9 FPS) but not for Ultra (41.9 FPS), where the 128 ROPs and 20.74 TFLOPS compute become the limiting factors.
Q: Does this combo perform better at 1080p or 1440p relative to its rank?
A: The combo rank of 584/1718 is based on overall performance. The measured data shows that 1080p Ultra (110.6 FPS) and 1440p High (96.4 FPS) both provide excellent frame rates, but 1440p offers a better balance of visual quality and performance given the 4K results are below 60 FPS on High.
Q: How does the GPU’s percentile ranking translate to Palworld performance?
A: The GPU is at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, yet the combo ranks 584th out of 1718 in Palworld. This suggests the game is more GPU-intensive than the average benchmark, as evidenced by the 41.9 FPS at 4K Ultra despite the GPU’s strong overall standing.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at each resolution?
A: At 1080p, the difference is 118.2 FPS (228.8 vs 110.6). At 1440p, it is 81.8 FPS (155.1 vs 73.3). At 4K, it is 41.0 FPS (82.9 vs 41.9). The narrowing gap indicates the GPU becomes the bottleneck as resolution increases.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700K provides a strong foundation for this pairing, but its role is secondary to the GPU in Palworld. With 12 cores (20 threads) based on Alder Lake architecture, the CPU has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves 29241 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 4128 in single-core, placing it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. Its 3DMark scores range from 1043 (single-thread) to 9979 (max threads), showing strong scaling across thread counts.
In Palworld, the CPU’s role is evident in the 1080p results, where frame rates exceed 200 FPS at Low settings. The fact that the combo reaches 228.8 FPS at 1080p Low indicates the i7-12700K can feed the GPU efficiently at high frame rates. However, the 4K results, which are all below 83 FPS, suggest the CPU is not the limiting factor at higher resolutions—the GPU’s pixel throughput is. The CPU’s 25 MB L3 cache and 5.00 GHz boost clock provide enough single-thread performance for Palworld’s game logic, while the 12 cores handle background tasks without creating a bottleneck. The measured data shows that the CPU’s impact diminishes as resolution increases, with the GPU taking over as the primary constraint. This is typical for a survival game where world simulation is spread across threads, but visual rendering dominates at higher pixel counts. The i7-12700K’s 125 W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 platform support dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory, which offers flexibility, but the game’s performance is dictated by the RX 6800 XT’s capabilities rather than memory bandwidth in this configuration.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700K
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 82.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 67.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 51.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 41.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 155.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 122.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 96.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 73.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 228.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 187.2 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 146.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 110.6 |
Palworld with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 6800 XT + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700K + RX 6800 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.