Palworld

Palworld

AVERAGE FPS
72
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 72 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 25 33 43 54
1440p QHD 46 60 78 97
1080p Full HD 69 91 119 147

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 54
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 High 33
3840x2160 Ultra 25
2560x1440 Low 97
2560x1440 Medium 78
2560x1440 High 60
2560x1440 Ultra 46
1920x1080 Low 147
1920x1080 Medium 119
1920x1080 High 91
1920x1080 Ultra 69

Palworld with AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis

Palworld places the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and Intel Arc B580 combination in a demanding survival sandbox where frame rates are heavily dictated by resolution and quality settings. The measured data reveals a configuration that is capable of strong 1080p performance but becomes progressively more strained as pixel count rises, with the GPU emerging as the primary bottleneck in higher-resolution scenarios.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 clearly illustrates how the workload shifts. At High settings, average FPS drops from 91 at 1080p to 60 at 1440p, a steep 34% reduction, and then falls further to 33 at 4K, representing a 64% decline from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern indicates that the Intel Arc B580 is being pushed to its limits as resolution increases, with the gap between 1440p and 4K being particularly punishing.

The Low settings row tells a similar story but with higher absolute numbers. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 147 FPS average, which drops to 97 at 1440p (a 34% reduction, mirroring the High settings percentage) and then to 54 at 4K (a 63% drop from 1080p). The consistency of these percentage drops across settings levels suggests that the resolution scaling penalty is primarily a GPU-bound phenomenon rather than being influenced by CPU limitations or specific quality toggles.

Medium settings show the most complete data with min/max FPS figures. At 1080p Medium, the average is 119 FPS with a minimum of 101 and maximum of 137. Moving to 1440p Medium drops the average to 78 (a 34% decrease) with min/max of 67/90. At 4K Medium, the average falls to 43 with min/max of 37/50, representing a 64% reduction from the 1080p Medium result. The consistent 34-36% penalty for stepping from 1080p to 1440p and the additional 45-46% penalty for stepping from 1440p to 4K confirms that this GPU hits a performance wall as fill rate demands escalate.

Ultra settings provide the most dramatic illustration of resolution impact. At 1080p Ultra, the system manages 69 FPS average, which drops to 46 at 1440p (a 33% reduction) and then to 25 at 4K (a 64% reduction from 1080p). The 4K Ultra result of 25 FPS is below playable thresholds for most users, while the 1440p Ultra figure of 46 FPS sits at the edge of smooth gameplay. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this combo is only viable at Low or Medium settings, and even then, the 54 FPS Low and 43 FPS Medium averages are marginal for fast-paced action.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580's specifications directly explain the observed scaling behavior. With 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivering 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, the GPU has sufficient memory capacity for Palworld's asset streaming but may struggle with bandwidth-intensive scenarios at higher resolutions. The base and boost clocks are both 2670 MHz, indicating a fixed operating point rather than dynamic boosting, which means the GPU's compute throughput is capped at 13.67 TFLOPS FP32.

The 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs provide the raw processing power, but the pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s become limiting factors at 4K resolution. The 20 ray tracing cores are present but Palworld's primary rendering load falls on traditional rasterization, where the B580's performance characteristics are moderate. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs and average benchmark score of 23021 place it as a mid-range performer, which aligns with the observed frame rates.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the B580's average benchmark score of 23021 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22895 (0.6% higher) and the RTX 3080 at 23172 (0.7% lower). This suggests the B580 delivers performance roughly comparable to older high-end NVIDIA cards, but those GPUs would likely scale differently at 4K due to their different memory configurations. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061 (0.2% higher), showing that raw compute benchmarks may not translate directly to Palworld's specific engine demands.

The 5 nm process node and 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die indicate modern manufacturing efficiency, but the 190 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU requirement show this is not a power-sipping component. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface may also limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios, though Palworld's asset streaming appears to fit within the available bandwidth based on the min FPS figures not collapsing at any resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations, this pairing ranks 2211 out of 2944 total combos for Palworld. This places it in the 25th percentile of all tested combinations, meaning roughly 75% of CPU-GPU pairings achieve better frame rates in this game. The rank reflects that while the Ryzen 7 9850X3D is a top-tier CPU (92nd percentile among all CPUs), the Arc B580's mid-range GPU performance pulls the overall combination down significantly.

The CPU's strong synthetic benchmarks — Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22807 and single-core of 2228, plus a Passmark multithread score of 41318 — suggest that the processor is not the limiting factor in Palworld. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15748 and DirectX 12 score of 76 indicate modest graphics capability relative to the CPU's compute strength. This mismatch creates a system where the CPU is underutilized in most Palworld scenarios, particularly at 4K where the GPU is clearly the bottleneck.

The combo rank of 2211 out of 2944 implies that users seeking higher Palworld performance should prioritize GPU upgrades over CPU changes, as the 9850X3D is unlikely to be the constraining component. The deltaPct values for the CPU's nearest rivals (all within 0.7% of its average score) confirm that the processor's performance is consistent with other high-end options, so swapping CPUs would yield minimal gains in this game.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combination in Palworld?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 provides the highest frame rates across all settings, with average FPS ranging from 147 at Low to 69 at Ultra. At 2560x1440, averages range from 97 at Low to 46 at Ultra, while 3840x2160 only offers playable averages at Low (54 FPS) and Medium (43 FPS).

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High settings in terms of performance hit?

A: At 1080p, Ultra averages 69 FPS versus High's 91 FPS, a 24% reduction. At 1440p, Ultra averages 46 FPS versus 60 FPS for High, a 23% reduction. At 4K, Ultra drops to 25 FPS from High's 33 FPS, a 24% reduction. The penalty is consistent across resolutions.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D bottlenecking the Intel Arc B580 in this game?

A: No, the data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. At 4K High, the combo achieves only 33 FPS, while the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2228) suggests it could handle higher frame rates if the GPU were faster. The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile.

Q: What FPS can I expect with Medium settings at 1440p?

A: The measured data shows a 78 FPS average with a minimum of 67 FPS and maximum of 90 FPS. This provides a playable experience with decent headroom above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does this combo compare to using a different GPU with the same CPU?

A: The combo rank of 2211 out of 2944 suggests that many other GPUs paired with this CPU would perform better. The GPU's average benchmark score of 23021 is comparable to the RTX 2080 (22895) and RTX 3080 (23172), indicating that pairing with a higher-tier GPU would likely improve the rank significantly.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this setup?

A: Only at Low settings (54 FPS average) or Medium settings (43 FPS average). High settings at 4K produce 33 FPS, and Ultra produces 25 FPS, both below comfortable playable thresholds.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 provides the most compelling experience. The 119 FPS average with a minimum of 101 FPS ensures smooth gameplay without frame rate drops below 100 FPS, which is ideal for a survival game where quick reactions matter. The jump from Medium to High at 1080p costs 28 FPS (from 119 to 91), while the jump from Low to Medium gains 28 FPS (from 147 to 119), suggesting Medium offers the most efficient quality-to-performance trade-off.

At 2560x1440, Medium settings again provide the best experience with a 78 FPS average and 67 FPS minimum. This remains above the 60 FPS standard for playability while offering better visual fidelity than Low's 97 FPS. The High preset at 1440p drops to 60 FPS average, which is playable but leaves no headroom for demanding scenes. Ultra at 1440p (46 FPS) and 4K Medium (43 FPS) are borderline, while 4K Low (54 FPS) is playable but visually compromised.

For users prioritizing frame rate above all, 1080p Low at 147 FPS average provides the smoothest experience, potentially benefiting high-refresh-rate displays. The measured maximum of 137 FPS at 1080p Medium (with 101 FPS minimum) suggests that Medium is the highest setting that consistently stays above 100 FPS at this resolution. At 4K, only Low settings achieve an average above 50 FPS, making it the only viable preset for competitive play at that resolution.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D brings substantial processing power to this combination, with 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge). The base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz provide strong single-thread performance, which is crucial for Palworld's game logic and physics calculations. The 96 MB of shared L3 cache (with 1 MB L2 per core) helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, potentially improving frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios.

Synthetic benchmarks confirm the CPU's capability: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22807 and single-core score of 2228 place it well above average, while the Passmark single-thread score of 4704 and multithread score of 41318 demonstrate balanced performance. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors, yet the combo still ranks only 2211 out of 2944 in Palworld, reinforcing that the GPU is the primary constraint.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5 may be sufficient for Palworld's streaming needs, but the 4 nm process node and 120 W TDP indicate this is a power-efficient but not power-limited design. The nearest rival comparisons show the 9850X3D within 0.7% of the Intel Core i9-14900 (58115 vs 58386 average score) and 0.2% of the Intel Xeon w5-2545, confirming that CPU choice among top-tier options would have minimal impact on Palworld performance. The data suggests that in this game, the CPU's role is to avoid becoming a bottleneck, which it achieves comfortably, rather than to actively boost frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the full range of settings was tested. Low settings produce the highest average at 147 FPS, followed by Medium at 119 FPS (with a minimum of 101 and maximum of 137), High at 91 FPS, and Ultra at 69 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 53% reduction in average frame rate, demonstrating that Palworld's Ultra preset imposes a significant rendering load even at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, the pattern continues with Low at 97 FPS, Medium at 78 FPS (minimum 67, maximum 90), High at 60 FPS, and Ultra at 46 FPS. The step from High to Ultra at 1440p costs 14 FPS (23%), while the step from Low to Medium costs 19 FPS (20%), indicating that the Medium preset offers the smallest performance penalty for a visual upgrade.

At 3840x2160, Low settings achieve 54 FPS, Medium drops to 43 FPS (minimum 37, maximum 50), High falls to 33 FPS, and Ultra reaches only 25 FPS. The 4K results show that the gap between Low and Medium is 11 FPS (20%), while Medium to High is 10 FPS (23%), and High to Ultra is 8 FPS (24%). The minimum FPS of 37 at 4K Medium indicates that even this moderate setting can experience noticeable stutters in demanding scenes.

Across all resolutions, the Medium settings row is the only one with complete min/max data, showing that frame time consistency degrades as resolution increases. At 1080p Medium, the spread between min and max is 36 FPS (101 to 137), at 1440p Medium it is 23 FPS (67 to 90), and at 4K Medium it is 13 FPS (37 to 50). This narrowing range at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU becomes consistently saturated, reducing both peak and trough performance.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B580

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2670 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Intel Arc B580 in Palworld

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 54.0
3840x2160 Medium 43.0
3840x2160 High 33.0
3840x2160 Ultra 25.0
2560x1440 Low 97.0
2560x1440 Medium 78.0
2560x1440 High 60.0
2560x1440 Ultra 46.0
1920x1080 Low 147.0
1920x1080 Medium 119.0
1920x1080 High 91.0
1920x1080 Ultra 69.0

Palworld with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Other GPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Palworld with Arc B580 + Other CPUs

See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Arc B580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.