Overpower

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a solid, mid-tier performance profile in Overpower. The data shows this combination ranks 1610th out of 2980 tested combos, placing it in the 46th percentile of all systems evaluated for this title. This is not a top-tier setup, but it is far from a weak one, indicating a balanced pairing that can handle the game's demands at most settings, though with clear limitations at the highest visual fidelity.

The ranking reflects a system that sits squarely in the middle of the pack. With an average benchmark score of 44466 for the CPU and 40377 for the GPU, both components are performing near their expected levels, and the game's results align with this. The combo's position suggests that while it won't break any records, it provides a dependable and consistent experience, making it a reasonable baseline for understanding the performance of this specific hardware pairing in a demanding action title.

How This Combo Ranks

The overall ranking of 1610 out of 2980 combos in Overpower places this system in the 46th percentile. This is a clear indicator that the pairing is neither exceptionally strong nor underpowered for this game. The data suggests that a significant portion of the tested systems—about 54%—perform better, but a similarly large portion perform worse. This middle-of-the-road position is a direct result of the individual component scores, which are themselves closely clustered with their nearest rivals.

The CPU, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, holds an 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs, which is quite strong. Its average benchmark score of 44466 is nearly identical to its closest competitor, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, which scores 44573, a negligible 0.2% difference. It is also virtually tied with the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342, 0.3% faster) and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309, 0.4% faster). This indicates that the processor is a high-performing part that is competitive with other top-tier mobile and desktop chips, and its performance is not a bottleneck in this configuration.

The GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, holds an 82nd percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 40377 is also closely matched with its immediate rivals. It is 0.1% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40318), 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40063), and 1.2% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870). While the GPU is a capable part, its relative standing is lower than the CPU's, suggesting that the graphics card is the primary factor limiting the combo's overall rank in Overpower. The game's performance is heavily dictated by the GPU, and while the CPU is strong, the GPU's mid-pack standing pulls the entire system's ranking down from what the CPU alone might suggest.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the dominant component in determining the frame rates for this combo. The benchmark results for Overpower scale directly with the GPU's workload, which is dictated by resolution and settings. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus provides a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient for the game at the tested settings, as frame times remain stable, particularly at 1440p and 1080p.

The GPU's clock speeds are 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost, which are the speeds that define its processing throughput. The data shows that the GPU's performance is the deciding factor in the FPS differences between settings. For instance, at 4K, moving from Low to High settings drops the average frame rate from 114 FPS to 66 FPS, a 42% reduction that is almost entirely attributable to the increased graphical load on the GPU. Similarly, the jump from High to Ultra at 4K results in a further 17% drop to 55 FPS. These are clear signs of a GPU-bound scenario where the renderer's capabilities are being taxed to their limit.

The GPU's raw compute power, rated at 30.87 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, is the engine that processes the complex shaders and effects in Overpower. The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores are also part of this processing pipeline, though their specific impact on this game's measured FPS is not isolated in the data. What is clear is that the RTX 5070 provides a strong, predictable performance curve. The data indicates it is more than capable of delivering high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p, but it begins to struggle to maintain a rock-solid 60 FPS at 4K with the highest preset.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Overpower?*

A: The combo ranks 1610th out of 2980 tested combinations, placing it in the 46th percentile of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H has an average benchmark score of 44466, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573) and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342).

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate is 151 FPS, which was achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, at 4K with Medium settings, the system averages 71 FPS with a minimum of 61 FPS. At High settings, it averages 66 FPS, but at Ultra settings, the average drops to 55 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to the AMD Radeon Pro 580?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40377, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 580's score of 40318.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average frame rate drops from 135 FPS on Low settings to 65 FPS on Ultra settings, a difference of 70 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how the combo performs across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is clearly CPU-bound at lower settings, as the GPU has ample headroom. The average frame rates are 151 FPS on Low, 94 FPS on Medium (with a min of 80 and max of 108), 87 FPS on High, and 73 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 78 FPS drop, which is a significant 52% reduction in performance, but the absolute numbers remain highly playable.

Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's load increases, and the frame rates become more balanced. The average FPS is 135 on Low, 84 on Medium (min 71, max 97), 78 on High, and 65 on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings is noticeable but not drastic. For example, at High settings, the frame rate falls from 87 FPS to 78 FPS, a 10% reduction, which indicates the system is still capable of delivering a smooth experience at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system becomes heavily GPU-bound, and the performance impact is substantial. The average FPS is 114 on Low, 71 on Medium (min 61, max 82), 66 on High, and 55 on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is 59 FPS, and the system struggles to maintain a consistent 60 FPS at the highest settings. The minimum FPS of 61 on Medium suggests that even this setting is near the edge of the system's comfort zone at 4K. The data shows a clear trend: the higher the resolution and settings, the more the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the more the frame rate drops.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the nature of the bottleneck in this system. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 87 at 1080p to 78 at 1440p, a 10% decrease, and then to 66 at 4K, a further 15% decrease from 1440p. The total drop from 1080p to 4K is 24%. This pattern indicates that while the GPU is taking on more work, it is scaling reasonably well until the 4K resolution, where the pixel count and shading demands begin to overwhelm it.

The scaling is more dramatic at Low settings. Here, the frame rate drops from 151 at 1080p to 135 at 1440p, an 11% decrease, and then to 114 at 4K, a 16% decrease from 1440p. The total drop is 24.5%. This larger percentage drop at lower settings suggests that the CPU is less of a factor, and the GPU's raw fill rate and compute power are being directly tested. At 1080p Low, the CPU can likely feed the GPU more frames that it can process, but as resolution increases, the GPU's workload grows faster than its ability to compensate.

The most telling data is at Ultra settings, where the frame rate goes from 73 at 1080p to 65 at 1440p (an 11% drop) and then to 55 at 4K (a 15% drop from 1440p). The total drop is 24.7%. The fact that the percentage drop is similar across all settings suggests that the GPU is the primary limiter across the board, but the absolute numbers at 4K Ultra (55 FPS) show that the GPU is running out of steam. The data indicates that the RTX 5070 is a strong 1440p GPU, but it is not powerful enough for a consistently smooth 4K experience at the highest presets.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience depends heavily on the user's resolution and performance targets. For 1920x1080, all settings are playable, but Ultra provides the most visually rich experience with an average of 73 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold and should be smooth for most players. If a higher refresh rate is desired, High at 87 FPS or Medium at 94 FPS are excellent choices that sacrifice minimal visual quality for a significant performance boost. Low at 151 FPS is recommended only for competitive play where maximum frame rate is paramount.

At 2560x1440, the data suggests that High settings at 78 FPS is the sweet spot. It offers a good balance between visual fidelity and performance, ensuring a smooth and responsive experience. Medium at 84 FPS is also a strong option for those who prefer a higher frame rate. Ultra at 65 FPS is playable, but the lower minimum FPS could lead to occasional stutters in demanding scenes. Low at 135 FPS is overkill for the visual quality, but it is there for those who need it.

For 3840x2160, the data indicates that Medium settings at 71 FPS is the most balanced choice. It is the only setting at 4K that consistently maintains an average above 60 FPS, and the minimum of 61 FPS suggests it is stable. High at 66 FPS is also an option, but it is closer to the edge. Ultra at 55 FPS is not recommended for a consistent experience, as it falls below the 60 FPS target and may feel less fluid. Low at 114 FPS is an option for those who value frame rate above all else, but it severely compromises the visual presentation.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H plays a supporting but crucial role in this combo's performance. With 16 cores and 16 threads, it is a highly capable processor for gaming workloads. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz is particularly important for single-threaded performance, which is often the primary driver in game logic and physics. The CPU's average benchmark score of 44466 places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, is only 0.2% faster. This indicates that the CPU is not a performance bottleneck in Overpower.

The data shows that the CPU can easily keep up with the GPU at lower resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 151 FPS, a number that is likely limited by the GPU's processing capability rather than the CPU. As resolution increases, the CPU's workload remains relatively constant, while the GPU's workload increases exponentially. This is why the frame rate drops more significantly at 4K, confirming that the GPU is the primary limiting factor.

The CPU's strong single-core performance, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2200.5, ensures that game logic is processed quickly and efficiently. This allows the GPU to receive a steady stream of draw calls and commands. The L3 cache of 18 MB is also beneficial for gaming, as it can store frequently accessed data, reducing latency. In this pairing, the CPU is a robust partner that provides a stable foundation for the GPU to deliver its performance, and it is not the reason for any performance shortfalls seen at higher resolutions or settings.