Overpower
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 184 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 114 | 138 | 148 | 234 |
| 1440p QHD | 135 | 163 | 174 | 271 |
| 1080p Full HD | 151 | 181 | 194 | 301 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with Intel Core Ultra X9 388H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis
# Overpower with Intel Core Ultra X9 388H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 delivers a playable but not exceptional experience in Overpower, with benchmark results showing a clear GPU-bound pattern across all tested resolutions. The combo ranks 2361 out of 2980 tested configurations, placing it in the lower-mid tier of the database, though the measured frame rates suggest the hardware can handle the game at medium settings with acceptable smoothness. The data reveals that this pairing is consistently limited by the graphics card rather than the processor, with the RTX 5050's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface proving to be the primary constraint at higher resolutions and quality presets.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a predictable decline as resolution increases, but the magnitude of that decline reveals important information about the system's bottleneck. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 113 FPS average, which drops to 100 FPS at 2560x1440 and further to 85 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents an 11.5% performance loss from 1080p to 1440p and a 15% loss from 1440p to 4K at Low settings. The relatively modest scaling between 1440p and 4K suggests the GPU is not entirely saturated at lower quality presets, as the pixel count increase of 2.25x from 1440p to 4K would normally produce a larger FPS drop if the GPU were the sole limiting factor.
However, the picture changes dramatically at higher quality settings. At Medium settings, the combo delivers 70 FPS at 1080p, 63 FPS at 1440p, and 53 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 10%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 15.9%. At High settings, the pattern continues with 65 FPS at 1080p, 58 FPS at 1440p, and 50 FPS at 4K, representing a 10.8% loss from 1080p to 1440p and a 13.8% loss from 1440p to 4K. The Ultra preset shows the steepest scaling curve: 54 FPS at 1080p, 48 FPS at 1440p, and 41 FPS at 4K, with declines of 11.1% and 14.6% respectively.
This scaling behavior indicates that the RTX 5050 becomes the limiting component as settings increase. The consistent 10-15% FPS reduction when moving between resolutions at Medium, High, and Ultra presets suggests that the GPU's compute resources and memory bandwidth are being progressively saturated. At Low settings, the smaller-than-expected penalty at 4K implies that the CPU can still feed the GPU adequately, but the graphics card's raw throughput caps the frame rate. The data clearly shows that Overpower becomes GPU-bound at 1440p and above for this combo, with the RTX 5050's 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 320.0 GB/s memory bandwidth being the decisive factors.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, featuring 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2317 MHz and a boost clock of 2572 MHz, with memory running at 2500 MHz for an effective 20 Gbps. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory pool on a 128-bit bus delivers 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is the most likely constraint in Overpower's higher quality presets given the game's action-oriented rendering demands.
The RTX 5050's shading resources include 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. With 20 ray tracing cores and 80 tensor cores, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which Overpower leverages for modern rendering features. The measured performance shows that at 1080p Medium, the combo achieves 70 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS, indicating that the GPU can maintain smooth gameplay when not pushed to extreme settings. The 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS average, however, demonstrates that the 8 GB VRAM capacity and 128-bit memory interface become severe bottlenecks at high resolution with maximum quality.
The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, which scores 21153 and is 0.6% faster, while the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713 and is 1.6% slower. The RTX 5050 also trails the AMD Radeon HD 8970M by 1% (21237 score) and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile by 1.6% (21379 score). This grouping suggests the GPU is competitive with older mid-range desktop parts but not with modern high-end offerings.
The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334 provide additional context for the gaming results. The Passmark G3D score of 17326 with a DirectX 12 score of 66 indicates that the GPU handles modern APIs reasonably well but is not optimized for the heaviest workloads. The combination of 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth means that Overpower's texture-heavy scenes at Ultra settings will likely cause the GPU to spill into system memory, explaining the significant FPS drops at 4K Ultra compared to 1080p Low.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Overpower at 4K with playable frame rates?
A: Yes, at Medium settings the combo achieves 53 FPS average at 3840x2160 with a minimum of 45 FPS, which is playable for most action games. At High settings, the average drops to 50 FPS, and at Ultra it falls to 41 FPS, making those presets less suitable for smooth 4K gameplay.
Q: What is the best resolution for this hardware in Overpower?
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 with Medium settings provides 63 FPS average with a minimum of 53 FPS, offering a good balance between visual quality and smoothness. At 1920x1080 Medium, the combo achieves 70 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS, which provides the most consistent experience.
Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?
A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21035, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153) and 1% lower than the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237). It is 1.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713) and 1.6% slower than the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379).
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H a bottleneck for the RTX 5050 in Overpower?
A: No, the CPU data suggests it is not the limiting factor. The Core Ultra X9 388H has 16 cores and 16 threads with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18911 places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The FPS scaling pattern indicates the GPU is the primary constraint.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 113 FPS average, while the Ultra preset delivers 54 FPS average. This represents a 59 FPS difference, or approximately 52.2% lower performance at Ultra compared to Low, demonstrating the significant GPU workload increase at maximum quality.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Overpower?
A: The combo ranks 2361 out of 2980 tested combinations, placing it in the 20.8th percentile of all tested hardware pairs. This ranking is notably lower than the individual component percentiles, indicating that the pairing may not be optimal for this specific game.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 113 FPS average on Low settings, which is the highest measured frame rate across all configurations. The Medium preset at 1080p yields 70 FPS average with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS, providing a smooth experience with some headroom. High settings at 1080p produce 65 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 54 FPS average. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 59 FPS reduction, representing a 52.2% performance penalty for maximum quality.
Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 100 FPS average, which is 13 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium at 1440p delivers 63 FPS average with a minimum of 53 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS, maintaining playability. High settings at 1440p produce 58 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 48 FPS average. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 52 FPS, or exactly 52% lower performance at maximum quality.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset delivers 85 FPS average, which is the only 4K configuration exceeding 60 FPS. Medium at 4K achieves 53 FPS average with a minimum of 45 FPS and a maximum of 61 FPS, making it the highest quality preset that remains consistently playable. High settings at 4K produce 50 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 41 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 44 FPS, representing a 51.8% performance reduction.
The minimum FPS data, available only for Medium settings, shows that the combo maintains a 60 FPS floor at 1080p, a 53 FPS floor at 1440p, and a 45 FPS floor at 4K. This minimum frame rate data is critical for action games, as it indicates the worst-case performance during intense scenes. The 45 FPS minimum at 4K Medium suggests occasional stuttering may occur, while the 60 FPS minimum at 1080p Medium provides a consistent experience.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 3, built on Intel's 3 nm process with the Panther Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 25 W. The CPU features 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, and it supports LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with 153.6 GB/s of bandwidth.
The CPU's benchmark results place it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44466. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D with an average score of 44573, which is 0.2% faster, while the Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342 and is 0.3% slower. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309 and is 0.4% slower, and the Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44240 and is 0.5% slower.
In Overpower, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU. The FPS scaling pattern shows that even at 1080p Low (113 FPS), the frame rate is not CPU-limited, as the same CPU with a more powerful GPU would likely achieve higher frame rates. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18911 and single-core score of 2200.5 indicate solid processing power, while the Passmark single-thread score of 4280 and multithread score of 36811 confirm the CPU can handle the game's AI and physics calculations without becoming a bottleneck.
The 16-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock provides ample headroom for Overpower's action-oriented gameplay, which typically benefits from high single-thread performance for game logic and moderate multithread performance for background tasks. The CPU's 25 W TDP suggests it is designed for mobile platforms, and its integration with LPDDR5X memory provides sufficient bandwidth for feeding the GPU, though the 153.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared between CPU and GPU workloads.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo is achieved at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, which delivers 70 FPS average with a minimum of 60 FPS. This configuration provides the best balance between visual quality and performance, ensuring that the frame rate never drops below 60 FPS even during demanding scenes. The minimum FPS of 60 at this setting is particularly valuable for action games, as it guarantees smooth gameplay without stuttering.
For users with 1440p monitors, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is the recommended choice, delivering 63 FPS average with a minimum of 53 FPS. While the minimum frame rate falls below 60 FPS, the overall experience remains playable, and the visual improvement over 1080p is significant. The High preset at 1440p (58 FPS average) is also viable but offers less headroom for frame rate drops during intense action sequences.
At 4K, the Medium preset is the only recommended option, providing 53 FPS average with a minimum of 45 FPS. While this falls below the 60 FPS threshold, it remains playable for most users, particularly with adaptive sync displays. The High preset at 4K (50 FPS average) is marginal, and the Ultra preset (41 FPS average) is not recommended due to the significant frame rate drops that could impair gameplay in a fast-paced action title.
The Low preset is not recommended for any resolution despite achieving 113 FPS at 1080p, 100 FPS at 1440p, and 85 FPS at 4K. The visual quality reduction is substantial, and the additional frame rate headroom does not compensate for the loss of graphical fidelity in a modern action game. The Ultra preset is only viable at 1080p (54 FPS average), but the Medium preset's 70 FPS with a 60 FPS minimum provides a better overall experience.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combo ranks 2361 out of 2980 tested configurations in Overpower, placing it in the bottom 20.8% of all tested hardware pairs. This ranking is notably lower than what the individual component percentiles might suggest, as the CPU sits in the 88th percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile. The discrepancy indicates that this specific pairing is not well-suited for Overpower's performance demands.
The GPU's average benchmark score of 21035 and its 66th percentile ranking suggest that the RTX 5050 is a mid-range part that struggles with this game's requirements. The combo's 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS and 1440p Ultra result of 48 FPS highlight the GPU's limitations at higher quality presets. The CPU's strong benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18911 and Passmark multithread score of 36811, do not translate into proportionally higher gaming performance because the GPU is the limiting factor.
The rank of 2361 out of 2980 means that 619 tested combos performed worse, while 2360 performed better. This places the combo in a position where users may need to compromise on resolution or quality settings to achieve acceptable frame rates. The data indicates that the RTX 5050's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory interface are the primary constraints, and pairing the Core Ultra X9 388H with a more powerful GPU would yield significantly better results in Overpower.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra X9 388H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 114.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 138.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 148.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 234.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 135.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 163.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 174.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 271.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 151.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 181.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 194.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 301.0 |
Overpower with iUltra X9 388H + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra X9 388H + RTX 5050
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.