Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
190
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 190 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 118 143 153 242
1440p QHD 139 168 180 280
1080p Full HD 157 187 201 311

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Ultra 118
3840x2160 High 143
3840x2160 Medium 153
3840x2160 Low 242
2560x1440 Ultra 139
2560x1440 High 168
2560x1440 Medium 180
2560x1440 Low 280
1920x1080 Ultra 157
1920x1080 High 187
1920x1080 Medium 201
1920x1080 Low 311

Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a strong, if not top-tier, performance profile in Overpower. The data indicates a clear pattern: the combination is capable of high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p, but demanding 4K Ultra settings will push it below the 60 FPS threshold. The benchmark results show a system that scales predictably with settings, making it a balanced partner for this action title.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a 24-core, 24-thread mobile processor based on the Arrow Lake-HX architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. These specifications place it in the top tier of mobile CPUs, and its benchmark scores confirm this positioning. The data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 20795, which are substantial results for a laptop chip.

In the context of Overpower, an action game, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates. The strong single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2204, is critical for game logic, physics, and draw call processing. The multi-core headroom, however, is less of a bottleneck here. The measured FPS data shows that even at 1080p Low settings, where the GPU is least stressed, the average frame rate is 151 FPS. This indicates that the CPU is not limiting performance at lower resolutions, as it is capable of pushing well beyond that figure.

The processor's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample data throughput for gaming workloads. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ultra 9 275HX holds its own, with its average benchmark score of 67469 being only -0.3% lower than the Intel Xeon w5-3525 and -0.5% lower than the AMD EPYC 4484PX. This places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, confirming that this is a high-end part. For Overpower, the data suggests the CPU is a capable and non-limiting component; the performance ceiling is set by the GPU, not the processor. The CPU's 24 threads ensure that any background tasks or game engine threading won't cause frame hitches, providing a stable foundation for the GPU to operate.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data for Overpower provides a clear hierarchy across settings presets at each resolution. The optimal choice depends on the user's refresh rate and resolution. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 73 FPS, which is playable on a standard 60 Hz monitor but falls short of high-refresh displays. The High preset at 1080p yields 87 FPS, while the Medium preset jumps to 94 FPS. The Low preset produces 151 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play on a 144 Hz or 165 Hz panel.

For a balanced experience at 1080p, the Medium preset is the sweet spot. It offers a 29% improvement over Ultra in average FPS (94 vs 73) while maintaining a minimum FPS of 80, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The High preset is also viable, but the Medium preset provides a better performance margin without a likely significant visual impact in a fast-paced action game.

Moving to 1440p, the pattern intensifies. The Ultra preset averages 65 FPS, which is just on the edge of playability. The High preset at 78 FPS is a more comfortable target for 60 Hz displays, but the Medium preset at 84 FPS is the recommended choice for this resolution. It provides a 29% increase over Ultra (84 vs 65) and a minimum FPS of 71, ensuring a stable experience. The Low preset at 1440p hits 135 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors but sacrifices visual fidelity.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiter. The Ultra preset drops to 55 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and may feel less fluid. The High preset at 66 FPS is the minimum recommended for a smooth experience, but the Medium preset at 71 FPS offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. The data shows that the Medium preset at 4K provides a 29% average FPS advantage over Ultra (71 vs 55) and is the only preset that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS without dropping to Low. Therefore, the Medium preset is the recommended setting for 4K on this hardware.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a significant drop in performance as resolution increases, which is a classic indicator of GPU-bound workloads. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 151 at 1080p to 135 at 1440p, a decline of 10.6%, and then to 114 at 4K, a further 15.6% drop from 1440p. This scaling shows that even at the lowest graphical settings, the resolution increase demands more from the GPU, causing a linear decrease in performance.

For higher settings, the drop is more pronounced. At Medium settings, the average FPS goes from 94 at 1080p to 84 at 1440p (a 10.6% decrease) and then to 71 at 4K (a 15.5% decrease from 1440p). At Ultra settings, the average FPS goes from 73 at 1080p to 65 at 1440p (an 11% decrease) and then to 55 at 4K (a 15.4% decrease from 1440p).

These consistent percentage drops across different settings presets indicate that the system is overwhelmingly GPU-limited. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would not scale so predictably with resolution; it would plateau at a certain frame rate regardless of resolution. The fact that the FPS decreases by roughly 10% from 1080p to 1440p and another 15% from 1440p to 4K at every settings level confirms that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the limiting component. The CPU has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU at all resolutions, but the GPU's rendering workload increases with pixel count, causing the frame rate to drop. The 4K Ultra result of 55 FPS is the clearest evidence of this GPU limitation, as the processor cannot compensate for the increased pixel fill rate demand.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 60 Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset at 1440p is recommended, as it delivers an average FPS of 84 with a minimum of 71 FPS, ensuring a stable experience above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset at 78 FPS is also viable, but Medium provides a better safety margin.

Q: Can this hardware achieve 100+ FPS at 1080p?

A: Yes, the data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the average FPS is 151. However, at higher settings, the frame rate drops below 100 FPS, with Medium at 94 FPS, High at 87 FPS, and Ultra at 73 FPS. To exceed 100 FPS consistently, the user would need to use the Low preset.

Q: How does the CPU benchmark compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has an average benchmark score of 67469, which is -0.3% lower than the Intel Xeon w5-3525 and -0.5% lower than the AMD EPYC 4484PX. It is also -0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX but 0.7% higher than the Intel Xeon 6515P.

Q: What is the performance difference between 4K Ultra and 4K Medium settings?

A: The 4K Ultra preset averages 55 FPS, while the 4K Medium preset averages 71 FPS. This represents a 29% increase in average frame rate when switching from Ultra to Medium, which is significant for achieving a smoother experience.

Q: Is the GPU the main bottleneck in this system?

A: Yes, the resolution scaling data indicates a GPU-bound system. The average FPS drops consistently by about 10-15% when moving from 1080p to 1440p and then to 4K, regardless of the settings preset. This scaling pattern shows that the GPU is the limiting component, as the CPU provides enough performance to avoid being a bottleneck.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark percentile rank?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has a percentile rank of 82 among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 40377, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 580 and 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the primary driver of Overpower's visual performance. It is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz, with a 250 W TDP. These specifications allow it to handle the game's demands at various resolutions, though the data shows its limits at 4K Ultra.

The 12 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for Overpower at the tested settings, as the game does not appear to exceed this limit based on the FPS measurements. The GPU's 6144 shading units and 48 RT cores provide ample compute power for the game's rendering tasks. The 30.87 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a strong indicator of its raw compute capability, which translates to the FPS figures seen in the benchmarks.

The GPU's performance is reinforced by its benchmark scores. It achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 and a Passmark G3D score of 29137. These numbers place it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40377. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5070 is 0.1% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 580 and 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100, but it is -1.2% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300. This positioning shows that while the GPU is not the absolute fastest, it is a capable and well-rounded performer for a mobile platform.

In practical terms for Overpower, the GPU's role is to maintain frame rates. At 1080p, it easily handles the game, pushing 151 FPS at Low settings. At 1440p, it still provides high frame rates, with 84 FPS at Medium. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as seen in the 55 FPS result at Ultra settings. The data suggests that the GPU is well-matched to the CPU, as neither component is drastically holding back the other, but the GPU defines the performance ceiling at higher resolutions and settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at how the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 perform in Overpower across all tested configurations.

1920x1080 (1080p)

  • Low: 151 FPS average. This is the highest frame rate recorded, indicating the GPU is far from being stressed and the CPU is providing ample headroom.
  • Medium: 94 FPS average, with a minimum of 80 FPS and a maximum of 108 FPS. This is a substantial drop from Low, showing the impact of increased graphical effects.
  • High: 87 FPS average. A further decrease from Medium, suggesting more demanding shaders and textures.
  • Ultra: 73 FPS average. This is still playable, but the gap between Medium and Ultra is 21 FPS, which is notable for competitive play.

2560x1440 (1440p)

  • Low: 135 FPS average. A 10.6% drop from the 1080p Low result, showing the resolution's impact on the GPU.
  • Medium: 84 FPS average, with a minimum of 71 FPS and a maximum of 97 FPS. This is the recommended preset for 1440p, as it stays above 60 FPS.
  • High: 78 FPS average. A 7.7% decrease from Medium, which is a smaller relative drop than at 1080p.
  • Ultra: 65 FPS average. This is just above the 60 FPS target, but the minimum FPS is not listed, indicating potential for dips.

3840x2160 (4K)

  • Low: 114 FPS average. This shows that even at Low settings, 4K is more demanding, with a 15.6% drop from the 1440p Low result.
  • Medium: 71 FPS average, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS. This is the only 4K preset that maintains an average above 60 FPS.
  • High: 66 FPS average. This is barely above the 60 FPS threshold, making it a marginal choice for 4K.
  • Ultra: 55 FPS average. This is below 60 FPS, indicating a less smooth experience. The data shows that the Ultra preset at 4K is not recommended for this hardware, as it falls below the playable threshold.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Cores / Threads 24 / 24
Base Clock 2700 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 55W
Socket Intel BGA 2114
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

VRAM 12 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2512 MHz MHz
TDP 250 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Ultra 118.0
3840x2160 High 143.0
3840x2160 Medium 153.0
3840x2160 Low 242.0
2560x1440 Ultra 139.0
2560x1440 High 168.0
2560x1440 Medium 180.0
2560x1440 Low 280.0
1920x1080 Ultra 157.0
1920x1080 High 187.0
1920x1080 Medium 201.0
1920x1080 Low 311.0

Overpower with iUltra 9 275HX + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with RTX 5070 + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 9 275HX + RTX 5070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.