Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
177
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 177 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 109 131 142 227
1440p QHD 128 155 167 267
1080p Full HD 144 173 187 299

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 227
3840x2160 Medium 142
3840x2160 High 131
3840x2160 Ultra 109
2560x1440 Low 267
2560x1440 Medium 167
2560x1440 High 155
2560x1440 Ultra 128
1920x1080 Low 299
1920x1080 Medium 187
1920x1080 High 173
1920x1080 Ultra 144

Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination delivers a top-tier experience in Overpower, an action title that clearly rewards both high-end CPU and GPU resources. This pairing sits in the 61st position out of 2,980 tested combos, placing it firmly in the upper echelon of configurations for this game. The data shows a system that provides exceptional frame rates across all resolutions and settings, though the scaling patterns reveal a nuanced balance between the processor and graphics card depending on the workload.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 61 out of 2,980 tested configurations places it in the top 2% of all pairings evaluated for Overpower. This is a strong result, though not the absolute pinnacle, indicating that while this hardware is exceptionally capable, there are a handful of combinations that edge it out in this specific title. The ranking reflects the combined capability of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the RTX 4090, and the data suggests that both components contribute meaningfully to the overall performance.

Looking at the CPU’s standing, the Core Ultra 7 265 holds a 93rd percentile ranking among all processors, which is a very high placement. Its average benchmark score of 64,640 is nearly identical to that of the AMD EPYC 4464P, which sits just 0.3% ahead, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, which trails by a mere 0.3%. This shows that the 265 is essentially tied with its closest rivals in synthetic workloads. The AMD EPYC 7343 is 0.7% behind, and the AMD EPYC 9124 is 0.7% ahead, meaning the 265 sits in a very tight cluster of high-performing CPUs where differences are within noise margins. For Overpower, this level of CPU performance is more than sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at most settings.

For the GPU, the RTX 4090 holds an 88th percentile ranking among all graphics cards. Its average benchmark score of 60,347 places it right next to the Intel Arc Pro A60, which differs by 0%, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48, which is 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M sits 2.5% ahead, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 2.9% behind. These rivals are professional or workstation-class cards, and the fact that the 4090 is compared to them in aggregate benchmarks underscores its raw compute strength. However, the GPU’s percentile ranking is slightly lower than the CPU’s, which hints that the graphics card, while powerful, might be the more limiting factor in certain Overpower scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions.

The combination of a top-2% CPU and a top-12% GPU results in a combo rank that is very strong but not perfect. The data indicates that there are 2,919 other combinations that rank lower, which means this setup outperforms the vast majority of systems tested for this game. The few combinations that rank higher likely feature even more specialized hardware or configurations that are better tuned for Overpower’s specific engine demands.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is a massive piece of silicon, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC. It packs 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output pipelines, along with 128 ray tracing cores and 512 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2,235 MHz and a boost clock of 2,520 MHz, with memory running at 1,313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective. This configuration delivers a pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 82.58 TFLOPS.

The memory subsystem is a key differentiator. The 4090 comes with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. This is a substantial amount of VRAM for Overpower, an action game that can be demanding on memory capacity at high resolutions and detail levels. With 24 GB available, the card is unlikely to run out of memory even at 4K with Ultra settings, which allows the GPU to focus on rendering frames rather than managing data swaps. The high bandwidth also ensures that textures and geometry can be fed to the shader units quickly, which is critical for maintaining smooth frame rates in fast-paced action sequences.

In Overpower, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s output, but at 4K, the pixel throughput demands shift almost entirely to the graphics card. The 4090’s raw compute power, combined with its large memory pool, makes it well-suited for this task. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the combo still manages an average of 109 FPS, which confirms the GPU’s capability. The card’s end-of-life production status and launch MSRP of 1,599 USD reflect its position as a flagship product, and its performance in this game justifies that classification.

The GPU’s benchmark scores further illustrate its strength. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 9,223, and in Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, it achieves 255,416 and 271,631 respectively. The Passmark G3D score of 38,194 and G2D score of 1,299 show that the card excels in 3D rendering tasks, which aligns with its primary purpose. The DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores of 326 and 150 are lower relative to other tests, but these are legacy benchmarks that do not fully utilize the card’s modern architecture. For Overpower, the relevant metrics are the high-end compute and memory bandwidth, both of which are exceptional.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance scaling as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 299 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates that the CPU is doing most of the heavy lifting at this resolution. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 267 FPS, a decrease of 32 FPS or about 10.7%. At 4K Low, the average falls further to 227 FPS, which is 40 FPS lower than 1440p and 72 FPS lower than 1080p. This scaling shows that even at Low settings, the resolution increase places more demand on the GPU, reducing frame rates accordingly.

For Medium settings, the trend continues. At 1080p, the average is 187 FPS, which drops to 167 FPS at 1440p and 142 FPS at 4K. The delta between 1080p and 4K is 45 FPS, or about 24%. This is a smaller percentage drop than at Low settings, which suggests that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as settings increase, but the CPU still has headroom. The minimum FPS at 1080p Medium is 159, with a maximum of 215, while at 1440p the minimum is 142 and maximum is 192. At 4K, the minimum is 120 and maximum is 163. These ranges show that frame times are relatively stable, with the spread between min and max increasing slightly at higher resolutions.

High settings show a similar pattern. At 1080p, the average is 173 FPS, dropping to 155 FPS at 1440p and 131 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K is 42 FPS, or about 24.3%. This is consistent with the Medium settings trend, indicating that the GPU is handling the increased load proportionally. At Ultra settings, the averages are 144 FPS at 1080p, 128 FPS at 1440p, and 109 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K is 35 FPS, or about 24.3% as well. The consistency of this percentage across Medium, High, and Ultra suggests that the scaling is primarily driven by resolution, not by the specific settings level.

The limiting component shifts as resolution increases. At 1080p, the high frame rates (299 FPS at Low) suggest that the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU has spare capacity. As resolution rises to 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes more heavily utilized, and the frame rates drop accordingly. The fact that the percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is similar across all settings indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU remains capable of feeding it data. The RTX 4090’s 24 GB of VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensure that memory is never a limiting factor, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential.

FAQ

*Q: What is the combo’s rank in Overpower among all tested configurations?*

A: The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 ranks 61st out of 2,980 tested combos for this game, placing it in the top 2% of all systems evaluated.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64,640, which is 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P (64,823) and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F (64,438). It is also 0.7% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7343 (64,202) and 0.7% behind the AMD EPYC 9124 (65,104).

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable at 1080p with this setup?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 299 FPS, which is the highest recorded average for any resolution or settings combination in the measured data.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4090 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4090 comes with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. This large memory pool and high bandwidth support high-resolution textures and complex scenes in Overpower.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The lowest average FPS is 109, achieved at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is still a highly playable frame rate for an action game, indicating the combo’s strength at the most demanding settings.

Q: How does the GPU’s percentile ranking compare to the CPU’s?

A: The RTX 4090 holds an 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the Core Ultra 7 265 holds a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs. This suggests the CPU is relatively stronger in its category than the GPU is in its own, though both are high performers.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers an average of 299 FPS at Low settings, which is the highest recorded value. The Medium setting yields an average of 187 FPS, with a minimum of 159 and maximum of 215. High settings produce an average of 173 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to 144 FPS. These numbers show that at 1080p, the system is capable of extremely high frame rates, even at the highest quality preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows a clear step down. Low settings average 267 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings average 167 FPS, with a minimum of 142 and maximum of 192. High settings average 155 FPS, and Ultra settings average 128 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p ranges from 32 FPS at Low to 16 FPS at Ultra, with the percentage decline being more pronounced at lower settings. This indicates that the GPU is beginning to take on a larger role at this resolution, but the CPU still has enough headroom to maintain high frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. Low settings average 227 FPS, which is a significant drop from 1080p but still excellent. Medium settings average 142 FPS, with a minimum of 120 and maximum of 163. High settings average 131 FPS, and Ultra settings average 109 FPS. The drop from 1440p to 4K is 40 FPS at Low, 25 FPS at Medium, 24 FPS at High, and 19 FPS at Ultra. The percentage decline is consistent, suggesting that the GPU is scaling predictably with resolution. The minimum FPS values at Medium settings show that even the lowest frame rates are above 120 FPS at 4K, ensuring a smooth experience.

The data also reveals that the gap between Low and Ultra settings narrows as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 155 FPS (299 vs 144). At 1440p, the difference is 139 FPS (267 vs 128). At 4K, the difference is 118 FPS (227 vs 109). This narrowing indicates that at higher resolutions, the GPU is more heavily loaded, and the impact of settings on frame rates is somewhat reduced. The RTX 4090’s 24 GB VRAM ensures that even at 4K Ultra, there is no memory capacity issue, allowing the GPU to maintain its performance.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It uses the Intel Socket 1851 and has 30 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 per core. The processor also includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 execution units, though this is not relevant for gaming with a discrete GPU.

The CPU’s benchmark scores demonstrate its strength in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42,216 in multi-core and 5,960 in single-core. Passmark results show a multithread score of 49,682 and a single-thread score of 4,689. The CPU also excels in specific tasks, with a data compression score of 522,983 and a floating-point math score of 172,776. These numbers indicate that the 265 is a well-rounded processor that can handle both gaming and productivity tasks with ease.

In Overpower, the CPU’s role is most evident at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 299 FPS, which is likely limited by the CPU’s ability to process game logic and draw calls. The 265’s high boost clock of 5.30 GHz and 20 cores provide ample processing power, but at such high frame rates, the CPU can become a bottleneck. However, the fact that the combo still achieves nearly 300 FPS shows that the CPU is performing exceptionally well. At higher resolutions, the CPU’s load decreases relative to the GPU, and the 265 has more than enough headroom to avoid limiting performance.

The CPU’s percentile ranking of 93 and its close benchmark scores to rivals like the AMD EPYC 4464P and EPYC 9124 show that it is among the best processors available. For Overpower, this means that the CPU is not a limiting factor in most scenarios. The only time the CPU might become a bottleneck is at 1080p with Low settings, where the frame rates exceed 290 FPS. In such cases, the GPU is not fully utilized, but this is an extreme scenario that most users will not encounter. The combo’s overall rank of 61 out of 2,980 reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU, with both components contributing to a top-tier gaming experience.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

Cores / Threads 20 / 20
Base Clock 2400 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 450 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 227.0
3840x2160 Medium 142.0
3840x2160 High 131.0
3840x2160 Ultra 109.0
2560x1440 Low 267.0
2560x1440 Medium 167.0
2560x1440 High 155.0
2560x1440 Ultra 128.0
1920x1080 Low 299.0
1920x1080 Medium 187.0
1920x1080 High 173.0
1920x1080 Ultra 144.0

Overpower with iUltra 7 265 + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with RTX 4090 + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 265 + RTX 4090

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.