Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
161
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 161 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 99 119 128 205
1440p QHD 116 140 151 241
1080p Full HD 130 157 169 271

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 205
3840x2160 Medium 128
3840x2160 High 119
3840x2160 Ultra 99
2560x1440 Low 241
2560x1440 Medium 151
2560x1440 High 140
2560x1440 Ultra 116
1920x1080 Low 271
1920x1080 Medium 169
1920x1080 High 157
1920x1080 Ultra 130

Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 pairs 20 cores with 20 threads, a configuration that favors parallel workloads over hyper-threaded scaling. With a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, the processor relies on high single-thread speeds to drive game logic, while the 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth ensure data flows efficiently to the cores. In the context of Overpower, an Action title, this CPU’s architecture, built on Arrow Lake-S with a 3 nm process node, demonstrates that its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 and single-core score of 5960 are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at most settings. The 65 W TDP and locked multiplier indicate a power-efficient design aimed at sustained performance rather than overclocking headroom, which aligns with the measured frame rates that remain consistently high across all tested resolutions.

The CPU’s benchmark percentile of 93 against all CPUs places it in the top tier, and its nearest rivals show only marginal differences. It trails the AMD EPYC 4464P by 0.3% in average benchmark score, while leading the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F by 0.3%, the AMD EPYC 7343 by 0.7%, and the AMD EPYC 9124 by 0.7%. This clustering suggests that within a few percentage points, the Core Ultra 7 265 offers comparable computational throughput to its closest competitors. In Overpower, the data shows that this processing power translates to a minimum average frame rate of 99 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is well above the threshold where CPU-bound limitations would typically emerge. The high boost clock of 5.30 GHz is particularly relevant for this game, as Action titles often feature complex physics and AI routines that benefit from rapid single-thread execution, and the 20 physical threads provide ample capacity for background tasks without compromising frame pacing.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 serves as the primary rendering engine in this configuration, equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The GPU’s architecture, Ada Lovelace, is built on a 5 nm process node and operates at a base clock of 2205 MHz with a boost clock of 2505 MHz. The memory clock runs at 1400 MHz, or 22.4 Gbps effective, which provides the raw throughput needed to feed the 9728 shading units and 112 ROPs at high resolutions. In Overpower, the measured FPS data shows that the RTX 4080 is capable of pushing frame rates above 200 FPS at 1080p Low settings, but the more telling results are at 4K, where the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute power are fully exercised.

The GPU’s benchmark percentile of 86 versus all GPUs places it solidly in the high-performance tier, though its nearest rivals highlight the competitive landscape. The RTX 4080 SUPER is nearly identical, with a deltaPct of 0.1% higher average score, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% lower, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% lower, and the AMD Radeon 8060S is 2.7% lower. This positioning suggests that the RTX 4080 is a strong performer, but not the absolute fastest, which is reflected in the Overpower results where frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is a critical asset for this game at 4K Ultra, as the data shows a drop from 128 FPS at Medium to 99 FPS at Ultra, indicating that higher texture detail and effects place additional strain on the GPU’s memory subsystem and compute units. The 320 W TDP and triple-slot cooler design are consistent with a high-end card that sustains boost clocks under load, ensuring that the measured FPS figures are representative of real-world gaming conditions.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data across three resolutions and four settings presets provides a clear picture of the optimal experience for this combo. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 130 FPS, which is fully playable on high-refresh monitors, while High reaches 157 FPS and Medium hits 169 FPS. However, the Low preset at 271 FPS is excessive for most displays, and the jump from Medium to Ultra costs 39 FPS, suggesting that the visual fidelity gains from Ultra are not worth the frame rate sacrifice for competitive play. At 1440p, the pattern shifts: Ultra averages 116 FPS, High averages 140 FPS, and Medium averages 151 FPS, with Low at 241 FPS. The 1440p Medium preset offers a balanced experience, providing a 35 FPS advantage over Ultra while maintaining the visual enhancements over Low that are meaningful in an Action title.

At 4K, the choices become more constrained. The Ultra preset drops to 99 FPS average, which is still smooth, but the High preset at 119 FPS offers a significant improvement with only a minor reduction in visual quality. Medium at 4K averages 128 FPS with a minimum of 109 FPS, making it the sweet spot for players prioritizing frame rate stability over maximum detail. The Low preset at 205 FPS is available for extreme responsiveness, but it likely strips out too many graphical features for an immersive Action experience. The data indicates that the best experience per the measured rows is the High preset at 1440p or 4K, as it provides a substantial frame rate buffer above 60 FPS while retaining enough visual detail to appreciate the game’s design. For 1080p users, the High preset at 157 FPS is recommended, as the jump to Medium offers only 12 FPS more, which is negligible compared to the quality loss.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 achieves a rank of 201 out of 3713 tested combos in Overpower, placing it in the top 5.4% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the synergy between the CPU and GPU, where the processor’s 20-core design and 5.30 GHz boost clock provide sufficient headroom for the RTX 4080 to operate at its full potential. The data shows that this combo is not limited by a weak link; instead, the performance is consistently high across all resolutions, with the lowest average FPS being 99 at 4K Ultra. The rank of 201 indicates that while many other combos are faster, the vast majority of systems (over 94%) are slower, making this a top-tier pairing for Overpower.

The percentile positioning of the individual components supports this ranking. The CPU’s 93rd percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile suggest that the combo’s 201st place is slightly lower than what the CPU alone would predict, but higher than the GPU alone, indicating that the GPU is the more likely limiting factor in this pairing. The nearest rival combos, as inferred from the component-level deltas, would include systems with the RTX 4080 SUPER, which offers a 0.1% higher GPU score, potentially pushing those combos a few ranks higher. Conversely, combos with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, which is 2.6% slower, would rank lower. This analysis shows that the Core Ultra 7 265 + RTX 4080 combo is well-balanced, with the CPU providing ample support for the GPU’s capabilities, resulting in a strong overall position in the benchmark database.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain over 120 FPS average?

A: The data shows that at 1440p High, the average FPS is 140, and at 4K Medium, it is 128. Both achieve over 120 FPS, but 1440p High offers a higher frame rate with better visual fidelity than 4K Medium.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 271 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 130 FPS. This represents a difference of 141 FPS, or approximately 108% higher performance at Low settings.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at 4K Ultra?

A: The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 99, which is a substantial frame rate. Given the CPU’s high single-thread score of 5960 in Cinebench R23, it is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU, as the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are more critical at this resolution.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo in the data?

A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 109 at 3840x2160 Medium settings. Other resolutions and settings do not have minimum FPS data available, so this is the only confirmed floor.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER has a deltaPct of 0.1% higher, meaning the SUPER is marginally faster. In practice, this difference is negligible for Overpower.

Q: Is the 16 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K Ultra settings in this game?

A: The data shows that 4K Ultra averages 99 FPS with this 16 GB card, indicating sufficient VRAM for the game’s demands. The drop from Medium to Ultra is 29 FPS, which may be due to compute load rather than memory capacity.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS values are 271 for Low, 169 for Medium (with a minimum of 144 and maximum of 194), 157 for High, and 130 for Ultra. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline of 141 FPS, with the largest single drop occurring between Low and Medium at 102 FPS. This suggests that the Medium preset introduces significant graphical effects that heavily impact performance, while the jump from Medium to High and High to Ultra are more moderate at 12 FPS and 27 FPS respectively. The 1080p results demonstrate that this combo is capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors at any setting, with even Ultra exceeding 130 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS figures are 241 for Low, 151 for Medium (with a minimum of 128 and maximum of 173), 140 for High, and 116 for Ultra. The gap between Low and Medium narrows to 90 FPS compared to 1080p, indicating that resolution scaling affects the lower presets more proportionally. The difference between High and Ultra is 24 FPS, which is slightly less than at 1080p, showing that the GPU becomes more stressed at higher resolutions but the relative cost of Ultra settings remains consistent. The 1440p results show a minimum FPS of 128 at Medium, ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense action sequences.

At 3840x2160, the average FPS values are 205 for Low, 128 for Medium (with a minimum of 109 and maximum of 147), 119 for High, and 99 for Ultra. The drop from Low to Medium at 77 FPS is the smallest among all resolutions, suggesting that at 4K, the GPU is the primary bottleneck and the additional settings have a diminishing impact on performance. The difference between High and Ultra is 20 FPS, which is the smallest gap observed, indicating that the Ultra preset’s extra features are less demanding at this resolution relative to the overall GPU load. The minimum FPS of 109 at 4K Medium confirms that this combo can maintain playable frame rates even at the highest resolution.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K varies significantly by settings preset, revealing the scaling behavior of this combo. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 271 at 1080p to 241 at 1440p and 205 at 4K, representing a 24.4% decrease from 1080p to 4K. This relatively small drop indicates that at Low settings, the CPU is more involved in frame generation, and the GPU has enough headroom to handle the increased pixel count without dramatic performance loss. At Medium settings, the FPS drops from 169 to 151 to 128, a 24.3% reduction from 1080p to 4K, showing similar scaling to Low, though the absolute numbers are lower.

At High settings, the FPS falls from 157 at 1080p to 140 at 1440p and 119 at 4K, a 24.2% decrease from 1080p to 4K. This consistency across Low, Medium, and High suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor, and the performance scales roughly with the pixel count increase from 2.07 million to 8.29 million pixels. However, at Ultra settings, the FPS drops from 130 at 1080p to 116 at 1440p and 99 at 4K, a 23.8% decrease from 1080p to 4K. The slightly smaller percentage drop at Ultra indicates that as the GPU becomes more saturated with effects, the additional resolution has less relative impact, or that the CPU begins to have a more significant role in maintaining frame rates.

The data shows that the limiting component in this combo is the GPU, as the FPS scaling closely follows the pixel count increase. At 1080p, the CPU’s 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures that frame rates are not artificially capped, but the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are fully utilized at higher resolutions. The 4K to 1440p scaling at Medium shows a 23 FPS drop, which is proportionate to the 2.25x pixel count difference, confirming that the RTX 4080 is the dominant factor. For players seeking to maintain high frame rates, the data suggests that reducing settings is more effective than lowering resolution, as the difference between 4K Medium and 1440p Ultra is only 12 FPS (128 vs 116), while the visual impact of resolution is often more noticeable.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

Cores / Threads 20 / 20
Base Clock 2400 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2505 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 205.0
3840x2160 Medium 128.0
3840x2160 High 119.0
3840x2160 Ultra 99.0
2560x1440 Low 241.0
2560x1440 Medium 151.0
2560x1440 High 140.0
2560x1440 Ultra 116.0
1920x1080 Low 271.0
1920x1080 Medium 169.0
1920x1080 High 157.0
1920x1080 Ultra 130.0

Overpower with iUltra 7 265 + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 265 + RTX 4080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.