Overpower
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 186 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 115 | 140 | 149 | 236 |
| 1440p QHD | 136 | 164 | 176 | 274 |
| 1080p Full HD | 153 | 183 | 197 | 304 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers a compelling, though not top-tier, experience in Overpower. The benchmark data indicates a system that is well-balanced at 1080p and 1440p, but which begins to show its limitations when pushed to 4K Ultra settings. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, the role of each component, and provides clear guidance on optimizing the game experience.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a 16-core, 22-thread mobile processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and can boost up to 5.00 GHz, which provides substantial headroom for demanding workloads. The processor is built on a 7 nm process and features a 24 MB shared L3 cache, alongside a 2 MB L2 cache per core and a 112 KB L1 cache per core. This configuration is designed to handle high-thread-count scenarios efficiently.
In the context of Overpower, an Action title, the CPU's role is to maintain a stable frame pipeline and handle game logic, physics, and AI calculations. The data shows that even at the highest settings, the frame rates do not collapse, suggesting that the CPU is not a primary bottleneck at lower resolutions. For instance, at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 133 FPS, a figure that relies on the CPU's ability to feed frames quickly to the GPU. The single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1759, is robust enough to prevent major stalls in frame delivery.
The processor's average benchmark score of 34083 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H, which scores 0.3% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, which scores 0.5% higher. These margins are negligible in real-world gaming, indicating that this CPU's performance is highly competitive with other mainstream options. The 22 threads are particularly useful for modern games that utilize multi-threading, and the data suggests that Overpower can leverage this capability, as the 165H does not appear to hold back the RTX 5060 in most tested scenarios.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is a discrete mobile GPU built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using a 5 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2497 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). With 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, the RTX 5060 is positioned as a capable 1080p and 1440p performer.
The GPU's role in Overpower is paramount, especially as resolution and settings increase. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor; at 4K resolution with High settings, the system averages 58 FPS, but this drops to 48 FPS at Ultra settings. This indicates that the GPU is being stressed by the combination of high resolution and high detail levels. The memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is sufficient for most tasks, but the 128-bit bus width may limit performance in texture-heavy scenes at 4K.
The RTX 5060's average benchmark score is 26331, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 860M, which scores 0.3% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, which scores 1.2% higher. The data shows that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. For example, moving from Low to Ultra settings at 1440p reduces the average FPS from 118 to 57, a drop of over 50%. This pattern is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario where the processor has enough headroom to keep up.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
In the comprehensive database of tested hardware combinations, this pairing of the Core Ultra 7 165H and RTX 5060 holds a rank of 1955 out of 2980 total combos. This places it in the middle-to-upper tier of all systems tested for Overpower, indicating that while it is not a top-end enthusiast setup, it is far from the bottom of the barrel. The rank suggests that this combo outperforms roughly 34% of all other tested configurations while being outperformed by the remaining 66%.
The ranking is a holistic measure that reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU. Given that the RTX 5060 sits in the 72nd percentile for GPUs and the CPU sits in the 84th percentile, one might expect a higher combined rank. However, the rank is specific to Overpower and considers the unique demands of this game. The data suggests that the combination is well-matched, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus may be the limiting factor preventing a higher rank, particularly in 4K scenarios where the system's performance drops significantly.
Compared to other combos, this setup offers a reliable baseline for 1440p gaming. It does not have the raw power to compete with high-end desktop replacements or top-tier mobile GPUs, but it provides a consistent experience across the board. The rank reflects the fact that the system is coherent; there is no single component that is drastically underperforming relative to the other, which is often a cause of poor overall rankings.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how the system performs across three resolutions and four quality presets.
At 1920x1080, the system is at its most comfortable. With Low settings, the average FPS is 133. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 83 FPS, with a minimum of 70 and a maximum of 95. High settings yield an average of 77 FPS, and Ultra settings bring the average down to 64 FPS. This shows a clear progression where the GPU becomes more stressed as settings increase, but even at Ultra, the frame rate remains playable.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. Low settings produce an average of 118 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings average 74 FPS, with a min/max of 63/85. High settings average 69 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to an average of 57 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is a significant 44 FPS drop, indicating that the Medium preset introduces a substantial increase in GPU workload.
At 3840x2160, the system begins to struggle with the highest settings. Low settings still manage an average of 101 FPS, which is impressive for 4K. Medium settings drop to 63 FPS, with a min/max of 53/72. High settings average 58 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 48 FPS. The data shows that at 4K, the gap between Low and Medium is 38 FPS, and the gap between Medium and Ultra is 15 FPS. This suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the resolution is stressing the memory bandwidth and shading units.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The scaling of performance from 1080p to 4K provides insight into the balance of the system. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 133 at 1080p to 118 at 1440p (an 11.3% decrease) and then to 101 at 4K (a 14.4% decrease from 1440p). This is a relatively gentle decline, indicating that at Low settings, the system is not entirely GPU-bound, and the CPU has enough headroom to maintain high frame rates.
At Medium settings, the drop is more pronounced. From 1080p (83 FPS) to 1440p (74 FPS) is a 10.8% decrease, but from 1440p to 4K (63 FPS) is a 14.9% decrease. The min/max values also show a wider spread at 4K, suggesting more variance in frame times. At High settings, the pattern continues: 1080p (77 FPS) to 1440p (69 FPS) is a 10.4% drop, and 1440p to 4K (58 FPS) is a 15.9% drop.
At Ultra settings, the scaling is the steepest. The system goes from 64 FPS at 1080p to 57 FPS at 1440p (a 10.9% drop) and then to 48 FPS at 4K (a 15.8% drop from 1440p). The data shows that the percentage drop from 1440p to 4K is consistently larger than the drop from 1080p to 1440p across all settings. This is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario, where the increased pixel count at 4K places a disproportionate load on the GPU's shading units and memory subsystem. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are likely the culprits, as they limit the effective bandwidth available for the high-resolution textures and effects.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend on the user's target resolution and desired frame rate.
For 1080p, the High preset at 77 FPS offers a good balance between visual fidelity and smoothness. However, if a higher frame rate is preferred for competitive play, the Medium preset at 83 FPS is a solid choice, providing a 6 FPS improvement with a slight reduction in visual quality. Ultra at 64 FPS is still playable but offers diminishing returns over High.
For 1440p, the Medium preset at 74 FPS is the recommended choice. It provides a smooth experience with a minimum of 63 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for most players. High at 69 FPS is also viable, but the min FPS is not recorded, making it harder to guarantee consistency. Ultra at 57 FPS is on the edge of playability and may result in noticeable stutters in fast-paced action scenes.
For 4K, the data suggests that the Low preset at 101 FPS is the only option for a consistently high frame rate. Medium at 63 FPS is playable but with a 53 FPS minimum, which could dip below acceptable levels in intense moments. High at 58 FPS and Ultra at 48 FPS are not recommended for a smooth experience, as they fall below the 60 FPS target and may feel sluggish.
In summary, the system is best utilized at 1080p High or 1440p Medium. These settings provide the best combination of visual quality and performance, allowing the hardware to operate within its comfortable envelope without being overly stressed.
FAQ
Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable in Overpower with this hardware?
A: The highest average FPS measured is 133, achieved at 1080p resolution with Low settings.
Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?
A: At 4K, only the Low preset (101 FPS) and Medium preset (63 FPS) average above 60 FPS. High and Ultra settings average 58 and 48 FPS, respectively, which are below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rival?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H has an average benchmark score of 34083, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H and 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. These differences are minimal in real-world gaming.
Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested GPUs?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26331.
Q: Is the system more CPU-bound or GPU-bound in Overpower?
A: The data indicates the system is GPU-bound at higher resolutions. The FPS drop from 1440p to 4K is consistently larger than the drop from 1080p to 1440p, suggesting the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity are the limiting factors.
Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?
A: The lowest average FPS recorded is 48, which occurs at 4K resolution with Ultra settings.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 115.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 140.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 149.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 236.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 136.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 164.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 176.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 274.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 153.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 183.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 197.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 304.0 |
Overpower with iUltra 7 165H + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 165H + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.