Overpower
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 85 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 52 | 63 | 67 | 108 |
| 1440p QHD | 61 | 74 | 79 | 127 |
| 1080p Full HD | 69 | 83 | 89 | 142 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + AMD Radeon 8060S, In-Depth Analysis
Overpower, the 2023 action title, presents a demanding workload that tests the balance between CPU and GPU in a mobile platform. This analysis examines the pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H with the AMD Radeon 8060S, using measured frame rate data to understand its performance profile. The data reveals a configuration that is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and capable of handling 4K at more moderate settings, with a clear bottleneck emerging as resolution increases.
How This Combo Ranks
The combined performance of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H and AMD Radeon 8060S in Overpower places this configuration at rank 1701 out of 2980 tested combos. This position, which sits just past the middle of the distribution, indicates that while this is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it is far from a low-end performer. The rank suggests a balanced pairing that delivers a solid, playable experience across the board, but one that can be surpassed by combinations with more powerful components on either side of the equation.
The ranking reflects a system that is likely constrained by its mobile form factor and power envelope. The CPU, with a 28 W TDP, and the GPU, with a 55 W TDP, are designed for efficiency. In a game like Overpower, which appears to scale significantly with resolution, the GPU becomes the primary driver of performance at higher settings. The rank of 1701 suggests that the GPU is strong enough to handle the game at 1080p and 1440p with high fidelity, but it may not have the raw overhead to dominate at 4K Ultra, where the frame rate dips to 52 FPS. The data shows a system that hits a performance ceiling that is respectable but not exceptional, aligning with its mid-pack ranking.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon 8060S is the primary engine for rendering Overpower's visuals, and its architecture and memory configuration play a decisive role in the measured results. Built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture and fabricated on a 4 nm process, this integrated GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It also includes 40 ray tracing cores, which can enhance visual fidelity in supported scenes. The GPU's clock speeds are notably high for an integrated part, with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. This high boost clock is a key factor in its ability to maintain competitive frame rates.
The most defining characteristic of this GPU is its memory configuration: "System Shared." This means the Radeon 8060S does not have its own dedicated VRAM but instead relies on the system's main memory. Consequently, the memory bus width and bandwidth are listed as "System Dependent." This has a direct and significant impact on performance, particularly at higher resolutions and texture settings. The GPU's pixel rate is 185.6 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 464.0 GTexel/s, which are solid figures. In practice, the shared memory architecture means that the performance is not just about the GPU's compute power, but also about the speed and bandwidth of the system's RAM. In Overpower, this is likely a limiting factor at 4K, where the demand for memory bandwidth increases substantially, contributing to the significant frame rate drop observed from 1080p to 4K.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H serves as the central processor, and its specifications are crucial for feeding the GPU and handling game logic. This chip, based on the Meteor Lake architecture, has 16 cores and 22 threads, providing substantial parallel processing power. It operates at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and can boost up to 5.00 GHz, which is a high frequency for a mobile processor. This combination of core count and clock speed is well-suited for modern games that can utilize multiple threads. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for gaming, as it can hold frequently accessed data, reducing latency.
The CPU's benchmark scores support its capability in a gaming context. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14551 and single-core score of 1759 indicate strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. In the context of Overpower, the CPU's role is to ensure that frame times are consistent and that the GPU is not starved of data. The data suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the system achieves 142 FPS on Low settings, which is a high frame rate that indicates the CPU can keep up with the GPU. However, as the resolution increases, the GPU becomes more strained, and the CPU's influence on the average FPS diminishes. The CPU's performance, as indicated by its 84th percentile ranking against all CPUs, shows it is a capable partner, but the overall system performance is ultimately gated by the GPU's rendering capabilities at higher resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates provide a clear picture of performance across different resolutions and settings. The data shows a consistent pattern: performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, but with some notable variations.
At 1920x1080, the settings have a pronounced impact on frame rate. On Low settings, the system achieves an average of 142 FPS, which ensures a very smooth experience on high-refresh-rate monitors. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 89 FPS, with a minimum of 76 FPS and a maximum of 102 FPS. This is still a very playable frame rate. On High settings, the average is 83 FPS. Pushing to Ultra settings brings the average down to 69 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium is significant, a 53 FPS drop, indicating that the Medium preset introduces a large increase in graphical load. The subsequent drops to High and Ultra are more moderate.
At 2560x1440, the overall performance drops as expected. On Low settings, the system averages 127 FPS, which is still very high. The Medium preset averages 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS. This is a comfortable frame rate for most users. The High preset yields an average of 74 FPS. Finally, the Ultra preset averages 61 FPS, which is right at the edge of what many consider the minimum for a smooth experience. The delta between Low and Medium is 48 FPS, showing a similar pattern to 1080p.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily taxed. The Low preset is still playable, with an average of 108 FPS. However, the Medium preset drops to an average of 67 FPS, with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS. The High preset averages 63 FPS, which is a common target for console-like experiences. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, producing an average of just 52 FPS. This is the only configuration where the frame rate dips below the 60 FPS threshold for the average. The data shows that 4K Ultra is a stretch for this hardware, while 4K Medium and High are viable options.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo handle Overpower at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, it can, but not at the highest settings. The data shows playable average frame rates at 4K with Low (108 FPS), Medium (67 FPS), and High (63 FPS) settings. However, at 4K Ultra, the average frame rate drops to 52 FPS, which may be less desirable for a smooth experience.
Q: What is the best resolution for a high-refresh-rate monitor?
A: At 1920x1080, the system is capable of very high frame rates. On Low settings, it achieves 142 FPS, and even on High settings, it maintains an average of 83 FPS. This makes 1080p the ideal resolution for taking advantage of a 144Hz or higher refresh rate display.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance compared to the GPU?
A: At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's capability is sufficient to support high frame rates, as seen with 142 FPS on Low settings. However, as resolution increases to 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, with the average frame rate dropping from 142 FPS at 1080p Low to 108 FPS at 4K Low, showing the GPU's workload is the primary constraint.
Q: Is the Medium settings preset a good choice for this system?
A: Yes, the Medium preset offers a strong balance. At 1080p, it delivers 89 FPS, and at 1440p, it delivers 79 FPS. Even at 4K, it maintains an average of 67 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. It provides a significant visual upgrade over Low settings while maintaining smooth performance.
Q: How significant is the performance drop from 1080p to 4K?
A: The drop is substantial. For example, on High settings, the average frame rate falls from 83 FPS at 1080p to 63 FPS at 4K, a 24% reduction. On Low settings, the drop is from 142 FPS to 108 FPS, a similar proportional decrease. This indicates the GPU's rendering load is a major factor.
Q: What are the minimum frame rates for the Medium preset?
A: The data includes minimum frame rates for the Medium preset. At 1080p, the minimum is 76 FPS. At 1440p, the minimum is 67 FPS. At 4K, the minimum is 57 FPS. These figures show that even in more demanding scenes, the frame rate remains in a playable range.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user's target resolution and preference for frame rate versus visual fidelity.
For users with a 1080p display, the High preset is the best overall choice. It delivers an average of 83 FPS, which is smooth and responsive, while providing a significant visual upgrade over Medium settings. The Ultra preset, at 69 FPS, is also viable for those who prioritize image quality above all else and can tolerate a slightly lower frame rate. For competitive play where maximum frame rate is key, the Low preset's 142 FPS is the clear winner.
For 1440p displays, the Medium preset is the most balanced recommendation. It produces an average of 79 FPS, ensuring a fluid experience with good visual detail. The High preset, at 74 FPS, is also a strong option if the user prefers higher fidelity. The Ultra preset, at 61 FPS, is borderline, but may be acceptable for slower-paced games. The Low preset, at 127 FPS, remains an option for high-refresh-rate gaming, but sacrifices a great deal of visual quality.
For 4K displays, the High preset is the most sensible choice. It achieves an average of 63 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold for a smooth experience. The Medium preset, at 67 FPS, is also excellent and may be preferred for a more stable frame rate. The Ultra preset, at 52 FPS, is not recommended for a consistently smooth experience. The Low preset, at 108 FPS, is an option for users who want to prioritize frame rate above all else at this resolution.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate data reveals how the system's performance scales as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, and this scaling has important implications for identifying the limiting component. The pattern is consistent across all settings: a clear and significant drop in average FPS is observed when moving to higher resolutions.
For example, on High settings, the average FPS drops from 83 at 1080p to 74 at 1440p, a reduction of 11%. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the average drops to 63 FPS, a further reduction of 15%. The total drop from 1080p to 4K is 24%. On Low settings, the trend is similar: 142 FPS at 1080p, 127 FPS at 1440p, and 108 FPS at 4K. This represents a 24% decrease from 1080p to 4K as well.
This consistent scaling pattern is a strong indicator that the AMD Radeon 8060S is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The GPU's workload increases with the number of pixels, and the data shows that this workload has a direct and substantial impact on the frame rate. The CPU's role becomes less significant as resolution increases, as it is able to prepare frames faster than the GPU can render them. The result is that the system's performance is fundamentally limited by the GPU's rendering capabilities and its shared memory bandwidth, which is particularly stressed at 4K. The 4K Ultra setting, at 52 FPS, demonstrates this limit most clearly, showing that the GPU is at its maximum capacity.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
AMD Radeon 8060S
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + AMD Radeon 8060S in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 108.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 67.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 63.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 52.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 127.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 79.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 74.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 61.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 142.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 89.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 83.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 69.0 |
Overpower with iUltra 7 165H + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with 8060S + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 165H + 8060S
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.