Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
75
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 75 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 46 56 60 96
1440p QHD 54 66 71 113
1080p Full HD 61 74 79 127

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 96
3840x2160 Medium 60
3840x2160 High 56
3840x2160 Ultra 46
2560x1440 Low 113
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 High 66
2560x1440 Ultra 54
1920x1080 Low 127
1920x1080 Medium 79
1920x1080 High 74
1920x1080 Ultra 61

Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 5 135H + AMD Radeon 8050S, In-Depth Analysis

Overpower, the 2023 action title, presents a demanding workload that stresses both the processor and the graphics solution. The data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S shows a system that is capable of solid performance at 1080p and 1440p, but requires careful settings management to maintain smooth gameplay. The benchmark results reveal a clear hierarchy across resolutions and presets, with the system's rank of 2198 out of 2980 tested combos indicating it sits in the upper-midrange tier for this specific game.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of which settings presets offer the best balance between visual fidelity and performance. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers an average of 79 FPS, which is a substantial jump from the High preset's 74 FPS, while still maintaining a playable experience with minimums of 67 FPS and maximums of 91 FPS. This makes Medium the recommended starting point for most users at this resolution, as it provides a comfortable performance buffer above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset drops to 61 FPS on average, which is technically playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes, making it a less attractive option for consistent smoothness.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scaling becomes more pronounced. The Medium preset averages 71 FPS, with minimums at 60 FPS and maximums at 81 FPS, again offering a stable experience. High settings at this resolution yield 66 FPS on average, which is still above 60 but closer to the edge of comfort. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls to 54 FPS, which is below the ideal smoothness threshold for an action game, suggesting that users should avoid this setting combination. For the best experience at 1440p, Medium is the clear winner, providing a 5 FPS advantage over High while likely offering similar visual improvements over Low, which hits 113 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to struggle with higher presets. Medium averages 60 FPS, with minimums at 51 FPS and maximums at 69 FPS, which is marginal for smooth gameplay. High settings at 4K drop to 56 FPS on average, while Ultra falls to 46 FPS, both of which are below the ideal threshold. The Low preset at 4K achieves 96 FPS, but this sacrifices significant visual quality. The data suggests that for 4K, Medium is the only viable preset for a near-60 FPS experience, but users should be prepared for occasional dips below 60 FPS in intense moments, as indicated by the 51 FPS minimum. Overall, the Medium preset consistently offers the best balance of performance and quality across all three resolutions, making it the recommended choice for this hardware combination.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a 14-core, 18-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 1, built on Intel's Meteor Lake architecture using a 7 nm process node. Its base clock is 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and it features a TDP of 28 W. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor is designed for mobile platforms, using the Intel BGA 2049 socket, and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

In the context of Overpower, the CPU's role appears to be significant but not the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions. The processor's benchmark scores show strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1700 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3521. Its multi-threaded capabilities are also robust, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11875.5 and a Passmark multithread score of 22422. The processor holds an 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs, placing it above average. When compared to its nearest rivals, it performs nearly identically to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, with a delta of -0.1%, and is just 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT.

The data suggests that at 1080p, where the GPU has less work to do, the CPU's performance becomes more relevant. The fact that the average FPS jumps from 74 on High to 79 on Medium, and then to 127 on Low, indicates that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively, but the GPU is still the primary limiter at higher settings. The 14 cores and 18 threads provide ample parallelism for the game's engine, likely preventing CPU-bound stutters in complex scenes. However, the processor's 28 W TDP is relatively modest, which may limit sustained performance in a thin-and-light chassis, but the benchmark data shows consistent results without evidence of severe thermal throttling. The CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache is also beneficial for keeping frequently accessed game data close to the cores, reducing latency and improving overall responsiveness.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC. It features a die size of 308 mm² and is part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The GPU has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, with a TDP of 55 W. Its memory configuration is system-shared, meaning it relies on the host system's RAM, with bandwidth described as system-dependent. The GPU specifications include 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. Its compute capabilities are rated at 11.47 TFLOPS for FP32 and FP16 operations, with a pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s.

In Overpower, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor in determining frame rates, especially at higher resolutions and settings. The 89th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates that this is a high-performing integrated solution, but it still faces limitations compared to dedicated graphics cards. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which it trails by only 0.3%, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, which is 2.6% faster. The system-shared memory is a critical factor, as the GPU's bandwidth is entirely dependent on the system's memory configuration, which can be a bottleneck in memory-intensive scenarios like high-resolution textures.

The FPS data reveals the GPU's scaling behavior. At 1080p, the GPU delivers 127 FPS on Low, 79 FPS on Medium, 74 FPS on High, and 61 FPS on Ultra. This shows a clear progression of performance loss as settings increase, with the largest drop occurring from Low to Medium (a 48 FPS reduction), indicating that the Medium preset introduces significant rendering workloads. At 1440p, the GPU produces 113 FPS on Low, 71 FPS on Medium, 66 FPS on High, and 54 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results show 96 FPS on Low, 60 FPS on Medium, 56 FPS on High, and 46 FPS on Ultra. The boost clock of 2800 MHz helps maintain performance, but the 55 W TDP limits the sustained power draw, which is evident in the diminishing returns at higher resolutions. The GPU's 32 ray tracing cores are present, but the data does not specify whether Overpower uses them, and the performance at Ultra settings suggests that ray tracing or other advanced effects could be a factor in the lower frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and the AMD Radeon 8050S achieves a rank of 2198 out of 2980 tested combos in Overpower. This places the system in the 26th percentile of all combos, meaning that approximately 74% of tested configurations perform better. This ranking is a direct reflection of the GPU's limitations, as the CPU is quite capable, but the integrated graphics solution cannot match the performance of dedicated graphics cards in this action title.

Looking at the component-level rankings, the CPU is in the 81st percentile, while the GPU is in the 89th percentile. The disparity between these rankings and the overall combo rank highlights that the system is not performing to its full potential in Overpower. The data suggests that the combo rank is dragged down by the GPU's inability to sustain high frame rates at demanding settings, particularly at 1440p and 4K. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, is only 0.3% faster on average, yet the combo rank suggests that even small performance differences can have a significant impact on the overall position in this game's benchmark database.

The combo's rank of 2198 indicates that while it is not a top-tier performer, it is still ahead of a considerable number of other systems. The fact that the GPU scores in the 89th percentile but the combo rank is only in the 74th percentile suggests that Overpower is particularly demanding on the graphics solution, and the system's shared memory architecture may be a disadvantage compared to combos with dedicated VRAM. The data implies that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming with medium-to-high settings, where it can maintain playable frame rates, but it will struggle to provide a smooth experience at higher resolutions with maxed-out settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Overpower with this hardware?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with Medium settings provides an average of 79 FPS, which is the most consistent playable experience. 2560x1440 with Medium yields 71 FPS on average, but 3840x2160 with Medium drops to 60 FPS with minimums of 51 FPS, which is less stable.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has an average benchmark score of 29093, which is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, which scores 29123 and is only 0.1% faster. It is also 0.5% faster than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, which scores 28940.

Q: What is the GPU's performance ranking relative to all other GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S holds an 89th percentile ranking among all GPUs, indicating it performs better than the vast majority of graphics solutions. Its average benchmark score is 62108.

Q: Which preset shows the largest performance drop from Low to Medium at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS drops from 127 on Low to 79 on Medium, a reduction of 48 FPS. This indicates that the Medium preset introduces substantial rendering workloads that impact the GPU significantly.

Q: Is the system capable of maintaining 60 FPS at 4K with any settings?

A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset achieves an average of 60 FPS, but the minimum FPS is 51, meaning it will dip below 60 in demanding scenes. The High preset averages 56 FPS, and Ultra averages 46 FPS, neither of which maintains 60 FPS.

Q: How does the combo's rank in Overpower compare to its component rankings?

A: The combo ranks 2198 out of 2980, placing it in the 26th percentile of all combos. This is significantly lower than the CPU's 81st percentile and the GPU's 89th percentile, suggesting that the game's demands on the shared-memory GPU architecture limit the overall system performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS values show a clear progression across settings. The Low preset achieves 127 FPS, which is the highest score at this resolution. Medium settings reduce this to an average of 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS. High settings further lower the average to 74 FPS, while Ultra settings produce an average of 61 FPS. The data indicates that the system can easily handle 1080p gaming at low settings, and even at High settings, it remains above 60 FPS, making 1080p a viable resolution for this combo across all presets.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops are more noticeable. The Low preset averages 113 FPS, which is still highly playable. Medium settings yield an average of 71 FPS, with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 81 FPS. High settings average 66 FPS, while Ultra settings fall to 54 FPS on average. This shows that at 1440p, the system can handle Medium and High settings with average frame rates above 60 FPS, but Ultra settings dip below the 60 FPS threshold, making it less ideal for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the system's limitations become apparent. The Low preset averages 96 FPS, which is still respectable, but the visual quality is significantly reduced. Medium settings average 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS, indicating occasional drops below the 60 FPS target. High settings average 56 FPS, and Ultra settings average 46 FPS. The 4K data shows that the system is best suited for Medium settings at this resolution, but users should expect some frame rate variability. The lack of min and max FPS data for several rows, such as High and Ultra at 4K, limits the analysis, but the average scores provide a clear picture of the performance envelope.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights into the system's bottleneck. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 127 at 1080p to 113 at 1440p, a 11% reduction, and then to 96 at 4K, a 24% reduction from 1080p. This pattern indicates that even at low settings, the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as the frame rate scales inversely with resolution, which is expected for a GPU-bound scenario.

At Medium settings, the average FPS declines from 79 at 1080p to 71 at 1440p (a 10% drop) and then to 60 at 4K (a 24% drop from 1080p). This consistent scaling suggests that the GPU's rendering load increases proportionally with pixel count, and the system-shared memory may be a limiting factor at higher resolutions due to increased memory bandwidth demands. The minimum FPS at Medium also shows a similar trend, dropping from 67 at 1080p to 60 at 1440p and then to 51 at 4K, indicating that the lower bounds of performance are also affected by resolution.

For High and Ultra settings, the scaling is more pronounced due to the increased graphical complexity. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 74 at 1080p to 66 at 1440p (an 11% drop) and then to 56 at 4K (a 24% drop). At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 61 at 1080p to 54 at 1440p (an 11% drop) and then to 46 at 4K (a 25% drop). The consistent scaling across all settings points to the GPU as the dominant bottleneck, as the CPU's performance is likely sufficient to handle the game's logic at all resolutions. The data implies that the AMD Radeon 8050S's system-shared memory and 55 W TDP limit its ability to maintain frame rates as the pixel count increases, making 1080p the resolution where this combo offers the most consistent performance across all presets.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H

Cores / Threads 14 / 18
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 4600 MHz
TDP 28W
Socket Intel BGA 2049
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon 8050S

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2800 MHz MHz
TDP 55 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 135H + AMD Radeon 8050S in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 96.0
3840x2160 Medium 60.0
3840x2160 High 56.0
3840x2160 Ultra 46.0
2560x1440 Low 113.0
2560x1440 Medium 71.0
2560x1440 High 66.0
2560x1440 Ultra 54.0
1920x1080 Low 127.0
1920x1080 Medium 79.0
1920x1080 High 74.0
1920x1080 Ultra 61.0

Overpower with iUltra 5 135H + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Other Games with iUltra 5 135H + 8050S

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.