Overpower

Overpower, a 2023 Action title, presents a demanding workload for the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and AMD Radeon 760M combination. The measured FPS data reveals a system that is consistently bound by its integrated graphics, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and settings are adjusted. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results across resolutions, examines the roles of the CPU and GPU, and provides actionable recommendations based solely on the measured frames.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent, clearly indicating that the AMD Radeon 760M is the primary limiting component. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 44 FPS at 1920x1080 to 33 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of 11 FPS or 25%. This scaling pattern is typical for an integrated GPU where the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth become increasingly strained as the resolution climbs.

Moving to Medium settings, the same trend is visible. The average at 1920x1080 is 28 FPS, which drops to 25 FPS at 2560x1440, and further down to 21 FPS at 3840x2160. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is a modest 3 FPS, but the jump to 4K costs another 4 FPS, showing how the GPU struggles to maintain even playable frame rates at higher pixel counts. At High settings, the progression is 26 FPS (1080p), 23 FPS (1440p), and 19 FPS (4K), demonstrating a nearly linear degradation of about 3-4 FPS per resolution step.

The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, shows the most severe scaling. It starts at 21 FPS at 1080p, drops to 19 FPS at 1440p, and bottoms out at 16 FPS at 4K. This final figure is barely interactive, confirming that the combination is not suited for maximum quality at any resolution above 1080p. The data suggests that the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s processing power is exhausted quickly, making it the bottleneck in all tested scenarios.

The delta between Low and Ultra settings at the same resolution also highlights the GPU’s limitations. At 1080p, the difference between Low (44 FPS) and Ultra (21 FPS) is 23 FPS, a 52% performance hit. At 4K, the same comparison shows a drop from 33 FPS to 16 FPS, a 17 FPS difference. This indicates that while the GPU is the bottleneck, its performance ceiling is so low that even the most significant settings changes yield only single-digit frame rate improvements at the highest resolutions.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a 14-core, 18-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11875.5 and a single-core score of 1700, place it in the 81st percentile among all CPUs. This indicates it has ample processing power for gaming, and in the context of Overpower, the data shows it is not the limiting factor.

The CPU’s performance relative to its rivals further confirms its capability. It sits within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, Intel Xeon Phi 7210, AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, and Intel Core i5-13500HX in average benchmark score. With a percentile vs. all CPUs of 81, the Core Ultra 5 135H is a strong performer, suggesting that its 18 threads and 18 MB of shared L3 cache are more than sufficient to handle the game’s logic and physics at the frame rates the GPU can deliver.

In the measured FPS data, the CPU’s role is inferred by the fact that the frame rates are consistently low, yet they scale with resolution and settings. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would remain relatively flat across different resolutions. Instead, the FPS drops as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of GPU limitation. The CPU’s high single-thread performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R15 single-core score of 244, helps ensure that it does not introduce stutters or frame dips even when the GPU is saturated.

The processor’s 28 W TDP and integration into a mobile platform mean it operates within a constrained power envelope, but its performance is still robust enough to avoid holding back the Radeon 760M. The data shows that at Low settings, the system can achieve 44 FPS at 1080p, which is a reasonable result for an integrated solution, and the CPU’s role is to maintain that performance without becoming a secondary bottleneck. The low FPS figures, therefore, are directly attributable to the GPU, not the processor.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output pipelines, with a boost clock of 2599 MHz. Its memory is system-shared, meaning the bandwidth is dependent on the system’s DDR5 memory. This configuration results in a Passmark G3D score of 5310, placing it in the 35th percentile among all GPUs, which is a low standing and reflects its integrated nature.

The GPU’s benchmark scores, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 20255, are modest. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, have average scores within 0.5% of it, but these are all discrete or older parts, highlighting the 760M’s position as a budget integrated solution. In Overpower, this GPU is the clear performance ceiling, as evidenced by the FPS drops at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s role is best illustrated by the measured FPS at Ultra settings. At 1080p, it manages 21 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. This is a direct result of the GPU’s limited pixel rate of 41.58 GPixel/s and texture rate of 83.17 GTexel/s, which are quickly overwhelmed by the game’s visual effects. The FP32 performance of 5.323 TFLOPS is insufficient for high-detail rendering at playable frame rates in a modern action title.

The fact that the GPU’s scores are in the 35th percentile means that most other GPUs in the database will outperform it. The 760M’s 16 ROPs are a particular constraint, as they limit the fill rate necessary for higher resolutions. The data shows that even dropping from High to Medium settings only yields a 2 FPS improvement at 1080p (26 to 28 FPS), which indicates the GPU is not just bandwidth-limited but also compute-limited. The system-shared memory, with its "System Dependent" bandwidth, further exacerbates the issue, as the GPU competes with the CPU for memory access.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combination is at 1920x1080 with Low settings, which yields an average of 44 FPS. This is the only configuration that approaches a playable frame rate, and it represents the best balance between visual fidelity and performance. The data shows that at 1080p Medium, the FPS drops to 28, which is a 36% decrease from Low, making the visual upgrade not worth the performance cost.

At 2560x1440, the only viable option is Low settings, which produces 39 FPS. However, this is still below the 44 FPS achievable at 1080p Low, so users with a 1440p display should consider running the game at a lower resolution if possible. The Medium preset at 1440p yields 25 FPS, which is not recommended for a smooth experience. For 4K, the data indicates that no preset is playable, with Low settings at 33 FPS being the best result, but this is still choppy and not recommended.

The High and Ultra presets are not advisable at any resolution. At 1080p, High yields 26 FPS and Ultra yields 21 FPS, both of which are below the 30 FPS threshold often considered the minimum for playability. The frame time consistency is also poor, as seen in the Medium preset’s min/max FPS range of 23 to 32 at 1080p, indicating potential stuttering. The data suggests that users should prioritize frame rate over graphical fidelity, as the GPU lacks the headroom to maintain smooth performance at higher settings.

For the best experience, the recommendation is to use 1920x1080 with Low settings. This provides the highest average frame rate and a stable enough performance for an action game. If a user insists on higher settings, Medium at 1080p is the next best option, but the 28 FPS average is borderline. The Ultra preset should be avoided entirely, as it brings the system to its knees, with a 16 FPS average at 4K, which is a slideshow.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this system in Overpower?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with Low settings provides the highest average frame rate at 44 FPS. This is the only combination that exceeds 40 FPS, making it the most playable configuration.

Q: Can this system run Overpower at 4K?

A: Yes, but not at a playable level. The best 4K result is 33 FPS at Low settings, which is below the 30 FPS threshold for smooth action. Higher settings at 4K yield 21 FPS or lower, which is not recommended.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019, which is within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M. It is slightly ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server by 0.4% and behind the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 by 0.5%.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck in this game?

A: No, the CPU is not the limiting factor. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has a high percentile of 81 and its FPS scaling with resolution indicates the GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU’s performance is sufficient to avoid holding back the integrated graphics.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 44 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 21 FPS. This is a 23 FPS difference, showing a significant performance hit from increasing settings.

Q: What is the system's rank among all tested combos in Overpower?

A: The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and AMD Radeon 760M ranks 2970 out of 2980 tested combos, placing it in the bottom percentile for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 44 FPS, which is the highest recorded for this system. Medium settings at this resolution drop to 28 FPS, with a minimum of 23 FPS and a maximum of 32 FPS, indicating some frame time variance. High settings average 26 FPS, while Ultra falls to 21 FPS, showing a steady decline as visual quality increases.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 39 FPS, which is a 5 FPS drop from 1080p. Medium settings yield 25 FPS, with a min/max of 21/28 FPS. High settings average 23 FPS, and Ultra drops to 19 FPS. The pattern is consistent: each settings tier costs approximately 4 FPS, and the resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p costs an additional 3-5 FPS depending on the preset.

At 3840x2160, the performance is significantly lower. Low settings average 33 FPS, which is the only 4K result above 30 FPS. Medium settings drop to 21 FPS, with a min/max of 18/24 FPS. High settings average 19 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 16 FPS. The data shows that 4K is not a viable resolution for this hardware, as even the lowest settings fail to provide a consistently smooth experience.

The Medium preset is the only one with reported min/max FPS values for all resolutions, providing insight into frame consistency. At 1080p, the range is 23-32 FPS, at 1440p it is 21-28 FPS, and at 4K it is 18-24 FPS. These ranges suggest that frame pacing is relatively stable, but the low averages make the experience feel sluggish. The lack of min/max data for other presets limits analysis, but the averages alone are sufficient to guide settings choices.

How This Combo Ranks

In the Overpower benchmark database, this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and AMD Radeon 760M ranks 2970 out of 2980 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 0.3% of all systems, indicating that it is one of the weakest configurations tested for this game. The rank is a direct reflection of the GPU’s low performance percentile of 35, which drags down the overall experience despite the CPU’s strong showing.

The rank of 2970 out of 2980 means that only 10 other combos perform worse in Overpower. This is a critical data point for users, as it signals that the system is not designed for high-end gaming. The combination’s performance is limited by the integrated GPU, which cannot keep up with the demands of the title at any playable setting. The CPU’s high percentile of 81 does not compensate for the GPU’s low standing.

Compared to other combos, this system is at the very bottom of the performance spectrum. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 6019 is only slightly above its nearest rivals, but those rivals are also low-end parts. In Overpower, the data shows that the frame rates are consistently below 45 FPS, and at higher settings they fall below 30 FPS, making the experience subpar. The ranking of 2970 out of 2980 is a clear indicator that users should expect minimal performance and should stick to the lowest settings and resolution to achieve the best possible frame rate. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a capable processor, but it is paired with a GPU that is simply not powerful enough for this game, resulting in a bottom-tier ranking.