Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
81
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 50 60 65 103
1440p QHD 58 70 76 121
1080p Full HD 66 79 85 136

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 103
3840x2160 Medium 65
3840x2160 High 60
3840x2160 Ultra 50
2560x1440 Low 121
2560x1440 Medium 76
2560x1440 High 70
2560x1440 Ultra 58
1920x1080 Low 136
1920x1080 Medium 85
1920x1080 High 79
1920x1080 Ultra 66

Overpower with Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Overpower presents a compelling case study in system balancing. The measured FPS data shows a configuration that scales predictably across resolutions and settings, but the relationship between the CPU’s substantial multi-threaded power and the GPU’s mid-range profile reveals a system that is consistently GPU-bound, even at 1080p. The combo ranks 1808th out of 2980 tested configurations, placing it in the 39th percentile of all tested pairs, which is a notable position for a 12-core processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock paired with a 2560-shader GPU. The following analysis dissects the measured rows to understand where the bottlenecks lie and what the data implies for gameplay.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across the three resolutions paints a clear picture of a system where the graphics card is the primary constraint. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 136 FPS at 1920x1080 to 121 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 103 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 24.3% decrease from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 14.9% decrease from 1440p to 4K. The total drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is 33 FPS, or 24.3% of the original value. This scaling pattern is classic for a GPU-limited scenario: as pixel count increases, the rendering load on the RTX 5050 grows, but the CPU has ample headroom to feed it frames.

At Medium settings, the same trend holds, with average FPS falling from 85 at 1080p to 76 at 1440p and then to 65 at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 10.6%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 14.5%. Interestingly, the percentage drop from 1440p to 4K is larger at Medium settings than at Low settings, suggesting that the higher settings are amplifying the GPU’s workload more aggressively. The High settings row shows a similar pattern: 79 FPS at 1080p, 70 FPS at 1440p, and 60 FPS at 4K. Here, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 11.4%, and from 1440p to 4K is 14.3%. The Ultra settings row, which is the most demanding, shows 66 FPS at 1080p, 58 FPS at 1440p, and 50 FPS at 4K.

The consistency of these drops suggests that the RTX 5050’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors, not the i7-12700KF’s processing power. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz and its 25 MB of shared L3 cache are more than sufficient to handle the frame generation at all tested resolutions. The data implies that if the GPU were replaced with a more powerful model, the FPS would scale nearly linearly with resolution, but as it stands, the 5050 is the bottleneck. The fact that the 4K Ultra setting still achieves 50 FPS average is notable, as it indicates the GPU can handle the load at that extreme setting, albeit with a lower frame rate. The lack of minFps data for most rows, except for the Medium settings, means we cannot fully assess frame time consistency, but the available data for Medium shows a 19 FPS spread between min and max at 1080p, which is relatively tight.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Examining the measured rows, the Medium preset emerges as the most balanced choice for this configuration, offering a strong compromise between visual fidelity and frame rate. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers an average of 85 FPS, with a minimum of 72 FPS and a maximum of 98 FPS. This is a 6 FPS improvement over High settings at the same resolution, and it provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The min FPS of 72 at Medium ensures that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate does not dip below playable levels. In contrast, High settings at 1080p average 79 FPS, which is still smooth, but the lack of min FPS data makes it harder to guarantee consistency. Ultra settings at 1080p drop to 66 FPS average, which is closer to the edge of acceptable performance for fast-paced action games.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset again provides the best experience, with an average of 76 FPS and a min of 64 FPS. This is a 6 FPS improvement over High settings (70 FPS average) and a 18 FPS improvement over Ultra (58 FPS average). The 64 FPS minimum at 1440p Medium is still above 60 FPS, indicating that the system can maintain a playable frame rate even during intense action sequences. For 3840x2160, the Medium preset drops to 65 FPS average with a min of 55 FPS, which is playable but begins to show the GPU’s limits. High settings at 4K average 60 FPS, which is exactly at the threshold, but the lack of min FPS data for High at 4K means we cannot confirm whether it dips below 60. Low settings offer the highest frame rates, with 136 FPS at 1080p, 121 FPS at 1440p, and 103 FPS at 4K, but these come at the cost of visual quality.

The data suggests that for the best balance of visual quality and performance, Medium is the recommended preset across all resolutions. The measured min FPS values at Medium (72 at 1080p, 64 at 1440p, 55 at 4K) show a consistent pattern of staying close to but not below the 60 FPS target at lower resolutions. The 6 FPS gap between Medium and High at 1080p and 1440p is substantial enough to prefer Medium, especially considering that the visual difference between these presets is often minimal in action games. For users who prioritize frame rate above all else, Low is a viable option, but the 17 FPS difference between Low and Medium at 1080p (136 vs. 85) is not worth the significant reduction in visual fidelity.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-12700KF brings a substantial amount of processing power to this pairing, with 12 cores and 20 threads based on the Alder Lake architecture. The base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz provide strong single-threaded performance, which is often critical for game logic and physics calculations. The CPU’s benchmark scores reinforce this, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838 and a single-core score of 4071. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9282 and max-thread score of 9983 indicate that the CPU can handle heavily threaded workloads, which is beneficial for modern games that utilize multiple cores for AI, streaming, and background tasks. The CPU’s percentile ranking of 85th vs. all CPUs places it in the upper echelon of processors.

In the context of Overpower, the measured FPS data suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution or setting. The fact that FPS drops consistently as resolution increases, regardless of settings, points to the GPU being the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the CPU is likely capable of producing far more than 136 FPS, but the RTX 5050 cannot render frames fast enough to keep up. The CPU’s 25 MB of L3 cache and 20 threads provide ample headroom for the game’s action sequences, ensuring that there are no CPU-related stutters or frame drops. The Passmark multithread score of 34092 and single-thread score of 3984 further confirm the CPU’s capability.

The nearest rivals for the i7-12700KF, including the Intel Core i7-13700T and Intel Core i5-13600T, have average scores that are within 0.2% of this CPU, indicating that the performance is competitive with newer parts. The deltaPct values of -0.1% and 0.2% respectively show that the 12700KF is essentially on par with these alternatives. This means that in Overpower, the CPU choice is unlikely to produce meaningful differences in FPS, as the GPU is the dominant factor. The data implies that users with this CPU should focus their attention on GPU settings rather than CPU overclocking, as the 12700KF’s stock performance is more than adequate for this title. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and unlocked multiplier (as indicated by the "K" suffix) suggest it has headroom for overclocking, but the measured FPS data does not indicate a need for it in this game.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 66 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings. This is the lowest average FPS among the tested settings at 1080p, with Low at 136 FPS, Medium at 85 FPS, and High at 79 FPS.

Q: Does the system maintain a playable frame rate at 4K?

A: Yes, all tested settings at 3840x2160 achieve an average FPS above 50. Low averages 103 FPS, Medium averages 65 FPS, High averages 60 FPS, and Ultra averages 50 FPS. The Medium setting shows a minimum of 55 FPS, indicating that even the most demanding scenarios stay within a playable range.

Q: Which setting provides the highest minimum FPS at 1440p?

A: The Medium setting has the highest measured minimum FPS at 2560x1440, with a min of 64 FPS. Low and High settings do not have min FPS data, but their averages are 121 FPS and 70 FPS respectively, suggesting they likely have higher minimums, but the data is not available.

Q: How does the CPU’s performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T, has a score of 35403, which is a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the 12700KF is essentially identical in performance. The Intel Core i5-13600T is 0.2% faster, also within a negligible margin.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The measured FPS data strongly indicates the GPU is the bottleneck. As resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, average FPS drops consistently across all settings, which is characteristic of GPU-limited performance. The CPU’s high multi-threaded scores and boost clock of 5.00 GHz suggest it has significant headroom.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: The difference is 70 FPS, with Low averaging 136 FPS and Ultra averaging 66 FPS at 1920x1080. This represents a 51.5% decrease in performance when moving from the lowest to the highest settings.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the clear bottleneck in this pairing, and its specifications explain why. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2317 MHz, with a boost clock of 2572 MHz. The card has 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The 5 nm process node from TSMC gives it a die size of 149 mm², and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is crucial for modern game features. The GPU’s percentile ranking is 66th vs. all GPUs, and its Passmark G3D score is 17326, which is modest for a dedicated graphics card.

The measured FPS data shows that the RTX 5050’s performance degrades predictably as resolution increases. At Low settings, the 33 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K (136 to 103) is a 24.3% reduction. At Ultra settings, the drop is 16 FPS (66 to 50), a 24.2% reduction. This consistency indicates that the GPU’s rendering throughput is the limiting factor, as the core clock and memory bandwidth are being fully utilized at all resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM is likely sufficient for this game at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K with Ultra settings, the memory capacity might be pressed, potentially causing texture swapping or reduced performance. However, the fact that 4K Ultra still achieves 50 FPS suggests the VRAM is not a critical issue.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, which has an average score of 21153, a deltaPct of -0.6% compared to the RTX 5050’s 21035 average score. This means the 5050 is essentially on par with that older mobile GPU, which is surprising given the generational difference. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT has a deltaPct of 1.6%, meaning it is slightly faster in benchmark scores. This context is important because it shows that the RTX 5050 is not a high-end card, and its performance in Overpower is consistent with its mid-range profile. The data implies that for this game, the GPU’s 320.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are the defining characteristics, and users cannot expect high frame rates at 4K without adjusting settings down to Medium or Low.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the RTX 5050 and i7-12700KF deliver a range of performance across the four settings. Low settings produce an average of 136 FPS, which is the highest measured in the entire dataset. Medium settings average 85 FPS, with a minimum of 72 FPS and a maximum of 98 FPS. High settings average 79 FPS, and Ultra settings average 66 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with a 70 FPS total difference between the extremes. The Medium setting’s min FPS of 72 is notably higher than the Ultra average, indicating that even the minimum frame rate at Medium is above the average at Ultra.

At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings average 121 FPS, a 15 FPS drop from 1080p. Medium settings average 76 FPS, with a min of 64 FPS and a max of 87 FPS. High settings average 70 FPS, and Ultra settings average 58 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings, ranging from 11.4% at High to 15 FPS (11.0%) at Low. The Medium setting’s min FPS of 64 is just above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the recommended setting for 1440p play.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limits become more apparent. Low settings average 103 FPS, a further 18 FPS drop from 1440p. Medium settings average 65 FPS, with a min of 55 FPS and a max of 74 FPS. High settings average 60 FPS, and Ultra settings average 50 FPS. The Medium setting’s min FPS of 55 is the lowest measured minimum in the dataset, indicating that 4K gaming on this GPU requires accepting occasional dips below 60 FPS. The 4K Low setting still achieves over 100 FPS, which is impressive, but the visual quality will be significantly reduced. The data shows that the RTX 5050 provides a playable experience at 4K, but only at lower settings, and the 60 FPS High setting is on the edge of playability.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 1808th out of 2980 tested combos in Overpower. This places the system in the 39.3rd percentile of all tested configurations, meaning that roughly 60% of the tested combos perform better. This ranking is somewhat surprising given the CPU’s strong performance, but it underscores the GPU’s role as the limiting factor. The i7-12700KF is a high-end processor with an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, but the RTX 5050’s 66th percentile ranking among GPUs drags the combo down.

The rank of 1808 suggests that this system is positioned in the lower-middle tier of tested configurations. To put it in context, the combo’s average FPS across all settings and resolutions is approximately 81 FPS (calculated from the 12 measured rows, averaging the avgFps values). This is a competent level of performance, but many other tested combos will have higher average FPS, particularly those with more powerful GPUs. The data implies that users with this combo should not expect to compete with high-end systems in terms of raw frame rates, but the system is capable of delivering a smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p with appropriate settings.

The ranking also highlights the importance of GPU choice over CPU choice in this game. If the i7-12700KF were paired with a significantly more powerful GPU, the combo’s rank would likely jump substantially, as the CPU has headroom to support higher frame rates. Conversely, pairing this CPU with a weaker GPU would result in a lower rank, as the GPU would become an even more severe bottleneck. The 1808th rank out of 2980 combos is a direct reflection of the RTX 5050’s mid-range capabilities, and it suggests that this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at high settings, or 1440p gaming at medium settings, rather than 4K gaming. The measured data shows that the combo can achieve 60 FPS at 4K High, but it is the exception rather than the rule, and the ranking reflects this overall performance profile.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Cores / Threads 12 / 20
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2572 MHz MHz
TDP 130 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 103.0
3840x2160 Medium 65.0
3840x2160 High 60.0
3840x2160 Ultra 50.0
2560x1440 Low 121.0
2560x1440 Medium 76.0
2560x1440 High 70.0
2560x1440 Ultra 58.0
1920x1080 Low 136.0
1920x1080 Medium 85.0
1920x1080 High 79.0
1920x1080 Ultra 66.0

Overpower with ii7-12700KF + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-12700KF + RTX 5050

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.