Overpower

The pairing of the Intel Core i5-14600K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 produces a formidable system for Overpower, a 2023 Action title. Benchmark results show this combination handles the game with high frame rates across all tested resolutions, though the scaling patterns reveal a clear shift in bottleneck behavior as pixel count increases. At 1080p, the system averages between 130 and 271 FPS depending on the preset, while at 4K, the range tightens to 99-205 FPS, indicating that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. The data reflects a well-balanced pairing, but the performance deltas between settings and resolutions offer specific insights into how each component contributes to the final experience.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a predictable yet informative decline in performance as resolution increases, with the magnitude of the drop varying significantly by preset. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 271 FPS at 1920x1080 to 241 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 30 FPS, and then to 205 FPS at 3840x2160, which is 66 FPS lower than the 1080p result. This 24.4% decrease from 1080p to 4K at Low settings suggests that even with minimal graphical load, the GPU is still managing the increased pixel count effectively, but the CPU's headroom is being progressively consumed.

For the Medium preset, the scaling is slightly steeper in absolute terms: 169 FPS at 1080p drops to 151 FPS at 1440p and then to 128 FPS at 4K. The 41 FPS total loss from 1080p to 4K represents a 24.3% reduction, which is remarkably similar to the Low preset's percentage drop, indicating that the GPU's workload scaling is consistent regardless of the visual complexity at these settings. However, the High preset tells a different story: 157 FPS at 1080p falls to 140 FPS at 1440p and then to 119 FPS at 4K, a 24.2% decrease overall, while the Ultra preset sees 130 FPS at 1080p, 116 FPS at 1440p, and 99 FPS at 4K, a 23.8% reduction.

These percentage drops are notably consistent across all four presets, hovering around 24% when moving from 1080p to 4K. This uniformity suggests that the rendering pipeline in Overpower scales linearly with resolution, and the RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to avoid memory-related stutters or bottlenecks. The fact that even the Low preset at 4K (205 FPS) remains far above the 1440p Ultra result (116 FPS) indicates that the GPU is not the sole constraint at lower resolutions; rather, the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads are providing ample performance headroom, allowing the GPU to stretch its legs as resolution rises.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this system in Overpower?*

A: The highest recorded average is 271 FPS at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is followed by 241 FPS at 2560x1440 Low and 205 FPS at 3840x2160 Low, showing that the system can push well beyond 200 FPS even at 4K when settings are minimized.

Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High at the same resolution?

A: At every resolution tested, the Ultra preset delivers a lower average frame rate than High. Specifically, at 1080p, Ultra averages 130 FPS versus 157 FPS for High; at 1440p, it is 116 FPS versus 140 FPS; and at 4K, it is 99 FPS versus 119 FPS. The gap is roughly 27-28 FPS across all resolutions, representing a 17-18% performance cost for the Ultra preset's additional visual features.

Q: Is the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gameplay in this title?

A: Yes, the data indicates no memory-related performance issues. At 3840x2160, the system maintains an average of 99 FPS on Ultra and 119 FPS on High, with the Medium preset showing a minimum frame rate of 109 FPS and a maximum of 147 FPS. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are clearly adequate for the game's demands at this resolution.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Medium presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 241 FPS, while Medium averages 151 FPS. This is a substantial 90 FPS difference, representing a 37.3% performance reduction when moving from Low to Medium. The Medium preset does provide a minimum FPS of 128 and a maximum of 173, indicating some variance, but the average remains well above typical display refresh rates.

Q: Does the CPU become a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the i5-14600K has significant headroom. At 1080p Low, the system hits 271 FPS, and at 1080p Medium, it stays at 169 FPS. Given that the CPU has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz and scores 24,491 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, it is unlikely to be the limiting factor at these frame rates, though the 1080p results show less scaling between presets compared to higher resolutions, hinting at some CPU involvement in frame pacing.

*Q: How does this system rank among all tested hardware combinations in Overpower?*

A: Out of 3,713 total combinations, this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 201st. This places it in the top 5.4% of all tested configurations, indicating that it is a high-end setup capable of delivering excellent performance throughout the game.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 plays a central role in determining Overpower's performance at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the frame rate scaling patterns. With a base clock of 2205 MHz and a boost clock of 2505 MHz, the GPU operates at high frequencies, and its 5 nm process node from TSMC allows for efficient power delivery. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, running at an effective speed of 22.4 Gbps, provides a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s across a 256-bit bus, which is more than sufficient for the game's texture and geometry data at 4K.

The GPU's benchmark scores contextualize its raw capabilities. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 6,567, and its Passmark G3D score is 34,457, which places it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4080 is effectively tied with the RTX 4080 SUPER, showing a deltaPct of just 0.1%, meaning it performs within a fraction of a percent of that card. It also outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.1% and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 2.6%, though these differences are minor in real-world gaming.

In Overpower, the GPU's workload becomes the primary constraint as resolution increases. The transition from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows a consistent performance reduction across all presets, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. However, the fact that even at 4K Ultra the system maintains 99 FPS average indicates that the RTX 4080 is not being fully saturated by this title, leaving headroom for future driver optimizations or more demanding scenes. The GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 280.6 GPixel/s pixel rate contribute to its ability to handle the game's action sequences without frame rate collapses, as evidenced by the Medium preset's 4K minimum of 109 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured frame rates, the Medium preset offers the most balanced experience across all resolutions, providing high average FPS while maintaining a stable minimum frame rate. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers 169 FPS average with a minimum of 144 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense action sequences. At 2560x1440, the average drops to 151 FPS with a minimum of 128 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS threshold for smoothness and suitable for high-refresh-rate displays. Even at 3840x2160, Medium maintains a 128 FPS average with a 109 FPS minimum, making it the only preset where 4K gameplay stays consistently above 100 FPS.

The High preset is a viable alternative for users prioritizing visual fidelity over maximum frame rates. It averages 157 FPS at 1080p, 140 FPS at 1440p, and 119 FPS at 4K, all of which are respectable, but the lack of a reported minimum FPS means variance is uncertain. The Ultra preset, while delivering the best image quality, incurs a significant performance penalty: 130 FPS at 1080p, 116 FPS at 1440p, and 99 FPS at 4K. These figures are still playable, but the drop from Medium to Ultra at 4K is 29 FPS, a 22.7% reduction that may not justify the visual gains.

For competitive play, the Low preset at 1080p (271 FPS) or 1440p (241 FPS) provides the highest possible frame rates, which can reduce input latency on high-refresh monitors. However, given that the Medium preset already delivers over 150 FPS at 1440p and over 120 FPS at 4K, it is recommended as the default choice. The data shows that the Medium preset's minimum FPS values (128 at 1440p, 109 at 4K) are the only ones recorded in the dataset, indicating a consistent frame pacing that is preferable for a smooth experience. Users with G-Sync or FreeSync displays will benefit most from the Medium preset, as it keeps frame rates within the VRR window without excessive variance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The dataset provides a complete matrix of average frame rates across three resolutions and four settings, with minimum and maximum values only recorded for the Medium preset. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves the highest average of 271 FPS, followed by Medium at 169 FPS (minimum 144, maximum 194), High at 157 FPS, and Ultra at 130 FPS. This represents a 141 FPS spread between the lowest and highest settings at 1080p, showing that the CPU is capable of pushing very high frame rates when the GPU load is reduced.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset still leads with 241 FPS, but the gap to Medium narrows slightly to 90 FPS, with Medium averaging 151 FPS (minimum 128, maximum 173). High follows at 140 FPS, and Ultra at 116 FPS. The total spread at 1440p is 125 FPS, which is smaller than at 1080p, indicating that the GPU is beginning to exert more influence on performance as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset drops to 205 FPS, Medium to 128 FPS (minimum 109, maximum 147), High to 119 FPS, and Ultra to 99 FPS. The spread here is 106 FPS, the smallest of the three resolutions, confirming that the GPU is the dominant factor at 4K. It is notable that the High and Ultra presets at 4K produce averages of 119 and 99 FPS, respectively, which is surprising given the typical performance hierarchy; the 20 FPS gap between them suggests that Ultra's additional effects (likely ray tracing or advanced shading) are particularly demanding on the GPU's 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores.

The Medium preset's recorded minimum and maximum values provide insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p, the 144-194 FPS range indicates a 50 FPS variance, while at 1440p, the 128-173 FPS range shows a 45 FPS variance, and at 4K, the 109-147 FPS range narrows to 38 FPS. This decreasing variance with resolution suggests that the GPU's workload becomes more uniform at higher pixel counts, reducing the likelihood of stutters from CPU-side frame drops.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14600K serves as the foundation for this system, and its specifications explain the high frame rates observed at lower resolutions. With 14 cores and 20 threads, the CPU offers substantial multi-threading capability, which is reflected in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,491 and Geekbench multi-core score of 16,673. Its boost clock of 5.30 GHz and base clock of 3.50 GHz allow for rapid single-thread execution, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,064 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,491.

In the context of Overpower, the CPU's role is most apparent at 1080p, where it must feed the RTX 4080 with enough draw calls to maintain frame rates above 200 FPS. The fact that the system achieves 271 FPS at 1080p Low and 241 FPS at 1440p Low indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck in these scenarios, as the GPU is still able to render frames at these high rates. However, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings (271 to 241 FPS, a 30 FPS drop) suggests that the GPU is taking on more of the load, while the CPU remains relatively idle.

The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache help reduce memory latency, which is crucial for maintaining consistent frame times in action games. Its Passmark multithread score of 38,682 and single-thread score of 4,270 further corroborate its strong performance, placing it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-14600K is essentially on par with the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (deltaPct of -0.2%) and the AMD EPYC 4345P (deltaPct of 0.3%), though these are workstation-class chips with different target workloads.

At 4K, the CPU's influence diminishes, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The difference between the Low preset (205 FPS) and Ultra preset (99 FPS) at 4K is entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering load, with the CPU providing sufficient IPC to avoid constraining the GPU. The i5-14600K's support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, along with its PCIe Gen 5 interface, ensures that system memory and peripheral bandwidth are not bottlenecks. Overall, the data indicates that this CPU-GPU combination is well-matched, with the CPU providing ample headroom at lower resolutions and the GPU dominating at higher ones, making the i5-14600K a solid choice for this game.