Overpower

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a robust 1080p and 1440p gaming experience in Overpower, with performance scaling that clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. This combo ranks in the 55th percentile of all tested configurations, holding its own against a wide field of competitors.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Alder Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. This configuration provides a solid foundation for gaming, as evidenced by its benchmark scores: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 and a single-core score of 1680. The processor's 18 MB of shared L3 cache further aids in reducing memory latency during gameplay.

In Overpower, the CPU's role is most apparent at lower resolutions and settings where the frame rate ceiling is higher. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 163 FPS, a figure that demands strong per-core performance. The i5-12400F's single-thread capabilities, shown in a 3DMark single-thread score of 909, allow it to keep pace with the GPU's output in these less demanding scenarios. The processor's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to handle the game's logic and physics without becoming a limiting factor, as the data shows no significant frame time inconsistencies at these settings.

However, the CPU's influence wanes as resolution increases. The benchmark results indicate that the i5-12400F provides a stable platform, but the performance ceiling in Overpower is dictated by the graphics card. The CPU's benchmark scores relative to its peers place it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19039. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and Intel Core 3 201E, show a delta of 0% and -0.1% respectively, indicating that the i5-12400F is a well-balanced mid-range option that does not introduce a noticeable bottleneck in this specific game.

The processor's 12 threads help maintain consistent frame pacing when the GPU is under load, but the data suggests that Overpower is not heavily multi-threaded. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5895 is only marginally higher than the 8-thread score of 4779, implying that the game's engine primarily utilizes a handful of cores. This means the i5-12400F's performance is more dependent on its boost clock of 4.40 GHz than its thread count. Overall, the CPU provides a capable foundation, but the measured FPS in Overpower is overwhelmingly a reflection of the GPU's capabilities.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

*Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this combo in Overpower?*

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 163, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo delivers an average of 59 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold often considered ideal for smooth gameplay.

Q: Is there a significant performance difference between Medium and High settings at 1440p?

A: Yes, the data shows an average of 91 FPS on Medium settings and 84 FPS on High settings at 2560x1440, a difference of 7 FPS in favor of Medium.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among all tested configurations in this game?

A: The combo ranks 1340 out of 2980 total tested combos, placing it in the upper half of all configurations.

Q: Does the GPU hold a higher benchmark percentile than the CPU?

A: No, the CPU has a percentile of 73 among all CPUs, while the GPU has a percentile of 58 among all GPUs. This suggests the CPU is relatively stronger in its category than the GPU is in its own.

Q: Are there any settings where the frame rate exceeds 120 FPS at 4K?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 123 FPS, indicating that the hardware can handle 4K if graphical fidelity is sacrificed.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which points directly to the GPU as the limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 163 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 145 FPS, a reduction of 18 FPS or roughly 11%. Stepping up to 4K Low, the average falls to 123 FPS, another 22 FPS drop from 1440p. This linear decline with resolution is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario.

The trend is even more pronounced at higher settings. At 1080p Ultra, the combo manages 78 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 70 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 59 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra shows a loss of 8 FPS, while from 1440p to 4K shows a loss of 11 FPS. This consistent decrease in performance as pixel count rises indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 7700's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are being increasingly taxed.

The data suggests that the i5-12400F is not the bottleneck in this configuration. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see a plateau or a much smaller difference between resolutions, particularly at lower settings where the CPU has more headroom. Instead, the frame rate continues to scale down with resolution, demonstrating that the GPU's rendering capacity is the constraint. The RX 7700's performance metrics, such as a Passmark G3D score of 20974, place it in the 58th percentile of GPUs, and its performance drops proportionally with the increased pixel workload.

At 1080p, the combo achieves 163 FPS on Low, which is a high enough frame rate that the CPU's single-thread performance could start to become relevant. However, the fact that the FPS still scales down to 123 FPS at 4K Low shows that even at the lowest settings, the GPU is still the primary limiter. This is a healthy sign for the pairing, as it means the CPU has enough headroom to support the GPU across a wide range of settings and resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 achieves a rank of 1340 out of 2980 tested combos in Overpower. This places the pairing in the 55th percentile of all configurations, meaning it outperforms the majority of systems tested. The rank reflects a balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU work well together, but it also indicates that there is a significant number of more powerful configurations above it.

When interpreting this rank, it is essential to consider the individual components' standings. The CPU sits in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, which is higher than the combo's overall rank. The GPU, conversely, sits in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. The combo's rank of 1340 is lower than the CPU's percentile would suggest, but higher than the GPU's percentile would imply on its own. This suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing, dragging the overall rank down slightly from where the CPU alone would place.

The data indicates that this combo is a competent mid-range performer. It is neither a top-tier enthusiast setup nor a low-end budget build. The rank of 1340/2980 means that roughly 1640 other combos are faster in Overpower, which includes systems with higher-end CPUs and GPUs. However, the combo still delivers playable frame rates in most scenarios, as seen in the measured FPS data. The ranking is a holistic measure, and the fact that this combo lands in the upper half suggests it offers a solid experience for the hardware involved.

The GPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 9060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, have average benchmark scores that are 1% and 1.7% higher, respectively. These small deltas in raw compute performance translate to minor differences in actual gaming FPS. The combo's rank in Overpower reflects these small margins, as it finds itself in a crowded field of similarly performing GPUs. The CPU's rivals, like the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, show a 0% delta, indicating that the i5-12400F is right at the average for its class.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and the desired frame rate. For players prioritizing smooth, high-refresh-rate gameplay at 1080p, the Low preset delivers an average of 163 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play. However, the Medium preset still offers a very respectable 102 FPS and likely provides a better visual experience without sacrificing too much performance.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the sweet spot, achieving an average of 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a good balance between visual fidelity and smoothness. The High preset at 1440p yields 84 FPS, which is still playable but offers a diminishing return for the visual upgrade. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls to 70 FPS, which is acceptable but may feel less fluid on high-refresh-rate monitors.

For 4K gaming, the situation is more nuanced. The Low preset is the only setting that provides a clearly smooth experience, with an average of 123 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 77 FPS, which is playable, but the High and Ultra presets fall to 71 and 59 FPS respectively. The Ultra preset at 4K is below the 60 FPS target and may result in noticeable stutter or input lag for some players. The data suggests that for a 4K experience, players should stick to Low or Medium settings to maintain acceptable frame rates.

When considering the entire dataset, the Medium preset at 1440p offers the best combination of performance and quality. It delivers a high average FPS of 91 with a relatively tight minimum of 77 FPS, indicating stable frame pacing. This preset is recommended for most users who want a visually pleasing experience without compromising on smoothness. For those with 1080p monitors, the Medium preset at 102 FPS is also a strong choice, providing a significant visual upgrade over Low while still being well above 60 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data for this combo in Overpower is comprehensive, covering three resolutions and four settings presets. Below is a detailed breakdown of the exact average frame rates, with minimum and maximum values where available.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: The average FPS is 163. This is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo.
• Medium: The average FPS is 102, with a minimum of 86 and a maximum of 117. This shows a stable performance window.
• High: The average FPS is 94.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 78.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: The average FPS is 145.
• Medium: The average FPS is 91, with a minimum of 77 and a maximum of 104.
• High: The average FPS is 84.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 70.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: The average FPS is 123.
• Medium: The average FPS is 77, with a minimum of 65 and a maximum of 89.
• High: The average FPS is 71.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 59.

The data shows a clear and consistent tiering of performance. At 1080p, the combo easily handles all settings, with even the Ultra preset maintaining a 78 FPS average. The step up to 1440p results in a roughly 10-15% performance hit across all settings, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. The jump to 4K is more severe, with the Ultra preset dropping to 59 FPS, a 24% reduction from the 1440p Ultra score of 70 FPS.

The minimum FPS values, provided only for the Medium presets, offer insight into frame pacing. At 1080p, the minimum is 86 FPS, which is 84% of the average. At 1440p, the minimum is 77 FPS, which is 85% of the average. At 4K, the minimum is 65 FPS, which is 84% of the average. This consistency suggests that the combo provides stable frame delivery without major hitches, even when the GPU is under heavy load at 4K. The maximum FPS values also show a similar pattern, indicating that the hardware does not experience significant thermal or power throttling during gameplay.