Overpower
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 135 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 82 | 99 | 108 | 174 |
| 1440p QHD | 100 | 116 | 125 | 203 |
| 1080p Full HD | 108 | 134 | 142 | 227 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Overpower, the 2023 action title, presents a fascinating case study in system balancing when paired with the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The measured data reveals a configuration that is heavily GPU-bound at lower resolutions, yet demonstrates a clear shift in bottleneck dynamics as resolution increases. This analysis breaks down the specific performance metrics, contextualizing them against the component's individual benchmark standings and the broader database of tested combos.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K tells a clear story about where the performance ceiling lies. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 227 FPS, which drops to 203.3 FPS at 1440p and further to 173.7 FPS at 4K. This represents a 23.5% reduction from 1080p to 4K, a relatively modest decline that suggests the CPU is still capable of feeding the GPU adequately even at the highest pixel counts.
However, the scaling pattern changes dramatically with higher settings. At Ultra settings, the transition from 1080p (107.8 FPS) to 1440p (100.1 FPS) shows only a 7.1% drop, while moving to 4K (82.1 FPS) introduces a cumulative 23.8% reduction. This non-linear scaling indicates that the RX 7900 XT's immense 800.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 20 GB GDDR6 frame buffer become increasingly dominant factors as pixel count and graphical complexity rise.
The most telling metric is the Low-to-Ultra performance delta at each resolution. At 1080p, Low settings yield 227 FPS while Ultra produces 107.8 FPS — a 52.5% performance penalty for maximum fidelity. At 4K, the same comparison shows 173.7 FPS versus 82.1 FPS, a 52.7% penalty. The consistency of this percentage across resolutions strongly implies that the GPU's shading units, texture units, and render output pipelines are the limiting factor, not the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the extensive database of 1,744 tested combinations, this specific pairing ranks 353rd for Overpower. This places it in the top 20.2% of all combos tested, which is notable given that the CPU itself sits at the 77th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 82nd percentile among all graphics cards. The rank suggests that the combination performs slightly below what the individual component percentiles might predict, hinting at a potential bottleneck.
The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its processing capability. The Intel Core i7-8700K scores virtually identically (0.1% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is only 0.7% behind, and the Intel Core i5-1335U trails by 0.3%. The AMD EPYC 7773X, despite being a server-class part, is 1.3% ahead in the aggregate benchmark. These narrow margins indicate that the i5-12400F's processing power is well within the expected range for modern gaming, yet its 6-core/12-thread configuration may not fully exploit the RX 7900 XT's capabilities in framerate-heavy scenarios.
The GPU's rival comparison shows a different story. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile scores identically (0.0% delta), while the NVIDIA CMP 70HX is 0.3% ahead and the RTX 4080 Mobile trails by 0.6%. The inclusion of mobile parts in this comparison underscores that the RX 7900 XT's raw compute power is substantial, but the rank of 353 suggests that real-world gaming performance depends heavily on the supporting CPU.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12400F operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, drawing from a 65 W TDP. Its 3DMark scores reveal a progressive scaling from 909 (single-thread) to 5,912 (max threads), with a notable jump between 8-thread (4,779) and 16-thread (5,895) tests. This scaling pattern suggests the 12 threads provide meaningful parallel processing headroom, but the architecture's 10 nm process and Alder Lake design prioritize efficiency over raw multi-core aggression.
In Overpower, the CPU's role appears secondary at higher resolutions. The 4K Ultra score of 82.1 FPS versus the 1080p Low score of 227 FPS demonstrates that the GPU is the primary performance driver. However, the 1080p Low result is particularly telling — 227 FPS requires the CPU to maintain a high instruction throughput, and the i5-12400F's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,332 and multi-core score of 16,518 indicate it can handle this demand without becoming the primary bottleneck.
The PassMark physics score of 1,202 and the data compression score of 233,327 suggest the CPU handles game logic and asset decompression tasks competently. The 18 MB of shared L3 cache provides a substantial buffer for frequently accessed data, which is critical for maintaining consistent frametimes in action-oriented scenes typical of Overpower's genre.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1080p, the data shows a clear hierarchy: Low settings deliver 227 FPS, Medium achieves 141.7 FPS, High reaches 134.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 107.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium (85.3 FPS) is significantly larger than the gap between Medium and High (7.3 FPS), suggesting that the Medium preset introduces substantial rendering features that tax the GPU without a proportional visual benefit.
Moving to 1440p, the scores compress slightly: Low produces 203.3 FPS, Medium 124.9 FPS, High 115.8 FPS, and Ultra 100.1 FPS. The Low-to-Medium delta narrows to 78.4 FPS, while the Medium-to-High gap remains small at 9.1 FPS. This pattern indicates that the GPU's 5,376 shading units and 336 texture mapping units are being utilized more efficiently at this resolution, with the memory subsystem's 320-bit bus providing adequate bandwidth.
At 4K, the breakdown becomes: Low 173.7 FPS, Medium 108.1 FPS, High 98.8 FPS, and Ultra 82.1 FPS. The Medium-to-High delta shrinks to just 9.3 FPS, while the Low-to-Medium gap remains significant at 65.6 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 82.1 FPS remains comfortably above playable thresholds, but the diminishing returns between Medium and High settings become more pronounced as pixel count increases.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo better suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming or smooth 4K gameplay?
A: The data shows 227 FPS at 1080p Low and 82.1 FPS at 4K Ultra, indicating it can serve both use cases. However, the 52.5% performance drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor even at lower resolutions when settings are maximized.
Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance impact Overpower's framerate?
A: The i5-12400F's 3DMark single-thread score of 909 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,332 support high framerate scenarios, as evidenced by the 227 FPS result at 1080p Low. The CPU's ability to maintain this throughput is critical for avoiding bottlenecks at lower resolutions.
Q: What is the most significant performance gap between settings?
A: The transition from Low to Medium settings produces the largest FPS drop at every resolution. At 1080p, this gap is 85.3 FPS (227 to 141.7), at 1440p it is 78.4 FPS (203.3 to 124.9), and at 4K it is 65.6 FPS (173.7 to 108.1).
Q: Does the RX 7900 XT's 20 GB VRAM provide any benefit in Overpower?
A: While the game's specific VRAM usage is not measured, the 20 GB GDDR6 memory with 800.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures the GPU is not constrained by memory capacity or bandwidth at any tested setting, allowing the 5,376 shading units to operate at full potential.
Q: How does this combo's rank of 353 out of 1,744 compare to the component's individual percentiles?
A: The CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 82nd percentile suggest a combined performance in the top 20-25% of all hardware. The 353rd rank places it slightly lower, indicating the pairing may not extract the full potential of either component.
Q: Which resolution provides the best balance of performance and visual fidelity?
A: The 1440p Medium result of 124.9 FPS offers a strong balance, delivering 44.9% higher framerate than 4K Ultra while maintaining substantial graphical detail. The 1440p High result of 115.8 FPS is also compelling, staying well above 100 FPS.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data suggests that the Medium preset provides the most efficient performance-to-fidelity ratio. At 1440p Medium, the combo delivers 124.9 FPS, which represents a 78.4 FPS improvement over Low settings while still maintaining 78.5% of the Ultra preset's framerate. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p yields only 9.1 FPS (7.3% improvement), while the jump from Low to Medium provides 78.4 FPS (62.8% improvement) — a clear indication that Medium captures most of the visual benefit without the heavy performance cost.
For 4K users, the Medium preset at 108.1 FPS is the optimal choice, providing 26 FPS more than High (98.8 FPS) and 26 FPS more than Ultra (82.1 FPS). The 4K Low setting of 173.7 FPS is unnecessarily high for most displays, making Medium the recommended compromise. At 1080p, the Ultra preset's 107.8 FPS is still highly playable, but the Medium preset's 141.7 FPS offers a 31.5% performance headroom that could benefit high-refresh-rate displays.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with 57,700 million transistors on a 5 nm process, is the dominant component in this pairing. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623 and PassMark G3D score of 29,009 place it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, and its performance in Overpower reflects this positioning. The GPU's 2,394 MHz boost clock and 2,025 MHz game clock provide substantial computational throughput, while the 800.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures data flows freely to the 5,376 shading units.
The GPU's role becomes increasingly pronounced at higher resolutions and settings. The 4K Ultra result of 82.1 FPS demonstrates that the GPU's 192 render output pipelines and 336 texture mapping units are handling the workload effectively, but the 52.7% performance penalty from Low to Ultra at 4K indicates that the GPU is operating near its limits. The 84 ray tracing cores, while present, do not appear to create a significant bottleneck in this non-ray-traced scenario.
The GPU's 20 GB VRAM capacity and 320-bit memory bus provide exceptional headroom for Overpower's asset streaming, and the 459.6 GPixel/s pixel rate ensures fill-rate is never the limiting factor. The measured FPS data suggests that the RX 7900 XT is the primary determinant of performance in this combo, with the CPU providing adequate support without becoming the critical constraint at any tested resolution or setting.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400F
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 173.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 108.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 98.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 82.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 203.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 124.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 115.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 100.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 227.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 141.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 134.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 107.8 |
Overpower with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with RX 7900 XT + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400F + RX 7900 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.