Overpower
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 36 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 25 | 29 | 47 |
| 1440p QHD | 28 | 32 | 36 | 53 |
| 1080p Full HD | 29 | 34 | 39 | 60 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 lands at rank 1701 out of 1744 tested combos in Overpower. That places this configuration in the bottom 2.5% of all tested systems, which is a striking result given the CPU’s pedigree. The data suggests this pairing is heavily constrained by the graphics card, as the 7900X is a top-tier processor while the GTX 1650 is an entry-level GPU from a much older generation. The delta between the CPU’s potential and the actual in-game outcome is immense, making this combo a textbook case of bottlenecking. Benchmarks for the CPU alone place it in the 93rd percentile among all processors, yet the combo rank indicates that raw processor strength does little to lift the gaming experience here.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is the limiting factor in this configuration. With 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, the GPU delivers 128.1 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest by modern standards. The base clock sits at 1485 MHz with a boost up to 1665 MHz, and the card’s FP32 throughput is 2.984 TFLOPS. These specifications place the GPU in the 43rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8713. In Overpower, the GPU’s role is decisive: at 1080p Low settings, the combo reaches 60.1 FPS, but any increase in graphical load causes a sharp decline. The data shows that the GTX 1650’s memory capacity and bandwidth are likely insufficient for the game’s higher presets, as frame rates drop below 30 FPS at 4K Ultra. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile (deltaPct -0.4) and AMD Radeon 550X (deltaPct -0.4), which are statistically equivalent in average score, underscoring that this card sits at a performance plateau that cannot be overcome by the CPU.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling across resolutions. Moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K at the same settings produces consistent frame rate erosion. At Low settings, the combo achieves 60.1 FPS at 1080p, drops to 52.6 FPS at 1440p, and falls to 47.2 FPS at 4K. This represents a 21.5% drop from 1080p to 4K, which is relatively mild and suggests that even at 4K Low, the GPU is not completely overwhelmed. However, at High settings, the scaling becomes steeper: 33.8 FPS at 1080p, 31.5 FPS at 1440p, and 25.2 FPS at 4K. The jump from Medium to High at any resolution incurs a significant penalty, indicating that the game’s higher presets demand more from the GPU than the 4 GB frame buffer can efficiently handle. The fact that 4K Ultra yields only 23.8 FPS while 1080p Low yields 60.1 FPS highlights that resolution scaling is not linear — the GPU’s resource limits compound at higher pixel counts. This behavior points squarely at the GPU as the limiting component, as a CPU-bound scenario would show flatter FPS across resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo playable at 1080p?
A: At 1080p Low, the combo averages 60.1 FPS, which is considered playable. However, at 1080p Medium, the average drops to 38.6 FPS, and at High it falls to 33.8 FPS, indicating that only the lowest preset delivers a smooth experience at this resolution.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has an average benchmark score of 50556, which is 0.1% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (50598) and 0.4% below the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (50738). It also trails the Intel Core i9-13980HX (50944) by 0.8%, showing that the CPU is competitive but not the absolute fastest in its class.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: At 1440p, the Low preset delivers 52.6 FPS, which is the only setting that approaches smooth gameplay. Medium yields 35.8 FPS, High produces 31.5 FPS, and Ultra drops to 27.6 FPS, so users must accept Low for a viable experience.
Q: Does the GPU have any headroom for future games?
A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 8713, placing it in the 43rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are within 0.5% in score, and with only 4 GB of VRAM, the data suggests limited headroom for demanding titles beyond Overpower’s Low preset.
Q: How does the combo rank globally?
A: The combo ranks 1701 out of 1744 tested combinations in Overpower, placing it in the bottom 2.5% of all systems tested for this game.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K?
A: At 4K, Low averages 47.2 FPS while Ultra averages 23.8 FPS, a difference of 23.4 FPS. This 49.6% reduction in performance from Low to Ultra demonstrates the GPU’s inability to handle high-end settings at this resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 60.1 FPS at Low settings, 38.6 FPS at Medium, 33.8 FPS at High, and 29.1 FPS at Ultra. The spread from Low to Ultra is 31.0 FPS, showing a steep decline as graphical fidelity increases. At 2560x1440, the numbers shift downward: 52.6 FPS at Low, 35.8 FPS at Medium, 31.5 FPS at High, and 27.6 FPS at Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 25.0 FPS, but the absolute values are lower across the board. At 3840x2160, the pattern continues with 47.2 FPS at Low, 28.8 FPS at Medium, 25.2 FPS at High, and 23.8 FPS at Ultra. Notably, the difference between High and Ultra at 4K is only 1.4 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset adds rendering load without meaningful frame rate benefit. Across all resolutions, the Low preset is the only one that consistently stays above 47 FPS, while Ultra never exceeds 29.1 FPS. The data shows that the GPU’s performance ceiling is around 60 FPS at 1080p Low, and every step up in settings or resolution pushes the frame rate further into sub-30 territory.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture with a 5 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with 64 MB of shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 43695 and a single-core score of 6168, placing it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Despite this immense processing power, the in-game results are dictated entirely by the GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 50556 is nearly six times the GPU’s average of 8713, yet the combo rank of 1701 out of 1744 shows that this disparity does not translate to gaming performance. The CPU’s nearest rivals — the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, Intel Core i7-13850HX, and Intel Core i9-13980HX — all have average scores within 0.8% of the 7900X, indicating that swapping the CPU would have negligible impact on Overpower’s frame rates. The data implies that the 12 cores and 24 threads are vastly underutilized in this scenario, as the GPU saturates long before the CPU reaches its limits. At 1080p Low, the CPU could theoretically push higher frame rates, but the GTX 1650’s 2.984 TFLOPS of FP32 performance caps the output at 60.1 FPS.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data points to a single viable path for this combo: the Low preset. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 60.1 FPS, which is the only configuration that clears the 60 FPS threshold. At 1440p Low, the average drops to 52.6 FPS, still playable but below the 60 FPS mark. The Medium preset at 1080p yields 38.6 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced action but falls short of smooth gameplay. High and Ultra presets at any resolution produce frame rates below 34 FPS, which is likely to feel stuttery in an action game. The recommendation is to run the game at 1080p Low for the best balance of visual clarity and performance, as this is the only setting where the GPU does not bottleneck the experience. For users who prioritize resolution over frame rate, 1440p Low at 52.6 FPS is a secondary option, but the 4K Low result of 47.2 FPS suggests diminishing returns at higher pixel counts. The Ultra preset offers no meaningful benefit at any resolution, with the best case being 29.1 FPS at 1080p, which is 31.0 FPS lower than the Low preset at the same resolution. Given the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 128.1 GB/s bandwidth, the data strongly advises against any preset above Low for consistent performance.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 47.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 28.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 25.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 23.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 52.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 35.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 31.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 27.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 60.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 38.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 33.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 29.1 |
Overpower with Ryzen 9 7900X + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with GTX 1650 + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 7900X + GTX 1650
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.