Overpower

FAQ

Q: What is the measured performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combo in Overpower?

A: The data shows playable frame rates across all tested settings. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 143 on Low to 69 on Ultra. At 3840x2160, the range narrows from 108 on Low to 52 on Ultra.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested system combinations in Overpower?

A: This pairing ranks 2146 out of 3713 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. The rank reflects the combined CPU and GPU performance in this specific action title.

Q: What is the best resolution for a smooth 60+ FPS experience?

A: All three resolutions achieve 60+ FPS averages on Medium settings. At 1920x1080 Medium, the average is 89 FPS; at 2560x1440 Medium, it is 79 FPS; and at 3840x2160 Medium, it is 68 FPS. Ultra settings at 4K drops to 52 FPS average.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G posts an average benchmark score of 27051, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i9-9900K (27097) and 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (26936). It also trails the Intel Core i5-14400T by 0.4% (27166) but leads the Intel Core i7-1370P by 0.6% (26900).

Q: How does the GPU stack up against its nearest competitors in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 20282, which is 1% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480), 1.2% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534), 1.3% lower than the Intel Arc B570 (20556), and 1.5% lower than the Intel Arc A750 (20582).

Q: Is there a meaningful FPS difference between Medium and High settings at 1440p?

A: Yes. At 2560x1440, Medium averages 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS, while High averages 74 FPS. The 5 FPS gap favors Medium, though both settings maintain smooth gameplay.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (Cezanne codename) built on TSMC's 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip includes 16 MB of L3 cache, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 64 KB of L1 cache per core. Memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

In Overpower, the CPU's role is primarily about maintaining consistent frame pacing, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is less likely to be the bottleneck. The data shows that at 1920x1080 Low, the combo reaches 143 FPS average, which suggests the processor can feed the GPU adequately at high frame rates. The single-thread benchmark scores — 899 in 3DMark single-thread and 1494 in Cinebench R23 single-core — indicate strong per-core performance for a desktop chip of this era.

The multi-threaded capabilities are substantial: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 12830.5, Geekbench multicore scores 9950, and PassMark multithread scores 24419. In a fast-paced action game like Overpower, these resources help with background tasks, physics calculations, and any streaming-related workloads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6629 and max-thread score of 6627 show scaling that remains consistent as thread count increases, which is typical for a fully populated 8-core design.

Compared to its nearest rivals in the benchmark database, the Ryzen 7 5700G performs nearly identically to the Intel Core i9-9900K, with a delta of just -0.2% in average benchmark score. It also trades blows with the Intel Core i5-14400T (-0.4%) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (+0.4%). This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios within Overpower, the experience would be indistinguishable from these competing processors.

The CPU's percentile rank of 79 among all tested CPUs means it outperforms the majority of processors in the database. For a game released in 2023, this chip provides enough compute headroom to avoid being the limiting factor in most configurations, particularly when paired with a GPU that has a percentile rank of 65.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is built on the Turing architecture (TU104 chip) using TSMC's 12 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). Core clocks are 1605 MHz base and 1770 MHz boost. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 40 RT cores, and 320 tensor cores.

In Overpower, the GPU is the primary driver of visual fidelity. The measured FPS data shows a clear scaling pattern across settings and resolutions. At 3840x2160, the GPU delivers 108 FPS on Low but only 52 FPS on Ultra — a 56 FPS spread that demonstrates how demanding the higher preset is at 4K. The Medium preset at 4K holds 68 FPS average with a minimum of 57 FPS, which is the only 4K configuration with recorded frame time variance in the data.

The RTX 2070 SUPER's bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is a key asset for high-resolution textures. At 2560x1440, the GPU manages 127 FPS on Low, 79 FPS on Medium (min 67, max 91), 74 FPS on High, and 61 FPS on Ultra. The 1440p results show a smoother degradation curve from Low to Ultra compared to 4K, with a 66 FPS total spread.

At 1920x1080, the GPU is clearly capable of high refresh rates: 143 FPS on Low, 89 FPS on Medium (min 76, max 102), 83 FPS on High, and 69 FPS on Ultra. The 1080p Medium result with its recorded min/max range of 76–102 FPS suggests the GPU maintains consistent frame delivery without major dips.

The GPU's benchmark profile shows a PassMark G3D score of 18169 and a PassMark GPU compute score of 7557. In DirectX 12, the PassMark score is 67, while DirectX 11 scores 151 and DirectX 9 scores 223. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1651. These synthetic results place the GPU at the 65th percentile among all tested GPUs.

Nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (avg score 20480, delta -1%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, -1.2%), Intel Arc B570 (20556, -1.3%), and Intel Arc A750 (20582, -1.5%). The RTX 2070 SUPER trails each by a small margin, indicating that its performance class sits just below these competing parts.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the data shows four distinct presets. Low averages 108 FPS, which is surprisingly high for 4K and indicates the game scales well on lower graphical loads. Medium averages 68 FPS with a minimum of 57 and maximum of 78, providing playable performance with some headroom. High averages 63 FPS. Ultra averages 52 FPS, which dips below the 60 FPS threshold that many players target.

At 2560x1440, Low delivers 127 FPS average, Medium hits 79 FPS (min 67, max 91), High reaches 74 FPS, and Ultra drops to 61 FPS. The step from Medium to High is only 5 FPS, while the step from High to Ultra is 13 FPS — a notable jump in performance cost for the Ultra preset.

At 1920x1080, Low provides 143 FPS average, which is close to a 144 Hz display's maximum refresh rate. Medium averages 89 FPS (min 76, max 102), High averages 83 FPS, and Ultra averages 69 FPS. The 1080p results show the smallest relative performance drop from Low to Ultra (74 FPS total), which suggests that at this resolution the GPU has enough resources to handle even demanding settings.

The data reveals that the Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values across all resolutions. This may indicate that the benchmark captured more detailed frame time data for this preset, or that Medium exhibits the most varied frame delivery. The minimum FPS values at Medium are 57 (4K), 67 (1440p), and 76 (1080p), all above the 50 FPS mark.

Resolution scaling behaves predictably. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Medium reduces average FPS from 89 to 79, a 10 FPS loss. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Medium reduces average FPS from 79 to 68, another 10 FPS loss. At Low settings, the resolution scaling is steeper: 143 to 127 to 108, representing 16 FPS and 19 FPS drops respectively. This suggests that Low settings become more GPU-bound as resolution increases, while Medium settings maintain a more consistent load profile.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2146 out of 3713 tested combinations in Overpower, placing it in the 57.8th percentile of all tested systems. This rank reflects a pairing where the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU — the Ryzen 7 5700G sits at the 79th percentile among CPUs, while the RTX 2070 SUPER sits at the 65th percentile among GPUs.

The CPU's benchmark average of 27051 places it nearly exactly at parity with its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-9900K (27097, delta -0.2%). The small deltas against the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (+0.4%), Intel Core i5-14400T (-0.4%), and Intel Core i7-1370P (+0.6%) mean that swapping the CPU for any of these alternatives would produce negligible changes in Overpower's performance.

The GPU's benchmark average of 20282 trails its nearest rivals by 1% to 1.5%. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 1% faster, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 1.2% faster, the Intel Arc B570 is 1.3% faster, and the Intel Arc A750 is 1.5% faster. These differences are small enough that real-world gaming performance in Overpower would be nearly identical, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck.

Given this rank, the combo sits in a crowded performance tier. The 3713 total combos mean that 1567 configurations perform worse and 2145 perform better. For a game like Overpower, which is an action title with a 2023 release date, this rank suggests the combo can handle the game comfortably at medium settings across most resolutions, but it is not positioned for maximum fidelity at 4K.

The data indicates this is a balanced pairing for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K achievable at Medium settings. The ranking reflects that the system is more capable than the majority of tested combos, though it does not reach the upper echelons dominated by newer hardware.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings in Overpower. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers the best balance of performance and visual quality, averaging 89 FPS with a minimum of 76 FPS. This provides a smooth experience on standard 60 Hz displays and leaves headroom for 100 Hz panels. The High preset at 83 FPS is also viable, but the 6 FPS gain from dropping to Medium is minimal in visual terms while providing a more comfortable frame buffer.

At 2560x1440, Medium is the recommended preset, averaging 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS. This keeps the experience above 60 FPS even during demanding scenes. High at 74 FPS is acceptable, but the margin above 60 FPS is thinner. Ultra at 61 FPS is borderline — playable on adaptive sync displays but risky for fixed refresh rate monitors if frame pacing varies.

At 3840x2160, Medium is the only preset that maintains a 60+ FPS average, hitting 68 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS. The 57 FPS minimum means occasional dips below 60, but the overall experience is acceptable for 4K gaming. High at 63 FPS is close but has no recorded minimum, suggesting potential instability. Low at 108 FPS is the highest average but sacrifices visual quality significantly. Ultra at 52 FPS falls below the 60 FPS target and is not recommended.

For players prioritizing maximum frame rates, 1080p Low delivers 143 FPS, which is suitable for high refresh rate displays. However, the visual compromise is substantial. The data suggests that Medium settings across all resolutions provide the most consistent performance with the best quality-to-frame-rate ratio. The Medium preset also has the most detailed frame time data in the benchmark, indicating it is a well-tested configuration point.

In summary, the optimal experience for this combo is 1080p Medium (89 FPS), 1440p Medium (79 FPS), or 4K Medium (68 FPS). Players with 60 Hz displays can safely use High at 1080p or 1440p, while those targeting 4K should stick with Medium to maintain playability.