Overpower

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop combo aimed at high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p gaming. In the action title Overpower, this pairing delivers playable frame rates across all tested settings, with the GPU acting as the primary performance driver at higher resolutions and the CPU providing ample headroom at lower ones. The measured data shows a consistent scaling pattern that reveals a balanced system, though the RX 6700 XT’s 12 GB VRAM and 192-bit memory interface become notable factors at 4K. This analysis breaks down the FAQ, component roles, resolution scaling, ranking, and exact measured FPS from the fact pack.

FAQ

*Q: What is the combo rank for this CPU and GPU in Overpower?*

A: This combination ranks 1945 out of 3713 tested combos in Overpower. That places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, meaning there are many faster pairings, but it also outperforms a significant number of alternatives.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the measured average FPS is 75. This is the lowest average among the four 1080p settings, yet it remains comfortably above the threshold for smooth gameplay in most action titles.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6700 XT have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 6700 XT features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity is sufficient for Overpower at the tested resolutions, as no VRAM-related stutters are indicated in the FPS data.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Ryzen 5 7400F?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz and a base clock of 3.70 GHz. With 6 cores and 12 threads, this CPU shows strong single-thread performance in benchmarks, which is relevant for game logic.

Q: Does the combo perform better at 1440p High or 1080p Ultra?

A: The combo achieves 80 average FPS at 2560x1440 High settings, while 1080p Ultra yields 75 average FPS. The higher resolution with High settings actually produces a slightly higher frame rate than 1080p Ultra, indicating that Ultra settings impose a heavier load at 1080p than the resolution increase to 1440p does.

Q: What is the single-core Cinebench R23 score for this CPU?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 3072 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 21765 in multi-core. This single-core result is competitive with recent desktop CPUs and supports the high FPS observed at lower resolutions.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the dominant factor in Overpower’s frame rate, particularly as resolution climbs. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, paired with a 192-bit bus and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, proves adequate for the game’s demands at all tested settings. The GPU’s boost clock reaches 2581 MHz, with a game clock of 2424 MHz and base clock of 2321 MHz. These clocks are on the higher end for the Radeon RX 6000 series, and the benchmark data reflects that: the GPU scores 19786 in Passmark G3D and 2435 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It places in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27425.

In Overpower, the GPU’s role is most visible when comparing settings within a single resolution. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra drops the average FPS from 155 to 75, a reduction of 80 FPS. This is a massive swing caused by the GPU’s workload increasing with texture quality, shadow detail, and post-processing effects. The RX 6700 XT’s compute capabilities—13.21 TFLOPS FP32 and 160 TMUs—handle these effects, but Ultra settings at 1080p demand more than the GPU can deliver relative to Low. The same pattern repeats at 1440p and 4K, where Ultra settings produce the lowest averages of 67 and 57 FPS, respectively.

The GPU’s memory configuration deserves attention. With 12 GB of VRAM, the RX 6700 XT avoids capacity limits in Overpower, as evidenced by stable FPS without reported minimum dips that would indicate swapping. The 384.0 GB/s bandwidth is a mid-range figure, and it becomes a limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the average drops to 57 FPS. The pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 413.0 GTexel/s are sufficient for 1440p High (80 FPS) but struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K with demanding settings. In short, the GPU is the bottleneck in this combo for most scenarios, especially beyond 1080p Medium.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS in Overpower shows a clear inverse relationship between resolution and frame rate, but the scaling is not uniform across settings. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 155 average FPS. Moving to 1440p Low reduces that to 138, a 17 FPS drop (about 11%). At 4K Low, the average falls to 117, another 21 FPS drop (about 15%). This gentler decline at Low settings suggests that the CPU still has headroom and the GPU is not fully saturated until higher resolutions.

High settings tell a different story. From 1080p High (90 FPS) to 1440p High (80 FPS), the drop is 10 FPS (11%). From 1440p High to 4K High (68 FPS), the drop is 12 FPS (15%). This is a consistent pattern, indicating that the GPU is scaling with pixel count. Ultra settings compress the range further: 1080p Ultra yields 75 FPS, 1440p Ultra yields 67 FPS, and 4K Ultra yields 57 FPS. The total drop from 1080p to 4K at Ultra is 18 FPS (24%), which is smaller in percentage terms than the Low setting drop of 38 FPS (24.5%). This suggests that at Ultra, the GPU is already near its limit at 1080p, so the resolution increase has less relative impact.

The Medium settings, which include min and max FPS data, provide additional insight. At 1080p Medium, the average is 97 FPS with a range of 82 to 111 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average is 86 FPS with a range of 73 to 99 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average is 73 FPS with a range of 62 to 84 FPS. The min-to-max spread narrows at higher resolutions, which indicates that the GPU becomes the consistent bottleneck, reducing frame-time variance. At 1080p, the CPU is more involved, leading to larger swings between minimum and maximum frame rates.

The data points to the GPU as the limiting component across all resolutions. Even at 1080p Low, the 155 FPS average is high, but not exceptionally so for a 6-core Zen 4 CPU paired with this GPU—suggesting the GPU caps the frame rate. At 4K Ultra, the 57 FPS average is a clear GPU-bound result, as the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are unlikely to bottleneck at such a low frame rate. For users targeting 1440p, the combo delivers between 67 and 138 FPS depending on settings, with High (80 FPS) being the sweet spot for visual quality versus performance.

How This Combo Ranks

In the global database of tested combos for Overpower, this pairing sits at rank 1945 out of 3713. That places it in the 52nd percentile (calculated from the rank and total combos), meaning it outperforms roughly half of all tested combinations. This is a mid-pack result, consistent with the hardware’s mid-range positioning. The CPU alone, the Ryzen 5 7400F, holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-14600T (avg score 32707, delta 0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, delta -0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, delta 0.3%). These deltas are tiny—within 0.3%—so the CPU’s raw compute is essentially on par with those alternatives.

The GPU, the RX 6700 XT, has an average benchmark score of 27425 and sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (27435, delta 0%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (27565, delta -0.5%), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (27135, delta 1.1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27839, delta -1.5%). Notably, the RX 6700 XT performs nearly identically to the RTX 4070 Mobile in average score, and it is only 0.5% behind the RTX 3090, a much higher-tier card. This indicates that the GPU is punching above its class in synthetic benchmarks, but in Overpower, the combo rank of 1945 shows that game-specific performance is more modest.

The combo’s mid-pack rank suggests that neither component is a standout in this game. The CPU’s high percentile ranking (83rd) is offset by the GPU’s lower percentile (72nd), and the game’s action-oriented nature likely favors GPU throughput. Compared to combos with higher ranks, this system would lag in scenarios demanding heavy rasterization, but it also beats many older or lower-tier pairings. The fact that the combo rank (1945) is lower than the individual component percentiles would suggest implies that Overpower is particularly sensitive to GPU performance, and the RX 6700 XT’s mid-range status holds the combo back from a higher placement.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename), built on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It runs at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boosts to 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and it is unlocked for overclocking. In synthetic benchmarks, the 7400F achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072. Its Passmark multithread score is 25645, with a single-thread score of 3689. These numbers place it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750.

In Overpower, the CPU’s role is secondary to the GPU, but it still matters at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 155 FPS, which is high enough that the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3072) becomes relevant for maintaining frame pacing. The 4.70 GHz boost clock ensures that game logic, AI, and physics calculations are processed quickly, avoiding CPU bottlenecks that would cap FPS below the GPU’s ability. The data supports this: at 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 97, with a minimum of 82 and maximum of 111. The 29 FPS spread between min and max suggests that the CPU is handling variable workloads—such as scene complexity—without severe stutters.

The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for Overpower, which is an action title that likely uses a handful of threads. The multi-core score of 21765 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong multi-threaded performance, but the game does not appear to scale heavily with core count, as the FPS differences between 1080p Low and 4K Low (155 to 117) are dominated by GPU load. The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core provide low-latency access to game data, which helps maintain consistent frame times. Compared to its nearest rivals, the 7400F is effectively tied with the Intel Core i5-14600T (delta 0.1%) and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (delta 0.2%), so any performance differences in Overpower would be negligible from the CPU side.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo in Overpower covers three resolutions and four settings each, for a total of 12 data points. All values are averages unless otherwise noted.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 155 FPS. Medium settings yield 97 FPS, with a minimum of 82 and maximum of 111. High settings drop to 90 FPS. Ultra settings bring the average down to 75 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is a 58 FPS reduction (37%), which is substantial, while Medium to High is only 7 FPS (7%), and High to Ultra is 15 FPS (17%). This indicates that Ultra settings add a significant GPU load beyond High.

At 2560x1440, the averages are lower but still playable. Low settings hit 138 FPS. Medium settings average 86 FPS, with a range of 73 to 99 FPS. High settings average 80 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 67 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is gentle: Low loses 17 FPS (11%), Medium loses 11 FPS (11%), High loses 10 FPS (11%), and Ultra loses 8 FPS (11%). This uniform 11% reduction across settings suggests that the GPU is handling the pixel count increase consistently, without hitting a memory bandwidth wall.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain high frame rates at demanding settings. Low settings average 117 FPS, which is still smooth. Medium settings average 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 and maximum of 84. High settings average 68 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 57 FPS. From 1440p to 4K, the reductions are: Low loses 21 FPS (15%), Medium loses 13 FPS (15%), High loses 12 FPS (15%), and Ultra loses 10 FPS (15%). Again, the scaling is uniform at 15%, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution, and the 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is likely a constraint.

The Medium settings are the only ones with min and max FPS data, and they reveal frame pacing characteristics. At 1080p Medium, the 82-111 range means a 29 FPS spread, which is wide and could indicate occasional CPU-driven dips. At 1440p Medium, the spread narrows to 26 FPS (73-99), and at 4K Medium, it narrows further to 22 FPS (62-84). This tightening of the range at higher resolutions confirms that the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck, reducing frame-time variance as the CPU waits for the GPU to finish rendering. For the other settings, only averages are provided, but the pattern is clear: the combo is best suited for 1080p High (90 FPS) or 1440p Medium (86 FPS), where it delivers smooth performance without the steep cost of Ultra settings. At 4K, only Low (117 FPS) and Medium (73 FPS) are viable, while High (68 FPS) and Ultra (57 FPS) approach the edge of playability for action games.