Overpower

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT combination delivers a broadly playable experience across most tested configurations in Overpower, though the data reveals clear limits at higher resolutions and settings. The combo ranks 2116th out of 2980 tested combos for this game, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This pairing of a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with an 8 GB RDNA 2 graphics card produces average frame rates ranging from 47 FPS at 4K Ultra to 129 FPS at 1080p Low. The measured results show a consistent pattern: lower resolutions and reduced settings yield substantial performance headroom, while the most demanding presets push the system near the edge of smooth gameplay. The following analysis walks through the measured data, component roles, and practical settings guidance based solely on the provided fact pack.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combo in Overpower?*

A: The combo ranks 2116th out of 2980 tested combinations for this game, meaning it sits in the lower third of all tested pairings.

Q: What is the best average FPS recorded for this combo in the game?

A: The highest average FPS is 129, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded, and under what conditions?

A: The lowest average FPS is 47, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings.

Q: Does the RX 6600 XT have enough VRAM for Ultra settings?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. At 4K Ultra the average FPS drops to 47, while at 1080p Ultra it reaches 62 FPS, indicating the card handles the game’s demands but with diminishing returns at higher resolutions.

Q: How much faster is the Ryzen 5 7400F compared to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32750, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707) and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697). Against the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812), it is 0.2% slower.

Q: Which resolution and settings combo provides the highest minimum FPS?

A: The data shows a minimum FPS of 69 at 1920x1080 Medium, which is the highest recorded min FPS across all tested rows. The 2560x1440 Medium row shows a min FPS of 61, and 3840x2160 Medium shows 52.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking compared to all GPUs?

A: The RX 6600 XT sits in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24442.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT achieves a rank of 2116 out of 2980 tested combos in Overpower. This places the pairing in the 71st percentile of combos, meaning roughly 29% of tested configurations perform worse, while the majority outperform it. The rank reflects a mid-tier position that aligns with the individual component standings: the CPU is in the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU is in the 70th percentile among all graphics cards. The gap between the CPU’s higher percentile and the combo’s overall rank suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in this game, as the measured frame rates align more closely with the graphics card’s capabilities than the processor’s.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32750 places it just 0.2% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697) and 0.1% above the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812) by 0.2%. These deltas are negligible, indicating the Ryzen 5 7400F performs nearly identically to those rivals in synthetic tests. For Overpower, this means CPU-bound scenarios would show no meaningful difference between these processors, so the frame rate variance across settings and resolutions is driven primarily by the RX 6600 XT.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24442 puts it 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277) and 0.8% ahead of the GTX 780 Ti (24236), while it trails the Intel Arc A350M (24647) by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (24170) by 1.1%. Despite the RTX 2080 SUPER having a lower average score in this database, the RX 6600 XT’s performance in Overpower at higher settings suggests the game favors the RDNA 2 architecture’s specific features. The 2116th rank out of 2980 combos means the system delivers playable but not outstanding results, with the 4K Ultra row falling below the 60 FPS threshold that many users consider the baseline for smooth action gameplay.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It contains 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die, with a transistor density of 46.7M per mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines, along with 32 ray tracing cores. Its base clock runs at 1968 MHz, with a game clock of 2359 MHz and a boost clock of 2589 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, operating at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, yielding a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 10.60 TFLOPS.

In Overpower, the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth directly influence the measured frame rates. At 4K resolution, the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for Low settings (98 FPS average) but becomes strained as settings increase: Medium yields 61 FPS, High drops to 57 FPS, and Ultra falls to 47 FPS. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth appears adequate for the game’s texture streaming at lower presets, but the 128-bit bus limits performance when higher-resolution textures and effects demand more data throughput. The 4K Medium row shows a minimum FPS of 52 and a maximum of 70, indicating noticeable frame time variance even at a playable average.

The GPU’s 70th percentile ranking among all GPUs reflects its mid-range positioning. Its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the GTX 1630 (0.7% slower), Arc A350M (0.8% faster), GTX 780 Ti (0.8% slower), and RTX 2080 SUPER (1.1% slower). These deltas are small, but in Overpower, the RX 6600 XT’s architecture-specific optimizations likely contribute to its ability to maintain 60+ FPS averages at 1080p Medium and High. The GPU’s 160 W TDP and dual-slot design are consistent with a mainstream card, and the 1x 8-pin power connector suggests modest power requirements for the performance delivered.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RX 6600 XT delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 129 FPS, the highest measured in the entire dataset. Medium settings yield 81 FPS average with a minimum of 69 and maximum of 93. High settings average 75 FPS, while Ultra drops to 62 FPS. The 1080p row shows a clear progression: each step from Low to Ultra reduces performance by roughly 14-18%, with the largest drop occurring between Low and Medium (48 FPS difference). The minimum FPS of 69 at Medium indicates the system maintains playable frame rates even in demanding scenes, while the 93 FPS maximum shows headroom for smooth action.

At 2560x1440, performance decreases noticeably. Low settings average 115 FPS, which is 14 FPS lower than 1080p Low. Medium settings average 72 FPS with a minimum of 61 and maximum of 83. High settings average 67 FPS, and Ultra drops to 55 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs approximately 11-13% performance across all settings. The 1440p Medium row remains above 60 FPS average, but the Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting users should avoid the highest settings at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limits become apparent. Low settings average 98 FPS, which is still respectable, but Medium drops to 61 FPS with a minimum of 52 and maximum of 70. High settings average 57 FPS, and Ultra falls to 47 FPS. The 4K results show a steep decline: the difference between Low and Medium is 37 FPS, while the gap between Medium and High is just 4 FPS. This suggests that at 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck regardless of settings, with the 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth struggling to feed the frame buffer at high resolutions.

Comparing settings across resolutions, the pattern is consistent: Low settings provide the highest frame rates, followed by Medium, High, and Ultra in descending order. The delta between Low and Ultra grows with resolution: 67 FPS at 1080p, 60 FPS at 1440p, and 51 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the GPU’s compute and memory resources are more heavily taxed at higher resolutions, reducing the relative impact of graphical settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, Medium settings provide the best balance: 81 FPS average with a 69 FPS minimum and 93 FPS maximum. The minimum stays above 60 FPS, ensuring consistent gameplay without noticeable stutters. High settings at 75 FPS average are also viable, but the lack of a reported minimum FPS makes it harder to guarantee smoothness. Ultra at 62 FPS average is borderline; the absence of a minimum FPS row means users risk drops below 60 FPS in intense scenes.

At 2560x1440, Medium settings are the recommended choice, delivering 72 FPS average with a 61 FPS minimum and 83 FPS maximum. The minimum FPS of 61 is just above the 60 FPS threshold, making this the highest quality preset that reliably maintains playable frame rates. High settings at 67 FPS average are acceptable but lack a reported minimum, while Ultra at 55 FPS average falls below the threshold and should be avoided for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the data suggests Low settings are the only fully playable option, with 98 FPS average. Medium settings at 61 FPS average with a 52 FPS minimum carry a risk of frame drops, while High (57 FPS) and Ultra (47 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS average threshold. For 4K gaming, users should prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, as the GPU cannot sustain high quality at this resolution.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot for this combo. The measured rows show that Medium consistently provides a minimum FPS above or near 60 FPS at 1080p and 1440p, with only the 4K Medium row dipping to a 52 FPS minimum. The jump from Low to Medium costs roughly 37-48 FPS at 1080p and 1440p, but the visual improvement likely justifies this trade-off for most users. For users with high-refresh-rate displays, 1080p Low at 129 FPS average offers the smoothest experience, but this comes at the cost of reduced graphical quality. The data does not include ray tracing or upscaling results, so those features are not assessed here.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor is built on a 5 nm process from TSMC, containing 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and has no integrated graphics.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 7400F scores 21765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3072 in single-core, 9141 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 1290 single-core, and 2193 in Cinebench R15 multi-core with 309 single-core. Its Passmark scores include 25645 for multithread, 3689 for single-thread, 45799 for floating point math, and 74745 for integer math. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32750, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all processors.

For Overpower, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates. At 1080p Low, the 129 FPS average suggests the CPU is capable of supporting high throughput, but the GPU still limits performance at higher settings. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration is well-suited for modern action games, providing sufficient parallelism for game logic and physics. The 4.70 GHz boost clock ensures strong single-thread performance, which is critical for games that rely on a few heavily loaded threads.

The data does not include separate CPU-bound benchmarks for Overpower, so the processor’s direct impact is inferred from the resolution scaling pattern. As resolution increases, the FPS drops proportionally, indicating the GPU becomes the bottleneck. At 1080p, the CPU has more headroom, but the RX 6600 XT still delivers only 129 FPS at Low settings, suggesting the GPU is the primary constraint even at lower resolutions. The CPU’s benchmark scores show it outperforms its nearest rivals by 0.1-0.3%, but this difference is unlikely to translate into measurable FPS gains in Overpower.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear scaling trend as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 129 at 1080p to 115 at 1440p (an 11% decrease) and then to 98 at 4K (a 24% decrease from 1080p). At Medium settings, the averages are 81, 72, and 61 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, respectively, representing a 25% drop from 1080p to 4K. High settings show 75, 67, and 57 FPS, a 24% decrease from 1080p to 4K. Ultra settings yield 62, 55, and 47 FPS, a 24% drop from 1080p to 4K.

The percentage declines are relatively consistent across settings, ranging from 24% to 25% when moving from 1080p to 4K. This consistency suggests the GPU scales predictably with resolution, and the limiting factor is the graphics card’s fill rate and memory bandwidth rather than the CPU. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 165.7 GPixel/s pixel rate are the key constraints at higher resolutions, as the GPU must process four times as many pixels at 4K compared to 1080p.

The 4K results are particularly telling. At 4K Low, the average FPS of 98 is still high, indicating the GPU can handle the pixel count when graphical settings are minimal. However, at 4K Medium, the average drops to 61 FPS with a minimum of 52, showing that the additional texture and shading work overwhelms the memory subsystem. The 4K Ultra average of 47 FPS confirms that this combo is not suited for 4K gaming at high quality. The 1080p to 1440p scaling is milder, with average FPS drops of 11-14% across settings, making 1440p a viable resolution for Medium and High presets.

The data indicates that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at any resolution. If the CPU were limiting, we would expect to see similar FPS across resolutions at a given setting, but the consistent 24-25% drop from 1080p to 4K proves the GPU is the constraining component. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s strong single-thread performance (3072 in Cinebench R23) and multi-core capabilities (21765) provide ample headroom for the RX 6600 XT to reach its limits. For users targeting 60 FPS gameplay, the data suggests 1080p Medium or High, or 1440p Medium, as the most appropriate configurations, while 4K should be limited to Low settings for playable frame rates.