Overpower
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 108 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 67 | 80 | 87 | 138 |
| 1440p QHD | 78 | 94 | 102 | 163 |
| 1080p Full HD | 88 | 106 | 114 | 183 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
# Overpower with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti delivers a solid 1440p experience in Overpower, with the data showing a clear GPU-bound pattern at higher resolutions and a CPU-limited ceiling at 1080p Low. The combo ranks 1015th out of 2980 tested configurations, placing it in the upper third of all systems, with the RTX 3070 Ti sitting at the 75th percentile among all GPUs and the Ryzen 5 7400F at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. This pairing demonstrates balanced but not exceptional performance, with the strongest results appearing at 1440p High where the average of 94 FPS represents a strong playable frame rate without requiring the lowest settings.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-limited scaling pattern. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 183 FPS at 1920x1080 to 163 FPS at 2560x1440, then to 138 FPS at 3840x2160 — a 24.6% reduction from 1080p to 4K. This relatively modest decline across resolutions indicates that even at Low settings, the RTX 3070 Ti maintains substantial headroom, though the GPU is clearly the primary limiter as resolution increases.
At High settings, the scaling is steeper: 106 FPS at 1080p drops to 94 FPS at 1440p (11.3% reduction) and further to 80 FPS at 4K (14.9% reduction from 1440p). The 4K High result of 80 FPS suggests the GPU is approaching its practical ceiling, as the pixel throughput demand at 3840x2160 with High details exceeds what the 8 GB frame buffer and 608.3 GB/s memory bandwidth can comfortably sustain. The transition from Medium to High at each resolution costs roughly 10-12% performance, while moving from High to Ultra costs 15-16% at every resolution tested.
The most telling data point comes from the Medium preset, which includes minimum FPS measurements. At 1080p Medium, the average is 114 FPS with a minimum of 97 FPS; at 1440p Medium, the average drops to 102 FPS with a minimum of 87 FPS; and at 4K Medium, the average is 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS. The minimum-to-average gap remains consistent at roughly 15% across all three resolutions, indicating that frame time consistency is stable regardless of resolution — a sign that neither the CPU nor GPU is experiencing sudden bottleneck shifts within a given preset.
FAQ
Q: How does this combo perform at 1440p Ultra?
A: The average frame rate is 78 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra, which is 16.1% lower than the 94 FPS at High settings. This makes Ultra playable but with a notable performance cost relative to High.
Q: What is the best resolution for this pairing?
A: The data shows 2560x1440 High as the sweet spot, delivering 94 FPS average. This represents a 12.8% improvement over 4K High while maintaining higher detail than 1080p Ultra, which achieves 88 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p Low?
A: At 1920x1080 Low, the average of 183 FPS is the highest across all tested configurations. The Ryzen 5 7400F's 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.70 GHz boost clock are capable of driving this frame rate, but the data suggests the CPU becomes the primary limiter at this setting since the GPU has little work to do.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 29945 places it 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (29928) and 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti (29783), while sitting 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30095).
Q: What frame rate can users expect at 4K Medium?
A: The measured average is 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS at 3840x2160 Medium. This indicates a playable 4K experience with some frame time variance.
*Q: Does this combo support ray tracing in Overpower?*
A: The RTX 3070 Ti includes 48 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but the measured FPS data does not include ray tracing-specific benchmarks, so performance with ray tracing enabled cannot be quantified from the available data.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ranks 1015th out of 2980 tested combos in Overpower, placing it in the 66th percentile of all configurations. This ranking reflects a system that is decidedly above average but not among the top performers, consistent with the GPU's 75th percentile standing and the CPU's 83rd percentile position among their respective component pools.
The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks — the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0.1% behind), Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, 0.2% behind), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, 0.2% ahead) — all fall within a 0.5% band of the 7400F's average score of 32750. This indicates that the CPU is performing exactly as expected for its class, with no anomalous behavior affecting the combo's game ranking.
On the GPU side, the RTX 3070 Ti's average benchmark score of 29945 puts it in a tight cluster with the RTX 5070 Mobile (29928, 0.1% ahead), RTX 2080 Ti (29783, 0.5% ahead), and Radeon RX 6800 (30095, 0.5% behind). The game-specific ranking of 1015th suggests that Overpower is neither particularly favorable nor unfavorable to this specific hardware combination, as the rank aligns closely with what the component percentiles would predict.
The combo ranks at 1015th with 2980 total combos means approximately 1965 configurations perform worse and 1014 perform better in this game. Given the hardware's mid-2020s vintage — the GPU released in 2021 and is now end-of-life while the CPU launched in 2025 — this ranking is reasonable for a system that pairs a current-generation budget CPU with a previous-generation mid-high GPU.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RTX 3070 Ti with the Ryzen 5 7400F produces a wide spread of results across presets. Low settings yield the highest average at 183 FPS, followed by Medium at 114 FPS (with a minimum of 97 and maximum of 131), High at 106 FPS, and Ultra at 88 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is substantial at 69 FPS (60.5% improvement for Low), while the step from Medium to High costs 8 FPS (7.0%) and from High to Ultra costs 18 FPS (17.0%).
At 2560x1440, the pattern shifts slightly. Low settings average 163 FPS, Medium averages 102 FPS (minimum 87, maximum 117), High averages 94 FPS, and Ultra averages 78 FPS. The Low-to-Medium delta is 61 FPS (59.8%), Medium-to-High costs 8 FPS (7.8%), and High-to-Ultra costs 16 FPS (17.0%). The consistency of the Medium-to-High cost across 1080p and 1440p suggests a stable rendering workload increase for High details.
At 3840x2160, the results compress as the GPU becomes more strained. Low averages 138 FPS, Medium averages 87 FPS (minimum 74, maximum 100), High averages 80 FPS, and Ultra averages 67 FPS. The Low-to-Medium gap narrows to 51 FPS (58.6%), while Medium-to-High costs 7 FPS (8.0%) and High-to-Ultra costs 13 FPS (16.3%). The 4K Ultra result of 67 FPS is the only preset below the 70 FPS threshold, indicating that Ultra at 4K is the one configuration where the GPU cannot maintain consistently high frame rates.
The minimum FPS data, available only for Medium presets, shows the frame time floor at each resolution: 97 FPS at 1080p, 87 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K. These minimums represent 85.1%, 85.3%, and 85.1% of their respective averages, demonstrating remarkable consistency in frame pacing across resolutions.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, built on the Ampere architecture with a GA104 chip fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process, provides the primary performance driver in this combo. Its 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which becomes a critical factor at 4K resolutions where the frame buffer demand exceeds what the memory capacity can efficiently cache.
The GPU's clock behavior — 1575 MHz base and 1770 MHz boost — combined with 6144 shading units and 192 texture mapping units, produces a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute of 21.75 TFLOPS is identical to the FP16 rate (1:1), which is notable for a GPU of this class. In Overpower, these specifications translate to the measured frame rates, with the GPU showing clear signs of being the limiting factor at 4K Ultra where the 67 FPS average indicates the rendering pipeline is saturated.
The GPU's percentile ranking of 75th among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29945, places it in the upper quartile of graphics cards. Its nearest rivals — the RTX 5070 Mobile (29928, 0.1% behind), RTX 2080 Ti (29783, 0.5% behind), and Radeon RX 6800 (30095, 0.5% ahead) — bracket its performance closely. The RTX 3070 Ti's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores are present but not directly exercised by the measured FPS data, which focuses on standard rasterization presets.
The 8 GB VRAM capacity is the most likely constraint at 4K, as the difference between 4K Medium (87 FPS) and 4K High (80 FPS) is only 7 FPS, while the jump from 1080p Medium to 4K Medium costs 27 FPS. This pattern suggests that beyond Medium settings at 4K, the GPU is both bandwidth-limited and capacity-limited, with the 608.3 GB/s bandwidth unable to compensate for the memory size limitation.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data points to 2560x1440 High as the optimal configuration for this combo in Overpower. At 94 FPS average, it provides a 16.1% improvement over 4K High (80 FPS) while maintaining higher visual fidelity than 1080p Ultra (88 FPS). The 1440p High preset also benefits from the CPU's ability to sustain frame rates in the 90s without the GPU becoming the bottleneck, as evidenced by the smaller gap between High and Medium at this resolution (8 FPS) compared to the Low-to-Medium jump (61 FPS).
For users prioritizing maximum frame rates, 1920x1080 Low delivers 183 FPS average, which is suitable for high-refresh-rate displays. However, the 69 FPS improvement from Low to Medium at 1080p (from 114 to 183 FPS) suggests that Low settings are leaving substantial performance on the table without providing proportionally better smoothness, as the minimum FPS at Medium (97 FPS) already exceeds the refresh rate of most standard monitors.
At 4K, Medium is the recommended ceiling. The 87 FPS average with a 74 FPS minimum is playable, and stepping up to High only gains 7 FPS while Ultra drops to 67 FPS. The 4K Ultra result falls below the 70 FPS threshold that many users consider the minimum for smooth gameplay, making it unsuitable for consistent play despite being technically above 60 FPS.
The data shows that Ultra settings are never the best choice for this combo — at every resolution, the step from High to Ultra costs 13-18 FPS (16-17%), which is a significant reduction for detail improvements that are typically marginal in fast-paced action games. The Medium preset at 1440p (102 FPS average) offers a balanced alternative for users who want higher detail than Low without sacrificing frame rate headroom.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, a 6-core 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename) on AMD's 5 nm process, provides the computational foundation for this combo. With a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz, the CPU delivers strong single-thread and multi-thread performance, as reflected in its Cinebench R23 scores of 3072 single-core and 21765 multi-core.
The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core, combined with dual-channel DDR5 memory support yielding 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, provide adequate data throughput for the GPU at most settings. The Passmark multi-thread score of 25645 and single-thread score of 3689 place the 7400F at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750.
In Overpower, the CPU's role becomes most apparent at 1080p Low, where the 183 FPS average suggests the GPU is not the limiting factor — the rendering workload at this setting is light enough that the CPU's ability to feed frames becomes the constraint. The 69 FPS difference between 1080p Low (183 FPS) and 1080p Medium (114 FPS) indicates that the GPU takes over as the primary bottleneck as soon as detail levels increase, while the relatively small 8 FPS gap between Medium and High at 1080p further confirms the GPU-bound nature at higher settings.
The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks all fall within 0.3% of its average score — the Intel Core i5-14600T at 32707 (0.1% behind), Intel Core Ultra 7 155H at 32697 (0.2% behind), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 (0.2% ahead) — indicating that the 7400F provides no unusual advantage or disadvantage in CPU-limited scenarios. The 6-core configuration with 12 threads is sufficient for Overpower's engine, as evidenced by the consistent frame pacing at Medium presets across all resolutions, but it does not provide the headroom seen in higher-core-count processors for background tasks or future titles.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 138.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 87.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 80.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 67.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 163.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 102.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 94.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 78.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 183.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 114.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 106.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 88.0 |
Overpower with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.