Minimum

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a playable experience in Minimum, a 2014 Third-Person Shooter. The data shows a system that scales predictably across resolutions and settings, with the GPU acting as the primary bottleneck at higher visual loads. This analysis breaks down the measured performance metrics, contextualizes the hardware’s standing against rivals, and provides specific settings guidance based on the raw FPS data.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall rank of this CPU and GPU combo for Minimum?*

A: The combo ranks 1562 out of 2939 tested combos for this specific game, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all possible configurations tested.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has an average benchmark score of 40518. Its closest rival, the Intel Core 7 253PE, scores 40557, a difference of -0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40431, which is 0.2% lower. This indicates performance is nearly identical to these competing processors.

Q: What is the best frame rate achieved at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate at 1920x1080 is 202 FPS, which is achieved with the Low settings preset. The next best is 154 FPS on Medium, followed by 130 FPS on High and 99 FPS on Ultra.

Q: Is there a significant performance drop when moving from 1440p to 4K?

A: Yes, the drop is substantial. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 84 at 2560x1440 to 45 at 3840x2160, a reduction of 39 FPS. This indicates a heavy load is placed on the GPU at 4K resolution.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it affect performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. This is sufficient for the game's demands at all tested settings, as the bottleneck shifts to the GPU's compute capabilities at higher resolutions.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark percentile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 sits at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 37648. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, which is 1.3% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, which is 0.4% lower. The performance is closely grouped with these cards.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this specific combination at rank 1562 out of 2939 tested configurations for Minimum. This position, roughly in the 47th percentile of all combos, suggests a balanced pairing. It is not at the extreme top tier, but it is far from the bottom. The ranking reflects a system that can comfortably handle the game, though it may not be pushing the highest refresh rates at maximum settings in 4K.

The general benchmark data for the individual components helps explain this rank. The CPU's average score of 40518 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, indicating a very strong processor. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 7 253PE, is virtually identical in performance with a delta of -0.1%. Similarly, the GPU's average score of 37648 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its closest competitor, the NVIDIA Tesla P4, is just 0.1% faster.

The fact that both components are high-performers in their respective fields, yet the combo does not crack the top 1000, suggests that the game's engine may not fully utilize the hardware's potential, or that other system factors, such as memory bandwidth, play a constraining role. The performance delta between this CPU and its rivals is minimal, meaning the choice between them would not significantly alter the game's frame rate. The GPU's position, closely matched with the RTX 4080 Mobile (1.3% delta), reinforces that this is a high-end mobile graphics solution that performs in a specific, well-defined tier.

Resolution Scaling

Analyzing the average FPS across resolutions reveals a clear and expected trend: performance degrades as resolution increases. At 1080p, the system is capable of very high frame rates, indicating the CPU is able to feed the GPU adequately. For instance, at High settings, the average FPS drops from 130 at 1920x1080 to 84 at 2560x1440, a 35% reduction. This is a classic sign of the GPU becoming more heavily utilized as the pixel count grows.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is even more dramatic. At High settings, the frame rate falls from 84 FPS at 2560x1440 to 45 FPS at 3840x2160, a 46% decrease. This steep drop-off is a strong indicator that the graphics card is the limiting component at 4K. The GPU is working at its maximum capacity to render the additional pixels, and the performance hit is significant. The CPU is no longer the primary constraint at this resolution; it has enough headroom to wait for the GPU to finish its work.

This pattern is consistent across all settings presets. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is noticeable, but the gap between 1440p and 4K is much larger. The data suggests that for a consistently smooth experience, 1440p is the practical ceiling for this combo, while 1080p allows for maximum frame rates. Pushing to 4K requires a significant compromise in visual settings to maintain playable performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo's capabilities across all tested configurations.

1920x1080: The system excels at this resolution. At Low settings, the average FPS is 202, providing an exceptionally smooth experience. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 154 FPS, with a minimum of 131 FPS and a maximum of 178 FPS. High settings yield an average of 130 FPS. Even at Ultra, the average remains a very playable 99 FPS. This resolution is where the combo is most comfortable, offering high refresh rate potential.

2560x1440: At 1440p, performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU's workload. Low settings produce an average of 130 FPS. Medium settings average 100 FPS, with a minimum of 85 and a maximum of 115. High settings average 84 FPS, which is still smooth for most players. Ultra settings bring the average down to 64 FPS, which is playable but may not be ideal for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors.

3840x2160: The 4K resolution presents a significant challenge. Low settings are required to maintain a high frame rate, averaging 70 FPS. Medium settings drop the average to 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 and a maximum of 62. High settings average 45 FPS, which is on the border of playability. Ultra settings are the most demanding, with an average of only 34 FPS, which would be a suboptimal experience.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the dominant component in this pairing. Its role becomes increasingly critical as resolution and settings are increased. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth are more than adequate for Minimum, which is a game from 2014. There is no indication from the data that memory capacity or bandwidth is a limiting factor at any tested setting.

Instead, the limiting factor is the GPU's raw compute power. The 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the engine that drives the frame rate. The benchmark results show this clearly. At 1080p, where the GPU is not fully saturated, the frame rates are high (130 FPS at High). As the resolution increases, the GPU must work harder to fill the larger frame buffer, and the FPS drops correspondingly.

The GPU's performance profile is well-established by its benchmarks. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 and PassMark G3D score of 26927 place it as a high-end part. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows it performs nearly identically to the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (0.1% delta) and is only 1.3% slower than the RTX 4080 Mobile. This confirms that the RTX 4070 is a potent mobile GPU, but it is not at the absolute top of the stack. For Minimum, its performance is sufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, players will need to make compromises.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution.

For 1920x1080, the High preset is the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, delivering an average of 130 FPS. Players with 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitors could even consider the Ultra preset, which still averages 99 FPS. The Low and Medium presets offer diminishing returns in visual quality for the extra frame rate, making them unnecessary for most users at this resolution.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is again the sweet spot, providing an average of 84 FPS. This is ideal for a 60Hz or 75Hz monitor. The Medium preset, at 100 FPS, is a good choice for those seeking higher refresh rates, while the Ultra preset at 64 FPS is a viable option for those who prioritize image quality over maximum smoothness.

For 3840x2160, compromises are mandatory. The Low preset, averaging 70 FPS, is the only option that provides a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset, at 54 FPS, is playable but will show some stutter in fast-paced scenes. High and Ultra presets are not recommended, as their average frame rates of 45 FPS and 34 FPS, respectively, fall below the threshold for a comfortable gaming experience.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H serves as a capable foundation for this gaming system. Its 16 cores and 16 threads, coupled with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, ensure that it is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions. The benchmark results support this, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28221 and a single-core score of 3984.

The CPU's role is most evident at 1080p. The fact that the system can achieve 202 FPS at Low settings and 130 FPS at High settings indicates that the CPU is able to process game logic and feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can render at these settings. The CPU is providing enough headroom for the GPU to operate at its full potential.

However, the CPU's influence diminishes as resolution increases. The data shows a significant FPS drop from 1080p to 4K, which is a hallmark of a GPU-bound scenario. At 4K, the CPU is likely waiting for the GPU to finish rendering each frame. The CPU's performance relative to its rivals is essentially a tie. The data shows a delta of -0.1% versus the Intel Core 7 253PE and +0.2% versus the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, meaning that swapping this processor for a direct competitor would have no measurable impact on Minimum's frame rates. The CPU is a strong performer, but in this title, the GPU is the definitive driver of performance.