Minimum

Minimum is a 2014 third-person shooter that still appears in modern benchmark databases, and the pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with the AMD Radeon 8060S produces a clear performance curve across resolutions and settings. The data shows a system that is highly capable at 1080p, comfortably smooth at 1440p, and only begins to struggle at 4K with the heaviest presets, making it a well-balanced mobile combo for this title.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a predictable yet steep decline as resolution increases, which points directly to the GPU becoming the primary limiting factor at higher pixel counts. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo delivers 120 FPS, which drops by 35% to 78 FPS at 2560x1440, and then falls another 46% to 42 FPS at 3840x2160. This scaling pattern is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario, where the Radeon 8060S’s rendering throughput is increasingly taxed by the growing number of pixels.

The transition from 1440p to 4K is particularly punishing. At Medium settings, the average frame rate goes from 92 FPS at 2560x1440 down to 50 FPS at 3840x2160, a loss of 42 FPS. This steep drop indicates that the GPU’s raw fillrate and shading capacity are overwhelmed at 4K, even before considering the higher preset’s additional load. The data suggests that 4K gaming is only viable with the Low preset, where the combo still manages 65 FPS, but any attempt to raise quality levels quickly pushes the experience below the 60 FPS threshold.

Conversely, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p is much more gradual, with the High preset losing 42 FPS (from 120 to 78) and the Low preset losing 66 FPS (from 187 to 121). The percentage drops are large, but the absolute values remain playable. This indicates that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU work in better harmony, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H’s 16 cores and 22 threads providing ample headroom to feed the GPU. At 4K, the CPU’s role diminishes, and the Radeon 8060S’s 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance becomes the binding constraint, as evidenced by the frame rate collapsing to 32 FPS on Ultra settings.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 8060S is the dominant component in this pairing, and its characteristics directly explain the observed frame rates. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, and it is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture with 2560 shading units. The benchmark results place this GPU in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 55757, which is remarkably close to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698, deltaPct 0.1) and even the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (56083, deltaPct -0.6). This positioning explains why the combo can push high frame rates at 1080p and solid numbers at 1440p.

The memory configuration is system-shared, meaning the GPU relies on the same DDR5 pool as the CPU, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. In Minimum, this shared memory setup does not appear to be a bottleneck at 1080p, where the Low preset hits 187 FPS, but it could contribute to the severe drop at 4K. The texture rate of 464.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 185.6 GPixel/s are respectable figures, yet they are insufficient to maintain fluid performance at 3840x2160 with High settings, where the average FPS falls to 42. The 32 FPS result at 4K Ultra is particularly telling, as it shows the GPU hitting its architectural limits when all effects are enabled.

The GPU’s 40 ray tracing cores are present, but for a 2014 title like Minimum, they are likely unused, meaning the performance is driven purely by rasterization. The data indicates that the Radeon 8060S is a strong mid-range performer, but it is not a 4K powerhouse. The 87th percentile ranking versus all GPUs, alongside its proximity to the RTX 5080 in average score, suggests that the 8060S punches above its weight at lower resolutions but cannot sustain that pace at 4K, where the 42 FPS High result becomes the key data point for users considering this combo for high-resolution play.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain a 60 FPS average?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the combo delivers an average of 78 FPS, and at Medium settings it reaches 92 FPS. At 4K, only the Low preset achieves a playable 65 FPS average, while High drops to 42 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compare to its direct rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. It is essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, deltaPct 0) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, deltaPct 0.1).

Q: Does the GPU outperform the CPU in their respective benchmark pools?

A: Yes. The AMD Radeon 8060S sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average score of 55757 is also much higher relative to its nearest rivals.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 143 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 122 FPS and a maximum of 165 FPS, indicating a very smooth experience.

Q: Is the 4K Ultra preset playable with this configuration?

A: No. The average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 32, which is below the typical 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Even the High preset at 4K only manages 42 FPS.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested configurations for this game?

A: The combo ranks 1677 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and performance goal. For 1080p gaming, the Ultra preset yields 92 FPS, which is already smooth, but the Medium preset at 143 FPS provides a more responsive experience with a minimum of 122 FPS. The Low preset at 187 FPS is excessive for most displays, so Medium is the best balance of visual fidelity and speed at this resolution.

At 1440p, the High preset delivers 78 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS baseline and offers better image quality than Medium’s 92 FPS. Users with high-refresh monitors may prefer Medium to stay closer to 90 FPS, but the data suggests that High is the sweet spot for a stable experience without sacrificing too much detail. The Ultra preset at 59 FPS is marginal, as it dips just below the 60 FPS line, making it a less reliable choice.

At 4K, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset at 65 FPS is the only option that clears the 60 FPS threshold, while Medium drops to 50 FPS and High falls to 42 FPS. The Ultra preset at 32 FPS is not recommended for serious play. For the best experience, users should run 1080p on Medium or 1440p on High, as these configurations provide the highest frame rates while still maintaining a reasonable level of visual quality. The 4K resolution is best left to Low settings if playability is the priority.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations for Minimum, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 8060S holds a rank of 1677 out of 2939 combos. This places it slightly below the median of the tested pool, indicating that while the hardware is competent, there are a significant number of configurations that achieve higher frame rates in this specific title. The rank is a composite measure, likely reflecting the GPU’s 87th percentile standing and the CPU’s 83rd percentile, but Minimum’s age and optimization may favor other setups.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (deltaPct 0.1) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (deltaPct -0.6), which are statistically equivalent in average score. This suggests that the 8060S is a strong GPU, but the combo’s overall rank of 1677 is dragged down by the CPU’s relative position, which is only 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. The data implies that the CPU is not a limiting factor at lower resolutions, but the combo’s mid-pack rank in Minimum reflects that many other tested systems, perhaps with desktop-class components, simply have more headroom for high-refresh 1080p or 1440p play.

Looking at the measured FPS, the combo is clearly capable of exceeding 60 FPS at 1080p on all presets and at 1440p on all presets except Ultra, which sits at 59 FPS. The 4K results are the weakest link, and the rank of 1677 likely incorporates these lower scores into the overall standing. For a mobile processor paired with an integrated-class GPU, the performance is respectable, but it does not crack the top half of the database, showing that dedicated gaming laptops with higher-end GPUs will outperform this setup in Minimum.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full dataset provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 187 FPS, which is the highest recorded value for this combo. The Medium preset follows with 143 FPS, showing a minimum of 122 FPS and a maximum of 165 FPS, indicating good frame pacing. High settings produce 120 FPS, while Ultra drops to 92 FPS, still well within playable territory.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 121 FPS, a 66 FPS drop from 1080p but still very smooth. Medium averages 92 FPS with a minimum of 79 FPS and a maximum of 106 FPS, maintaining a consistent experience. High settings yield 78 FPS, which is the recommended tier for this resolution, while Ultra falls to 59 FPS, just below the 60 FPS mark.

At 3840x2160, the performance degrades significantly. Low settings average 65 FPS, barely clearing the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 50 FPS with a minimum of 42 FPS and a maximum of 57 FPS, showing more variance. High settings drop to 42 FPS, and Ultra plummets to 32 FPS. These 4K numbers highlight the GPU’s limitations, as the scaling from 1080p to 4K at High settings results in a 78 FPS loss (from 120 to 42), which is a 65% reduction in frame rate.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It has a 24 MB shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. In the context of Minimum, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic, and its performance is more than adequate for this task, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32697, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707 (deltaPct 0), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (deltaPct 0.1), showing that the 155H is competitive with these mid-range parts. In multi-threaded workloads like Cinebench R23, it scores 15028, while the single-thread score is 1743, which is sufficient for older games like Minimum that do not heavily utilize many cores.

The data suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this system. At 1080p Low, the 187 FPS result indicates that the CPU can process frames quickly enough to allow the GPU to run at full tilt. Even at 1080p Ultra, the 92 FPS average shows that the CPU has headroom, as the drop from Low to Ultra is primarily due to GPU load. At 4K, the CPU’s influence diminishes further, with the GPU clearly limiting performance. The Passmark multithread score of 24873 and the single-thread score of 3468 confirm that the 155H is a capable all-rounder, but in Minimum, its 22 threads are likely underutilized, given the game’s 2014 release date. The CPU’s 28 W TDP is low, but it does not appear to throttle performance in this scenario, as the frame rates remain consistent across resolutions.