Minimum
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 41 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 15 | 19 | 23 | 30 |
| 1440p QHD | 27 | 35 | 42 | 55 |
| 1080p Full HD | 42 | 55 | 65 | 85 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc B370, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a fundamentally GPU-limited experience in Minimum, with performance collapsing as resolution increases. The data shows a clear pattern: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 85 FPS, but this drops to 55 FPS at 1440p and plummets to just 30 FPS at 4K. This steep decline indicates the Arc B370, with its 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 1280 shading units, is the primary bottleneck across all tested configurations. The CPU, with 20 cores and 28 threads boosting to 5.40 GHz, is far more capable than the GPU demands, as evidenced by the CPU's 91st percentile ranking among all processors. Consequently, the i7-14700F's substantial headroom remains largely untapped in this title, making the graphics card the sole determinant of frame rates at every resolution.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate curve from 1080p to 4K is steep and unforgiving, revealing a classic case of GPU-bound scaling. At 1080p Low, the system produces 85 FPS, which serves as the performance ceiling for this combination. Moving to 1440p Low reduces the average to 55 FPS, a 35% decrease, while 4K Low further degrades performance to just 30 FPS, representing a 65% drop from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets, indicating that the Arc B370's memory bandwidth, labeled "System Dependent," and its 20 ROPs are saturated well before the CPU can influence results.
The 4K High preset yields only 19 FPS, making it effectively unplayable, while 4K Ultra bottoms out at 15 FPS. Even the most favorable 4K configuration, Low, struggles to maintain 30 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay in a third-person shooter. At 1440p, the situation improves but remains marginal: High delivers 35 FPS, Medium 42 FPS, and Ultra 27 FPS. Only the 1440p Low preset, at 55 FPS, approaches a playable standard, though it still falls short of the 60 FPS target that many players prefer.
The data suggests that the limiting component is unequivocally the GPU. The Intel Arc B370's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (deltaPct -0.5) and the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (deltaPct -0.2). These are legacy parts from over a decade ago, confirming that the Arc B370 is an entry-level graphics solution. The CPU, by contrast, posts an average benchmark score of 53620, placing it just 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P. This disparity in capability is stark: the CPU is a top-tier performer while the GPU sits at the bottom of the stack.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-14700F is a Raptor Lake Refresh part with 20 cores (8 performance and 12 efficiency) and 28 threads, running at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its benchmark results are impressive across the board: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122, a Geekbench multi-core score of 19620, and a Passmark multithread score of 41317. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2429. In the context of Minimum, however, these numbers are largely irrelevant because the GPU cannot translate CPU prowess into frame rate gains.
The data shows that increasing resolution from 1080p to 4K at Low settings reduces FPS from 85 to 30, a 65% decline. If the CPU were the limiting factor, this drop would be far less severe, as the i7-14700F's 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache would easily handle the game's data demands. The game, released in 2014, is not particularly demanding on modern processors, and the i7-14700F's 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its ability to handle any workload Minimum can present. The bottleneck is purely graphical, with the Arc B370's 25 W TDP and IGP form factor indicating its intended role as a low-power integrated solution rather than a discrete gaming card.
The CPU's role in this combo is therefore one of wasted potential. The 20-core, 28-thread configuration is overkill for a title that struggles to exceed 85 FPS even at the lowest settings. The Passmark data encryption score of 30144 and floating point math score of 107005 further illustrate the processor's computational strength, which remains idle while the GPU labors. For users who might upgrade the GPU in the future, the i7-14700F would provide ample headroom, but in this pairing, it is not the performance limiter.
Settings Recommendations
Given the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend entirely on the target resolution and acceptable frame rate. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers 85 FPS, which is the only configuration that approaches high-refresh-rate gaming. The Medium preset drops to 65 FPS, which is still playable, while High falls to 55 FPS and Ultra to 42 FPS. For competitive play, 1080p Low is the clear choice, as it maximizes smoothness and responsiveness.
At 1440p, the situation requires compromise. The Low preset yields 55 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. Medium drops to 42 FPS, and High to 35 FPS, both of which may feel sluggish in a third-person shooter that benefits from fluid motion. Ultra at 27 FPS is borderline unplayable. The data suggests that 1440p Low is the only viable option, and even then, users should expect occasional frame drops, as the Medium preset's minimum FPS is 36 at this resolution.
At 4K, no settings preset provides a satisfactory experience. Low achieves 30 FPS, which is the minimum threshold for playability but still feels choppy. Medium drops to 23 FPS with a minimum of 19 FPS, High to 19 FPS, and Ultra to 15 FPS. The recommendation is to avoid 4K entirely with this hardware combination unless the user is willing to accept a slideshow-like experience. The best experience per the measured rows is unequivocally 1080p Low, which provides the highest average FPS and avoids the steep performance penalties of higher resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 2703 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the bottom 8% of all systems. This poor ranking is directly attributable to the GPU's weak performance, as the CPU is a top-tier part. The Arc B370's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (score 1190, deltaPct -0.5) and the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (score 1186, deltaPct -0.2). These rivals are separated by less than 1% in performance, indicating that the Arc B370 is competitive with early-2010s discrete GPUs, which is a poor showing for a modern part.
The CPU, conversely, ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P (score 53701, deltaPct -0.2) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (score 53288, deltaPct 0.6). This means the i7-14700F is a high-end processor that is being held back by an entry-level GPU. The combo's rank of 2703 out of 2939 reflects this mismatch, as the system's overall gaming performance is dictated by its weakest link. Users considering this combo should be aware that the GPU is the limiting factor and that upgrading to a more capable graphics card would dramatically improve the ranking.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Minimum?*
A: The data shows 1920x1080 provides the highest frame rates across all settings, with Low achieving 85 FPS, Medium 65 FPS, High 55 FPS, and Ultra 42 FPS. 1440p and 4K offer significantly lower performance, with 4K Low only reaching 30 FPS.
Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700F or the Intel Arc B370 the bottleneck?
A: The GPU is the bottleneck. The Arc B370's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of GPUs, while the i7-14700F ranks in the 91st percentile of CPUs. The FPS drop from 85 at 1080p Low to 30 at 4K Low confirms graphics-limited scaling.
*Q: Can this combo play Minimum at 60 FPS?*
A: Only at 1080p Low, which produces 85 FPS. At 1080p Medium, the average drops to 65 FPS, which exceeds 60 FPS but with a minimum of 56 FPS. All other settings and resolutions fall below 60 FPS.
Q: How does the Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The Arc B370's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 is within 1% of the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, deltaPct -0.5) and the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, deltaPct -0.2). This places it in the same performance class as those legacy parts.
Q: What is the CPU's performance relative to its rivals?
A: The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288) and 0.8% higher than the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206). It trails the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701) by 0.2%.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: No. The highest 4K average FPS is 30 at Low settings, with Medium at 23 FPS, High at 19 FPS, and Ultra at 15 FPS. These frame rates are below playable thresholds for a third-person shooter.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table presents the exact measured average FPS values for each resolution and settings preset combination in Minimum.
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |
|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|
| 3840x2160 | High | 19 | — | — |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 30 | — | — |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 23 | 19 | 26 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 15 | — | — |
| 2560x1440 | High | 35 | — | — |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 55 | — | — |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 42 | 36 | 48 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 27 | — | — |
| 1920x1080 | High | 55 | — | — |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 85 | — | — |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 65 | 56 | 75 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 42 | — | — |
The data reveals a consistent pattern: each step up in resolution at the same settings costs roughly 30-35% of the frame rate. From 1080p Low (85 FPS) to 1440p Low (55 FPS) is a 35% reduction, and from 1440p Low to 4K Low (30 FPS) is a 45% reduction. The Medium preset shows similar scaling, with 65 FPS at 1080p, 42 FPS at 1440p, and 23 FPS at 4K. The High preset follows suit: 55 FPS at 1080p, 35 FPS at 1440p, and 19 FPS at 4K. Ultra is the most demanding, with 42 FPS at 1080p, 27 FPS at 1440p, and 15 FPS at 4K.
The minimum FPS values, where available, show that frame pacing is relatively stable at Medium settings. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 56 FPS against a 65 FPS average, a 14% drop. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 36 FPS against a 42 FPS average, a 14% drop. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 19 FPS against a 23 FPS average, a 17% drop. This suggests that the Arc B370 maintains consistent performance without severe stuttering, but the absolute numbers are too low for smooth gameplay at higher resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-14700F
Intel Arc B370
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc B370 in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 30.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 23.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 19.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 15.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 55.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 42.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 27.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 85.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 65.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 55.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 42.0 |
Minimum with ii7-14700F + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with Arc B370 + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-14700F + Arc B370
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.