Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER pairing delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter, making it a combination that thoroughly overwhelms the game's engine at most settings. The data shows that this system is capable of pushing past 350 FPS at 1080p on Low settings, positioning it in the 92nd percentile of tested hardware combinations for performance headroom.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU/GPU combination in Minimum?*

A: The combo ranks 311 out of 3,712 tested combinations, placing it in the top 8% of all systems benchmarked for this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT scores 29,879 on average, which is statistically identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H at 29,868 (0% delta) and only 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and 7840HS at 29,955. It edges the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X by 0.6%.

Q: Does the GPU outperform the original RTX 4080?

A: Yes, but by a negligible margin. The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080's 54,247, effectively making them performance equals in the aggregate benchmark.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 4K with High settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 79 FPS at 3840x2160 resolution with High settings, which remains fully playable even on high-refresh-rate 4K displays.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at any resolution?

A: The data suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck at 1440p or 4K, as frame rates scale consistently with resolution. However, at 1080p Low settings, the 354 FPS ceiling appears limited by the CPU's single-thread performance rather than the GPU.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 delivers 147 FPS, which exceeds 144Hz refresh rates. The Medium preset at 175 FPS provides additional headroom for 165Hz displays without requiring the performance drop to 112 FPS seen at Ultra.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a 16 GB GDDR6X card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 256-bit memory bus providing 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock of 2550 MHz and base clock of 2295 MHz drive 10,240 shading units, with 320 texture mapping units and 112 ROPs handling pixel throughput at 285.6 GPixel/s. For a game from 2014 like Minimum, these specifications are overwhelmingly excessive, which explains the triple-digit frame rates across most settings.

The GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power and 80 RT cores are far beyond what this title requires, yet the benchmark data reveals that the card still scales its performance with resolution and settings. At 1080p Low, the card produces 354 FPS, but this drops to 123 FPS at 4K Low — indicating that even this massive GPU is eventually constrained by the pixel workload at higher resolutions. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is never remotely challenged by Minimum, as the game's texture requirements are modest compared to modern titles.

The GPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks confirms its position in the hierarchy. Its passmark G3D score of 34,245 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 260,075 place it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,209. Interestingly, the closest rival is the non-SUPER RTX 4080 at 0.1% lower performance, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB actually scores 2.7% higher in average benchmarks. This suggests that the SUPER variant's advantage is primarily in features and power efficiency rather than raw compute throughput.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings selection. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers 271 FPS average with a minimum of 230 FPS and maximum of 312 FPS, which provides excellent consistency for competitive play. The High preset at 228 FPS is nearly as smooth and may offer better visual fidelity without sacrificing playability. The Low preset's 354 FPS is excessive for virtually any display, while Ultra drops to 173 FPS — still playable but with diminishing visual returns for a 2014 title.

At 2560x1440, High settings at 147 FPS represent the sweet spot for 144Hz displays, as this matches the refresh rate almost exactly. Medium delivers 175 FPS with a minimum of 149 FPS, which is ideal for 165Hz monitors and provides a 19% buffer above High's average. Ultra at 112 FPS remains fluid but may not justify the visual upgrade over High given the game's age. Low at 228 FPS is unnecessary unless targeting 240Hz displays.

For 3840x2160, High settings at 79 FPS provide a playable experience on 60Hz displays, though the Medium preset at 94 FPS offers better headroom with a minimum of 80 FPS. Ultra drops to exactly 60 FPS, which is marginal for 60Hz panels and not recommended when Medium provides 57% more average performance. Low at 123 FPS is the only 4K preset that exceeds 120 FPS, but the visual compromise is significant.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the frame rate progression shows a clear pattern across presets. Low settings produce 354 FPS average, which is the highest measured figure in any configuration. Medium settings reduce performance to 271 FPS with a recorded range of 230-312 FPS, indicating solid frame pacing. High settings deliver 228 FPS, while Ultra drops to 173 FPS — a 51% reduction from Low but still far above display refresh rates.

The 2560x1440 results follow the same trajectory with lower absolute numbers. Low achieves 228 FPS, Medium reaches 175 FPS with a minimum of 149 FPS and maximum of 201 FPS, High produces 147 FPS, and Ultra settles at 112 FPS. The consistency of the Medium preset at this resolution is notable, as the 52 FPS spread between minimum and maximum is tighter than the 82 FPS spread at 1080p Medium.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops become more pronounced. Low yields 123 FPS, Medium delivers 94 FPS with an 80-108 FPS range, High produces 79 FPS, and Ultra falls to 60 FPS exactly. This represents a dramatic scaling where Ultra at 4K is 83% slower than Low at 1080p, demonstrating that even this high-end GPU encounters limits when pushing a 2014 title to modern resolutions with maximum settings.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the system's bottleneck characteristics. At Low settings, performance drops from 354 FPS at 1080p to 228 FPS at 1440p (a 36% reduction) and further to 123 FPS at 4K (a 65% reduction from 1080p). This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU becomes progressively more limiting as resolution increases, which is expected given the fixed CPU workload.

At High settings, the scaling is similar: 228 FPS at 1080p falls to 147 FPS at 1440p (36% drop) and 79 FPS at 4K (65% drop). The proportional consistency across settings suggests that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints at higher resolutions. The RTX 4080 SUPER's 736.3 GB/s bandwidth and 285.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but become taxed at 4K with higher settings.

The 1080p Low result of 354 FPS is particularly revealing. This figure is likely near the CPU's frame generation limit, as the Ryzen 7 5800XT's single-thread score of 959 in 3DMark is good but not exceptional. The fact that 1440p Low still achieves 228 FPS suggests the GPU has ample headroom at lower resolutions, while the 123 FPS at 4K Low indicates the GPU is now doing meaningful work. This transition point sits between 1440p and 4K, where the limiting component shifts from CPU to GPU.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. With a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz, this chip provides substantial compute headroom for gaming workloads. Its 32 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for Minimum, though the game's age means it likely cannot fully utilize all 16 threads.

Synthetic benchmarks show the CPU's strengths: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23,794 and single-core score of 3,359 indicate balanced performance. Passmark results demonstrate particular prowess in integer math (93,942) and floating-point math (53,808), while the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,683 confirms strong multithreaded capabilities. The 105W TDP and unlocked multiplier allow for overclocking, though the stock configuration is already sufficient for this game.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 81 against all processors places it in the upper quintile, with nearest rivals including the Ryzen 7 7840H and Ryzen 7 8845HS showing near-identical performance. For Minimum specifically, the CPU's role is most evident at 1080p Low settings, where the 354 FPS result likely approaches the processor's maximum frame generation capability. At higher resolutions and settings, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as evidenced by the performance scaling patterns. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides ample parallelism for background tasks while gaming, ensuring consistent frame delivery without stutter from CPU contention.