Minimum

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER lands at rank 311 out of 3712 tested combinations for Minimum. That places this pairing in the top 8.4% of all tested combos in the database, a strong showing that reflects the balanced nature of both components. The CPU sits in the 81st percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, so neither part is dramatically holding the other back in the broader scheme of tested hardware.

When looking at the GPU's nearest rivals, the RTX 4080 SUPER's average benchmark score of 54209 is nearly identical to the standard RTX 4080 at 54247, a delta of only -0.1%. The gap widens slightly against the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54828 (-1.1%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55698 (-2.7%). These are small margins, meaning the RTX 4080 SUPER is essentially trading blows with its closest competitors rather than dominating them in raw compute benchmarks Jard. On the CPU side, the Ryzen 7 5800X's average score of 29123 puts it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, while trailing the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 by 0.4% and the Intel Core i5-13500HX by 0.5% — all effectively within noise.

What matters more for gaming is the measured frame rate data. The combo's rank of 311 suggests that while this is a high-performing setup, there are 310 other combos that deliver better results in Minimum. Given that the RTX 4080 SUPER is an end-of-life product and the Ryzen 7 5800X is a 2020-era CPU, this ranking makes sense — newer platforms with faster memory and newer architectures will edge it out, but for a system built on the AM4 socket, this is a formidable pairing.

FAQ

Q: How does this combo perform at 1080p compared to 4K?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 354 FPS average, while at 3840x2160 with Low settings it drops to 123 FPS average. That's a 65% reduction in frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 147 FPS average, Medium delivers 175 FPS, and Ultra delivers 112 FPS. The Medium preset offers the highest average frame rate among the three higher-quality presets, with a minimum of 149 FPS and maximum of 201 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo produces 60 FPS average. Given that the GPU is in the 86th percentile and the CPU is in the 81st percentile, and considering the dramatic frame rate drop from 4K Low (123 FPS) to 4K Ultra (60 FPS), the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution and settings level.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800X compare to its nearest rivals in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X scores 15476 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 11036 in Geekbench multi-core. Its average benchmark score of 29123 places it 0.1% above the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and 0.6% above the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, but 0.5% below the Intel Core i5-13500HX.

Q: Can this combo handle high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 228 FPS average, Medium delivers 271 FPS, and Low delivers 354 FPS. Even the Ultra preset maintains 173 FPS average, which exceeds the refresh rate of most 1080p gaming monitors.

Q: What is the frame time consistency like at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo reports a minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 201 FPS, with an average of 175 FPS. The spread of 52 FPS between minimum and maximum indicates some variance, but the minimum still clears 144 FPS for smooth gameplay on high-refresh displays.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals where the bottleneck shifts in this system. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 354 FPS average. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings, the frame rate drops to 228 FPS — a 35.6% reduction. Jumping to 3840x2160, the frame rate falls to 123 FPS, another 46.1% drop from 1440p. This steep scaling curve indicates that at lower resolutions, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more frames than the GPU can render, and as resolution increases, the GPU becomes progressively more saturated.

At High settings, the pattern holds: 228 FPS at 1080p, 147 FPS at 1440p, and 79 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 35.5% from 1080p to 1440p and 46.3% from 1440p to 4K — nearly identical to the Low setting scaling. This consistency suggests that the relative load distribution between CPU and GPU remains stable across quality presets, with the GPU taking on proportionally more work as resolution climbs.

Ultra settings tell a similar story with a more severe absolute drop. The combo achieves 173 FPS at 1080p Ultra, 112 FPS at 1440p Ultra, and 60 FPS at 4K Ultra. The 4K Ultra result of exactly 60 FPS average is notable — it suggests the system is hitting a performance wall where the GPU is fully saturated, and the frame rate is being constrained by the rendering workload rather than any CPU limitation. The fact that 4K Ultra produces exactly 60 FPS while 4K High produces 79 FPS indicates that the Ultra preset adds enough rendering overhead to push the GPU to its limit at this resolution.

The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can push well past 144 FPS at most settings. At 4K, it remains playable but requires dropping to High or Medium settings to maintain frame rates above 60 FPS, with Medium delivering 94 FPS average and a minimum of 80 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. The Low preset produces 354 FPS average, which is the single highest measured result in the dataset. Medium settings yield 271 FPS average with a minimum of 230 FPS and maximum of 312 FPS. High settings drop to 228 FPS average, and Ultra settings maintain 173 FPS average. All of these results exceed the refresh rate of typical 1080p gaming monitors, making this resolution almost entirely GPU-bound at higher settings and CPU-bound at lower settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show the expected scaling. Low settings produce 228 FPS average, Medium delivers 175 FPS with a minimum of 149 FPS and maximum of 201 FPS, High settings achieve 147 FPS average, and Ultra settings hold at 112 FPS average. The Medium preset at 1440p is particularly interesting — its minimum of 149 FPS means the combo never drops below the 144 Hz threshold, which is the sweet spot for high-refresh 1440p monitors.

At 3840x2160, the performance profile changes significantly. Low settings produce 123 FPS average, which is still smooth for most displays. Medium settings deliver 94 FPS average with a minimum of 80 FPS and maximum of 108 FPS. High settings drop to 79 FPS average, and Ultra settings fall to 60 FPS average. The 4K results show a clear progression: as settings increase from Low to Ultra, the frame rate decreases by roughly 30-35 FPS per step, with the largest single drop occurring between Medium (94 FPS) and High (79 FPS).

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset consistently shows the most complete data with minimum and maximum values reported, while Low, High, and Ultra presets only report averages. The Medium preset's minimum FPS values are 230 at 1080p, 149 at 1440p, and 80 at 4K, indicating that even in the worst-case scenes, the combo maintains playable frame rates at all resolutions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X brings 8 cores and 16 threads to this pairing, running at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boosting to 4.70 GHz. This is a Zen 3 architecture part built on TSMC's 7 nm process, with a 32 MB L3 cache and support for DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU's benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: it scores 7586 in 3DMark with 16 threads, 7578 with max threads, and 15476 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Single-thread performance is also solid, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 943 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1574.5.

In the context of Minimum, a third-person shooter from 2014, the CPU's single-thread performance is likely more relevant than its multi-thread capabilities. The game's release date of June 2014 predates the widespread adoption of many-core CPUs in gaming, and the 5800X's strong single-core performance — evidenced by its PassMark single-thread score of 3445 — ensures that frame pacing remains consistent even in scenes with heavy physics or AI calculations. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking among all processors confirms that it is not a weak link in this system.

The nearest rival data for the CPU shows that the 5800X is competitive with the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, with delta percentages of 0.1% and 0.6% respectively. However, it trails the Intel Core i5-13500HX by 0.5% in average benchmark score. These differences are minimal and unlikely to manifest as noticeable frame rate differences in Minimum, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the dominant factor.

At 1080p with Low settings, the combo reaches 354 FPS, which is well beyond what most displays can show. This result indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with a massive number of frames per second when the GPU is not heavily loaded. The fact that the frame rate drops to 123 FPS at 4K Low settings — a 65% reduction — demonstrates that the GPU's rendering workload is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU has ample headroom at all tested settings.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimizing the gameplay experience at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 173 FPS average, which is more than sufficient for any monitor on the market. The High preset at 228 FPS and Medium at 271 FPS offer diminishing returns in terms of visual quality versus frame rate headroom, but all presets are playable. For 1080p, the Ultra preset is recommended for the best visual experience, as the frame rate remains well above 144 FPS and the GPU has enough headroom to handle the additional rendering load.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset stands out as the optimal choice. It delivers 175 FPS average with a minimum of 149 FPS, which means the system never dips below the 144 Hz refresh rate threshold that is common on 1440p gaming monitors. The High preset at 147 FPS average is close behind, but its minimum frame rate is not reported, making it harder to guarantee consistent frame pacing. The Ultra preset at 112 FPS average is still smooth, but the step down from Medium to Ultra represents a 36% reduction in frame rate, which may not be worth the visual upgrade for competitive play. For 1440p, Medium settings provide the best balance of frame rate consistency and visual fidelity.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes considerably. The Ultra preset produces exactly 60 FPS average, which is the bare minimum for smooth gameplay on a 60 Hz display. The High preset at 79 FPS and Medium at 94 FPS both offer more headroom, with Medium providing a minimum of 80 FPS. For 4K gaming, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers 94 FPS average with a minimum of 80 FPS, ensuring that frame rates stay well above 60 FPS even in demanding scenes. The High preset at 79 FPS is also viable, but the Medium preset's reported minimum of 80 FPS makes it the safer option for consistent performance.

Across all resolutions, the Low preset produces the highest frame rates but sacrifices too much visual quality for most users. The data shows that the Medium preset is the most balanced option for this combo, offering strong average frame rates with reported minimums that confirm playable performance. For users with high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p or 1440p, the Ultra or High presets are viable options that still deliver frame rates above 144 FPS at 1080p and above 110 FPS at 1440p.