Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 112 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 49 | 60 | 77 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 95 | 118 | 149 |
| 1080p Full HD | 115 | 152 | 180 | 233 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
This analysis examines the performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in the 2014 third-person shooter Minimum. The data is derived from measured frame rates across three resolutions and four quality presets. The combination ranks 771st out of 1733 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the database, with a substantial performance ceiling that varies significantly with settings.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound curve, but with a twist: the scaling is not perfectly uniform, and the magnitude of the drop depends heavily on the preset. At 1080p High, the combo delivers 152.1 FPS. Moving to 1440p High reduces that to 95.4 FPS, a 37.3% decrease. At 4K High, the average falls to 49.4 FPS, which is 67.5% below the 1080p figure. This steep decline indicates that the Radeon RX 7700 XT is the primary limiting factor as pixel count rises, with its 12 GB of memory and 192-bit bus being increasingly taxed.
The Low preset tells a different story. At 1080p Low, the system produces 232.9 FPS, suggesting that the CPU is still feeding the GPU effectively. At 1440p Low, the score drops to 148.5 FPS (a 36.2% reduction), and at 4K Low, it settles at 77.4 FPS (a 66.8% reduction from 1080p). The percentage drops are similar to High, but the absolute headroom is much larger. This suggests that even at 4K Low, the system is not completely overwhelmed, and the bottleneck remains the GPU's raw shading throughput rather than its memory subsystem.
The Medium preset shows a middle ground: 179.5 FPS at 1080p, 117.5 FPS at 1440p, and 60.3 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K is 48.7%, which is steeper than the drop from 1080p to 1440p (34.5%). This non-linearity hints that at 4K Medium, the GPU is hitting a more pronounced resource wall, likely related to fill-rate and memory bandwidth requirements. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with 115.4 FPS at 1080p, 72.2 FPS at 1440p, and just 37.8 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is below the 40 FPS threshold that many users consider a minimum for smooth gameplay, making that configuration only suitable for slower-paced or non-competitive play.
The data suggests that the CPU is not a major constraint in this title at these settings. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides ample processing power; the frame rate drops are almost entirely attributable to the GPU's pixel-pushing capabilities. For players targeting high refresh rates, the 1080p High result of 152.1 FPS is particularly notable, as it approaches the 144 Hz marker. At 1440p, the High preset's 95.4 FPS is playable but not ideal for competitive play, while 4K is firmly in the field of visual fidelity over frame rate.
Settings Recommendations
The optimal preset depends on the target resolution and the user's priority between visual quality and frame rate. For 1080p, the High preset is the clear winner, delivering 152.1 FPS while maintaining a significant visual upgrade over Low. The performance gap between High and Ultra is 36.7 FPS (152.1 vs 115.4), a 24.1% reduction, which is a steep price for the incremental visual gains that Ultra typically provides. Medium at 179.5 FPS is faster but sacrifices the richer lighting and texture detail that High offers in a third-person shooter.
At 1440p, High again provides the best balance, with 95.4 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS standard, and the 23.2 FPS difference between High and Medium (95.4 vs 117.5) is moderate. Ultra drops to 72.2 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 24.3% reduction from High. Given that the game is from 2014, High settings are likely to capture most of the available visual richness without the disproportionate cost of Ultra.
For 4K, the recommendation becomes more nuanced. The High preset yields 49.4 FPS, which is marginal for a third-person shooter. The Medium preset offers 60.3 FPS, which is smoother and may be the better choice for maintaining a consistent frame pacing. The Low preset at 77.4 FPS provides the most fluid experience but severely compromises visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 37.8 FPS is not recommended, as the frame rate dips below a playable threshold for most users. In this scenario, the data indicates that Medium is the sweet spot, offering a 22.1% improvement over High while still retaining a reasonable level of graphical detail.
The measured rows show a clear pattern: the step from Medium to High costs a modest amount of performance, while the step from High to Ultra is disproportionately expensive. Across all resolutions, Ultra costs roughly 24% to 31% more in frame rate than High. Therefore, the analysis suggests that High is the default recommendation for 1080p and 1440p, while Medium is the pragmatic choice for 4K.
GPU Role
The Radeon RX 7700 XT is the dominant factor in this game's performance. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at most settings, but becomes a limiting factor at 4K with higher presets. The GPU's boost clock of 2544 MHz and game clock of 2171 MHz drive a 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which explains the strong performance at lower resolutions.
The data shows that the GPU's compute capability is not the primary bottleneck at 1080p; the High preset's 152.1 FPS suggests that the shading units and ROPs are well-utilized but not saturated. However, the 4K Ultra result of 37.8 FPS indicates a hard ceiling. This is likely due to the combination of pixel fill rate (244.2 GPixel/s) and memory bandwidth being overwhelmed by the 8.3 million pixels per frame. The 54 RT cores are irrelevant here, as Minimum does not appear to use ray tracing based on the benchmark data provided.
The GPU's 96 ROPs are a critical resource. At 4K, the ROP output must process significantly more fragments, and the 37.8 FPS at Ultra suggests that the render output units are saturated. The 549.5 GTexel/s texture rate also plays a role, as higher presets typically increase texture sampling complexity. The GPU's percentile ranking of 73rd among all GPUs puts it in a solid mid-range position, but the nearest rivals (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, AMD Radeon RX 570) show that the competitive field is tight, with deltaPct values near zero. The memory capacity of 12 GB is adequate for this title, as the game's release date suggests it is not a VRAM-heavy application, but the bandwidth limitation is evident at 4K.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Minimum?*
A: The data shows that 1080p High delivers 152.1 FPS, which is the most balanced result. At 1440p High, the average drops to 95.4 FPS, while 4K High falls to 49.4 FPS. For competitive play, 1080p is preferred; for visual quality, 1440p is the highest resolution that maintains a comfortable frame rate.
Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High?
A: Across all resolutions, Ultra is significantly more demanding. At 1080p, Ultra yields 115.4 FPS versus High's 152.1 FPS, a 24.1% reduction. At 1440p, the gap is 72.2 FPS versus 95.4 FPS (24.3% reduction), and at 4K, Ultra produces 37.8 FPS versus 49.4 FPS (23.5% reduction). The performance cost is consistent, making Ultra a poor trade-off.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K?
A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck at 4K. The frame rate drops from 152.1 FPS at 1080p to 49.4 FPS at 4K on High settings, a 67.5% reduction. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides sufficient processing power; the performance scaling tracks the GPU's pixel throughput.
Q: Can this combo achieve 60 FPS at 4K?
A: Yes, but only at Medium settings, which produces 60.3 FPS. The High preset falls short at 49.4 FPS, and Ultra is much lower at 37.8 FPS. Low settings achieve 77.4 FPS, but with a significant visual quality reduction.
Q: How does this combo rank against other tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 771st out of 1733 total combinations, placing it in the 55th percentile. This is a mid-pack ranking, indicating that many other CPU and GPU pairings are faster, but this system is by no means weak.
Q: What is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo?
A: The highest average frame rate is 232.9 FPS at 1080p with Low settings. This demonstrates the CPU's ability to push high frame rates when the GPU load is low.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT achieves a rank of 771 out of 1733 tested combos, putting it in the upper half of the database. This is a solid mid-range result, suggesting that the pairing is well-balanced but not exceptional for this game. The CPU's average benchmark score of 26574 places it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 30097 places it in the 73rd percentile among GPUs. The fact that the CPU ranks higher than the GPU suggests a slight imbalance, where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can fully utilize.
The nearest CPU rivals are the AMD EPYC 8024P (deltaPct 0.1), Intel Core i9-11900K (deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen 5 7600 (deltaPct -0.2), and Intel Core i9-12900HK (deltaPct -0.4). The tight deltaPct values indicate that the 5800X3D is performing at the expected level for its class. For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (deltaPct 0), AMD Radeon RX 570 (deltaPct -0.2), NVIDIA Tesla M60 (deltaPct 0.4), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.6). These near-zero deltas confirm that the RX 7700 XT is right in the middle of its performance tier.
The overall combo rank of 771 suggests that while the individual components are strong, the pairing does not lift to the top tiers. This is likely due to the GPU being the limiting factor in a game that is not CPU-intensive. The data indicates that the CPU is capable of higher frame rates, as evidenced by the 232.9 FPS at 1080p Low, but the GPU cannot sustain those rates at higher settings. Therefore, this combo is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming, where it performs admirably, rather than 4K, where it falls short of the top percentile.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a 5000-series processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The processor has a 96 MB shared L3 cache, which is a distinctive feature of the X3D line and is designed to provide a significant performance boost in gaming workloads. The CPU's benchmark results are strong: it scores 24063 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3397 in single-core, with a PassMark multithread score of 28309.
In Minimum, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck at any tested resolution or settings. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 232.9 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that requires a capable processor to maintain. The 5800X3D's 8 cores and high cache size are more than sufficient for this 2014 title, which is not known for heavy multi-threading requirements. The CPU's percentile ranking of 83rd versus all CPUs further confirms its strength.
The CPU's performance relative to its rivals is remarkably consistent, with deltaPct values between -0.4 and 0.1 compared to the nearest competitors. This suggests that the 5800X3D is performing exactly as expected for its position in the market. The lack of a significant CPU bottleneck means that the frame rate differences between settings are almost entirely due to GPU load. This is a positive attribute for the combo, as it means the system can scale its performance predictably with graphics settings, without the CPU causing stutters or frame drops. The 105 W TDP and the fact that it is an end-of-life product with a launch MSRP of $449 are relevant considerations for system builders, but the benchmark data confirms that it remains a highly capable gaming CPU.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 77.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 60.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 49.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 37.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 148.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 117.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 95.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 72.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 232.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 179.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 152.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 115.4 |
Minimum with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + RX 7700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.