Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
112
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 112 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 38 50 65 79
1440p QHD 72 94 113 150
1080p Full HD 113 152 177 234

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 79
3840x2160 Medium 65
3840x2160 High 50
3840x2160 Ultra 38
2560x1440 Low 150
2560x1440 Medium 113
2560x1440 High 94
2560x1440 Ultra 72
1920x1080 Low 234
1920x1080 Medium 177
1920x1080 High 152
1920x1080 Ultra 113

Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT delivers a 1080p experience that is firmly in high-refresh territory, but the data shows a steep and revealing performance curve as resolution climbs. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo hits 234.4 FPS average, which drops to 152.4 FPS at High, 177.3 FPS at Medium, and 112.5 FPS at Ultra. Moving to 2560x1440, the averages fall to 150 FPS at Low, 94.1 FPS at High, 113.2 FPS at Medium, and 72.4 FPS at Ultra. At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically: Low settings produce 79.1 FPS, Medium 64.5 FPS, High 50.1 FPS, and Ultra 38.4 FPS.

The scaling pattern from 1080p to 4K reveals that the RX 7700 XT becomes the dominant limiting factor at higher resolutions. From 1080p Low to 4K Low, the average FPS falls from 234.4 to 79.1, a reduction of roughly 66%. The same settings tier at High drops from 152.4 FPS to 50.1 FPS, a decline of about 67%. This consistent ~66-67% reduction across Low and High presets indicates that the GPU’s rendering throughput is the primary constraint, as the CPU’s frame generation headroom is not being exhausted at these pixel counts. The Ultra preset shows a similar relative drop from 112.5 FPS to 38.4 FPS, reinforcing that the graphics card’s fill rate and shading capacity are what scale inversely with resolution. The Ryzen 5 7600X, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is capable of feeding the GPU at 1080p, where the 234.4 FPS Low result demonstrates that the processor is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions. However, at 4K, the GPU’s 96 ROPs and 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are overwhelmed by the pixel workload, making the RX 7700 XT the clear performance ceiling.

How This Combo Ranks

The benchmark database places this specific CPU-GPU combination at rank 771 out of 1733 tested combos for “Minimum.” This rank, which sits in the 44th percentile of all recorded pairings, reflects the balanced nature of the 7600X and RX 7700 XT. The CPU itself holds a percentile of 83 against all processors, while the GPU sits at a percentile of 73 against all graphics cards. The slight gap between the two components’ standings suggests that the CPU has more relative headroom than the GPU, which is consistent with the resolution scaling data showing GPU-bound behavior at 1440p and above. In the database’s broader context, the combo’s rank of 771 out of 1733 means it outperforms roughly 55% of tested pairings, but it does not crack the top half of the distribution. The nearest rival CPUs, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U with an average score of 26262, show a delta of 0% against the 7600X’s average benchmark score of 26272, indicating that the processor's synthetic performance is tightly clustered with mobile and lower-power desktop parts. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 with an average score of 30109 (a delta of 0%) and the AMD Radeon RX 570 at 30158 (a delta of -0.2%), showing that the RX 7700 XT’s average benchmark score of 30097 places it in a competitive mid-range bracket. In-game, the combo’s rank reflects that the pairing is competent but not exceptional for this 2014 title, which is undemanding by modern standards but still exposes the GPU’s limits at 4K Ultra.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gaming, the data supports using High or Ultra settings without sacrificing fluidity. At 1920x1080, High produces 152.4 FPS average, which is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay on high-refresh monitors, while Ultra still delivers 112.5 FPS. Medium at 177.3 FPS and Low at 234.4 FPS offer diminishing returns in visual quality for the extra frame rate, so High is the sweet spot for a balance of image fidelity and performance. At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts to Medium, which yields 113.2 FPS average and provides a stable experience; High drops to 94.1 FPS, which is still playable but leaves less margin for demanding scenes. Ultra at 1440p falls to 72.4 FPS, which may feel less responsive in a third-person shooter where aiming precision matters. For 3840x2160, the data indicates that only Low settings (79.1 FPS) are viable for a consistently smooth experience; Medium (64.5 FPS) and High (50.1 FPS) are borderline, while Ultra (38.4 FPS) falls below acceptable playability thresholds. Given the game’s 2014 release date and its genre, prioritizing frame rate over maximum visuals at 4K is the prudent choice, making Low the recommended preset at that resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture across three resolutions and four settings tiers. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are as follows: Low 234.4 FPS, Medium 177.3 FPS, High 152.4 FPS, and Ultra 112.5 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 121.9 FPS, showing that settings have a substantial impact at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the averages are Low 150 FPS, Medium 113.2 FPS, High 94.1 FPS, and Ultra 72.4 FPS. The spread here narrows to 77.6 FPS, indicating that the GPU’s workload is becoming more uniform across settings as resolution increases. At 3840x2160, the averages are Low 79.1 FPS, Medium 64.5 FPS, High 50.1 FPS, and Ultra 38.4 FPS. The spread further narrows to 40.7 FPS, which suggests that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily pixel-bound that even Low settings cannot fully escape the resolution penalty. The data shows that the difference between Low and Medium at 4K is 14.6 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is 11.7 FPS, meaning that the settings tiers have relatively consistent performance gaps even at the highest resolution. The absence of min or max FPS values means that the analysis relies solely on averages, which are sufficient to establish the overall trend of diminishing returns as resolution scales.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in “Minimum”?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 provides the highest frame rates, with Low at 234.4 FPS and High at 152.4 FPS, making it the optimal resolution for maximizing performance.

Q: How does the RX 7700 XT compare to its nearest GPU rival?

A: The RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 30097, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 scores 30109, a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon RX 570 scores 30158, a delta of -0.2%, indicating near-identical synthetic performance.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7600X a bottleneck at 4K?

A: No. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 26272 and its 83rd percentile ranking suggest it has ample headroom; the FPS drops from 1080p to 4K are consistent with GPU-bound behavior, not CPU limitations.

Q: What FPS can I expect at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average is 94.1 FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings, which is a smooth experience for a third-person shooter, though Medium at 113.2 FPS offers a higher margin.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: It ranks 771 out of 1733 combos, placing it in the 44th percentile, which means it outperforms about 55% of tested CPU-GPU pairings in this game.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low averages 234.4 FPS and Ultra averages 112.5 FPS, a difference of 121.9 FPS, showing that settings have a major impact at this resolution.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture, built on a 5 nm process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. Its base clock is 4.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, and it features 32 MB of shared L3 cache plus 1 MB of L2 cache per core. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a single-core score of 3406 in Cinebench R23 and a multicore score of 24128, along with a Geekbench single-core score of 2892 and multicore score of 12905. These results place the 7600X in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26272. In the game “Minimum,” the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic, and the data shows that it does so effectively at 1080p, where the 234.4 FPS Low result indicates no significant CPU limitation. The 3DMark scores further illustrate the processor’s threading capabilities: 2-thread score of 2028, 4-thread score of 3796, 8-thread score of 5715, and 16-thread score of 6879, showing a scaling pattern that benefits from additional threads up to 8. At higher resolutions, the CPU’s workload does not increase proportionally with pixel count, so the 7600X’s high single-thread performance (1060 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures that frame pacing remains stable even when the GPU is fully saturated. The processor’s 105 W TDP and unlocked multiplier suggest it is designed for performance-oriented builds, and its DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient data throughput for gaming workloads.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base clock is 1435 MHz, with a game clock of 2171 MHz and a boost clock of 2544 MHz. Its compute resources include 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 ray tracing cores, yielding 35.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s. In synthetic tests, the GPU scores 22547 in Passmark G3D and 127549 in Geekbench OpenCL, with an average benchmark score of 30097, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. In “Minimum,” the GPU’s role is dominant, as evidenced by the resolution scaling data: at 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 38.4 FPS, while at 1080p Ultra it reaches 112.5 FPS. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is more than sufficient for a 2014 title, which does not demand high memory allocation, so the limiting factor is raw shading and rasterization throughput. The 96 ROPs are tasked with pixel output, and the 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports the texture and geometry data at high resolutions. The GPU’s 245 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a mid-range power profile, and its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures adequate bandwidth for the CPU to communicate frame data. The nearest GPU rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, scores 30109 in average benchmarks, a 0% delta, confirming that the RX 7700 XT is competitively positioned, though the in-game results show that this positioning does not translate to 4K Ultra playability, where the GPU is clearly the bottleneck.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2544 MHz MHz
TDP 245 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 79.1
3840x2160 Medium 64.5
3840x2160 High 50.1
3840x2160 Ultra 38.4
2560x1440 Low 150.0
2560x1440 Medium 113.2
2560x1440 High 94.1
2560x1440 Ultra 72.4
1920x1080 Low 234.4
1920x1080 Medium 177.3
1920x1080 High 152.4
1920x1080 Ultra 112.5

Minimum with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RX 7700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.