Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers exceptional performance in Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter released in 2014. The data places this combination at rank 109 out of 1733 tested combos, placing it in the top 6.3% of all configurations. This is a formidable pairing that crushes the game at every resolution, though the scaling patterns reveal a significant CPU bottleneck at lower resolutions, which is typical for a game of this era.

How This Combo Ranks

The measured data for this combo shows a dominant position in the benchmark database. With a rank of 109 out of 1733 tested combinations, the Ryzen 5 7600X and RTX 4080 SUPER sit comfortably in the top tier of performance. This ranking is driven by the sheer strength of both components, which are individually in the 83rd and 88th percentiles for CPUs and GPUs respectively.

The GPU is the primary driver of raw frame rates here. The RTX 4080 SUPER's average benchmark score of 53610 puts it 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and 2.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. While those deltas are small in synthetic tests, the real-world FPS in Minimum shows the 4080 SUPER's ability to push massive frame counts. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 26272, is statistically tied with its nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Ryzen 7 7735U, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE, and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — all within a 0.2% delta. This means the 7600X provides a solid foundation without being a weak link.

The combination’s high rank is not surprising given the game's age relative to these components. The 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock is more than sufficient for a 2014 title, while the 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on the GPU eliminates any VRAM constraints even at 4K Ultra. The result is a system that consistently delivers playable frame rates at all tested settings and resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X a bottleneck for the RTX 4080 SUPER in this game?

A: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU becomes the primary limiting factor. The FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p is 351.7 to 172.7, which shows GPU scaling, but the massive raw numbers suggest the CPU is capping potential output. At 4K, the GPU takes over as the bottleneck, with FPS dropping from 123.7 at Low to 62.5 at Ultra.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a high refresh rate?

A: For 240Hz displays, 1080p is the only viable option, with all settings except Ultra exceeding 226.8 FPS. For 144Hz monitors, 1440p works well at High (147.4 FPS) and Medium (176.4 FPS) settings. At 4K, the combo cannot reach 144 FPS even at Low settings, capping out at 123.7 FPS.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: The data shows a significant drop. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 226.8 at 1080p to 147.4 at 1440p, and then to 80.2 at 4K. That is a 64.6% reduction in FPS from 1080p to 4K at High settings, indicating the GPU is increasingly stressed at higher resolutions.

Q: Does the game benefit from the CPU's high boost clock?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 5 7600X has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz and a single-thread score of 3406 in Cinebench R23. This strong single-core performance is crucial for older games like Minimum, which often rely on fewer threads. The 3dmark single-thread score of 1060 supports this, showing the CPU can handle the game's primary thread without issue.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER's VRAM affect performance?

A: With 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and a 256-bit bus providing 736.3 GB/s bandwidth, VRAM is not a limiting factor. Even at 4K Ultra, the game does not exceed this capacity, allowing for stable frame rates without texture pop-in or stuttering.

Q: What is the lowest FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS in the measured data is 62.5 at 4K Ultra settings. While this is the minimum of the dataset, it still remains above the 60 FPS threshold, making the game fully playable at the highest visual fidelity.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling data reveals a classic pattern of CPU and GPU load shifting. At 1080p, the combo produces enormous frame rates, with the Low setting hitting 351.7 FPS. This high number suggests the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU could likely render even more frames if the CPU could feed it faster. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings shows a drop to 228.1 FPS, a 35.1% decrease, which is largely due to the increased pixel count.

Moving to 4K Low, the FPS falls to 123.7, representing a 64.8% drop from 1080p. This steep decline indicates the GPU is now the bottleneck, as the rendering workload scales with resolution. At High settings, the drop is similar: 226.8 FPS at 1080p, 147.4 at 1440p, and 80.2 at 4K. The consistent relative drops across settings confirm that resolution is the primary factor in frame rate reduction, with the CPU's influence diminishing as resolution increases.

The data shows that at 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-bound, while at 4K, it becomes GPU-bound. This is evident from the FPS ratios. At 1080p Ultra, the combo achieves 172.7 FPS, while at 4K Ultra, it drops to 62.5 FPS, a 63.8% reduction. This shows that the RTX 4080 SUPER is the component that determines the ceiling at 4K, while the Ryzen 5 7600X limits the absolute maximum at 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1080p, the combo delivers outstanding results across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 351.7 FPS, Medium 273.6 FPS, High 226.8 FPS, and Ultra 172.7 FPS. These numbers indicate that even at Ultra, the system is capable of driving high-refresh-rate monitors, and at Low, it far exceeds the capability of most displays.

At 1440p, performance remains excellent. Low settings yield 228.1 FPS, Medium 176.4 FPS, High 147.4 FPS, and Ultra 114.5 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for the combo, as all settings remain above the 100 FPS mark, providing a fluid experience on 144Hz monitors with high visual quality.

At 4K, the GPU workload becomes significant. Low settings deliver 123.7 FPS, Medium 96.9 FPS, High 80.2 FPS, and Ultra 62.5 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 49.5%, showing the impact of increased graphical fidelity. While Ultra is still playable, the frame rate dips below the 100 FPS threshold, making High settings a more balanced choice for a smoother experience.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is a Zen 4 architecture processor built on a 5 nm process. Its base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz are key to its performance in Minimum. The game, released in 2014, likely does not utilize more than a few threads, making the CPU's high single-core performance essential. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3406 and a 3dmark single-thread score of 1060 confirm its strength in this area.

The processor's multi-threaded capabilities are also robust, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24128 and a Passmark multithread score of 28390. However, these are less relevant for Minimum given its age. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency, which can benefit game performance. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5 ensures data flows efficiently to the GPU.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor. The FPS at Low settings (351.7) versus Ultra (172.7) shows that while the GPU is doing more work at Ultra, the CPU is still able to feed it enough data to maintain high frame rates. However, the absolute ceiling at 1080p is likely set by the CPU's processing power, as the GPU is not fully utilized at Low settings.

Settings Recommendations

For players seeking the highest possible frame rates, the Low preset at 1080p delivers an average of 351.7 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play on 360Hz monitors. However, this sacrifices visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 1080p, offering 273.6 FPS, is a strong alternative for those wanting a balance between performance and image quality.

At 1440p, the Medium preset is the recommended starting point, delivering 176.4 FPS. This provides a smooth experience on 144Hz displays while maintaining good visual quality. The High preset at 147.4 FPS is also viable, offering a slight improvement in textures and effects without dropping below the 144 FPS threshold for most of the time.

At 4K, the High preset is the best choice for a balanced experience, with an average of 80.2 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS standard and provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium (96.9 FPS). The Ultra preset, at 62.5 FPS, is only recommended for those who prioritize visuals over frame rate, as it sits just above the 60 FPS boundary. For a 120Hz 4K display, the Low preset at 123.7 FPS is the only way to approach the refresh rate limit.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the powerhouse behind the high frame rates in Minimum. With a boost clock of 2550 MHz and 10240 shading units, it provides immense raw compute power, reflected in its FP32 performance of 52.22 TFLOPS. The GPU sits in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53610, putting it ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 0.2%.

The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus offers a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. This is more than sufficient for Minimum, even at 4K Ultra, ensuring that textures and geometry load quickly without stuttering. The GPU's 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores are overkill for this title but ensure future-proofing for more demanding games.

The data shows that the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K. The FPS drops from 123.7 at Low to 62.5 at Ultra, a 49.5% reduction, which is directly attributable to the increased pixel shading and texture work. At 1080p, the GPU is less stressed, but its high performance still allows for 172.7 FPS at Ultra, showing it is capable of handling the game with ease. The RTX 4080 SUPER's performance is consistent with its top-tier ranking, making it an excellent choice for high-resolution gaming.