Minimum

# Minimum: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Intel Arc B570 — Benchmark Analysis

This combination pairs AMD's 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 5700X3D (Zen 3, Vermeer architecture, 7 nm, 96 MB shared L3 cache) with Intel's Arc B570 GPU (Xe2-HPG architecture, Battlemage generation, 10 GB GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, 380.0 GB/s bandwidth). The data shows this pairing lands at rank 2336 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. The measured frames per second across resolutions and settings reveal a system that is consistently playable at 1080p but struggles to maintain smooth performance at 4K, with the GPU acting as the primary bottleneck in most scenarios.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Minimum?*

A: The highest measured average is 145 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next-best result is 111 FPS at the same resolution with Medium settings, followed by 93 FPS at High and 71 FPS at Ultra.

Q: How does this combo perform at 1440p compared to 1080p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 94 (Low), 72 (Medium), 60 (High), and 46 (Ultra). This represents a reduction of approximately 35% from the corresponding 1080p results at Low settings, and roughly 35-35% across the other presets as well.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combination?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 50 (Low) to 25 (Ultra). Only the Low setting exceeds 30 FPS, while Medium averages 39 FPS and High averages 32 FPS. The Ultra preset drops below 30 FPS, indicating that 4K gaming is only marginally playable at lower settings.

Q: What is the combo's overall rank in the database?

A: The combo ranks 2336 out of 2939 tested combinations in Minimum, placing it in the 21st percentile of all tested systems. This rank reflects the GPU's mid-range standing (65th percentile among all GPUs) combined with the CPU's upper-mid positioning (77th percentile among all CPUs).

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score is 20556, which is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534) and 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc A750 (20582). The deltaPct values indicate near-identical performance among these three, with the AMD Radeon R9 M390X trailing at 20662 (-0.5% relative).

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 5700X3D hold back the GPU in this game?

A: Benchmark results indicate the CPU is not the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 145 FPS, but at 4K Ultra it drops to 25 FPS — a performance cliff that aligns with GPU compute limits rather than CPU core throughput. The CPU's 16 threads and 96 MB L3 cache provide ample headroom for this 2014 title.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 brings 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is modest by modern standards, and the 2500 MHz base/boost clock (identical figures) keeps the GPU operating at a fixed frequency. The 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs define the raw throughput capabilities, with a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute sits at 11.52 TFLOPS, which is the figure most relevant for traditional rasterization workloads like Minimum.

In the measured FPS data, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution scales upward. At 3840x2160, the gap between Low (50 FPS) and Ultra (25 FPS) is a 50% reduction, indicating that the GPU is being pushed to its limits by both pixel count and shader complexity. The Medium preset at 4K shows 39 FPS average with a minimum of 33 and maximum of 44, suggesting frame pacing is relatively stable even when the GPU is under heavy load. The 10 GB framebuffer is sufficient for this game's textures at all settings, as no VRAM-related stutter is evident in the data — the bottleneck is pure compute throughput rather than memory capacity.

The GPU's benchmark percentile of 65 places it near the mid-range tier, but its nearest rivals are a mix of mobile and desktop parts: the RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% higher), Arc A750 (0.1% lower), Quadro M4000M (0.4% higher), and R9 M390X (0.5% lower). This close grouping suggests the Arc B570 performs consistently with its peers in synthetic tests, but the Minimum results show it trailing what a higher-tier GPU might achieve at 4K. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is a limiting factor at high resolutions, as the data shows a steep drop from 1440p to 4K — the 4K Ultra result of 25 FPS is only 54% of the 1440p Ultra result of 46 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D provides 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process. The base clock of 3.00 GHz boosts to 4.10 GHz, and the 96 MB shared L3 cache is the standout feature — this large cache is designed to reduce memory latency in gaming workloads. The CPU's benchmarks show strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 22366, while the single-core score is 3157. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6764 and max-thread score of 6755 indicate consistent scaling across all available threads, while the 2-thread score of 1575 shows that lightly-threaded workloads also perform adequately.

For Minimum, a third-person shooter released in 2014, the CPU's role is largely about maintaining frame pacing and avoiding bottleneck situations at lower resolutions. The data suggests this is achieved: at 1080p Low, the system hits 145 FPS, which is a frame rate that would stress many CPUs but is comfortably handled by the 5700X3D's 8 cores and high cache capacity. The CPU's percentile of 77 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24709, places it just below the Ryzen 5 7600X3D (24728, -0.1%) and Ryzen 9 5900HX (24822, -0.5%), while slightly above the Core i5-12450HX (24576, +0.5%) and Core i5-11600 (24563, +0.6%).

The 105 W TDP and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth (DDR4 dual-channel) are adequate for feeding the GPU at 1080p, but the CPU is not the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The evidence is clear: from 1080p Low (145 FPS) to 1440p Low (94 FPS) to 4K Low (50 FPS), the FPS drops are proportional to pixel count increases, which is the signature of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's 16 threads and high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 2970) ensure that even in CPU-intensive moments, the GPU remains the primary constraint.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 145 FPS, Medium drops to 111 FPS (with a minimum of 95 and maximum of 128), High averages 93 FPS, and Ultra settles at 71 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 51% reduction in average FPS, which is a typical scaling curve for a GPU-bound title. The Medium preset's min/max range of 95-128 FPS indicates consistent frame delivery, with no severe dips that would indicate CPU stalls or memory bandwidth issues.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages fall to 94 FPS (Low), 72 FPS (Medium, min 61 / max 82), 60 FPS (High), and 46 FPS (Ultra). The Medium preset at 1440p shows a tight frame range of 61-82 FPS, suggesting that the GPU can maintain stable pacing even as resolution increases. The drop from 1080p Medium (111 FPS) to 1440p Medium (72 FPS) is 35%, which closely matches the 1.78x pixel count increase (2.07 million to 3.69 million) — indicating near-linear scaling with pixel load.

At 3840x2160, performance becomes marginal. Low averages 50 FPS, Medium 39 FPS (min 33 / max 44), High 32 FPS, and Ultra 25 FPS. The 4K Medium result of 39 FPS is the only preset that maintains a minimum above 30 FPS, while High and Ultra fall below the 30 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The scaling from 1440p Medium (72 FPS) to 4K Medium (39 FPS) is a 46% reduction, which is steeper than the 2.25x pixel increase (3.69 million to 8.29 million) would predict — this indicates the GPU is hitting memory bandwidth or compute limits beyond raw pixel throughput.

The overall pattern across all resolutions shows that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and playability, with the 1080p Medium result (111 FPS) being the highest average above 100 FPS, and the 1440p Medium result (72 FPS) remaining comfortably above 60 FPS for most displays.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2336 out of 2939 tested combinations, placing it in the 21st percentile of all systems in the Minimum database. This rank is notably lower than what the individual component percentiles might suggest — the CPU sits at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 65th percentile, but the combined result falls well below those marks. This discrepancy indicates that the pairing is not optimal for this specific game, likely because the GPU's mid-range performance cannot fully leverage the CPU's strong gaming capabilities.

The rank is particularly telling when compared to the nearest rival GPUs. The Arc B570's average benchmark score (20556) is nearly identical to the RTX 3070 Mobile (20534) and Arc A750 (20582), yet the Minimum results show that this combo struggles at 4K — the 4K Ultra average of 25 FPS is below the 30 FPS threshold that many users consider the minimum for acceptable playability. The rank of 2336 suggests that many other combos in the database achieve better performance in Minimum, likely due to more balanced CPU-GPU pairings or GPUs with higher memory bandwidth.

The CPU's nearest rivals tell a similar story: the Ryzen 5 7600X3D, Ryzen 9 5900HX, Core i5-12450HX, and Core i5-11600 all have average benchmark scores within 0.6% of the 5700X3D, yet the combination's rank in Minimum implies that the GPU is the deciding factor. This is consistent with the FPS data, which shows GPU-bound behavior at all resolutions above 1080p. The combo rank of 2336/2939 means that approximately 79% of tested systems outperform this pairing in Minimum, which is a sobering statistic for a CPU that ranks in the top quarter of all processors.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gaming, the Medium preset at 111 FPS is the optimal choice — it provides a 20% FPS increase over High (93 FPS) while maintaining visual quality significantly above Low (145 FPS). The Ultra preset at 71 FPS is still playable but offers diminishing returns over Medium given the 36% FPS penalty. For competitive play, the Low preset at 145 FPS is recommended, as it maximizes frame rate and minimizes input latency.

At 1440p, the Medium preset at 72 FPS is the best balance, delivering smooth gameplay on 60 Hz displays with room to spare for 75 Hz panels. The High preset at 60 FPS is also viable for users prioritizing visual fidelity, while Ultra at 46 FPS may be too inconsistent for fast-paced third-person shooting. The Low preset at 94 FPS is the choice for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors, though the visual compromise is significant.

At 4K, the options are limited. The Low preset at 50 FPS is the only setting that consistently exceeds 48 FPS, making it the recommended choice for playability. Medium at 39 FPS is acceptable for slower-paced gameplay, but the High (32 FPS) and Ultra (25 FPS) presets fall below the 30 FPS threshold and are not recommended for this title. The data shows that 4K Ultra is essentially unplayable with this combo, and even High settings require significant compromises in frame pacing.

The overall recommendation is to use Medium settings at 1080p or 1440p, as this preset provides the best balance of performance and visual quality across all measured resolutions. The Medium preset's minimum FPS values (95 at 1080p, 61 at 1440p, 33 at 4K) indicate that it maintains frame stability without severe dips, making it the safest choice for consistent gameplay.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent reduction across all settings: Low drops from 145 to 94 FPS (-35%), Medium from 111 to 72 (-35%), High from 93 to 60 (-35%), and Ultra from 71 to 46 (-35%). This uniform reduction closely matches the 1.78x increase in pixel count, indicating that the GPU is scaling linearly with resolution at these levels. This is the expected behavior for a GPU-bound scenario where the CPU has sufficient headroom.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a different pattern. Low drops from 94 to 50 FPS (-47%), Medium from 72 to 39 (-46%), High from 60 to 32 (-47%), and Ultra from 46 to 25 (-46%). The pixel count increases by 2.25x from 1440p to 4K, but the FPS reduction is only ~46-47% — meaning the performance drop is less than linear. This suggests that at 4K, the GPU is not purely pixel-bound but is also limited by other factors such as memory bandwidth or shader complexity that do not scale directly with resolution.

The steepest absolute drop occurs at High settings: from 60 FPS at 1440p to 32 FPS at 4K, a 28 FPS reduction. The smallest absolute drop is at Ultra: from 46 to 25 FPS, a 21 FPS reduction. The proportional consistency across all settings (35% for 1080p-to-1440p, 46-47% for 1440p-to-4K) strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component throughout. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would plateau at higher resolutions rather than continuing to decline, and the scaling percentages would diverge more significantly between settings.

The data reveals that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the GPU can maintain playable frame rates across all settings. At 4K, only the Low preset approaches smoothness, and even then the 50 FPS average is far from ideal. The limiting component is clearly the Intel Arc B570, whose 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 11.52 TFLOPS compute cannot keep pace with the 8.29 million pixels at 4K, regardless of the CPU's capable 8-core, 16-thread configuration.