Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 pairing delivers a high-performance experience in Minimum, a third-person shooter released in 2014. The benchmark data shows this combination achieves exceptional frame rates, with the RTX 5080’s substantial memory bandwidth and raw compute power dominating the workload across all tested resolutions and settings. Analysis of the measured frames per second (FPS) reveals a system with considerable headroom, where the GPU’s capabilities are the primary driver of performance, even when paired with a capable 6-core processor.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, code-named Raphael, and built on a 5 nm process. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and has a base clock of 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Its cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 21,765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,072 in single-core, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs tested.

For a 2014 title like Minimum, the CPU’s processing power is more than sufficient to keep up with the GPU. The game’s engine is not known for being exceptionally demanding on multi-threaded workloads, meaning the 7400F’s 6 cores and 12 threads are likely underutilized. The single-thread performance, as reflected by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,072, is critical for game logic and draw calls, and this processor provides ample speed to avoid becoming a bottleneck. The data confirms this; at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 369 FPS, a number so high that it indicates the CPU is feeding frames faster than most displays can even show them.

The processor’s nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the Intel Core i5-14600T, which scores an average of 32,707, a mere 0.1% difference from the 7400F, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H with an average score of 32,812, which is 0.2% lower. These minuscule deltas show that the 7400F is positioned in a highly competitive performance tier, but in the context of Minimum, the CPU’s absolute performance level is secondary to the GPU. The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this pairing, as the frame rates scale consistently with GPU workload changes across different settings and resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is the dominant component in this configuration. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and the GB203 chip, featuring 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The GPU has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. Its memory subsystem is particularly noteworthy: 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a massive 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a key specification for Minimum, as the game’s environments and effects can consume significant video memory at higher resolutions.

The RTX 5080’s compute capabilities are substantial, with an FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS. In terms of benchmark percentiles, it sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S, which has a delta of 0.6% in average benchmark score, and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, which is 2.2% faster. However, in the specific context of Minimum, the RTX 5080’s strengths are clearly demonstrated. The combination of high clock speeds and the 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth allows for exceptional texture streaming and high-detail rendering without stutter.

The GPU’s role becomes increasingly apparent as resolution increases. At 4K Ultra settings, the system produces an average of 63 FPS, which is a demanding scenario. The GPU is the sole processor of this graphical load, and the data shows it handles the task competently. The fact that the frame rate drops from 369 FPS at 1080p Low to 63 FPS at 4K Ultra is a direct consequence of the GPU’s rendering workload increasing, not a limitation imposed by the CPU. The RTX 5080 is the clear performance ceiling for this combo.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data provides clear insight into how the system scales across resolutions. At 1080p High settings, the average frame rate is 237 FPS. Moving to 1440p High, the average drops to 153 FPS, a reduction of approximately 35%. At 4K High, the average is 82 FPS, which is a further 46% reduction from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the CPU has enough headroom to maintain frame delivery, and the GPU’s rendering time increases proportionally with pixel count.

When examining Low settings, the scaling is even more dramatic. The jump from 1080p Low (369 FPS) to 1440p Low (238 FPS) is a 35% drop, and then to 4K Low (128 FPS) is a further 46% drop. These percentages indicate that the workload is scaling almost linearly with the pixel throughput, confirming that the RTX 5080 is the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a plateau in frame rates at lower resolutions, but the data shows a continuous climb, meaning the CPU is still not saturated even at 369 FPS.

The behavior at Medium settings reinforces this analysis, with average FPS of 283 at 1080p, 182 at 1440p, and 98 at 4K. The consistent percentage drops across all settings presets indicate that the system’s performance is predictable and directly tied to the GPU’s rendering pipeline. The RTX 5080’s 16 GB of VRAM is also likely sufficient to prevent any memory-related stutters at 4K, as the frame time variance, where available, remains controlled. The data shows a clear hierarchy: the GPU’s workload is the primary determinant of performance, with resolution acting as the direct scaling factor.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark results provide a comprehensive look at performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system achieves its highest frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 369, which is an extremely high number, suggesting the game is rendering frames faster than necessary for most displays. Medium settings bring the average down to 283 FPS, with a minimum of 240 and a maximum of 325. High settings produce an average of 237 FPS, and Ultra settings yield 181 FPS. These numbers show that even at the highest settings, the system is capable of sustaining refresh rates well above 144 Hz.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains excellent. The Low preset achieves an average of 238 FPS, while Medium settings average 182 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 155 and maximum of 210. The High preset produces 153 FPS, which is still a very playable frame rate for competitive or fast-paced gameplay. The Ultra preset averages 117 FPS, indicating that players can still enjoy high refresh rates with maximum visual fidelity at this resolution.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the system begins to show its limits, though it remains highly capable. The Low settings average 128 FPS, which is more than sufficient for a smooth experience. Medium settings average 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 and a maximum of 113, showing some frame time variance but overall solid performance. High settings average 82 FPS, and the Ultra preset brings the average down to 63 FPS. This data suggests that for 4K gaming, players will need to balance visual quality with frame rate preferences, as the Ultra preset dips below the 60 FPS threshold on average, while High settings maintain a comfortable margin above it.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 pairing holds a combo rank of 173 out of 2,939 unique combinations. This places it in the top 6% of all tested systems, which is a strong result for a high-end configuration. The rank is a holistic measure of the combo’s performance in Minimum, and the high placement is a direct result of the RTX 5080’s dominance in the GPU benchmarks and its ability to push high frame rates even at 4K resolution.

The rank reflects the balance of the system. A lower-ranked combo might feature a more powerful CPU but a weaker GPU, or vice versa. In this case, the combo’s strength lies in the GPU’s raw power, which compensates for the CPU’s mid-range position. The CPU’s percentile rank of 83 and the GPU’s percentile rank of 87 are close, but the GPU’s workload in this game is much higher. The combo rank of 173 suggests that this pairing is more than the sum of its parts, as the CPU provides enough support to let the GPU operate without any significant bottlenecks, allowing the system to achieve its full potential in the benchmark.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and RTX 5080 combo achieves an average of 237 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor. Frame rates scale consistently with resolution changes, and the CPU is capable of producing very high frame rates (369 FPS at 1080p Low) without appearing to be a bottleneck.

Q: How much of a performance drop is there from 1440p to 4K at Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 Medium, the average FPS is 182. At 3840x2160 Medium, the average FPS is 98, which is a reduction of approximately 46%.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for the 4K Medium preset?

A: The minimum FPS recorded for the 3840x2160 Medium preset is 83, with a maximum of 113.

Q: Does the system maintain high frame rates at 4K with maximum settings?

A: At 4K Ultra settings, the average FPS is 63. This is playable but is the lowest average among all tested configurations.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 173rd out of 2,939 tested combinations, placing it in the top 6% of all systems in the database for this game.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s display and performance goals. For players with a 1080p display, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it delivers an average of 181 FPS, which is well above the refresh rate of most monitors. This allows for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset at 1080p also offers a significant advantage, with 237 FPS, but the visual improvements from Ultra are likely worth the slight frame rate reduction.

At 1440p, the High preset is the recommended balance, providing an average of 153 FPS. This is high enough for 144 Hz displays, and the visual quality is superior to the Medium preset. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 117 FPS, which is still a good experience, but the High preset offers a more comfortable margin for frame rate stability. For users with 1440p 240 Hz monitors, the Medium preset at 182 FPS is a viable option, though it sacrifices some graphical detail.

For 4K resolution, the High preset is the most balanced choice, with an average of 82 FPS. This provides a smooth experience on most displays and maintains a high level of visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 98 FPS is also a strong option for those prioritizing frame rate, while the Ultra preset at 63 FPS is best reserved for players who value visual quality above all else and can tolerate a frame rate that may dip below 60 in intense scenes. The Low preset is not recommended at any resolution, as the visual downgrade is significant, and even the Medium preset provides a substantial performance boost over it.