Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 113 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 52 | 62 | 81 |
| 1440p QHD | 74 | 97 | 116 | 151 |
| 1080p Full HD | 115 | 151 | 179 | 234 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT delivers a performance profile in Minimum that is heavily dictated by resolution. At 1080p, the system produces frame rates well above the refresh rates of most standard monitors, while 4K Ultra presents a demanding scenario that tests the limits of the graphics card. The data suggests a system that is highly capable for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming, but one where the GPU becomes the primary constraint as pixel count rises.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals a predictable and significant drop in average frame rates across all settings presets. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 234 at 1080p to 151 at 1440p, finally reaching 81 at 4K. This represents a 65% reduction in average frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K. The trend is consistent across all presets, with High settings dropping from 151 FPS at 1080p to 97 FPS at 1440p and 52 FPS at 4K. Medium settings follow the same pattern, yielding 179, 116, and 62 FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 2160p respectively. The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling, starting at 115 FPS at 1080p and dropping to 74 FPS at 1440p, then down to 40 FPS at 4K.
The scaling pattern indicates that the Radeon RX 7700 XT is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 1080p results, particularly the 234 FPS Low and 179 FPS Medium figures, suggest that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to achieve very high frame rates. However, as resolution increases, the GPU's workload expands with the pixel count, causing the frame rate to scale downwards in a manner consistent with a graphics-bound scenario. The fact that even at 4K Low the system only manages 81 FPS, while at 1080p Low it achieves 234 FPS, demonstrates that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary bottlenecks at 4K. The game's age from 2014 likely means it is not heavily multithreaded, so the 6-core processor does not become a limiting factor until frame rates are extremely high, as seen at 1080p Low.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is built on the Zen 3 architecture with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz and a base clock of 3.60 GHz. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, a configuration that provides solid multi-threaded performance for modern titles, but for a game released in 2014, the single-thread performance is often more critical. The benchmark data shows a single-thread score of 913 in 3dmark and 2438 in Cinebench R23, while multi-thread scores reach 5554 and 17272 in the same tests respectively. These figures indicate a processor with strong per-core capabilities that can handle the game logic and draw calls efficiently.
In the context of Minimum, the CPU's role is to maintain high minimum frame rates and prevent bottlenecks at lower resolutions. The data shows that at 1080p, the system reaches an average of 234 FPS on Low settings. This high frame rate suggests that the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution and settings combination; the GPU is still able to render frames as fast as the CPU can issue draw commands. The 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth provide sufficient data throughput for the game's assets. The processor's percentile ranking of 74 among all CPUs indicates it is a capable performer, sitting close to the Intel Core i5-12490F, which has an average benchmark score of 20802 against the 5600GT's 20733, a delta of -0.3%.
The 3dmark 2-thread score of 1794 and 4-thread score of 3446 are relevant for a game from this era. Many titles from 2014 were optimized for dual or quad-core processors. The Ryzen 5 5600GT's high boost clock of 4.60 GHz ensures that even workloads relying on a single thread are handled effectively, as evidenced by the 3dmark single-thread score of 913. This strong single-thread performance is likely the reason why the 1080p frame rates are so high, as the CPU can process the game's main thread quickly enough to keep up with the GPU's output at lower resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT achieves a rank of 1392 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum. This places the system in the top 37.5% of all configurations tested, indicating a solidly above-average performance tier. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU, with the system's performance being strong enough to handle high refresh rate gaming at 1440p and 1080p, while also being capable of playable 4K frame rates on lower settings.
The GPU's individual performance is a key contributor to this ranking. The Radeon RX 7700 XT has an average benchmark score of 22549, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile with a score of 22435 (a 0.5% delta) and the RTX 4060 Mobile with a score of 22729 (a -0.8% delta). This indicates that the desktop RX 7700 XT is performing in a similar tier to these mobile parts, which is a strong showing given the power constraints of laptops. The CPU's 74th percentile ranking also contributes to the combo's overall position, ensuring that the system is not held back by a weak processor.
The data suggests that this combo is well-matched for Minimum. The CPU does not bottleneck the GPU at standard gaming resolutions, and the GPU provides enough raw power to produce high frame rates. The rank of 1392 out of 3712 indicates that while there are faster combinations available, this particular pairing offers a level of performance that will satisfy most gamers looking for a smooth experience. The gap between this combo and the top-tier setups is likely due to more powerful GPUs like the RTX 2080, which scores 22895 in the average benchmark, a 1.5% delta over the RX 7700 XT.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance. The Low preset yields an average of 234 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 179 FPS with a minimum of 153 FPS and a maximum of 206 FPS. High settings produce an average of 151 FPS, and Ultra drops to 115 FPS. These numbers indicate that even at the highest settings, the system is capable of driving a 144Hz monitor at 1080p, and at Low settings, it can take full advantage of a 240Hz display. The variation between Low and Ultra is significant, with a 119 FPS difference, showing that the game's settings have a substantial impact on the GPU load.
Moving to 2560x1440, the average frame rates remain high. Low settings produce 151 FPS, Medium averages 116 FPS with a minimum of 98 FPS and maximum of 133 FPS, High averages 97 FPS, and Ultra averages 74 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for the RX 7700 XT, as even the Ultra preset maintains an average above 60 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay. The 1440p results show a more balanced load between CPU and GPU, with the frame rates scaling down from the 1080p figures in a linear fashion.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The Low preset produces an average of 81 FPS, which is still playable, but the Medium preset drops to 62 FPS with a minimum of 53 FPS. High settings average 52 FPS, and Ultra falls to 40 FPS. The 4K results highlight the limitations of the 12 GB of VRAM and the 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth when pushing a large number of pixels. The drop from 1440p to 4K at High settings is 45 FPS, demonstrating the exponential increase in rendering workload. For 4K gaming, the data suggests that only the Low and Medium presets are viable for a consistently smooth experience.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo in Minimum?*
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 is the optimal resolution. At 1440p, the Ultra preset averages 74 FPS, while the High preset averages 97 FPS. This provides a good balance between visual quality and frame rate, ensuring smooth gameplay above 60 FPS.
Q: Can this system achieve 144 FPS at 1920x1080?
A: Yes. At 1080p, the Low preset averages 234 FPS, the Medium preset averages 179 FPS, and the High preset averages 151 FPS. All three presets exceed the 144 FPS threshold, making the system suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: It is playable but limited. The 4K Low preset averages 81 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 62 FPS. However, the High preset drops to 52 FPS, and Ultra falls to 40 FPS. For a consistent 60 FPS experience, users should stick to Low or Medium settings at 4K.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20733. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-12490F, scores 20802, which is a delta of -0.3%. This indicates the two processors perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks.
Q: Does the game utilize the CPU's multi-threading capabilities?
A: Given the game's 2014 release date and the frame rates observed, it is likely optimized for fewer threads. The high average FPS at 1080p (234 FPS on Low) suggests that the CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3dmark single-thread score of 913, is more critical than its multi-threaded capabilities.
Q: What is the GPU's performance ranking among all tested graphics cards?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22549. Its performance is similar to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which has a delta of -1.5% from the RX 7700 XT.
Settings Recommendations
For a balance between visual fidelity and performance, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is the recommended starting point. This configuration yields an average of 116 FPS with a minimum of 98 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience even during intense gameplay sequences. The 1440p Medium preset provides a significant visual upgrade over Low settings while maintaining a frame rate that exceeds the requirements of most high-refresh-rate monitors. The minimum FPS of 98 also provides a comfortable buffer above the 60 FPS threshold.
For users with 1080p displays, the High preset is the best choice. It averages 151 FPS, which is well above 144 FPS, and provides a substantial visual improvement over Medium. The Ultra preset at 1080p is also viable, averaging 115 FPS, but the jump from High to Ultra yields diminishing returns in visual quality for a 36 FPS performance cost. For 4K displays, the Low preset is the only option that guarantees a consistently high frame rate, averaging 81 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K is playable with an average of 62 FPS, but the minimum of 53 FPS may result in occasional stutters in demanding scenes.
The data indicates that the game is not particularly demanding on the GPU, given the high frame rates achieved at 1080p and 1440p. Therefore, users should prioritize higher settings at 1440p over lower settings at 4K for the best overall experience. The 12 GB of VRAM on the RX 7700 XT is ample for this title, as even the 4K Ultra preset, which likely uses the most memory, does not appear to be constrained by VRAM capacity, but rather by the GPU's raw compute power.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the dominant component in this system for Minimum. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for the game's textures and geometry at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's boost clock of 2544 MHz and game clock of 2171 MHz allow it to process the game's graphics workload efficiently. The 3456 shading units and 96 ROPs are responsible for the high fill rates observed in the benchmark results.
The GPU's role becomes increasingly important as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU can feed the GPU fast enough to achieve 234 FPS on Low settings, but as the resolution climbs to 4K, the GPU's pixel processing capabilities become the limiting factor. The 4K Ultra average of 40 FPS demonstrates the GPU's struggle with the increased pixel count and the associated memory bandwidth demands. The 35.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the raw compute power that drives these frame rates, and it is clear that this is not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra in this title.
The GPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks shows it is a mid-range to upper-mid-range part, with a Passmark G3D score of 22547 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, scores 22895 in the average benchmark, a 1.5% difference. This suggests that the RX 7700 XT is a modern equivalent to that older flagship card. The data shows that for Minimum, the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rate at 1440p and above, while at 1080p, the system is well-balanced, allowing the CPU's strong single-thread performance to shine through.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 81.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 62.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 52.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 40.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 151.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 116.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 97.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 74.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 234.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 179.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 151.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 115.0 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 5600GT + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600GT + RX 7700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.