Minimum

This analysis examines the performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in the third-person shooter Minimum. The data is derived from measured FPS results at multiple resolutions and settings presets, providing a clear picture of the combo's capabilities and limitations.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 holds a rank of 1549 out of 2939 tested combos for this specific game. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all tested systems, indicating that while it is not a top-tier performer, it is far from being a weak contender. The ranking suggests that this pairing is a balanced match for Minimum, capable of delivering solid frame rates without being held back by a significant bottleneck.

Benchmark results indicate that the CPU and GPU are well-aligned in their overall capabilities. The processor's average benchmark score is 36945, which places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The graphics card's average benchmark score is 17639, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The disparity in percentiles suggests that the GPU is the more limiting factor in this pairing, a common scenario in gaming where graphical load often outpaces CPU demands.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the performance deltas are exceptionally tight. The Ryzen 5 5600F scores 0% different from the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, and it is a mere 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D. It is also 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and 0.5% behind the Intel Core i9-12900T. These negligible differences mean that in CPU-bound scenarios, swapping to any of these alternatives would yield virtually identical performance. The choice between them would come down to platform features rather than raw gaming speed.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are less comparable in terms of modern gaming performance. The RTX 4060's score is 0.2% above the AMD Radeon HD 7790, 0.3% above the AMD Radeon 780M, 0.5% above the AMD Radeon Pro 560, and 0.7% above the AMD Radeon Pro 460. These are older or integrated-class parts, which highlights that the RTX 4060's direct competition is in a different performance tier. The combo's overall rank is therefore more heavily influenced by the CPU's strong standing than the GPU's mid-range position.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, built on a 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. This configuration is well-suited for gaming, where the boost clock can be leveraged for single-threaded tasks, and the 12 threads provide ample headroom for background processes and modern game engines.

In the context of Minimum, a third-person shooter, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics calculations, and draw calls. The benchmark results show that this processor is not a weak link in the combo. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 202 FPS, a very high frame rate that indicates the CPU is feeding the GPU efficiently. The processor's PassMark single-thread score of 2872 and multithread score of 19236 are strong indicators of its capability to handle the game's demands.

The CPU's performance relative to its rivals is effectively a tie. With a 0% delta versus the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and a 0.2% deficit versus the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, the Ryzen 5 5600F is operating at the top of its class. This means that for a game like Minimum, which appears to scale well with CPU performance, the 5600F is providing all the necessary compute power. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is also a benefit, as it helps reduce memory latency and can improve performance in games that have large data sets to access.

The processor's memory support for DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is adequate for this game. While not the fastest available, it does not appear to be a bottleneck based on the high FPS figures seen at lower resolutions. The data suggests that the 5600F is a capable and well-matched partner for the RTX 4060, ensuring that the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates, especially at higher resolutions.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance rank of this CPU and GPU combo in Minimum?*

A: The combo ranks 1549 out of 2939 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600F compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 have identical average benchmark scores, with a delta of 0%. They are direct performance equivalents.

Q: What is the best average FPS achieved by this combo, and at what settings?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 202, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

*Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for this combo in Minimum?*

A: Benchmark results indicate the GPU is the more limiting factor. The RTX 4060 has a 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the CPU has an 85th percentile ranking, suggesting the graphics card is the performance ceiling.

Q: Does the combo achieve a playable frame rate at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 45. This is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. Lowering the settings to Low increases the average to 70 FPS, which is a more comfortable playable range.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo records an average of 100 FPS, with a minimum of 85 FPS and a maximum of 115 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how the combo performs across different settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the resolution most likely to be CPU-bound, the frame rates are exceptionally high. With Low settings, the average FPS is 202, which drops to 155 on Medium and 130 on High. The Ultra preset sees a significant drop to 99 FPS, indicating a substantial increase in graphical load. The Medium preset at this resolution has a reported minimum of 131 FPS and a maximum of 178 FPS, showing a stable frame time experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong. The Low preset averages 130 FPS, which is a solid score for a higher resolution. The Medium preset averages 100 FPS, with a minimum of 85 FPS and a maximum of 115 FPS. High settings average 84 FPS, and Ultra drops to 64 FPS. These numbers show that the combo is well-suited for 1440p gaming, even on High settings, where it maintains a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a noticeable hit, which is expected given the increased pixel count. The Low preset is the most playable, averaging 70 FPS. Medium settings average 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS. High settings average 45 FPS, and Ultra drops to 34 FPS. The data shows that for 4K gaming, users will need to stick to Low or Medium settings to achieve a consistently smooth experience. The lack of min/max data for most presets suggests that the frame times are stable, with the exception of the Medium presets which have recorded ranges.

The progression of scores from Low to Ultra at each resolution follows a predictable pattern. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 103 FPS, at 1440p it is 66 FPS, and at 4K it is 36 FPS. This diminishing gap at higher resolutions reinforces the idea that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, while at 1080p, the CPU's strong performance is what allows the high frame rates.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is a clear indicator of the GPU's role as the limiting component. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 202 FPS. At 1440p Low, this drops to 130 FPS, a reduction of 72 FPS. At 4K Low, the average is 70 FPS, a further drop of 60 FPS. This scaling pattern shows that the GPU is being pushed harder as the resolution increases, which is a typical sign of a GPU-bound scenario.

For High settings, the scaling is similar. The 1080p High average is 130 FPS. At 1440p High, it drops to 84 FPS, a 46 FPS reduction. At 4K High, it falls to 45 FPS, another 39 FPS reduction. The large absolute drops in FPS as resolution increases indicate that the RTX 4060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit memory bus are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but are challenged at 4K.

This behavior is typical for a mid-range GPU paired with a strong CPU. At 1080p, the CPU has the headroom to push high frame rates, but the GPU's rendering capabilities become the limiting factor. The data suggests that the sweet spot for this combo is 1440p, where the frame rates are still high (e.g., 84 FPS on High) without the extreme performance hit seen at 4K. The GPU's 272.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth is a key factor in this scaling, as higher resolutions require more data to be transferred and processed.

The fact that the frame rate drops by roughly half when moving from 1080p to 4K on the Low preset (202 FPS to 70 FPS) further confirms the GPU-bound nature at higher resolutions. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the scaling would be less severe, as the CPU's workload does not increase proportionally with resolution. This analysis points to the RTX 4060 as the component that users should consider upgrading first if they wish to improve 4K performance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user's target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p, the Medium preset offers an excellent balance with an average of 155 FPS, ensuring extremely smooth gameplay. The High preset is also a strong choice, providing an average of 130 FPS while likely improving visual fidelity. The Ultra preset, while still playable at 99 FPS, offers diminishing returns and a significant performance cost compared to High.

At 1440p, the High preset is the recommended choice, delivering an average of 84 FPS. This is comfortably above the standard 60 FPS target and provides a good balance between quality and performance. The Medium preset is also viable, offering 100 FPS for users who prioritize frame rate above all else. The Ultra preset at 64 FPS is playable, but users may notice more frequent dips, making High the safer and more consistent option for a competitive third-person shooter.

For 4K, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset is the only one that consistently provides a playable experience, with an average of 70 FPS. The Medium preset, with an average of 54 FPS and a minimum of 46 FPS, is borderline and may result in noticeable stuttering during intense action sequences. The High and Ultra presets, at 45 FPS and 34 FPS respectively, are not recommended for a game that requires quick reactions. The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver high frame rates without compromising on visual settings. For 4K, users would need to significantly lower settings, and even then, the experience may not be as smooth as at lower resolutions.