Minimum

# FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600's overall performance standing among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 sits in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21,765. Its closest rival, the Intel Xeon D-1746TER, scores 21,635, a delta of 0.6% — the Ryzen is effectively tied with that server chip. It is also 0.6% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9554P (21,899) and 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i7-11700F (21,957) in average score.

Q: How does the GPU's memory configuration affect its performance in this game?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB uses a 128-bit memory bus with GDDR6 memory at 12 Gbps effective, delivering 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 4 GB capacity is a hard constraint at higher resolutions: at 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 22.4, while at 4K Low it reaches 41.2, indicating that the memory subsystem and GPU load dominate the frame rate at that resolution.

Q: What is the best-performing settings/resolution combination for this combo?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 117.7 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At the same resolution, Medium produces 94.1 FPS, High produces 75.7 FPS, and Ultra drops to 58.9 FPS. The data shows that Low settings at 1080p is the only configuration exceeding 100 FPS for this pairing.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested combinations in this game?

A: The combo ranks 1,574 out of 1,733 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 9% of all pairings. This reflects the GPU's 50th percentile standing among all GPUs and the CPU's 79th percentile standing, but the measured FPS data shows the GPU is the limiting factor across most settings.

Q: What are the CPU's multi-threaded benchmark results?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 scores 18,309 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 7,689 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 1,845 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Its PassMark multithread score is 21,541, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 5,659. The single-thread scores are 2,584 (Cinebench R23), 1,085 (Cinebench R20), and 260 (Cinebench R15).

Q: What is the GPU's power and interface specification?

A: The RTX 3050 4 GB has a TDP of 90 W, requires a single 6-pin power connector, and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The suggested PSU is 250 W. Its dimensions are 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height, with a dual-slot cooler design.

# GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is built on the GA107 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. Its base clock is 1545 MHz, boosting to 1740 MHz, while memory runs at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. Its FP32 throughput is 7.127 TFLOPS, and the pixel rate is 55.68 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s.

In this game, the GPU's role is defined by its 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the capacity limit becomes apparent at 4K. The data shows a clear pattern: at 4K Ultra, the combo produces 22.4 FPS, while at 4K Low it produces 41.2 FPS. This 18.8 FPS difference (roughly 84% improvement from Low to Ultra, but in the wrong direction) demonstrates that the GPU is heavily constrained at 4K, and lowering settings cannot overcome the fundamental memory and compute limitations.

At 2560x1440, the GPU performs more reasonably: Low settings yield 79.3 FPS, Medium 56.4 FPS, High 49.8 FPS, and Ultra 39.2 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 40.1 FPS drop, indicating the GPU's compute resources are being saturated as settings increase. At 1920x1080, the GPU delivers 117.7 FPS on Low, 94.1 on Medium, 75.7 on High, and 58.9 on Ultra. The 1080p results show the GPU can maintain playable frame rates even at Ultra, but the 4 GB memory capacity is a looming constraint.

The RTX 3050's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it exactly in the middle of the performance distribution. This is consistent with its measured behavior: capable at lower resolutions, but struggling at 4K where the 4 GB frame buffer becomes a bottleneck. The GPU's end-of-life production status and 8 nm process node do not affect its measured performance, but they contextualize its position in the market.

# Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent resolution scaling pattern across all settings. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at Low settings, the average FPS drops from 117.7 to 79.3, a 38.4 FPS reduction (approximately 32.6% lower). At Medium settings, the drop is from 94.1 to 56.4, a 37.7 FPS reduction. At High settings, the drop is from 75.7 to 49.8, a 25.9 FPS reduction. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 58.9 to 39.2, a 19.7 FPS reduction.

Moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 shows even steeper declines. At Low settings, FPS drops from 79.3 to 41.2, a 38.1 FPS reduction (48% lower). At Medium settings, the drop is from 56.4 to 35.0, a 21.4 FPS reduction. At High settings, the drop is from 49.8 to 27.5, a 22.3 FPS reduction. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 39.2 to 22.4, a 16.8 FPS reduction.

The scaling behavior indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is largest at Low settings (from 117.7 to 41.2, a 65% reduction), which suggests that even at the lowest settings, the GPU cannot keep up with the pixel count. At Ultra settings, the drop is smaller in absolute terms (from 58.9 to 22.4, a 62% reduction), but the starting point is already low.

The data also shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck at any resolution. The Ryzen 5 5600's single-thread score of 2,584 in Cinebench R23 and its 79th percentile ranking indicate sufficient headroom. The fact that FPS scales consistently with resolution and settings—rather than plateauing due to CPU limits—confirms that the RTX 3050 4 GB is the performance ceiling.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its best results. Low settings yield an average of 117.7 FPS, making it the only configuration above 100 FPS. Medium settings produce 94.1 FPS, High settings produce 75.7 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 58.9 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 58.8 FPS, showing a substantial performance cost for higher visual fidelity. Even at Ultra, the frame rate remains playable for a third-person shooter, though it approaches the lower bound of smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. Low settings average 79.3 FPS, Medium averages 56.4 FPS, High averages 49.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 39.2 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium is a 22.9 FPS drop, which is the largest single-step decrease in this resolution. This suggests that Medium settings introduce a significant GPU load increase, likely from additional shading and texture work.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings average 41.2 FPS, Medium averages 35.0 FPS, High averages 27.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 22.4 FPS. The data shows that only Low settings at 4K exceed 30 FPS, and even that is marginal. Ultra settings at 4K produce frames below 24 FPS, which is below the standard motion picture frame rate and indicates a poor experience.

The settings scaling at each resolution is consistent: Low to Medium shows the largest drop, followed by Medium to High, and High to Ultra shows a smaller absolute drop. This pattern holds across all three resolutions, suggesting that the GPU's compute and memory resources are progressively taxed by each settings tier, with diminishing returns on visual quality relative to the FPS cost.

# How This Combo Ranks

The combo of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB ranks 1,574 out of 1,733 tested combinations in this game. This places it in the bottom 9% of all pairings, which is a low standing for a CPU that individually performs in the 79th percentile. The discrepancy between the CPU's strong relative performance and the combo's weak ranking underscores the GPU's role as the limiting factor.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs is the primary driver of this combo's low position. With an average benchmark score of 0 for the GPU (no benchmarks were recorded in the data), the measured FPS results are the only indicator of its in-game performance. The 4 GB memory capacity is a notable constraint, as the data shows 4K Ultra producing only 22.4 FPS.

The combo's rank suggests that most other tested pairings achieve higher frame rates in this game. The CPU's nearest rivals—the Intel Xeon D-1746TER, AMD EPYC 9554P, AMD EPYC 9534, and Intel Core i7-11700F—all have average scores within 0.9% of the Ryzen 5 5600, but none of them are paired with this specific GPU in the ranking context.

The data indicates that the RTX 3050 4 GB, despite being an end-of-life product with a 50th percentile standing, is the defining component for this combo's performance tier. Users seeking higher frame rates would need to consider a different GPU pairing, as the CPU has ample headroom—its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,309 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,256 show no signs of bottlenecking at any resolution tested.