Minecraft

Minecraft

AVERAGE FPS
225
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 225 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 63 102 128 162
1440p QHD 121 194 245 309
1080p Full HD 192 308 388 490

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 162
3840x2160 Medium 128
3840x2160 High 102
3840x2160 Ultra 63
2560x1440 Low 309
2560x1440 Medium 245
2560x1440 High 194
2560x1440 Ultra 121
1920x1080 Low 490
1920x1080 Medium 388
1920x1080 High 308
1920x1080 Ultra 192

Minecraft with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis

# Minecraft with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

This combination delivers exceptional performance in Minecraft, with the data showing that framerates remain highly playable even at 4K Ultra settings, though the scaling pattern reveals a system that becomes progressively more GPU-bound as resolution increases. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 provides substantial single-thread headroom, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT carries increasing load at higher resolutions, creating a balanced pairing that excels in this sandbox title.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling curve across the three tested resolutions. At 1080p High settings, the combo produces 308 FPS average, which drops to 194 FPS at 1440p and further to 102 FPS at 4K. This represents a 37% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a 67% reduction from 1080p to 4K. The pattern indicates that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as resolution climbs, since the CPU's single-thread performance is strong enough to feed the graphics card at lower resolutions without bottlenecking.

Looking at Low settings reveals the full extent of CPU headroom. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 490 FPS average, which is extraordinarily high and suggests the CPU is capable of driving framerates far beyond what most displays can show. The drop to 309 FPS at 1440p Low and 162 FPS at 4K Low shows that even with minimal graphical load, the scaling is not linear, indicating that the GPU still plays a significant role in determining final output. The difference between 1080p Low and 4K Low is a 67% reduction, identical to the High settings scaling, which suggests consistent GPU-bound behavior regardless of graphical complexity.

Medium settings present the most complete dataset, including minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p Medium, the average is 388 FPS with a minimum of 330 and maximum of 446, showing a remarkably stable frame delivery with only a 30% spread between minimum and maximum. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 245 FPS with a range of 208 to 282, maintaining similar stability. The 4K Medium result shows 128 FPS average with 109 minimum and 147 maximum, again displaying tight frame pacing. The consistency of these ranges across resolutions suggests the system handles frame generation smoothly, without major spikes or drops.

Ultra settings produce the most demanding workload, with 4K Ultra yielding 63 FPS average, 1440p Ultra at 121 FPS, and 1080p Ultra at 192 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 37% reduction, while the jump to 4K produces a 67% reduction from 1080p. This consistent pattern across all settings indicates that the resolution scaling is uniform regardless of graphical preset, confirming that the GPU's pixel throughput is the dominant factor at higher resolutions.

The data suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU has sufficient headroom to maintain high framerates even at Ultra settings, while at 4K, the GPU workload becomes substantial enough to bring averages down to more conventional levels. The 4K Ultra result of 63 FPS is still above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating that this combination can handle the most demanding configuration in Minecraft at native 4K resolution.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration proves adequate for Minecraft's texture handling, as the measured results show no indication of memory capacity limiting performance at any tested resolution or setting. The GPU's RDNA 2.0 architecture operates with a base clock of 2150 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, providing substantial compute throughput for the game's rendering requirements.

The GPU's 2560 shading units and 160 texture mapping units work together to deliver the pixel and texture processing needed for Minecraft's block-based rendering. The 64 ROPs handle final pixel output, and the 40 ray tracing cores provide additional acceleration for any ray-traced rendering features. The FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS gives the card ample raw compute capability, which is reflected in the strong 4K performance metrics.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 71st percentile among all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 20700. Its nearest rival comparisons show it performing within 1.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, with the RX 6750 XT actually leading by that margin. This competitive positioning suggests the card provides performance comparable to higher-tier mobile solutions, which aligns with the strong Minecraft results observed.

The 4K Ultra result of 63 FPS demonstrates the GPU's ability to handle demanding workloads, while the 4K Low result of 162 FPS shows that even at reduced settings, the card maintains high throughput. The consistent scaling pattern across settings indicates that the GPU's clock speeds scale appropriately under load, maintaining boost behavior across different graphical intensities. The 12 GB memory capacity provides sufficient headroom for high-resolution textures and render distances, ensuring that memory bandwidth does not become a bottleneck in this title.

FAQ

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra settings in Minecraft?

A: Yes, the measured 4K Ultra result shows an average of 63 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. The minimum FPS for this configuration was not recorded, but the average indicates playable performance at the highest tested settings.

Q: How much performance is gained by lowering settings from Ultra to High?

A: At 1080p, High settings produce 308 FPS compared to 192 FPS at Ultra, representing a 60% increase. At 1440p, the gain is similar at 60% (194 vs 121 FPS), and at 4K, High delivers 102 FPS versus 63 FPS at Ultra, a 62% improvement.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor even at 1080p, since Low settings produce 490 FPS versus 308 FPS at High and 192 FPS at Ultra. The CPU's strong single-thread performance allows framerates to scale significantly with graphical settings, indicating GPU-bound behavior.

Q: What kind of frame stability can be expected at Medium settings?

A: The Medium settings data includes minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p, the range is 330-446 FPS with an average of 388, showing a 30% spread. At 1440p, the range is 208-282 with an average of 245, and at 4K, the range is 109-147 with an average of 128. These tight ranges indicate stable frame delivery.

Q: How does this combination rank among all tested system configurations?

A: The combo ranks 443rd out of 1176 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems tested for Minecraft. This ranking reflects the strong performance observed across all resolution and settings combinations.

Q: Is there a significant difference between 1440p and 4K performance?

A: Yes, the difference is substantial across all settings. At High settings, 1440p produces 194 FPS versus 102 FPS at 4K, a 47% reduction. At Medium, the drop is from 245 to 128 FPS (48% reduction), and at Ultra, from 121 to 63 FPS (48% reduction). The consistent ~48% reduction indicates a linear resolution scaling pattern.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance for optimal settings at each resolution. For 1080p displays, Ultra settings deliver 192 FPS average, which far exceeds the refresh rate capabilities of most monitors. This makes Ultra the recommended choice for 1080p, as the performance headroom is substantial even at maximum graphical quality. Players with high refresh rate displays will still benefit from the 192 FPS average, which exceeds 144 Hz and approaches 165 Hz capabilities.

At 1440p, Ultra settings produce 121 FPS average, which remains above 120 Hz refresh rate thresholds and provides an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. The 1440p Medium settings deliver 245 FPS for players prioritizing maximum framerates, but the Ultra setting's 121 FPS is sufficient for smooth gameplay on most displays. The recommendation is Ultra for 1440p, as the visual quality improvement is significant while maintaining high frame delivery.

For 4K displays, the choice depends on preference for visual fidelity versus frame rate. Ultra settings achieve 63 FPS average, which is above the 60 FPS standard for console-like smoothness but leaves limited headroom for demanding scenes. High settings at 4K produce 102 FPS, providing a 62% performance improvement over Ultra while presumably sacrificing some visual quality. The data shows Medium at 4K delivers 128 FPS, which offers the best combination of high frame rates and moderate visual quality.

The Medium preset across all resolutions shows the most consistent frame delivery, with measured minimum and maximum values demonstrating tight ranges. At 4K Medium, the 109-147 FPS range with 128 average provides a stable experience that avoids the potential minimum frame drops that might occur at Ultra settings. For players who value consistent frame pacing over maximum visual quality, Medium at 4K represents the safest choice.

The Low settings, while producing the highest framerates (490 FPS at 1080p, 309 FPS at 1440p, 162 FPS at 4K), sacrifice too much visual quality for the modest gains over Medium. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p reduces average FPS from 490 to 388 (21% reduction) while providing substantial visual improvements. The recommendation is to prioritize Medium or High settings over Low unless maximum competitive framerates are required.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination ranks 443rd out of 1176 tested system configurations for Minecraft, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all tested combos. This ranking indicates that while the system performs strongly, there are 442 configurations that achieve higher overall performance in this game. The upper-middle tier placement reflects the balanced nature of this pairing, which delivers high framerates but does not reach the extreme performance levels of top-tier combinations.

The CPU component of this pairing, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, holds the 89th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 46062. Its nearest rival comparisons show it performing nearly identically to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (0.1% ahead), Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.1% behind), AMD EPYC 4364P (0.2% ahead), and AMD EPYC 7303 (0.2% ahead). This clustering indicates that the CPU's performance is well-established and consistent with other strong processors in its class.

The GPU, AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, sits in the 71st percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 26011. Its nearest rivals show it leading the AMD Radeon R9 M395X by 0.5%, AMD FirePro W7100 by 0.6%, AMD FirePro D700 by 0.7%, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.1%. The GPU's competitive position against mobile high-end solutions explains its ability to maintain strong Minecraft performance across all resolutions.

The combination's rank of 443 out of 1176 suggests that Minecraft's performance is more dependent on CPU single-thread capabilities than raw GPU power, since this system's GPU is in the 71st percentile while the overall combo rank is in the 62nd percentile. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235's strong single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 4516) contributes significantly to the high framerates observed, particularly at lower resolutions where CPU headroom is more relevant.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest framerates across all settings. Low settings produce 490 FPS average, Medium produces 388 FPS with a minimum of 330 and maximum of 446, High produces 308 FPS, and Ultra produces 192 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent reduction in framerates, with Ultra delivering 39% of the Low setting's performance.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong with Low settings at 309 FPS, Medium at 245 FPS (minimum 208, maximum 282), High at 194 FPS, and Ultra at 121 FPS. The 1440p results show a 37% reduction from 1080p across all settings, maintaining the same proportional relationship between settings as observed at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the system delivers 162 FPS at Low, 128 FPS at Medium (minimum 109, maximum 147), 102 FPS at High, and 63 FPS at Ultra. The 4K results show a 67% reduction from 1080p across all settings, consistent with the expected pixel count increase from 1080p to 4K.

The Medium settings across all resolutions provide the most comprehensive data, with minimum and maximum FPS values recorded. At 1080p Medium, the 330-446 FPS range shows a 35% spread from minimum to maximum. At 1440p Medium, the 208-282 FPS range shows a 36% spread. At 4K Medium, the 109-147 FPS range shows a 35% spread. This consistency in frame delivery across resolutions indicates stable performance characteristics.

The Ultra settings show the greatest performance cost, with 4K Ultra at 63 FPS representing the lowest measured average in the dataset. This remains above the 60 FPS threshold, but offers less headroom than other configurations. The 1080p Ultra at 192 FPS and 1440p Ultra at 121 FPS provide more comfortable margins above common refresh rate targets.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 235

Cores / Threads 14 / 14
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2600 MHz MHz
TDP 250 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Minecraft

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 162.0
3840x2160 Medium 128.0
3840x2160 High 102.0
3840x2160 Ultra 63.0
2560x1440 Low 309.0
2560x1440 Medium 245.0
2560x1440 High 194.0
2560x1440 Ultra 121.0
1920x1080 Low 490.0
1920x1080 Medium 388.0
1920x1080 High 308.0
1920x1080 Ultra 192.0

Minecraft with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs

See how Minecraft performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minecraft with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs

See how Minecraft performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + RX 6750 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.