Minecraft

Minecraft

AVERAGE FPS
420
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 420 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 119 191 241 304
1440p QHD 229 366 461 582
1080p Full HD 362 579 730 873

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 304
3840x2160 Medium 241
3840x2160 High 191
3840x2160 Ultra 119
2560x1440 Low 582
2560x1440 Medium 461
2560x1440 High 366
2560x1440 Ultra 229
1920x1080 Low 873
1920x1080 Medium 730
1920x1080 High 579
1920x1080 Ultra 362

Minecraft with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, In-Depth Analysis

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 lands at rank 31 out of 1176 tested combos in Minecraft. That places this configuration in the top 2.6% of all tested pairings, which is a commanding position for a game that is notoriously sensitive to single-thread performance. The data shows a system that is clearly at the upper echelon of what is achievable in this title, though the ranking also suggests there are 30 other combinations that edge it out, likely due to even more extreme CPU clock tuning or memory optimizations.

What makes this rank particularly interesting is the nature of Minecraft itself. The game is a sandbox title with a release date of 2011-11-17, yet the measured FPS figures here are anything but dated. The benchmark results indicate that this modern hardware combination is capable of pushing frame rates that would be considered excessive for most titles, but Minecraft's rendering engine and world-generation algorithms can still create significant bottlenecks. The fact that this combo sits at rank 31 indicates that while the hardware is exceptional, there is measurable headroom between it and the absolute top performers.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 91 against all processors puts it in the top 9% of tested CPUs, and the GPU's percentile of 92 against all GPUs places it in the top 8%. When both components are in the 90th percentile or above, the combination should theoretically be near the pinnacle of gaming performance. Yet the data reveals that the combo rank of 31 out of 1176 is slightly worse than what the individual component percentiles might suggest. This implies that Minecraft's specific workload characteristics may not perfectly align with the strengths of this particular pairing, or that other combos in the top 30 have found a more optimal balance for this game's engine.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 54762, which is remarkably close to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55093 with a deltaPct of -0.6. This means the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is essentially neck-and-neck with that Intel part in overall CPU benchmarks, differing by less than 1%. The GPU tells a similar story, with the RTX 5090's average benchmark score of 79842 being within 0.3% of the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB's score of 79605. These tight margins at the component level make the rank 31 placement in Minecraft all the more notable, as it demonstrates that even small differences in benchmark scores can translate into meaningful positional shifts in a specific game's combo ranking.

FAQ

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested configurations in Minecraft?

A: This combination ranks 31st out of 1176 tested combos, placing it in the top 2.6% of all pairings tested for this game. The data confirms it is a high-end configuration, though 30 other combos achieve higher measured performance.

Q: What is the CPU's performance position relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54762, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF's 55093 and 1.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K's 54053. It also outperforms the Intel Xeon 6505P by 2% and the Intel Core i7-14700F by 2.1%.

Q: What is the GPU's performance position relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79842, which is 0.3% higher than the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB's 79605 and 0.6% higher than the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB's 79396. It trails the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X by 1.4%.

Q: What is the highest measured average FPS for this combo in Minecraft?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 873 at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. The next highest is 730 at the same resolution with Medium settings, followed by 582 at 2560x1440 with Low settings.

Q: What is the lowest measured average FPS for this combo in Minecraft?

A: The lowest measured average FPS is 119 at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. This is the only measured configuration that falls below 190 FPS, indicating that 4K Ultra is the most demanding scenario in the data.

Q: Does the data include minimum or maximum FPS for all settings?

A: No, the data only includes minimum and maximum FPS for Medium settings across all three resolutions. For 3840x2160 Medium, the range is 205 to 277 FPS; for 2560x1440 Medium, it is 392 to 530 FPS; and for 1920x1080 Medium, it is 620 to 839 FPS. All other settings only report average FPS.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a chip designated as GB202, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. The GPU's base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost clock of 2407 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. These specifications position the RTX 5090 as a flagship card, and its percentile ranking of 92 against all GPUs confirms this status.

In Minecraft, the GPU's role is interesting because the game is not traditionally GPU-bound at lower resolutions. The measured data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 873 FPS average. At 2560x1440 with Low settings, that drops to 582 FPS, and at 3840x2160 with Low settings, it reaches 304 FPS. This scaling pattern suggests that the RTX 5090 is more than capable of handling the rendering load, even at 4K, where it still maintains over 300 FPS on Low settings.

The GPU's 32 GB of VRAM is far beyond what Minecraft would require, even with extensive modding or high-resolution texture packs. The benchmark results indicate that the GPU is not the limiting factor in most scenarios, as frame rates remain exceptionally high across all tested settings. The RTX 5090's compute capabilities, measured at 104.8 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicate substantial headroom for any future game updates or more demanding shader packs that players might install.

The GPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database are interesting comparisons. The Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB and 12 GB are professional-grade cards, not consumer gaming GPUs, yet they score within 0.3% and 0.6% of the RTX 5090 respectively in average benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, a mobile GPU, scores 1.1% lower, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 1.4% higher. This clustering of scores suggests that the RTX 5090's benchmark position is competitive, though the measured FPS in Minecraft at 4K Ultra (119 FPS) demonstrates that even this powerful GPU can be challenged by the game's most demanding settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of how this combo performs across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 362 at Ultra settings to 873 at Low settings. The Medium setting at this resolution reports an average of 730 FPS with a minimum of 620 and maximum of 839. High settings at 1080p achieve 579 FPS average. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is likely CPU-bound, as the frame rates are extraordinarily high and the GPU has significant headroom.

Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern continues with lower but still impressive numbers. Low settings produce 582 FPS average, Medium produces 461 FPS with a range of 392 to 530, High produces 366 FPS, and Ultra produces 229 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is noticeable but not dramatic, suggesting that the system can handle the increased pixel count without significant performance degradation.

At 3840x2160, the data shows the most substantial impact. Low settings still manage 304 FPS average, which is an excellent result for 4K gaming. Medium settings produce 241 FPS with a range of 205 to 277, High settings produce 191 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 119 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 119 FPS is the only measured configuration that falls below 190 FPS, highlighting the significant rendering demands of the highest settings at this resolution.

The Medium settings data is particularly useful because it includes minimum and maximum FPS values. Across all three resolutions, the spread between minimum and maximum is relatively tight: 205 to 277 at 4K, 392 to 530 at 1440p, and 620 to 839 at 1080p. This consistency suggests that the frame pacing is stable, with no significant stuttering or frame drops that would indicate a bottleneck. The data implies that the system delivers a smooth experience across all tested configurations, with the only potential concern being the 4K Ultra setting where the average of 119 FPS might be considered borderline for very high refresh rate displays.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling behavior of this combo reveals important insights into where the bottleneck lies. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by approximately 33% on Low settings (873 to 582), 37% on Medium settings (730 to 461), 37% on High settings (579 to 366), and 37% on Ultra settings (362 to 229). This consistent drop of roughly one-third across all settings suggests that the scaling is primarily driven by the GPU's rendering load, as the pixel count increases by about 78% from 1080p to 1440p, yet the FPS only drops by about 35%.

From 1440p to 4K, the scaling is more pronounced. Low settings drop from 582 to 304 FPS, a 48% reduction; Medium drops from 461 to 241, a 48% reduction; High drops from 366 to 191, a 48% reduction; and Ultra drops from 229 to 119, a 48% reduction. The pixel count increases by about 125% from 1440p to 4K, so the FPS drop of approximately 48% indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor at higher resolutions, but the system still maintains playable frame rates even at 4K.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is the primary limiting factor, as the RTX 5090 is likely not fully utilized at frame rates above 500 FPS. The fact that the FPS scales almost linearly with resolution from 1440p to 4K indicates that the GPU is being increasingly taxed as resolution increases. However, even at 4K Ultra, the system maintains 119 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. This indicates that the combo is well-balanced for Minecraft, with the CPU providing sufficient single-thread performance to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, and the GPU having enough raw power to handle the most demanding 4K settings.

The resolution scaling analysis implies that players using this combo with a 1080p or 1440p monitor will be limited by the CPU's ability to generate frames, not the GPU's ability to render them. Conversely, at 4K, the GPU becomes more relevant, but it still has enough headroom to deliver high frame rates. This makes the combo versatile across different display configurations, with the only scenario where performance might be considered inadequate being 4K Ultra, where the 119 FPS average might not fully utilize a 240Hz or higher refresh rate display.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience per the measured rows depends heavily on the display's resolution and refresh rate. For 1920x1080 displays, all settings are playable, but the Medium setting at 730 FPS average with a minimum of 620 FPS is the recommended choice. This provides a significant improvement over High's 579 FPS while maintaining a very high minimum frame rate that ensures smooth gameplay. The Ultra setting at 362 FPS is also viable, but the jump from Medium to Ultra only adds visual quality while reducing performance by half, which may not be worth it on a typical 1080p display.

For 2560x1440 displays, the Medium setting at 461 FPS average with a minimum of 392 FPS is again the recommended option. The High setting at 366 FPS is also excellent, and the difference between Medium and High is more pronounced in visual quality terms. However, the Ultra setting at 229 FPS is still well above the 144Hz refresh rate that most 1440p gaming monitors offer, making it a viable choice for those who prioritize visual fidelity over raw frame rates. The data suggests that even Ultra at 1440p is a smooth experience, with no measured minimum FPS below 200.

For 3840x2160 displays, the recommendation depends on the refresh rate of the monitor. For 60Hz displays, the Ultra setting at 119 FPS is perfectly adequate and provides the best visual experience. For 120Hz or higher refresh rate displays, the High setting at 191 FPS is recommended, as it delivers a significant FPS boost while still maintaining high visual quality. The Medium setting at 241 FPS with a minimum of 205 is the best option for very high refresh rate 4K displays, as it ensures the frame rate never drops below 200 FPS.

The data indicates that the Medium setting is the sweet spot across all resolutions, offering the best balance of visual quality and performance. It is the only setting that includes minimum and maximum FPS measurements, and these ranges show excellent consistency, with the minimum FPS being at least 85% of the average across all three resolutions. This suggests that the Medium setting provides the most stable frame pacing, which is crucial for a consistent gaming experience. For players with high refresh rate displays, the High setting is also a strong recommendation, as it maintains frame rates well above 60 FPS even at 4K.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Granite Ridge. It has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 120 watts. The CPU features 128 MB of L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. These specifications are notable for Minecraft, which is known to be sensitive to single-thread performance and cache size.

The CPU's benchmark results show strong single-thread performance, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1269 and a passmark_single_thread score of 4646. The single-core Cinebench scores are also impressive, with R15 at 679, R20 at 2830, and R23 at 6739. These scores indicate that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D has excellent per-core performance, which is critical for Minecraft's main game loop and world generation. The Geekbench single-core score of 3041 further confirms this strength.

The large 128 MB L3 cache is particularly relevant for Minecraft, as the game frequently accesses world data and chunk information. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, which provides fast access to frequently used data. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 12490 and 3dmark_max_threads score of 13795 indicate that the CPU also has substantial multi-threaded performance, though Minecraft's utilization of multiple cores is often limited.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 91 against all processors places it in the top 9%, and its nearest rivals are all Intel parts. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF scores 0.6% higher, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 1.3% lower. The Intel Xeon 6505P and Core i7-14700F score 2% and 2.1% lower respectively. These tight margins suggest that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is competitive with the best Intel has to offer, and its 3D V-Cache technology likely provides an advantage in games that benefit from large cache sizes.

In the context of the measured FPS data, the CPU's role is evident in the 1080p results where frame rates exceed 500 FPS on Low settings. At these frame rates, the CPU's single-thread performance and cache efficiency are the primary drivers, as the GPU has minimal rendering load. The fact that the combo achieves 873 FPS at 1080p Low indicates that the CPU is exceptionally well-suited to Minecraft's workload. The CPU's boost clock of 5.50 GHz is the maximum allowed by the data, and the 12-core, 24-thread configuration provides ample headroom for background tasks while gaming.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4400 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

VRAM 32 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2407 MHz MHz
TDP 575 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Minecraft

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 304.0
3840x2160 Medium 241.0
3840x2160 High 191.0
3840x2160 Ultra 119.0
2560x1440 Low 582.0
2560x1440 Medium 461.0
2560x1440 High 366.0
2560x1440 Ultra 229.0
1920x1080 Low 873.0
1920x1080 Medium 730.0
1920x1080 High 579.0
1920x1080 Ultra 362.0

Minecraft with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Other GPUs

See how Minecraft performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minecraft with RTX 5090 + Other CPUs

See how Minecraft performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + RTX 5090

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.