Minecraft: Java Edition
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 213 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 99 | 122 | 155 |
| 1440p QHD | 113 | 181 | 233 | 290 |
| 1080p Full HD | 181 | 289 | 368 | 463 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minecraft: Java Edition with Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, In-Depth Analysis
# Minecraft: Java Edition — Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
The data for Minecraft: Java Edition with the Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 shows a system that transitions from a CPU-bound experience at lower resolutions to a GPU-limited one at 4K. Across twelve measured configurations spanning three resolutions and four settings presets, the average frame rates range from 61.2 FPS at 4K Ultra to 462.8 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating that this combination is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay at virtually any setting, though the headroom shrinks considerably at the highest 4K preset.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear shift in the bottleneck. At 1080p High, the system delivers 288.8 FPS; moving to 1440p High drops that to 180.5 FPS, a reduction of roughly 37%. Continuing to 4K High yields 98.9 FPS, another 45% decline. This pattern — a steep drop at each resolution step — suggests that the GPU is becoming increasingly dominant as a limiter, especially since the 1080p numbers are so high that the CPU's six cores are likely the primary constraint at that point.
The Low preset illustrates this even more starkly. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 462.8 FPS, which is far beyond what any display refresh rate can use. At 1440p Low, it falls to 289.9 FPS, and at 4K Low, it settles at 154.5 FPS. The fact that 4K Low still produces over 150 FPS indicates that even at the highest resolution, this CPU-GPU pairing is never truly struggling in this title — the question is merely whether the GPU can keep up with the CPU's output as pixel count increases.
Ultra settings amplify the resolution sensitivity. The Ultra preset at 1080p produces 181.2 FPS, which drops to 112.6 FPS at 1440p (a 38% decline) and then to 61.2 FPS at 4K (a 46% further decline). The 4K Ultra figure is the only measured configuration below 60 FPS, and it sits barely above that threshold. The data suggests that the RTX 4060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus become the limiting factors at 4K with maxed settings, while the i5-12400's 2.50 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost clocks are sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Alder Lake-S family, built on a 10 nm process. Its benchmark results place it in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19,850. In Cinebench R23, it scores 15,935 in multi-core and 2,249 in single-core, while 3DMark single-thread tests show 910 points. These figures indicate a processor that excels at single-threaded workloads, which is directly relevant to Minecraft: Java Edition — a game historically known for its reliance on a primary render thread.
The measured FPS at 1080p Low (462.8) versus 4K Low (154.5) shows a 3x difference, but the fact that 1080p Low produces nearly 500 FPS means the CPU is not a limiting factor even in the best case for the GPU. The i5-12400's nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the Intel Core i7-9700 (0.1% higher average score), the Intel Core i7-8700 (0.2% lower), and the Intel Core i5-11600K (0.4% higher), all of which cluster within half a percent — indicating that this CPU sits in a very competitive performance tier.
At 4K High, the system produces 98.9 FPS, which is 34% lower than 1440p High's 180.5 FPS. If the CPU were the primary constraint, the frame rate would not drop so dramatically with resolution. Instead, the data shows that the i5-12400's 12 threads and 18 MB of shared L3 cache are more than adequate for Minecraft's demands, particularly given that the game's Java-based engine benefits from the strong single-core performance (2,249 in Cinebench R23 single-core) rather than raw multi-threaded throughput.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process at TSMC, is the other half of this pairing. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2,125 MHz (17 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, yielding 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's boost clock of 2,460 MHz and 3,072 shading units contribute to a PassMark G3D score of 19,545 and an average benchmark score of 23,181, placing it in the 66th percentile among all GPUs.
The GPU's role becomes apparent when comparing settings at the same resolution. At 1440p, the gap between Low (289.9 FPS) and Ultra (112.6 FPS) is 2.6x, while at 4K, the same settings comparison shows a 2.5x gap (154.5 vs. 61.2 FPS). This consistent scaling across settings indicates that the GPU's shading units and memory bandwidth are the primary determinants of frame rate once the resolution exceeds 1080p. The RTX 4060's nearest rivals — the AMD Radeon RX 6600M (0.6% higher), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti (0.7% higher), Intel Arc B580 (0.7% lower), and AMD Radeon 760M (0.8% lower) — all sit within a narrow band, but none of these competitors would likely handle Minecraft's chunk-loading and draw calls as efficiently given the RTX 4060's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, even if those features are not directly exercised by this title.
The 4K Ultra result of 61.2 FPS is the clearest indicator of GPU limitation. That figure is 66% lower than 1080p Ultra's 181.2 FPS, and the drop from 1440p Ultra (112.6 FPS) to 4K Ultra (61.2 FPS) represents a 46% reduction. The 8 GB VRAM capacity, while not explicitly stressed in the measured data, is a plausible contributor to this falloff given Minecraft's tendency to cache textures and world data.
How This Combo Ranks
Among all 1,727 tested CPU-GPU combinations for Minecraft: Java Edition, this pairing ranks 973rd. That places it in the lower-middle portion of the field, which may seem surprising given the strong absolute frame rates. However, the ranking reflects the fact that many other combos — particularly those with higher-end GPUs or CPUs with greater single-thread performance — achieve even higher FPS in a game that can exceed 500 FPS at 1080p with the right hardware.
The rank of 973 out of 1,727 means that roughly 56% of tested combos perform better, while 44% perform worse. This is consistent with the RTX 4060 being an entry-level-to-midrange GPU in the current market, paired with a midrange CPU from the previous generation. The i5-12400's 77th percentile CPU ranking and the RTX 4060's 66th percentile GPU ranking both suggest a system that is competent but not exceptional; the combo ranking reflects that this pairing sits near the median of all possible combinations.
Notably, the combo's frame rates at 1080p are high enough that the ranking is likely determined by results at higher resolutions and settings, where the RTX 4060's modest memory bandwidth and 8 GB capacity put it at a disadvantage relative to GPUs with 16 GB or wider buses. The measured data supports this: at 4K Ultra, the 61.2 FPS result is the weakest of the twelve configurations, and it is this kind of result that likely drags the combo's rank down relative to systems with stronger GPUs.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system's performance is exceptional across all settings. Low settings produce 462.8 FPS, Medium yields 368.1 FPS, High delivers 288.8 FPS, and Ultra drops to 181.2 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 61% reduction, which is substantial but leaves even the Ultra preset with frame rates far above typical 144Hz display refresh rates. The gap between Medium and High (79.3 FPS) is slightly larger than the gap between High and Ultra (107.6 FPS), suggesting that the Ultra preset introduces disproportionately heavy effects.
Moving to 2560x1440, the same pattern holds but with reduced headroom. Low settings produce 289.9 FPS, Medium 233.2 FPS, High 180.5 FPS, and Ultra 112.6 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings: Low falls by 37%, Medium by 37%, High by 38%, and Ultra by 38%. This uniform scaling indicates that the GPU is handling the increased pixel count linearly, with no unexpected bottlenecks appearing at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the data shows the system's limits. Low settings still produce 154.5 FPS, which is playable on any display, but Medium falls to 122.4 FPS, High to 98.9 FPS, and Ultra to 61.2 FPS. The drop from 1440p to 4K is more severe than the 1080p-to-1440p transition: Low falls by 47%, Medium by 48%, High by 45%, and Ultra by 46%. This steeper decline at 4K is characteristic of a GPU that is running out of memory bandwidth — the 272.0 GB/s figure is modest by modern standards, and the 128-bit bus is a known limitation for high-resolution gaming.
Settings Recommendations
For 1080p displays, the data shows that even the Ultra preset at 181.2 FPS exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors, making the highest settings the clear choice — there is no measurable downside to maxing out the game at this resolution. Medium settings at 368.1 FPS are only relevant for competitive play where every frame matters, but the visual compromise is unlikely to be worth it for most users.
At 1440p, the Ultra preset's 112.6 FPS is still well above 60 FPS and suitable for high-refresh-rate displays up to 120Hz. High settings at 180.5 FPS offer additional headroom for 165Hz or 240Hz monitors, but the visual difference between High and Ultra in Minecraft is often subtle, particularly for the game's blocky aesthetic. The data suggests that High is the sweet spot at this resolution, providing 60% more FPS than Ultra while sacrificing only the most demanding effects.
For 4K displays, the choice is more constrained. Ultra settings at 61.2 FPS are just barely above the 60 FPS threshold, making them viable for slower-paced gameplay but risky for fast action where frame time consistency matters. High settings at 98.9 FPS offer a more comfortable margin and are the recommended preset for 4K, as they deliver a 62% FPS increase over Ultra with a modest visual trade-off. Medium at 122.4 FPS is the choice for those who prioritize frame rate above all else, while Low at 154.5 FPS is effectively a competitive mode setting that most players will not need.
The overall data indicates that this i5-12400 + RTX 4060 combination is best suited for 1080p Ultra or 1440p High gameplay. At 4K, it can handle High settings comfortably, but the Ultra preset pushes the GPU to its limit. The CPU is never the bottleneck in any measured configuration, confirming that the RTX 4060's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus are the defining constraints of this pairing in Minecraft: Java Edition.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in Minecraft: Java Edition
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 154.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 122.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 98.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 61.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 289.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 233.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 180.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 112.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 462.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 368.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 288.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 181.2 |
Minecraft: Java Edition with ii5-12400 + Other GPUs
See how Minecraft: Java Edition performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minecraft: Java Edition with RTX 4060 + Other CPUs
See how Minecraft: Java Edition performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400 + RTX 4060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.